The influence of soil organic matter content and substance lipophilicity on the toxicity of pesticides to the earthworm Eisenia andrei.

To account for potential differences in bioavailability (and toxicity) due to different soil organic matter (OM) contents in natural and artificial soil (AS), in the current European environmental risk assessment (ERA) a correction factor (CF) of 2 is applied to toxicity endpoints for so called lipophilic pesticides (i.e. log Kow > 2) generated from laboratory tests with soil invertebrates. However, the appropriateness of a single CF is questioned. To improve the accuracy of ERA, this study investigated the influence of soil OM content on the toxicity to the earthworm Eisenia andrei of five active substances used in pesticides covering a wide range of lipophilicity. Laboratory toxicity tests were performed in AS containing 10 %, 5 % and 2.5 % peat, and a natural LUFA 2.2 soil (4.5 % OM), assessing effects on survival, biomass change and reproduction. Pesticide toxicity differed significantly between soils. For all pesticides, toxicity values (LC50, EC50) strongly correlated with soil OM content in AS (r2 > 0.82), with toxicity decreasing with increasing OM content. Obtained regression equations were used to calculate the toxicity at OM contents of 10.0 % and 5.0 %. Model-estimated toxicity between these soils differed by factors of 1.9-3.6, and 2.1-3.2 for LC50 and EC50 values, respectively. No clear relationships between pesticide lipophilicity and toxicity-OM relationships were observed: the toxicity of non-lipophilic and lipophilic pesticides was influenced by OM content in a similar manner. The results suggest that the CF of 2 may not be appropriate as it is based on incorrect assumptions regarding the relationships between lipophilicity, OM content and toxicity. Further research should be conducted to understand the mechanistic link between toxicity and soil OM content to better define more chemically and ecologically appropriate CFs for ERA.

Intermediate-tier options in the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products for soil invertebrates-Synthesis of a workshop.

The European environmental risk assessment (ERA) of plant protection products follows a tiered approach. The approach for soil invertebrates currently consists of two steps, starting with a Tier 1 assessment based on reproduction toxicity tests with earthworms, springtails, and predatory mites. In case an unacceptable risk is identified at Tier 1, field studies can be conducted as a higher-tier option. For soil invertebrates, intermediate tiers are not implemented. Hence, there is limited possibility to include additional information for the ERA to address specific concerns when the Tier 1 fails, as an alternative to, for example, a field study. Calibrated intermediate-tier approaches could help to address risks for soil invertebrates with less time and resources but also with sufficient certainty. A multistakeholder workshop was held on 2-4 March 2022 to discuss potential intermediate-tier options, focusing on four possible areas: (1) natural soil testing, (2) single-species tests (other than standard species), (3) assessing recovery in laboratory tests, and (4) the use of assembled soil multispecies test systems. The participants acknowledged a large potential in the intermediate-tier options but concluded that some issues need to be clarified before routine application of these approaches in the ERA is possible, that is, sensitivity, reproducibility, reliability, and standardization of potential new test systems. The definition of suitable assessment factors needed to calibrate the approaches to the protection goals was acknowledged. The aims of the workshop were to foster scientific exchange and a data-driven dialog, to discuss how the different approaches could be used in the risk assessment, and to identify research priorities for future work to address uncertainties and strengthen the tiered approach in the ERA for soil invertebrates. This article outlines the background, proposed methods, technical challenges, difficulties and opportunities in the ERA, and conclusions of the workshop. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:780-793. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Influence of soil organic matter content on the toxicity of pesticides to soil invertebrates: A review.

A better understanding of how soil organic matter (OM) content influences pesticide toxicity to soil invertebrates is needed to improve the ecological relevance of risk assessment approaches. In the current study, soil invertebrate toxicity data (LC50 and EC50 values) were collected from studies determining the toxicity of organic chemicals in soils with varying OM content. Relevant studies were identified by performing a literature search and through the use of toxicity databases. The data were used to address the following questions: (1) Can the relationship between toxicity and soil OM content be quantified? (2) Does soil OM content influence different toxicity endpoints in a similar way? (3) Is the influence of soil OM content on sensitivity to pesticides different between species? The results indicate that toxicity-OM relationships are chemical dependent, differ between endpoints, and are species-specific. Hence, the grouping of chemicals based solely on their lipophilicity, as well as having only one correction factor for multiple species, may not be an appropriate approach to risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1457-1472. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Smarter Sediment Screening: Effect-Based Quality Assessment, Chemical Profiling, and Risk Identification.

Sediments play an essential role in the functioning of aquatic ecosystems but simultaneously retain harmful compounds. However, sediment quality assessment methods that consider the risks caused by the combined action of all sediment-associated contaminants to benthic biota are still underrepresented in water quality assessment strategies. Significant advancements have been made in the application of effect-based methods, but methodological improvements can still advance sediment risk assessment. The present study aimed to explore such improvements by integrating effect-monitoring and chemical profiling of sediment contamination. To this end, 28 day life cycle bioassays with Chironomus riparius using intact whole sediment cores from contaminated sites were performed in tandem with explorative chemical profiling of bioavailable concentrations of groups of legacy and emerging sediment contaminants to investigate ecotoxicological risks to benthic biota. All contaminated sediments caused effects on the resilient midge C. riparius, stressing that sediment contamination is ubiquitous and potentially harmful to aquatic ecosystems. However, bioassay responses were not in line with any of the calculated toxicity indices, suggesting that toxicity was caused by unmeasured compounds. Hence, this study underlines the relevance of effect-based sediment quality assessment and provides smarter ways to do so.