Circumferential (360°) trabeculotomy for steroid-induced glaucoma in adults.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 360° circumferential trabeculotomy (TO) for steroid induced glaucoma (SIG) of short duration. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of surgical results of 46 eyes of 35 patients undergoing microcatheter-assisted TO. All eyes had high intraocular pressure for at most about 3 years due to steroid use. Follow-up was between 2.63 and 47.9 months (mean 23.9, median 25.6). RESULTS: Intraocular pressure (IOP) before surgery was 30.8 ± 8.3 mm Hg, with 3.8 ± 1.0 pressure-lowering medications. After 1 to 2 years, mean IOP was 11.2 ± 2.6 mm Hg (n = 28); mean number of IOP-lowering medications was 0.9 ± 1.3. At their last follow-up, 45 eyes had an IOP < 21 mm Hg, and 39 eyes had an IOP < 18 mm Hg with or without medication. After 2 years, the estimated probability of having an IOP below 18 mm Hg (with or without medication) was 85 ± 6%, and the estimated probability of not using medication was 56 ± 7%. Steroid response was no longer present in all eyes receiving steroids after surgery. Minor complications consisted of hyphema, transient hypotony, or hypertony. One eye proceeded to receiving a glaucoma drainage implant. CONCLUSION: TO is particularly effective in SIG with relative short duration. This concurs with the pathophysiology of the outflow system. This procedure seems particularly suited for eyes for which target pressures in the mid-teens are acceptable, particularly when chronic use of steroids is necessary .

Predictive Value of the Esterman Visual Field Test on the Outcome of the On-Road Driving Test.

Purpose: As the prevalence of age-related visual field disorders and the number of older drivers are rising, clear criteria on visual field requirements for driving are important. This article explores the predictive value of the Esterman visual field in relation to the outcome of an on-road driving test. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for driver's license applicants who, based on their visual field, performed an on-road driving test. Cases (N = 101) with a failed on-road driving test were matched with 101 controls with a passed outcome. The Esterman visual field was divided in regions, and the number of points missed per region was counted. Logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed for each region. Results: Most regions presented a significantly increased odds for failing the driving test when more points were missed. The odds ratio for the whole visual field was 2.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-4.14, P < 0.001) for all the participants. However, ROC curves failed to reveal distinct fail-pass criteria based on the number of points missed, as revealed by a large amount of overlap between cases and controls. Conclusions: These findings confirm the relation between visual field damage and impaired driving performance. However, the Esterman visual field results were not conclusive for predicting the driving performance of the individual driver with visual field defects. Translational Relevance: In our group of participants, the number of on-road driving tests cannot be further reduced by a more detailed definition of fail-pass criteria, based on the Esterman visual field test.