Inhalation anesthesia and shielding devices to allow accurate preclinical irradiation of mice with clinical linac-based systems: Design and dosimetric characteristics.

This technical note describes two devices to enable accurate irradiation of mice on clinical linac-based systems. To study the effects of radiation in murine, preclinical animal models, controlled and accurate dosing is important. This is not only important when specific volumes need to be irradiated, but also when the whole animal body is irradiated. To enable both purposes, we designed two devices. One device to administer Total Body Irradiation (TBI) simultaneously to six, free walking mice, and a second device, denoted as target box, in which we irradiate specific parts of the mice whilst organs-at-risk (OAR) are protected. In this latter device, we can position the mice in multiple ways. One configuration allows to sedate twelve mice simultaneously by isoflurane inhalation anesthesia and protect the body by lead shielding to allow radiation of the head only. Alternatively, the target box can be used to sedate maximal 4 mice simultaneously to irradiate the flank or paws only. All these setups allow high experimental throughput and thus a minimal occupation of the clinical equipment. As measured, the delivered radiation dosages in the regions of interest were accurate for both devices. In this technical note, we describe the design and build of these devices.

Report of AAPM Task Group 235 Radiochromic Film Dosimetry: An Update to TG-55.

The use of radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry in radiation therapy is extensive due to its high level of achievable accuracy for a wide range of dose values and its suitability under a variety of measurement conditions. However, since the publication of the 1998 AAPM Task Group 55, Report No. 63 on RCF dosimetry, the chemistry, composition, and readout systems for RCFs have evolved steadily. There are several challenges in using the new RCFs, readout systems and validation of the results depending on their applications. Accurate RCF dosimetry requires understanding of RCF selection, handling and calibration methods, calibration curves, dose conversion methods, correction methodologies as well as selection, operation and quality assurance (QA) programs of the readout systems. Acquiring this level of knowledge is not straight forward, even for some experienced users. This Task Group report addresses these issues and provides a basic understanding of available RCF models, dosimetric characteristics and properties, advantages and limitations, configurations, and overall elemental compositions of the RCFs that have changed over the past 20 yr. In addition, this report provides specific guidelines for data processing and analysis schemes and correction methodologies for clinical applications in radiation therapy.

Suitability of EBT3 GafChromic film for quality assurance in MR-guided radiotherapy at 0.35 T with and without real-time MR imaging.

The 0.35 T 60Co MRIdian system (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View) has been in clinical use in our institution since May 2016. For quality assurance (QA) of dose delivery and end-to-end testing for this machine, a reliable dosimeter is required. However, it is possible that a magnetic field may cause perturbations to dosimetry measurements. For static magnetic fields, there is conflicting information in the literature concerning EBT film behaviour, while for real-time MR imaging such information is not available at all. The purpose of this study was to investigate the suitability of EBT3 GafChromic film for MRIdian QA, both with and without real-time MR imaging. EBT3 film sheets were irradiated in water using the MRIdian and a conventional linear accelerator (Linac) for reference. Dose calibration measurements were first performed up to 8 Gy for both machines. The MRIdian measurements were performed with and without real-time MR imaging. Second, film sheets were irradiated at seven different angles with respect to the B0-field. Optical density and dose values were analysed for the three colour channels. In both the film dose-response and B0-field orientation measurements, the mean dose values were within the 1% uncertainty range of prescribed dose values for the red and green channels, for both machines. There were no dose deviations detected between the MRIdian and Linac film measurements, nor for different B0-field orientations. In addition, the film dose-response measurements during real-time imaging were within 1.5% of the reference Linac measurements. EBT3 GafChromic film can be used for absolute dosimetry during real-time MR imaging independent of its orientation in the B0-field. This makes it a suitable dosimeter for patient-specific QA measurements and end-to-end testing of 0.35 T MRI-radiotherapy devices.

Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is detecting possible differences between local QA findings and those of an audit, using the same set of treatment plans. METHODS: A pre-defined set of clinical plans was devised and imported in the participating institute's treatment planning system for dose computation. The dose distribution was measured using an ionisation chamber, radiochromic film and an ionisation chamber array. The centres performed their own QA, which was compared to the audit findings. The agreement/disagreement between the audit and the institute QA results were assessed along with the differences between the dose distributions measured by the audit team and computed by the institute. RESULTS: For the majority of the cases the results of the audit were in agreement with the institute QA findings: ionisation chamber: 92%, array: 88%, film: 76% of the total measurements. In only a few of these cases the evaluated measurements failed for both: ionisation chamber: 2%, array: 4%, film: 0% of the total measurements. CONCLUSION: Using predefined treatment plans, we found that in approximately 80% of the evaluated measurements the results of local QA of IMRT and VMAT plans were in line with the findings of the audit. However, the percentage of agreement/disagreement depended on the characteristics of the measurement equipment used and on the analysis metric.