Myeloid transforming protein Evi1 interacts with methyl-CpG binding domain protein 3 and inhibits in vitro histone deacetylation by Mbd3/Mi-2/NuRD.

The ecotropic viral integration site 1 ( Evi1) gene encodes a putative transcription regulator, which is aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemias (AML) with chromosomal abnormalities involving the 3q26 locus. Repression and activation of transcriptional control have been reported, but it is currently unclear how Evi1 may evoke these opposing effects. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified a novel binding partner of Evi1, i.e., methyl binding domain 3b (Mbd3b) protein, a member of the Mi-2/NuRD histone deacetylase complex. Applying in vitro and in vivo assays, we found that Evi1 interacts with Mbd3b but not with other MBD family members Mbd1, -2, and -4 or MeCP2. We show that interaction of Evi1 with Mbd3 requires 40 amino acids that are adjacent and downstream of the methyl binding domain (MBD). We further demonstrate that the first three zinc fingers of Evi1 are needed for Mbd3 interaction. Evi1 acts as a transcriptional repressor when recruited to an active promoter, yet when present in the Mi-2/NuRD complex through Mbd3 interaction, it inhibits the histone deacetylation function of this multiprotein structure. Our data may in part explain how Evi1 could act as a repressor as well as an activator of transcription.

High EVI1 levels predict adverse outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence of EVI1 overexpression and chromosome 3q26 abnormalities underestimated.

Inappropriate expression of EVI1 (ecotropic virus integration-1), in particular splice form EVI1-1D, through chromosome 3q26 lesions or other mechanisms has been implicated in the development of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To validate the clinical relevance of EVI1-1D, as well as of the other EVI1 splice forms and the related MDS1/EVI1 (ME) gene, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed in 534 untreated adults with de novo AML. EVI1-1D was highly expressed in 6% of cases (n = 32), whereas 7.8% were EVI1(+) (n = 41) when all splice variants were taken into account. High EVI1 predicted a distinctly worse event-free survival (HR = 1.9; P = .002) and disease-free survival (HR = 2.1, P = .006) following multivariate analysis. Importantly, we distinguished a subset of EVI1(+) cases that lacked expression of ME (EVI1(+)ME(-); n = 17) from cases that were ME(+) (EVI1(+)ME(+); n = 24). The atypical EVI1(+)ME(-) expression pattern exhibited cytogenetically detectable chromosomal 3q26 breakpoints in 8 cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed 7 more EVI1(+)ME(-) cases that carried cryptic 3q26 breakpoints, which were not found in the EVI1(+)ME(+) group. EVI1(+)ME(-) expression predicts an extremely poor prognosis distinguishable from the general EVI1(+) AML patients (overall survival [OS]: P < .001 and event-free survival [EFS]: P = .002). We argue that EVI1/ME quantitative expression analysis should be implemented in the molecular diagnostic procedures of AML.