Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(4): 555-561, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to calculate on 3D volumes obtained from 16 weeks' gestation normative data of facial height (FH), facial width (FW) and their ratio and to test these parameters in pathological cases. METHODS: In total, 228 volumes were analyzed: 207 from normal and 21 from pathological cases. After multiplanar correction to the exact midsagittal plane FH was measured from the nasion to the gnathion and FW between the most lateral points on the zygomatic arch. RESULTS: For both FH and FW the intra- and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient variability was 0.99 and the difference between paired measurements was less than 0.3 cm in 95% of the cases. FH increased from 1.48 to 5.08 cm (FH = -16.10 + 3.78 × log(GA), R2: 0.93) and FW from 2.20 to 6.42 cm (FW: 4.19-17.18 × log(GA), R2: 0.85). The ratio increased steadily until about 25 weeks and less thereafter (ratio: (1/GA) × 26.44 + 0.92, R2: 0.23). In pathological cases 16.6% of measurements were outside the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative data for FH and FW measurements and insight in normal facial growth after 16 weeks' gestation. FH exceeds FW growth especially before 25 weeks.


Assuntos
Face/embriologia , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Estudos Transversais , Face/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Valores de Referência , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 15(8): e163, 2013 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23996964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Online health communities are becoming more popular in health care. Patients and professionals can communicate with one another online, patients can find peer support, and professionals can use it as an additional information channel to their patients. However, the implementation of online health communities into daily practice is challenging. These challenges relate to the fact that patients need to be activated to (1) become a member (ie, subscription) and (2) participate actively within the community before any effect can be expected. Therefore, we aimed at answering 2 research questions: (1) what factors are associated with subscription to an online health community, and (2) which are associated with becoming an active participant within an online health community. OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators as perceived by patients for the implementation of an online health community. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Three Dutch fertility clinics (2 IVF-licensed) offered their patients a secure online clinical health community through which clinicians can provide online information and patients can ask questions to the medical team or share experiences and find support from peers. We randomly selected and invited 278 men and women suffering from infertility and attending 1 of the participating clinics. Participants filled out a questionnaire about their background characteristics and current use of the online community. Possible barriers and facilitators were divided into 2 parts: (1) those for subscription to the community, and (2) those for active participation in the community. We performed 2 multivariate logistic regression analyses to calculate determinants for both subscription and active participation. RESULTS: Subscription appeared to be associated with patients' background characteristics (eg, gender, treatment phase), intervention-related facilitators (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% CI 1.14-5.27), and patient-related barriers (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54), such as not feeling the need for such an online health community. After subscription, determinants for participation consisted of aspects related to participant's age (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97), length of infertility (OR 1.48, 05% CI 1.09-2.02), and to intervention-related facilitators (OR 5.79, 95% CI 2.40-13.98), such as its reliable character and possibility to interact with the medical team and peers. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an online health community in addition to usual fertility care should be performed stepwise. At least 2 strategies are needed to increase the proportion of patient subscribers and consequently make them active participants. First, the marketing strategy should contain information tailored to different subgroups of the patient population. Second, for a living online health community, incorporation of interactive elements, as well as frequent news and updates are needed. These results imply that involving patients and their needs into the promotion strategy, community's design, and implementation are crucial.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Infertilidade Masculina/terapia , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...