Evidence-based interventions to reduce tuberculosis stigma: a systematic review.

SETTING: While substantial progress is being made in tuberculosis (TB) control, the success of public health efforts is hampered by pervasive stigma. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic literature review to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing TB stigma in patients, health care workers, care givers and the general community. DESIGN: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated interventions aimed at reducing TB stigma and were published between 1950 and 2015. We searched eight databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, World Health Organization Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), and complemented the searches by using the snowball strategy and by reviewing relevant grey literature. RESULTS: Only seven studies were identified as providing quantitative (n = 4) or qualitative (n = 3) evidence of effectiveness in reducing TB stigma. Quality assessment of the studies was poor. Knowledge-shaping and attitude-changing interventions aimed at the public, patients and their families were effective in reducing anticipated stigma. Home visits and support groups were effective in reducing both anticipated and internalised stigma. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of reliable information on the effectiveness of TB stigma-reduction interventions. Knowledge-shaping, attitude-changing and patient-support interventions can be effective in reducing TB stigma, but more rigorous evaluations are needed.

The better than dead method: feasibility and interpretation of a valuation study.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the valuation of health states worse than being dead suffers from two problems: [1] the use of different elicitation methods for positive and negative values, necessitating arbitrary transformations to map negative to positive values; and [2] the inability to quantify that values are time dependent. The Better than Dead (BTD) method is a health-state valuation method where states with a certain duration are compared with being dead. It has the potential to overcome these problems. OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of the BTD method to estimate values for the EQ-5D system. METHODS: A representative sample of 291 Dutch respondents (aged 18-45 years) was recruited. In a web-based questionnaire, preferences were elicited for a selection of 50 different health states with six durations between 1 and 40 years. Random-effects models were used to estimate the effects of socio-demographic and experimental variables, and to estimate values for the EQ-5D. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 41 respondents. RESULTS: Important determinants for BTD were a religious life stance [odds ratio 4.09 (2.00-8.36)] and the educational level. The fastest respondents more often preferred health-state scenarios to being dead and had lower test-retest reliability (0.45 versus 0.77 and 0.84 for fast, medium and slow response times, respectively). The results showed a small number of so-called maximal endurable time states. CONCLUSION: Valuating health states using the BTD method is feasible and reliable. Further research should explore how the experimental setting modifies how values depend on time.