Trauma care before and after optimisation in a level I trauma Centre: Life-saving changes.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of trauma systems has led to a significant reduction in mortality and length of hospital stay. In our level I trauma centre, 24/7 in-hospital coverage was implemented, and a renovation of the trauma room took place to improve the trauma care. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of the optimised in-hospital infrastructure in terms of mortality, processes and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. All adult trauma patients admitted to our trauma centre directly during two time periods (2010-2012 and 2014-2016) were included. Any patients below the age of 18 years and patients who underwent primary trauma screening in another hospital were excluded. Logistic and linear regression were used and adjusted for demographics and characteristics of trauma. The primary endpoint was mortality. The secondary endpoints were subgroups of earlier mortality rates and severely injured patients, processes and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In period I, 1290 patients were included, and in period II, 2421. The adjusted mortality in the trauma room (odds ratio (OR): 0.18; CI: 0.05-0.63) and the total in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.63 CI: 0.42-0.95) showed a significant reduction in period II. The trauma room (TR) time decreased by 30 min (p < 0.001), and the time until CT decreased by 22 min (p < 0.001). The number of delayed diagnoses and complications were significantly lower in the second period, with an OR of 0.2 (CI: 0.1-0.2) and 0.4 (CI: 0.3-0.6), respectively. The hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay decreased significantly, -1.5 day (p = 0.010) and -1.8 days (p = 0.022) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Optimisation of the in-hospital infrastructure related to trauma care resulted in improved survival rates in both severely injured patients as well as in the whole trauma population. Moreover, the processes and clinical outcomes improved, showing a shorter hospital length of stay, shorter TR time, fewer complications and fewer delayed diagnoses.

Modular continuing professional development for emergency physicians - the MNSHA masterclass programme.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency physician (EP) training in the Netherlands is currently a 3-year competency-based programme. Upon its completion, many Dutch EPs feel that they lack some of the skills and the knowledge necessary to be fully prepared for the challenges of emergency medicine. We perceived a need for new methods to deliver continuing professional development (CPD). METHODS: A needs analysis survey was conducted to ascertain whether our perceived need for a new CPD programme was genuine. A new course was developed, incorporating innovative learning methods. The results of the needs analysis were incorporated into the programme. Another survey was held among participants of the first two editions of the programme. RESULTS, DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Modular CPD for Emergency Physicians (Dutch: MNSHA) is a modular programme that aims to deliver CPD to Dutch EPs. It combines innovative educational methods, such as asynchronous learning in a flipped classroom, with web-based mentoring. The aim is for participants to develop effective, individualized and sustainable methods to gain and maintain knowledge and skills as a part of their ongoing professional education. The participant survey showed encouraging results, strongly suggesting an improvement in confidence. A more robust study would be required to better assess the outcomes of our programme.