Results of Use of Tissue-Engineered Autologous Oral Mucosa Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Trial.

BACKGROUND: Harvest of oral mucosa for urethroplasty due to urethral stricture is associated with donor-site-morbidity. We assessed functionality and safety of an authorized tissue-engineered oral mucosa graft (TEOMG) under routine practice in stricture recurrences of any etiology, location, length and severity (real-world data). METHODS: 99 patients from eight centers with heterogenous urethroplasty experience levels were included in this prospective, non-interventional observational study. Primary and secondary outcomes were success rate (SR) and safety at 12 and 24months. FINDINGS: All but one patient had ≥1, 77.1% (64 of 83)≥2 and 31.3% (26 of 83)≥4 previous surgical treatments. Pre- and postoperative mean±SD peak flow rate (Qmax) were 8.3±4.7mL/s (n=57) and 25.4±14.7mL/s (n=51). SR was 67.3% (95% CI 57.6-77.0) at 12 and 58.2% (95% CI 47.7-68.7) at 24months (conservative Kaplan Meier assessment). SR ranged between 85.7% and 0% in case of high and low surgical experience. Simple proportions of 12-month and 24-month SR for evaluable patients in all centers were 70.8% (46 of 65) and 76.9% (30 of 39). Except for one patient, no oral adverse event was reported. INTERPRETATIONS: TEOMG is safe and efficient in urethroplasty.

Testicular Functions and Clinical Characterization of Patients with Gender Dysphoria (GD) Undergoing Sex Reassignment Surgery (SRS).

INTRODUCTION: Cross-sex hormone treatment of gender dysphoria (GD) patients changing from male to female a prerequisite for sex reassignment. For initial physical adaptation, a combined treatment of anti-androgens and estrogens is used. Provided that patients fulfill specific criteria, sex reassignment surgery (SRS) presents the final step toward physical adaptation. However, systematic studies analyzing effects of hormone treatment regimens are lacking. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different hormonal treatment strategies regarding endocrinological parameters and testicular histology. METHODS: Testicular tissues were obtained in a multicenter study from 108 patients on the day of SRS from three clinics following different treatment strategies. Patients either discontinued treatment 6 weeks (clinic A) or 2 weeks (clinic B) prior to SRS or not at all (clinic C). Testicular tissues, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid blood and questionnaires were obtained on the day of SRS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood hormone and intratesticular testosterone (ITT) levels were measured. Testicular weight and histology were evaluated and the percentage of luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) positive cells was determined. RESULTS: According to the questionnaires, patients showed desired phenotypical changes including breast growth (75%) and smooth skin (32%). While patients from clinics A and B presented with rather virilized hormonal levels, patients from clinic C showed generally feminized blood serum levels. Histological evaluation revealed highly heterogeneous results with about 24% of patients presenting with qualitatively normal spermatogenesis. In accordance with serum endocrine profile, ITT levels were lowest in clinic C and correlated with testosterone and free testosterone, but not with the spermatogenic state. The percentage of LHCGR-positive cells and ITT levels did not correlate. CONCLUSION: Only patients that did not discontinue hormonal treatment showed feminized blood levels on the day of SRS. The ones who stopped re-virilized quickly. Interestingly, testicular histology was highly heterogeneous irrespective of the treatment strategy, a phenomenon that requires further investigation.

Increasing the dose of vardenafil on a daily basis does not improve erectile function after unilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Several treatment regimens for rehabilitation of erectile function (EF) after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nsRP) are currently discussed. The optimal and most cost-effective therapy is still not found yet. AIM: To evaluate the effect of vardenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor, dose escalation on recovery of EF after unilateral nsRP. METHODS: Thirty-six sexually active patients received a unilateral nsRP. All patients completed an International Index of Erectile Function-5 items (IIEF-5) questionnaire concerning EF preoperatively. Group 1 (N = 12 patients) received vardenafil 5 mg/day vs. group 2 (N = 12) who received vardenafil 10 mg/day at night beginning the day of catheter removal. A control of 12 patients underwent follow-up without PDE5 inhibitors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The IIEF-5 was the primary end point. IIEF-5 questionnaires were completed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after nsRP. RESULTS: In group 1 (5 mg/day vardenafil) the IIEF-5 score decreased from a preoperative 22.4 mean score to 4.2 at 3 months, 8.9 at 6 months, and 13.4 mean score at 12 months after nsRP vs. preoperative 22.8, 4.1 at 3 months, 7.9 at 6 months, and 12.8 mean score at 12 months in group 2 (10 mg/day vardenafil). In the control group the preoperative IIEF-5 mean score of 21.9 decreased to 3.8 at 3 months, 6.1 at 6 months, and 8.9 at 12 months. Statistical evaluation showed significant difference in IIEF-5 score and time to recovery of EF between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.01). No statistical differences were found between groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Daily low-dose vardenafil lead to significant improvement of recovery of EF. In this study doubling the dosage did not improve the recovery of EF further.

The Real-Life Safety and Efficacy of vardenafil (REALISE) study: results in men from Europe and overseas with erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular or metabolic conditions.

INTRODUCTION: The Real-Life Safety and Efficacy of vardenafil study is an international, open-label, prospective, noncomparative, noninterventional study in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To determine the safety and efficacy of vardenafil in a large international pool of men with ED (aged ≥ 18 years) and associated underlying conditions (N=73,946), in a real-life setting. METHODS: Patients attended an initial physician visit and one to two follow-up visits. Data were acquired by physician interviews and patient diaries and recorded in case report forms (CRFs). Data were pooled from 47 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the rest of the world (excluding the United States and Japan for methodological reasons). Results were stratified by baseline ED severity, body mass index (BMI), and the presence of hypertension, diabetes, lipid metabolism disorder, or cardiovascular disease (CVD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CRFs and patient questionnaires containing questions on overall improvement of erection, satisfaction with efficacy, and desire to continue vardenafil use. RESULTS: Many participants had hypertension (32.0%), diabetes (22.1%), lipid metabolism disorder (14.6%), or CVD (42.2%). High percentages of patients reported improvements in erectile function, irrespective of baseline ED severity (mild, 97.0%; moderate, 96.2%; severe, 85.5%), BMI (<25, 94.1%; ≥ 25 and <30, 94.6%; ≥ 30, 92.9%), or the presence of hypertension (93.6%), diabetes (92.6%), lipid metabolism disorder (94.7%), or CVD (93.3%). Over 90% of patients, including those with underlying conditions, reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with vardenafil efficacy, and stated their intention to continue vardenafil use after the end of the study period. The incidence of adverse events was low, and 97.0% of patients were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with vardenafil tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: These data from a worldwide population of men with ED and associated underlying conditions show that vardenafil is effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of ED in a real-life setting, supporting its use as a first-line ED therapy.

Metallothionein in bladder cancer: correlation of overexpression with poor outcome after chemotherapy.

We examined metallothionein (MT) expression in bladder cancer and its relationship to clinicopathologic factors, survival data, and outcome of chemotherapy. In 97 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, 34 of whom received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, MT expression was evaluated immunohistochemically. Results were correlated with histopathologic data, survival rates, and outcome of chemotherapy. MT overexpression was present in 33 patients (34.0%): strong in 7 (7.2%) and focal in 26 (26.8%). Overexpression was an independent prognostic factor and was significantly associated with poor survival. Patients undergoing chemotherapy showed worse survival if their tumours were MT-positive than if they were MT-negative. MT overexpression predicts unfavorable survival in bladder cancer patients. In those treated with cisplatin chemotherapy, survival is significantly poorer if tumours express MT. Our results show that MT overexpression may mediate resistance to alkylating agents. Therefore, further studies are warranted to define those patients who need a more aggressive therapy.

Efficacy and safety of flexible-dose vardenafil in men with type 1 diabetes and erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 70% of men with diabetes, occurring with a higher prevalence in those with type 1 diabetes than with type 2 diabetes. Studies investigating treatment of ED in men with diabetes have largely been conducted in a total male population with diabetes. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of the potent oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor vardenafil in men with ED and type 1 diabetes. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flexible-dose vardenafil therapy in a prospective randomized study in phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor-naïve subjects with type 1 diabetes and ED. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor-naïve patients were randomized to receive placebo (N = 149) or flexible-dose (5-20 mg) (N = 153) vardenafil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sexual Encounter Profile diary questions 2 and 3, concerning success rates of vaginal insertion and maintenance of erection to allow successful intercourse, respectively. RESULTS: Vardenafil significantly improved mean success rates for Sexual Encounter Profile 2 and 3 compared with baseline and placebo at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (P < 0.0001, intention to treat and last observation carried forward). These rates were unaffected by stratification into distinct subsets according to the level of HbA(1c) (HbA(1c) < 7%, good glycemic control; HbA(1c) >7- < or = 8%, moderate glycemic control; and HbA(1c) > 8%, poor glycemic control). Vardenafil treatment also significantly improved the Erectile Function domain score (P < 0.0001) of the International Index of Erectile Function compared with placebo, in addition to scores for the other individual domains of the International Index of Erectile Function. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (3.1%) and flushing (2.5%), which were mild to moderate and transient in nature. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that vardenafil significantly improves erectile function in men with type 1 diabetes and is well tolerated, regardless of the level of glycemic control.

Efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of tadalafil and patterns of sexual activity in men with diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction: Scheduled use vs. on-demand regimen evaluation (SURE) study in 14 European countries.

AIM: The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 20-mg tadalafil taken on demand or three times per week and its effect on the sexual activity of patients with diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: The scheduled use vs. on-demand regimen evaluation (SURE) was a randomized, crossover, open-label study with 4,262 patients in 14 European countries. The efficacy measures for the 762 patients with diabetes and ED included changes from baseline in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the proportion of "yes" responses to patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) questions 2 (SEP2) and 3 (SEP3). The treatment satisfaction was measured with responses to SEP question 4 (SEP4) and SEP question 5 (SEP5), and sexual attempts data were collected. Patient preference for either regimen was determined by the treatment preference question (TPQ). RESULTS: At end point on both regimens, the mean IIEF EF domain score was 22, and >40% of the patients had a normal EF domain score (> or =26). The proportion of "yes" responses was > or =73% for SEP2 (penetration), > or =58% for SEP3 (successful intercourse), >46% for SEP4 (hardness of erection), and > or =45% for SEP5 (overall satisfaction). Efficacy was maintained up to 36 hours post-dosing. More than 70% of sexual attempts while on the three-times-per-week regimen and approximately 50% of the attempts on the on-demand treatment occurred >4 hours post-dosing. Tadalafil was well tolerated, with dyspepsia and headache as the most frequent adverse events reported. Treatment preference was 57.2% for on demand and 42.8% for three times per week. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil, when taken on demand or three times per week, is efficacious and safe in men with diabetes and ED.

An evaluation of an alternative dosing regimen with tadalafil, 3 times/week, for men with erectile dysfunction: SURE study in 14 European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the preference for 2 dosing regimens (on demand or 3 times/week) for tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor with a duration of effectiveness up to 36 hours in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). DESIGN AND METHODS: SURE is a 14 European country, multicenter, crossover, and open-label study. Men with ED (N=4262) were randomized to tadalafil 20mg treatment on demand (maximum one dose per day and before sexual activity) or 3 times/week for 5-6 weeks. After a 1-week washout period, patients were crossed over to the alternate regimen for 5-6 weeks. The patient's response to a treatment preference question (TPQ) was used to determine the preferred treatment regimen. RESULTS: The mean age of the randomized patients was 55 years and 85.2% reported a history of ED for one year or greater. Overall, the responses of 3861 men to the TPQ assessment showed that 57.8% preferred the on-demand regimen and 42.2% preferred the 3 times/week dosing. Both regimens were efficacious and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, while 57.8% of men preferred the on-demand regimen of tadalafil 20mg, a substantial number (42.2%) preferred the 3 times/week treatment. The two regimens provide additional treatment options by giving men with erectile dysfunction unique flexibility in dosing with tadalafil.

Safety and efficacy of vardenafil, a selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction and arterial hypertension treated with multiple antihypertensives.

INTRODUCTION: Vardenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, was evaluated in a prospective trial in the primary care setting involving hypertensive men with ED who were receiving at least one antihypertensive medication. AIMS: To investigate the safety and efficacy of flexible-dose vardenafil therapy compared with placebo in PDE5 inhibitor-naïve subjects with arterial hypertension and ED. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 354 patients received placebo or vardenafil (5-20 mg) for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy measures were diary responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) questions 2 (vaginal insertion) and 3 (maintenance of erection). Additional efficacy measures included positive responses to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, vardenafil significantly improved mean SEP2 and SEP3 success rates over the 12-week study period (intention-to-treat [ITT] and last observation carried forward [LOCF]) analysis). For LOCF, SEP2 and SEP3 were 83% for vardenafil vs. 58% for placebo and 67% for vardenafil vs. 35% for placebo, respectively (P<0.0001 vs. placebo). Improved erections (GAQ) were experienced by 80% of vardenafil-treated patients at study end, compared with 40% for placebo (P<0.0001, LOCF). The most commonly reported treatment-emerging adverse events were headache (3.1%) and flushing (1.6%), which were mild-to-moderate and transient in nature. Importantly, there were no significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure or heart rate between the vardenafil and placebo groups. The average number of antihypertensives used per patient was 1.5 and 1.4 in the vardenafil and placebo groups, respectively. Both the incidence of adverse events and the ability to maintain an erection were unaffected by stratification into distinct subsets according to the class of antihypertensive medication being received. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil significantly improves EF in hypertensive men treated with concomitant antihypertensive medication, is well tolerated, and does not significantly affect blood pressure.