Pregnancy diagnosis in sows: direct ELISA for estrone in feces and its prospects for an on-farm test, in comparison to ultrasonography.

The usefulness of fecal estrone (E1) measurement as a tool for pregnancy diagnosis was investigated. Concentrations of E1 were measured in feces from pregnant and nonpregnant sows by a direct ELISA without extraction. Highly significant differences in E1 concentrations were found in feces from nonpregnant and pregnant sows (P = 0.016 to < 0.001). Pregnancy diagnosis on Days 26 to 32 after insemination, based both on fecal E1 concentrations as measured by ELISA and ultrasonography using a 5.0 MHz linear-array transducer, was performed in a group of 496 gilts and sows. The fecal E1 test had a sensitivity (correct diagnosis of pregnancy) of 96.5% and a specificity (correct diagnosis of nonpregnancy) of 93.6%, using 3.65 ng E1/g feces as a cut-off value. For ultrasonographic pregnancy diagnosis the test sensitivity and specificity were 99.3 and 92.5%, respectively. Although an increase of fecal E1 concentrations was noticed for increasing litter sizes, the results indicated that these concentrations could not be used to predict litter size. It is concluded that the distribution of fecal E1 concentrations in both nonpregnant and pregnant sows offers a suitable basis for the development of a simple, sow-side pregnancy test.

Pregnancy diagnosis in the dog: a comparison between abdominal palpation and linear-array real-time echography.

This paper presents quantitative results of canine pregnancy diagnoses performed by abdominal palpation and/or linear-array real-time echography. Each animal was first palpated by an experienced clinician and then another investigator performed ultrasound scanning using a 3 MHz transducer. In other dogs echography was undertaken only when the result of abdominal palpation was negative or doubtful or when the owner requested ultrasound scanning. Using all tests performed between days 20 and 49 of pregnancy (day 0 = day of first mating or insemination), the results of abdominal palpation (n = 116) versus real-time scanning (n = 135) were: sensitivity: 89.0% v 92.9%; specificity: 93% v 96.0%; positive predictive value: 95.6% v 97.5%; negative predictive value: 83.3% v 88.9%. Results of ultrasound tests performed in 97 other dogs were: sensitivity: 92.4%; specificity: 97.7%; positive predictive value: 98.0% and negative predictive value: 91.4%. Almost identical figures were found when only the tests performed between days 25 and 35 of pregnancy were included. It was concluded that real-time ultrasound scanning is an accurate method for discriminating between pregnant and non-pregnant bitches; sensitivity and specificity of the abdominal palpation technique executed by an experienced clinician approach that of ultrasound scanning; small litter size and lack of knowledge of conception date are the main sources of false negative diagnoses.

Accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis and prediction of foetal numbers in sheep with linear-array real-time ultrasound scanning.

Pregnancy diagnosis was carried out in sheep by means of transabdominal linear-array real-time ultrasound scanning. Animals were restrained standing, and the transducer was placed on the hairless area of the ventral abdominal wall just in front of the udder. Of a total of 818 tests, 724 were performed between days 29 and 89 of pregnancy, 598 animals subsequently lambed and 126 were non-lambing animals. Only 8 of these tests were wrong: 3 false positive and 5 false negative diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, positive- and negative predictive values for these tests were 99.2%, 97.6%, 99.5%, and 96% respectively. There was evidence to indicate that the three false positive tests were caused by foetal mortality or unobserved abortions that took place after testing. Only 2 of the 5 false negative tests were carried out after day 39 of gestation. Counting of foetal numbers (1, 2 or 3) was performed in only some animals (n = 210) between days 45 and 77 of gestation. Three groups of animals (A: 89 ewes; B: 27 PMSG-treated ewes; C: 94 ewes) were analyzed separately. Overall accuracy of all predictions was 83.1%, 37.0% and 78.7% for the 3 groups respectively. Animals in group B produced only 3 or more lambs. Sensitivity of the countings of singles, twins and triplets or more were 90.4%, 90.4% and 50% respectively for the animals from group A and 91.9%, 86% and 21.4% for the animals from group C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)