Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Ann Clin Biochem ; 52(Pt 5): 550-61, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25732130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain can reduce the length of hospital admission, prevent unnecessary diagnostic work-up and reduce the burden on our health-care systems. The combined use of biomarkers that are associated with different pathophysiological aspects of acute myocardial infarction could improve the early diagnostic assessment of patients presenting with chest pain. METHODS: We measured cardiac troponin I, copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein concentrations in 584 patients who presented to the emergency department with acute chest pain. The diagnostic performances for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and NSTEMI were calculated for the individual markers and their combinations. Separate calculations were made for patients presenting to the emergency department <3 h, 3-6 h and 6-12 h after chest pain onset. RESULTS: For ruling out acute myocardial infarction, the net predictive values (95% CI) of cardiac troponin I, copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein were 90.4% (87.3-92.9), 84% (79.8-87.6) and 87% (83.5-90), respectively. Combining the three biomarkers resulted in a net predictive value of 95.8% (92.8-97.8). The improvement was most pronounced in the early presenters (<3 h) where the combined net predictive value was 92.9% (87.3-96.5) compared to 84.6% (79.4-88.9) for cardiac troponin I alone. The area under the receiver operating characteristic for the triple biomarker combination increased significantly (P < 0.05) compared to that of cardiac troponin I alone (0.880 [0.833-0.928] vs. 0.840 [0.781-0.898], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combining copeptin, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein and cardiac troponin I measurements improves the diagnostic performance in patients presenting with chest pain. Importantly, in patients who present early (<3 h) after chest pain onset, the combination improves the diagnostic performance compared to the standard cardiac troponin I measurement alone.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Proteínas de Ligação a Ácido Graxo/sangue , Glicopeptídeos/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Troponina I/sangue , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Dor no Peito/sangue , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Proteína 3 Ligante de Ácido Graxo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 15(5): 289-94, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25178669

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: DELIVER (DELiverability of the Resolute Integrity Stent in All-Comer Vessels and Cross-OvER stenting) was a prospective, multicenter, all-comers registry to assess the deliverability of the Resolute Integrity™ zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). METHODS/MATERIALS: Patients (n=7740 patients, 10449 lesions) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and deemed suitable for R-ZES implantation were enrolled and treated according to standard practice of the participating centers in 30 countries. Outcomes included delivery success and in-hospital target lesion failure (TLF), major adverse cardiac event (MACE), and Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis. We performed a post hoc analysis comparing deliverability, in-hospital clinical outcomes and resource utilization with radial vs. femoral access. RESULTS: A high proportion of the population had complex disease (71%): mean lesion length was 26.7±17.5 mm, 35% of lesions were moderately/severely calcified and 17% were bifurcated. Femoral and radial accesses were used in 53% and 46% of patients, respectively. Patients treated using femoral access had more complex coronary artery disease. Primary delivery success was 98.9% and did not differ by approach. Radial access was associated with lower stent and balloon utilization, but higher guide catheter utilization, lower procedure duration, and contrast administered compared with femoral access. In-hospital TLF and MACE occurred in 1.6% of patients; definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 0.2%. Clinical outcomes did not differ by vascular access. CONCLUSIONS: R-ZES was found to be highly deliverable in a complex, all-comers, international population, regardless of whether radial or femoral access was used. In-hospital outcomes were excellent with very low risk of complications.


Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Stents Farmacológicos , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...