FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.

INTRODUCTION: It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice. METHODS: The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups. DISCUSSION: As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.

Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Current evidence on vascular access strategies for haemodialysis patients is based on observational studies that are at high risk of selection bias. For elderly patients, autologous arteriovenous fistulas that are typically created in usual care may not be the best option because a significant proportion of fistulas either fail to mature or remain unused. In addition, long-term complications associated with arteriovenous grafts and central venous catheters may be less relevant when considering the limited life expectancy of these patients. Therefore, we designed the Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS) trial to determine the best strategy for vascular access creation in elderly haemodialysis patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: OASIS is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with an equal participant allocation in three treatment arms. Patients aged 70 years or older who are expected to initiate haemodialysis treatment in the next 6 months or who have started haemodialysis urgently with a catheter will be enrolled. To detect and exclude patients with an unusually long life expectancy, we will use a previously published mortality prediction model after external validation. Participants allocated to the usual care arm will be treated according to current guidelines on vascular access creation and will undergo fistula creation. Participants allocated to one of the two intervention arms will undergo graft placement or catheter insertion. The primary outcome is the number of access-related interventions required for each patient-year of haemodialysis treatment. We will enrol 195 patients to have sufficient statistical power to detect an absolute decrease of 0.80 interventions per year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because of clinical equipoise, we believe it is justified to randomly allocate elderly patients to the different vascular access strategies. The study was approved by an accredited medical ethics review committee. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and will be implemented in clinical practice guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7933. PROTOCOL VERSION AND DATE: V.5, 25 February 2021.

Surgical intervention for upper extremity nerve compression related to arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic renal failure patients with arteriovenous hemodialysis access may exhibit pain and neurological complaints due to local nerve compression by the access conduit vessels of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas or the prosthesis of arteriovenous grafts. In this study, we have examined the results of surgical intervention for vascular access-related nerve compression in the upper extremity. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was performed of all patients referred for persistent pain and neurological complaints after vascular access surgery for hemodialysis. There were four brachial-cephalic, three brachial-basilic upper arm arteriovenous fistulas, and three prosthetic arteriovenous grafts. All patients had pain and sensory deficits in a distinct nerve territory (median nerve: 6; median + ulnar nerve: 1; medial cutaneous nerve: 1), and two patients had additional motor deficits (median nerve). RESULTS: A total of 10 patients (mean age: 59 years; range: 25-73 years; 2 men; 4 diabetics) were treated by surgical nerve release alone (2 patients) or in combination with access revision (8 patients). Mean follow-up was 23 months (range: 8-46 months). Direct complete relief of symptoms was achieved in six patients. Three patients had minor complaints, and one patient had a reoperation with good success. CONCLUSION: Vascular access-related nerve compression is an uncommon cause for pain, sensory and motor deficits after vascular access surgery. Surgical nerve release and access revision have good clinical outcome with relief of symptoms and maintenance of the access site in the majority of patients.

[Endovascular arteriovenous fistulas: percutaneous creation of vascular access for hemodialysis]. / Endovasculair aangelegde arterioveneuze fistels.

A novel endovascular technique allows percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. The proximal radial artery is cannulated through the perforating vein in the cubital fossa using ultrasound guidance. A fused anastomosis between these blood vessels is created using heat and pressure. This results in an arteriovenous fistula that can be regarded as an alternative for a surgically created brachiocephalic fistula. In our early experience, this new technique is safe and successful. Moreover, no complications due to high-flow fistulas have been reported with this technique to date. Nevertheless, the intervention rate and the cost effectiveness of the new endovascular technique need to be compared to traditional open surgery before it can be considered standard clinical care.

Pre-operative Patient Specific Flow Predictions to Improve Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation (Shunt Simulation Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) needs to mature before it becomes suitable to cannulate for haemodialysis treatment. Maturation importantly depends on the post-operative flow increase. Unfortunately, 20-40% of AVFs fail to mature (FTM). A patient specific computational model that predicts immediate post-operative flow was developed, and it was hypothesised that providing information from this model for planning of fistula creation might reduce FTM rates. METHODS: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial in nine Dutch hospitals was conducted in which patients with renal failure who were referred for AVF creation, were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the control or computer simulation group. Both groups underwent a work up, with physical and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) examination. In the simulation group the data from the DUS examination were used for model simulations, and based on the immediate post-operative flow prediction, the ideal AVF configuration was recommended. The primary endpoint was AVF maturation defined as an AVF flow ≥500 mL/min and a vein inner diameter of ≥4 mm six weeks post-operatively. The secondary endpoint was model performance (i.e. comparisons between measured and predicted flows, and (multivariable) regression analysis for maturation probability with accompanying area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC]). RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were randomly assigned (116 in the control and 120 in the simulation group), of whom 205 (100 and 105 respectively) were analysed for the primary endpoint. There was no difference in FTM rates between the groups (29% and 32% respectively). Immediate post-operative flow prediction had an OR of 1.15 (1.06-1.26; p < .001) per 100 mL/min for maturation, and the accompanying AUC was 0.67 (0.59-0.75). CONCLUSION: Providing pre-operative patient specific flow simulations during surgical planning does not result in improved maturation rates. Further study is needed to improve the predictive power of these simulations in order to render the computational model an adjunct to surgical planning.

Natural Vascular Remodelling After Arteriovenous Fistula Creation in Dialysis Patients With and Without Previous Ipsilateral Vascular Access.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to observe the natural haemodynamic changes after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in haemodialysis patients with and without a previous ipsilateral vascular access. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single centre cohort study. Patient demographics were registered and pre- and post-operative vessel ultrasound examinations were performed at regular follow up intervals. Arteriovenous fistula outcomes in terms of vessel diameter and access flow enhancement were determined for radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, and brachiobasilic AVFs. RESULTS: In total, 331 patients (median age 66 years, 60% male) with 366 new autologous AVFs were studied, of whom 112 patients had a previous ipsilateral vascular access (VA). Patients with a previous ipsilateral VA had a statistically significantly greater pre-operative brachial artery diameter (4.4 mm) and flow (106 mL/min), and basilic vein diameter (4.9 mm), compared with patients without a previous ipsilateral VA (4.0 mm, 54 mL/min, and 4.3 mm, respectively). For all AVF configurations these differences gradually disappeared over three months after AVF creation. The haemodynamic changes reached a plateau at three months, and were statistically significantly accelerated in patients with a previous ipsilateral VA. There were no differences in primary failure or high flow complications between both groups. CONCLUSION: Arteriovenous fistulae show haemodynamic and remodelling changes up to three months post-operatively. Previous ipsilateral VAs may initiate vessel preconditioning, and accelerate the observed haemodynamic changes after AVF creation. However, this preconditioning does not result in a beneficial or detrimental effect on VA function.

Computational Modelling Based Recommendation on Optimal Dialysis Needle Positioning and Dialysis Flow in Patients With Arteriovenous Grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) typically lose patency within two years of creation due to venous neointimal hyperplasia, which is initiated by disturbed haemodynamics after AVG surgery. Haemodialysis needle flow can further disturb haemodynamics and thus impact AVG longevity. In this computational study it was assessed how dialysis flow and venous needle positioning impacts flow at the graft-vein anastomosis. Furthermore, it was studied how negative effects of dialysis needle flow could be mitigated. METHODS: Non-physiological wall shear stress and disturbed blood flow were assessed in an AVG model with and without dialysis needle flow. Needle distance to the venous anastomosis was set to 6.5, 10.0, or 13.5 cm, whereas dialysis needle flow was set to 200, 300 or 400 mL/min. Intraluminal needle tip depth was varied between superficial, central, or deep. The detrimental effects of dialysis needle flow were summarised by a haemodynamic score (HS), ranging from 0 (minimal) to 5 (severe). RESULTS: Dialysis needle flow resulted in increased disturbed flow and/or non-physiological wall shear stress in the venous peri-anastomotic region. Increasing cannulation distance from 6.5 to 13.5 cm reduced the HS by a factor 4.0, whereas a central rather than a deep or superficial needle tip depth reduced the HS by a maximum factor of 1.9. Lowering dialysis flow from 400 to 200 mL/min reduced the HS by a factor 7.4. CONCLUSION: Haemodialysis needle flow, cannulation location, and needle tip depth considerably increase the amount of disturbed flow and non-physiological wall shear stress in the venous anastomotic region of AVGs. Negative effects of haemodialysis needle flow could be minimised by more upstream cannulation, by lower dialysis flow and by ensuring a central needle tip depth. Since disturbed haemodynamics are associated with neointimal hyperplasia development, optimising dialysis flow and needle positioning during haemodialysis could play an important role in maintaining AVG patency.

Three Year Patency and Recurrence Rates of Revision Using Distal Inflow with a Venous Interposition Graft for High Flow Brachial Artery Based Arteriovenous Fistula.

OBJECTIVES: Upper arm arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) occasionally develop high flow. Revision using distal inflow (RUDI) effectively reduces flow of high flow accesses (HFA) in the short-term and is also popularised for treatment of haemodialysis access induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI). The long-term efficacy is unknown. The study's aim was to report on 3 year RUDI patency and recurrence rates for HFA with and without HAIDI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a HFA with or without HAIDI undergoing RUDI using greater saphenous vein (GSV) interposition between March 2011 and October 2017 at three facilities. AVFs were termed HFA if flow volumes exceeded 2 L/min on two consecutive measurements using dilution techniques. HAIDI was diagnosed as recommended. Following RUDI, follow up was not different from standard care in AVF patients. Data on post-operative flows and re-interventions were extracted from electronic patient files. Loss to follow up was avoided. Rates of patency and HFA recurrence were analysed. RESULTS: During the observation period, 21 patients were studied (7 females, 54 years ± 3). Fourteen had uncomplicated HFA whereas seven had additional HAIDI. Immediately post-operatively, flows decreased threefold (3120 mL/min ± 171 vs. 1170 mL/min ± 87, p < .001). Overall 3 year primary patency was 48% ± 12 (HFA, 55% ± 15 vs. HAIDI/HFA, 29% ± 17, p = .042). Secondary patency was identical in both groups (overall, 84% ± 9). Interventions were percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 12, 9 patients), thrombectomy (n = 7, 3 patients), and revision with new interposition grafts (n = 3). After 3 years, 51% ± 12 were free of high flow (HFA, 32% ± 13 vs. HAIDI/HFA, 100%, p = .018). High immediate post-operative access flow predicted recurrence (OR 1.004 [1.000-1.007], p = .044). Patients with recurrence were 12 years younger than those without (p = .055). CONCLUSION: RUDI with GSV interposition for HFA offers acceptable patency rates after 3 years although re-interventions are often required. High immediate post-operative flows and young age are associated with recurrent high flow.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Placement of a Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter and Outcomes: The CAPD I Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best operation technique, open versus laparoscopic, for insertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter with regard to clinical success. Clinical success was defined as an adequate function of the catheter 2 - 4 weeks after insertion. METHODS: All patients with end-stage renal disease who were suitable for PD and gave informed consent were randomized for either open surgery or laparoscopic surgery. A previous laparotomy was not considered an exclusion criterion. Laparoscopic placement had the advantage of pre-peritoneal tunneling, the possibility for adhesiolysis, and placement of the catheter under direct vision. Catheter fixation techniques, omentopexy, or other adjunct procedures were not performed. Other measured parameters were in-hospital morbidity and mortality and post-operative infections. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, 95 patients were randomized to this study protocol. After exclusion of 5 patients for various reasons, 44 patients received an open procedure and 46 patients a laparoscopic procedure. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, current hemodialysis, severe heart failure, and previous an abdominal operation were not significantly different between the groups. However, in the open surgery group, fewer patients had a previous median laparotomy compared with the laparoscopic group (6 vs 16 patients; p = 0.027). There was no statistically significant difference in mean operation time (36 ± 24 vs 38 ± 15 minutes) and hospital stay (2.1 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 7.3 days) between the groups. In the open surgery group 77% of the patients had an adequate functioning catheter 2 - 4 weeks after insertion compared with 70% of patients in the laparoscopic group (p = not significant [NS]). In the open surgery group there was 1 post-operative death (2%) compared with none in the laparoscopic group (p = NS). The morbidity in both groups was low and not significantly different. In the open surgery group, 2 patients had an exit-site infection and 1 patient had a paramedian wound infection. In the laparoscopic group, 1 patient had a transient cardiac event, 1 patient had intraabdominal bleeding requiring reoperation, and 1 patient had fluid leakage that could be managed conservatively. The survival curve demonstrated a good long-term function of PD. CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing open vs laparoscopic placement of PD catheters demonstrates equal clinical success rates between the 2 techniques. Advanced laparoscopic techniques such as catheter fixation techniques and omentopexy might further improve clinical outcome.

Surgical and Endovascular Intervention for Dialysis Access Maturation Failure During and After Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: Review of the Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Maturation failure is the major obstacle to establishing functional arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) for haemodialysis treatment. Various endovascular and surgical techniques have been advocated to enhance fistula maturation and to increase the number of functional AVFs. This narrative review considers the available evidence of interventional techniques for treatment of AVF non-maturation. RESULTS: Intra-operative vein dilation and anastomosis modification results in a clinical maturation rate of 74-92% and a 6 month cumulative AVF patency of 79-93%. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with or without accessory vein obliteration is successful in 43-97% of patients. The long-term primary patency of PTA is rather low and multiple re-interventions are needed to achieve an acceptable cumulative fistula patency. The results of surgical revision exceed the results of endovascular intervention, with a mean primary one year patency of 73% (range 68-78%) compared with 49% (range 28-72%), respectively. The role of accessory vein obliteration remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Intervention for autologous arteriovenous fistula non-maturation is worthwhile and results in an increased number of functional fistulae. The outcome of surgical revision is better than endovascular and might be preferable in certain patient populations.

Pre-operative Duplex Ultrasonography in Arteriovenous Fistula Creation: Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement.

OBJECTIVE: Although clinical guidelines on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation advocate minimum luminal arterial and venous diameters, assessed by duplex ultrasonography (DUS), the clinical value of routine DUS examination is under debate. DUS might be an insufficiently repeatable and/or reproducible imaging modality because of its operator dependency. The present study aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement of DUS examination in support of AVF surgery planning. METHODS: Ten end stage renal disease patients were included, to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement of pre-operative DUS measurements. All measurements were performed by two trained and experienced vascular technicians, blinded to measurement readings. From the routine DUS protocol, representative measurements (venous diameters, and arterial diameters and volume flow in the upper arm and forearm) were selected. For intra-observer agreement the measurements were performed in triplicate, with the probe released from the skin between each. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intra- and inter-observer agreement, and Bland-Altman plots used to graphically display mean measurement differences and limits of agreement. RESULTS: Ten patients (6 male, 59.4±19.7 years) consented to participate, and all predefined measurements were obtained. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra-observer agreement of diameter measurements were at least 0.90 (95% CI 0.74-0.97; radial artery). Inter-observer agreement was at least 0.83 (0.46-0.96; lateral diameter upper arm cephalic vein). The Bland-Altman plots showed acceptable mean measurement differences and limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement can be reached for the discrete pre-operative DUS measurements advocated in clinical guidelines. DUS is therefore a reliable imaging modality to support AVF surgery planning. The content of DUS protocols, however, needs further standardisation.

Preoperative computer simulation for planning of vascular access surgery in hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, 20-40% of all constructed AVFs fail to mature (FTM), and are therefore not usable for hemodialysis. AVF maturation importantly depends on postoperative blood volume flow. Predicting patient-specific immediate postoperative flow could therefore support surgical planning. A computational model predicting blood volume flow is available, but the effect of blood flow predictions on the clinical endpoint of maturation (at least 500 mL/min blood volume flow, diameter of the venous cannulation segment ≥4 mm) remains undetermined. METHODS: A multicenter randomized clinical trial will be conducted in which 372 patients will be randomized (1:1 allocation ratio) between conventional healthcare and computational model-aided decision making. All patients are extensively examined using duplex ultrasonography (DUS) during preoperative assessment (12 venous and 11 arterial diameter measurements; 3 arterial volume flow measurements). The computational model will predict patient-specific immediate postoperative blood volume flows based on this DUS examination. Using these predictions, the preferred AVF configuration is recommended for the individual patient (radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, or brachiobasilic). The primary endpoint is FTM rate at six weeks in both groups, secondary endpoints include AVF functionality and patency rates at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02453412), and ToetsingOnline.nl (NL51610.068.14).

The value of intravascular ultrasound in the treatment of central venous obstructions in hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard in diagnosis and treatment of central venous obstructions (CVOs) in hemodialysis access. However, growing data suggest that DSA might underestimate the degree and morphology of venous outflow stenosis. This could lead to inappropriate CVO management. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been shown to identify lesion characteristics remaining obscure with angiography. With the current study we suggest IVUS as an eminent imaging modality in CVO management. METHODS: Twelve patients (8 male, mean age 62.4 ± 9 years) were analyzed for suspicion of symptomatic CVO. Both angiography and IVUS evaluation were performed to determine the degree of obstruction before and after PTA. Stent placement was indicated when significant residual stenosis (>50% lumen reduction) was suspected. RESULTS: Conventional plain angiography determined 8 out of 12 central venous lesions significant. Secondary signs of obstruction, i.e., collateral filling, was present in all 12 cases. After PTA, persistent significant stenosis was observed in 3 out of 12 patients. IVUS showed significant lumen reduction in all 12 cases. Additionally, IVUS showed a median cross-sectional area of 24 ± 12 mm2 before PTA and 37 ± 23 mm2 after PTA (NS). Furthermore, IVUS showed signs of intraluminal fibrotic trabeculations in 9 patients. Stenting was performed in 10 patients with >50% lumen reduction on IVUS after PTA. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional angiography seems unreliable to identify all significant aspects of a central venous outflow obstruction. Additional use of IVUS might aid in the decision-making process and select the optimal treatment strategy.

Hemodialysis vascular access management in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: In the Netherlands, 86% of patients start renal replacement therapy with chronic intermittent hemodialysis (HD). Guidelines do indicate predialysis care and maintenance of a well-functioning vascular access (VA) as critical issues in the management of the renal failure patient. Referral to the surgeon and time to VA creation are important determinants of the type and success of the VA and HD treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from a national questionnaire showed that time from referral to the surgeon and actual access creation is <4 weeks in 43%, 4 to 8 weeks in 30% and >8 weeks in 27% of the centers. Preoperative ultrasonography and postoperative access flowmetry are the diagnostic methods in the majority of centers (98%). Most facilities perform rope-ladder cannulation with occasionally the buttonhole technique for selected patients in 87% of the dialysis units. Endovascular intervention for thrombosis is practiced by 13%, surgical thrombectomy by 21% and either endovascular or surgery by 66% of the centers. Weekly multidisciplinary meetings are organized in 57% of the units. Central vein catheters are inserted by radiologists (36%), nephrologists and surgeons (32%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that guidelines implementation has been successful in particular regarding issues as preoperative patient assessment for VA creation and postoperative surveillance in combination with (preemptive) endovascular intervention, leading to very acceptable VA thrombosis rates.

One-year efficacy of the RUDI technique for flow reduction in high-flow autologous brachial artery-based hemodialysis vascular access.

PURPOSE: Flow reduction is advised in hemodialysis (HD) patients with a high-flow (>2 L/min) arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The revision using distal inflow (RUDI) technique is based on the premise that access flow is attenuated once inflow is provided by a smaller caliber forearm artery. Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of RUDI during a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: All HD patients undergoing a RUDI operation using a greater saphenous vein (GSV) or a basilic vein (BaV) interposition for a high-flow access (HFA, >2 L/min) during a 3.5-year time period were included. Serial access flow, percentage of freedom from recurrent high flow and complications were determined. RESULTS: A total of 19 HFA patients were studied (11 males, age 55 ± 3 years). All AVFs were brachial artery based (brachiocephalic, n = 14; brachiobasilic, n = 5). RUDI immediately reduced access flow by almost 2 L/min (3,080 ± 200 to 1,170 ± 160 mL/min (p = 0.001)). Access flows at 1, 6 and 12 months were 1,150 ± 160, 1,460 ± 200 and 1,580 ± 260 mL/min, respectively. Postoperative complications included insufficient flow reduction (n = 1, BaV) and occlusion requiring revision (n = 1, GSV). Recurrent HFA occurred three times (n = 2 BaV, n = 1 GSV). Access flows were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the BaV group compared to the GSV group. CONCLUSIONS: RUDI effectively reduces access flow in a brachial artery-based high-flow HD vascular access. A flow-reducing effect is sustained at 1-year follow-up in most patients. GSV is preferred as an interposition graft compared to a BaV.

How to improve vascular access care.

Preservation of a well-functioning vascular access (VA) is one of the most important and problematic areas in the care of dialysis patients. Providing high quality of care can reduce morbidity, improve quality of life and reduces costs. Given the increased complexity and the multidisciplinary character of VA care, it is a prerequisite to establish a dedicated multidisciplinary approach. An essential part of VA care is the management of the process before, during and after cannulation. A lack of knowledge and skills can have major implications for dialysis patients and may be related to VA outcome. Therefore, VA care requires continuous education of staff and patients, timely referral, adequate planning, and early identification or prevention of complications with elective treatment. Furthermore, access care data should be measured to continuously improve VA quality and measure the effects of the performance and effort.

Effectiveness of surgical banding for high flow in brachial artery-based hemodialysis vascular access.

OBJECTIVE: Autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis (HD) access may develop high flow (>2 L/min) over time. Reducing flow volume of a high-flow access (HFA) using a surgical banding technique has been reported to be successful in the short-term. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of banding in HFAs in terms of freedom from recurrence of high flow during a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: All HD patients undergoing surgical banding of an HFA during an 8-year period in three hospitals were retrospectively studied. Access flow data, freedom of recurrent high flow, and complications were analyzed during a 12-month postoperative observation period. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (30 males; age, 51 ± 2 years) were available for analysis. Banding was performed 30 ± 6 months after arteriovenous access construction. Most of the HFA patients (56%) required medication for hypertension, but diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial obstructive disease were seldom observed (6% and 12%, respectively). Most HFAs (96%) were brachial artery-based fistulas (brachiocephalic: 56%, basilic vein transposition: 40%, radiocephalic: 4%). Banding initially reduced access flow by >50% (3070 ± 95 vs 1490 ± 105 mL/min, P < .001). Recurrent high flow (>2 L/min) developed in 52% of the patients during the observation period. Young age (45 ± 3 vs 57 ± 3 years; P = .02) and an access flow >1 L/min immediately after banding (P = .03) were risk factors for recurrent high flow. CONCLUSIONS: An immediate postbanding access flow >1 L/min and young age are risk factors for recurrent high flow in a banded brachial artery-based HD access during a 1-year follow-up.

Buttonhole needling of haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae results in less complications and interventions compared to the rope-ladder technique.

BACKGROUND: The rope-ladder puncture technique, with cannulation along the whole length of the vessel traject, has been very common in haemodialysis patients with autogenous arterio-venous fistula (AVF). Today's dialysis population with AVF may exhibit difficult cannulation, because of a short vein length or a complicated cannulation route. An alternative needling possibility is the buttonhole (BH) technique, which inserts needles at exactly the same location during every dialysis session. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of both cannulation techniques on the incidence of vascular access (VA) complications. METHODS: A total of 75 prevalent haemodialysis patients with autogenous AVF using the BH technique were compared with 70 patients using the rope-ladder technique. The following parameters were registered: haematoma occurrence, redness, swelling, aneurysm formation, the use of sharp or dull needles, miscannulations, and interventions. Needling pain and fear of puncture were assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS). The duration of the follow-up was 9 months. RESULTS: Patients in the BH group had more unsuccessful cannulations, compared with the rope-ladder method (P < 0.0001), but the frequency of haematoma (P < 0.0001) and aneurysm formation (P < 0.0001) was less. In addition, intervention such as angioplasty (P < 0.0001) was higher in patients using the rope-ladder technique. A negative outcome of the BH technique was the higher incidence of access infections compared to the rope-ladder method. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the BH method is a valuable technique with few complications like haematoma, aneurysm formation and the need for interventions. However, the infections induced by the BH method should not be underestimated. This underlines the importance of an aseptic and correct technique of the buttonhole procedure.

Cannulation and vascular access-related complications in hemodialysis: factors determining successful cannulation.

Little is known about cannulation of the vascular access (VA), such as the number of successful cannulation procedures, frequency of complications caused by cannulation, and VA failure. Incident patients were followed for 6 months, from the first successful cannulation with 2 needles--both used for the hemodialysis treatment. Data included patient characteristics, comorbidities, and medication. Vascular access characteristics included: type of VA and location, vein diameter assessed by Duplex ultrasound, length of the cannulation route, and maturation period. Longitudinal data were collected by dialysis nurses, using identical questionnaires, and a standardized method to register data from each dialysis session. Among 10 Dutch dialysis facilities, clinical data from 120 patients were collected from June 2005 to March 2007. The use of autogenous arteriovenous fistulae (P<0.001) and limited length of the cannulation route (P<0.003) negatively affect the outcome of cannulation and complications such as use of single-needle (SN) dialysis and central vein catheters (CVC). Previous use of CVC and SN hemodialysis were significant predictors for VA failure (P<0.0001). The present study demonstrated that during the first 6 months of a newly placed VA, a huge number of cannulation-related complications such as miscannulation, use of CVC, and SN dialysis are encountered. Despite the fact that guidelines recommended the arteriovenous fistulae as the preferred VA, cannulation-related complications can lead to increased morbidity. The length of the cannulation route positively correlates with successful cannulation. Therefore, adjusted cannulation techniques might be indicated to improve VA outcome.