Results of systematic patient outcome monitoring: Does post-dilatation during angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention improve clinical outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates clinical outcomes after implementing a liberal post-dilatation strategy during PCI. BACKGROUND: Post-dilatation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed to achieve optimal stent expansion and reduce complications. However, its prognostic effects are unclear and conflicting. METHODS: This study is a pre-post-intervention analysis of two cohorts, before (2015-2017) and after (2018-2020) implementation of a liberal post-dilatation strategy. The primary end point consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary end points consisted of the individual components of the primary end point as well as 1 year mortality and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 10,153 patients were included: 5,383 in the pre-cohort and 4,770 in the post-cohort. The 30-day MACE was 5.00% in the pre-cohort and 4.09% in the post-cohort (p = 0.008; OR 0.75 (CI 0.61-0.93)). There was a significant difference between the pre- and post-cohort in 30-day mortality, respectively, 2.91% and 2.25% (p = .01; OR 0.70 (CI 0.53-0.93)), and MI at 30 days, 1.17% versus 0.59% (p = .003; OR 0.49 (CI 0.31-0.78)). At 1 year, there was a significant difference in mortality between the pre-cohort, 5.84%, and post-cohort, 5.19% (p = .02; OR 0.79 (CI 0.66-0.96)). CONCLUSIONS: A liberal post-dilatation strategy after PCI was associated with a significant decrease in 30-day MACE, 30-day MI, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. Future studies are warranted to validate the causality between post-dilatation and improvement of clinical outcomes.

Accuracy and Potential Benefit of Ultraselective Invasive Coronary Angiography Guided by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.

OBJECTIVES: It is unknown whether computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) can be used to perform ultraselective invasive coronary angiography (ICA) by only visualizing the abnormal coronary artery on CTCA and defer visualization of the normal contralateral coronary artery. This study assessed the accuracy of CTCA in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on CTCA limited to either the left (LCA) or right coronary artery (RCA) in predicting a contralateral coronary artery without abnormalities on CTCA determined to be normal by ICA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with CAD limited to the LCA or RCA on CTCA. Primary endpoint was the accuracy of CTCA to predict a contralateral coronary artery without abnormalities on CTCA to be normal by ICA. Secondary endpoints were potential reductions in procedure time and radiation exposure if an ultraselective ICA approach would be used compared to standard ICA. RESULTS: In total, 202 patients were included. CTCA was correct in predicting a normal contralateral coronary artery in 201 of the 202 patients (99.5%). Deferring ICA of the normal contralateral coronary artery on CTCA resulted in a potential reduction in procedure time and dose area product of 4.22 ± 2.67 minutes (61 ± 16% reduction) and 1501 ± 1304 mGy•cm² (29 ± 13% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, CTCA was extremely accurate in predicting a normal contralateral coronary artery in patients with LCA- or RCA-limited CAD on CTCA. A potential CTCA-guided ultraselective ICA approach was feasible and would have led to a considerable decrease in procedure time and radiation exposure.

Single center experience in the treatment of hemodynamically significant diffuse coronary artery disease of the left anterior descending.

INTRODUCTION: To date there are no recommendations on how to treat patients with an FFR positive but diffusely diseased left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not so evident due to doubts regarding longevity and patency. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study assessed clinical outcomes in patients presenting with symptomatic single vessel coronary artery disease of a diffusely diseased, hemodynamically significant LAD treated by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) between 2015 and 2020. Primary outcome of this study was the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization during 2-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints consisted of the individual components of the primary endpoint. Change in angina severity grade based on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class between baseline and 2-year follow-up was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included of which 25 patients underwent CABG and 34 patients were treated by OMT. There was a statistically significant difference in FFR value at baseline between the treatment groups (CABG 0.70 ± 0.04; OMT 0.75 ± 0.04; p < 0.001). After 2-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences with regard to the primary endpoint (CABG 16% (n = 4); OMT 17.6% (n = 6); p = 1.00) and secondary endpoints between the groups over 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with hemodynamically significant diffuse single vessel coronary artery disease of the left anterior descending, there was no difference between OMT and CABG in terms of mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization and symptom reduction after two years of follow-up.