Two years' experience with inspiration breath-hold in liver SBRT.

•The workflow of inspiration breath-hold SBRT for liver metastases is described.•Inspiration breath-hold in liver SBRT is feasible for 95% of the patients.•An individual margin recipe for inspiration breath-hold liver SBRT is explained.•Margin reduction of 10 mm using inspiration breath-hold compared to free breathing.

The ArcCHECK diode array for dosimetric verification of HybridArc.

The aim of this work is to evaluate dosimetric accuracy of a new treatment modality, HybridArc, in iPlan RT Dose 4.5 (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany) using a four-dimensional diode array (ArcCHECK, Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, USA). HybridArc is able to enhance dynamic conformal arcs with inversely planned elements. HybridArc plans for various sites (intracranial and extracranial) were constructed and after that these plans were recalculated for the ArcCHECK diode array with Monte Carlo (MC) and Pencil Beam (PB) dose algorithms in iPlan RT Dose. All measurements of these HybridArc plans were performed with 6 MV photon beams of a Novalis accelerator (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany) using the ArcCHECK device without and with an insert containing an ionization chamber. Comparison of the absolute dose distributions measured and calculated in iPlan RT Dose with the MC algorithm at the cylinder of the ArcCHECK diode array for HybridArc plans gives good agreement, even for the 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance-to-agreement criteria. The PB calculations significantly differ from the ArcCHECK measurements so that the MC algorithm is found to be superior to the PB algorithm in the calculation of the HybridArc plans. One of the drawbacks of the PB calculations in iPlan RT Dose is the too large arc step size of 10°. Use of a finer angular resolution may improve the PB results significantly.

Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.

This study presents data for verification of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). MC calculations were compared with pencil beam (PB) calculations and verification measurements in phantoms with lung-equivalent material, air cavities or bone-equivalent material to mimic head and neck and thorax and in an Alderson anthropomorphic phantom. Dosimetric accuracy of MC for the micro-multileaf collimator (MLC) simulation was tested in a homogeneous phantom. All measurements were performed using an ionization chamber and Kodak EDR2 films with Novalis 6 MV photon beams. Dose distributions measured with film and calculated with MC in the homogeneous phantom are in excellent agreement for oval, C and squiggle-shaped fields and for a clinical IMRT plan. For a field with completely closed MLC, MC is much closer to the experimental result than the PB calculations. For fields larger than the dimensions of the inhomogeneities the MC calculations show excellent agreement (within 3%/1 mm) with the experimental data. MC calculations in the anthropomorphic phantom show good agreement with measurements for conformal beam plans and reasonable agreement for dynamic conformal arc and IMRT plans. For 6 head and neck and 15 lung patients a comparison of the MC plan with the PB plan was performed. Our results demonstrate that MC is able to accurately predict the dose in the presence of inhomogeneities typical for head and neck and thorax regions with reasonable calculation times (5-20 min). Lateral electron transport was well reproduced in MC calculations. We are planning to implement MC calculations for head and neck and lung cancer patients.

Definition and validation of a reference target volume in early stage node-positive cervical carcinoma, based on lymphangiograms and CT-scans.

PURPOSE: To establish a reference planning target volume for postoperative radiotherapy in stage Ib and IIa N+ cervical carcinoma, based on 47 lymphangiograms and 15 CT-scans. METHODS: Radiation oncologists (n=17) from all radiotherapy institutes in The Netherlands were asked to define the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV), and to delineate (on simulation films) the radiotherapy treatment portals following a radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection for an early stage cervical carcinoma with positive iliac lymph nodes. A reference PTV was defined by using 47 normal lymphangiograms and CT-data of the pelvis from 15 patients who underwent surgery for cervical carcinoma. The simulation films were digitized and evaluated for adequacy in covering the PTV, previously individually determined by the radiation oncologists. Subsequently, the simulation films were also evaluated for adequacy in covering the reference PTV. RESULTS: Large variations were observed in the portals used and in treatment techniques. From the digitized films, it appeared that in 50% of the cases the defined PTV was not covered adequately. Furthermore, 71% of the treatment plans would not cover the lateral borders of the reference PTV sufficiently. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no consensus on the target volumes to be irradiated in postoperative radiotherapy of early stage cervical carcinoma. When a PTV defined on the basis of lymphangiograms and CT-data is taken as a reference, 71% of the treatment plans would not cover this PTV adequately. These findings indicate the need for a consensus in the design of standardized treatment volumes.

Three-dimensional treatment planning for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with node-positive cervical cancer. Comparison between a conventional and a conformal technique.

PURPOSE: Reduction of irradiated small bowel volume, using a conformal three-dimensional treatment planning technique in postoperative radiotherapy of cervical cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Large gynecological treatment fields including the para-aortic nodes were analyzed in 15 patients. A conventional treatment plan with anterior and posterior (AP-PA) parallel opposed fields and a 3D 4-field conformal radiotherapy plan with a central blocking of small bowel were compared for each patient. Dose-volume histograms and dose parameters were established. Because of the tolerance constraints of the small bowel, the cumulative dose applied to the target was 48.6 Gy. RESULTS: The mean Tumor Control Probability (TCP) values for both the conventional and the conformal technique were 0.60 and 0.61, respectively, with ranges of 0.56 to 0.67 and 0.57 to 0.66, respectively. The mean volume receiving 95% or more of the prescribed dose (V95) of the small bowel was 47.6% (32.5 to 66.3%) in the AP-PA technique and 14.9% (7.0 to 22.5%) in the conformal technique (p < 0.001), indicating a significant reduction in irradiated volume of small bowel in the higher dose range. The mean Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) decreased from 0.11 to 0.03 with the conformal plan. In patients who received a pedicled omentoplasty during surgery, the mean V95 for small bowel could be reduced to 8.5% (7.0 to 9.9%). The mean median dose to the kidneys was only slightly elevated in the conformal treatment. Especially the mean dose to the right kidney in conventional vs conformal treatment was 3.3 vs 7.9 Gy. The mean near-minimum dose (D95) to the rectosigmoid decreased from 48.4 to 30.1 Gy in the conformal plan compared to the conventional plan. CONCLUSION: The small bowel dose can be significantly reduced with 3D treatment planning, particularly if a pedicled omentoplasty is performed. This allows dose escalation to the tumor region without unacceptable toxicity for the small bowel.

Dosimetric evaluation of the Siemens Virtual Wedge.

Recently, Siemens has introduced its Virtual Wedge (VW). On a Mevatron accelerator, this option generates a wedge-like dose profile by moving a collimator jaw at constant speed while varying the dose rate. In this paper the formalism is given that is used to deliver a wedge profile and from that the expressions for possible combinations of wedge angle, field size and delivered MUs are derived. Also the time needed to deliver a VW field is calculated. An effective attenuation coefficient mu is used in the implementation. For three beam energies, values of mu are determined in order to get VW angles that are as close as possible to the hard wedge angles, over a wide range of field sizes and wedge angles. Linearity with number of MUs and gantry angle dependence of the generated dose profiles were checked. These factors did not have a significant influence on the VW dose profiles. Wedge factors should be close to unity in the VW implementation. We have measured a number of wedge factors and found that they start to deviate from 1 with more than 1% for large wedge angles and field sizes, up to 3.5% for a 19 x 19 cm2, 60 degrees VW field. The Virtual Wedge turned out to be a reliable tool that can be used clinically, provided that it can be handled by the treatment planning system. It provides extra flexibility and usually results in shorter beam on times.

Leaf trajectory calculation for dynamic multileaf collimation to realize optimized fluence profiles.

An algorithm for the calculation of the required leaf trajectories to generate optimized intensity modulated beam profiles by means of dynamic multileaf collimation is presented. This algorithm iteratively accounts for leaf transmission and collimator scatter and fully avoids tongue-and-groove underdosage effects. Tests on a large number of intensity modulated fields show that only a limited number of iterations, generally less than 10, are necessary to minimize the differences between optimized and realized fluence profiles. To assess the accuracy of the algorithm in combination with the dose calculation algorithm of the Cadplan 3D treatment planning system, predicted absolute dose distributions for optimized fluence profiles were compared with dose distributions measured on the MM50 Racetrack Microtron and resulting from the calculated leaf trajectories. Both theoretical and clinical cases yield an agreement within 2%, or within 2 mm in regions with a high dose gradient, showing that the accuracy is adequate for clinical application.

Dynamic multileaf collimation without 'tongue-and-groove' underdosage effects.

In all commercially available multileaf collimators, a 'tongue-and-groove'--or similar--construction is used for reduction of leakage radiation between adjacent leaves. These constructions can cause serious underdosages in intensity-modulated photon beams. A method for leaf trajectory calculation for dynamic multileaf collimation, which fully avoids these underdosage effects, is presented. The method is based on pairwise synchronizations of trajectories of adjacent leaf pairs, such that the delivered beam intensity in each 'tongue-and-groove' region is always equal to the smallest of the two prescribed intensities for the two corresponding leaf pairs. The effectiveness of the method has been proven for a large number of intensity-modulated fields, using the dynamic multileaf collimation mode of our MM50 Racetrack Microtron. Compared to dynamic multileaf collimation without synchronization, beam-on times are always equal or longer. For the cases that we studied, the beam-on time was typically increased by 5 to 15%.

Simulation accuracy in radiotherapy for maxillary sinus tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical importance of beam positioning during simulation of radiation treatment for tumors in the maxillary sinus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients were prepared as if they were to be treated for a maxillary sinus tumor. A three-beam computed tomography (CT) scan-based computer plan was made for each patient. The location of the central beam axis of each beam was measured, relative to bony anatomical structures. A simulation was performed using the bony references to position the radiation beams during simulation. After this, the simulation procedure was repeated by the use of a noninvasive external localization frame with a known accuracy and reproducibility within 2 mm margins. RESULTS: When defining the clinical target volume as the known tumor with a 1 cm margin, three out of five patients would suffer a partial geographical miss throughout the entire radiation treatment due to erroneous beam positioning at the simulation stage when using bony structures as a guide for beam positioning. The influence of these errors is analyzed as normal tissue complication and tumor control probabilities. CONCLUSION: When defining a planning target volume, one should consider a margin to correct for possible simulation errors. We advise the use of objective, external (and thus nonanatomical) landmarks as a reference during simulation to reduce this extra margin to a minimum. In case of simulation, using bony structures as a reference, an additional margin should be entered, depending on the simulation accuracy that can be obtained.

Granulate of stainless steel as compensator material.

Compensators produced with computer controlled milling devices usually consist of a styrofoam mould, filled with an appropriate material. We investigated granulate of stainless steel as filling material. This cheap, easy to use, clean and re-usable material can be obtained with an average granule diameter of 0.3 mm, enabling an accurate and reproducible filling. No wax or other sealing material is added. The density of the granulate is approximately 4.5 g/cm3, which allows an accurate production of compensators in a sufficiently wide transmission range without the compensators becoming too thick. Transmission and surface dose measurements show that the dosimetric properties of stainless steel granulate are suitable for use as compensator material.