The diuretic effect of calcium entry blockade in normals and hypertensive patients.

Calcium entry blockers have been shown to exert hemodynamic and diuretic effects in the kidney. The diuretic effects can be demonstrated most clearly in the isolated perfused kidney, not influenced by compensatory mechanisms such as a lower blood pressure or changes of hormones. However, they can also be shown in vivo in humans. We studied the renal effects of calcium entry blockade after the first dosage and after continued oral dosages of 20 mg nicardipine tid in patients with essential hypertension and in normotensive controls. Renal function was determined during maximal free water clearance, allowing estimation of changes in "proximal" and "distal" tubular sodium reabsorption. Results showed a natriuretic effect. In the control subjects, clearance results were compatible with a decrease of proximal and distal tubular reabsorption, but in the hypertensive group natriuresis was mainly achieved by an increase of the glomerular filtration rate and a decrease of fractional distal reabsorption. In both groups the natriuresis occurred concomitantly with a lower blood pressure. The ratio plasma renin activity/plasma aldosterone concentration increased, although nicardipine did not inhibit the increase of plasma aldosterone during angiotensin II infusion. Pre-treatment with the calcium entry blocker nitrendipine enhanced the natriuretic effect of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) in sodium replete normal volunteers. Facilitation of sodium excretion by human ANF may be an additional diuretic mechanism of calcium entry blockers.

Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function.

The pharmacokinetics of lisinopril was studied after administration of single and multiple doses of 5 mg to hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function. In patients with severe renal failure the peak concentrations were higher, the decline in serum concentration was slower and the time to peak concentration was extended. Accumulation of lisinopril was highly correlated with the creatinine clearance. The effective half-life was doubled and tripled in patients with mild and severe renal impairment, respectively, as compared to patients with a normal renal function. Lisinopril lowered blood pressure in all three groups over 24 h. It is suggested that smaller doses of lisinopril should be administered to patients with severe renal failure.

The effect of converting enzyme inhibition on the enhanced proximal sodium reabsorption induced by chronic diuretic treatment in patients with essential hypertension.

During chronic chlorthalidone treatment of patients with essential hypertension, distal tubular sodium reabsorption is continuously inhibited. At the same time, sodium balance is maintained by an increase of the proximal tubular sodium reabsorption. In the present study, we investigated whether this increase is caused by a stimulated renin-angiotensin system (RAS). For this purpose, the renal effects of converting enzyme inhibition (CEI) were evaluated in 12 patients with essential hypertension who remained hypertensive despite chronic chlorthalidone treatment. After 6 weeks of chlorthalidone, an intravenous injection of 10 mg enalaprilic acid decreased the mean arterial pressure (MAP) from 110 to 102 mm Hg. The effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) increased. However, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the fractional excretions of sodium, lithium and free water did not change significantly. After 2 additional weeks of chlorthalidone combined with enalapril 20 mg b.i.d., MAP fell to 90 mm Hg, ERPF remained elevated and plasma aldosterone concentration decreased. As in the acute study, no significant changes were detected in the GFR and the fractional excretions of sodium, lithium or free water. Extracellular fluid volume was not diminished during these 2 weeks. Fractional proximal sodium reabsorption during chronic chlorthalidone therapy was higher when calculated from free water clearance (91%) than from the lithium clearance (71%), but neither of the two were affected by acute or chronic CEI. The results of this study suggest that during chronic diuretic treatment, maintenance of sodium balance by increased proximal reabsorption is not dependent on the stimulated RAS, or alternatively, that this function of the RAS is exactly counterbalanced by another effect of CEI, possibly by the fall in blood pressure.

Lisinopril in hypertensive patients with and without renal failure.

Lisinopril (MK521), a lysine analogue of enalaprilic acid, the bioactive metabolite of enalapril, has a longer half-life than enalaprilic acid, and is excreted unchanged in the urine. Its kinetic profile and antihypertensive and hormonal effects have been investigated in an open study in 3 groups each of 6 hypertensive patients, with normal, moderate and severe impairment of renal function. Serum drug level, blood pressure, converting enzyme activity (CEA), plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone concentration (PAC), and serum potassium and creatinine were measured during 1 week following a single oral dose and subsequently following 8 daily doses of 5 mg lisinopril. Accumulation of lisinopril was found in the severe renal failure group. CEA was suppressed to less than 10% of its initial value from 4 to 24 h after the initial dose in all three groups, and the suppression was more marked and lasted longer in patients with severe renal failure. An inverse correlation was found in all patients between log serum lisinopril concentration and log CEA. Lisinopril lowered blood pressure in all three groups over 24 h. PRA rose and PAC fell similarly in the groups. Serum potassium increased in the renal failure groups and creatinine remained unchanged in all groups. Thus, when lisinopril 5 mg is given daily to patients with severe renal failure it may accumulate. The high serum lisinopril concentration does not cause an excessive antihypertensive effect. In patients with severe renal failure, adjustment of the dose or the dosing frequency to the degree of renal failure is recommended to avoid administration of doses in excess of those required to achieve adequate inhibition of converting enzyme.

Comparison of enalapril and propranolol in essential hypertension.

In 40 patients with essential hypertension, enalapril was compared with propranolol as an antihypertensive agent in a double-blind study. The patients were randomly given either enalapril 5-10-20 mg bid or propranolol 40-80-120 mg bid in a treatment consisting of step-by-step increases in dosage. When the diastolic blood pressure remained greater than 90 mm Hg on the highest dosage, hydrochlorothiazide was added. Both enalapril and propranolol reduced blood pressure, although the patients tended to achieve lower blood pressures while on enalapril. More patients on propranolol required additional diuretic therapy than patients on enalapril. Propranolol reduced heart rate; with enalapril there were no changes in heart rate. Both drugs increased serum potassium and urea. Plasma renin substrate was reduced by enalapril, but raised by propranolol. Enalapril increased plasma renin activity and angiotensin I, while propranolol reduced both. Converting enzyme activity was lowered with enalapril but was unchanged with propranolol. Both drugs reduced angiotensin II. Plasma aldosterone concentration was more suppressed with propranolol than with enalapril.

Changes in blood pressure and body fluid volumes during diuretic therapy in patients with essential hypertension who receive enalapril.

We evaluated the effect of additional chlorthalidone therapy on blood pressure and body fluid volumes in 10 patients with essential hypertension who did not respond to chronic converting enzyme inhibition with enalapril. Values assessed after 3 days and 6 weeks of combined enalapril and chlorthalidone therapy were compared with initial values during enalapril monotherapy. After 3 days the mean arterial pressure (MAP), plasma volume (PV), blood volume (BV), and extracellular fluid volume (ECFV) decreased. There was a positive correlation between the percentage decreases in MAP and BV. After 6 weeks the MAP decreased further, but the decreases in PV, BV, and ECFV were less pronounced. At this time there was a positive correlation between the percentage decreases in MAP and ECFV. Our results support the hypothesis that contraction of the ECFV is an antihypertensive mechanism of diuretics. The antihypertensive effect of diuretics is enhanced during converting enzyme inhibition, while the body remains protected against volume deficits, possibly by the lower blood pressure itself.

Changes in haemodynamics and body fluid volume due to enalapril in patients with essential hypertension on chronic diuretic therapy.

In 12 patients with essential hypertension who remained hypertensive despite chronic chlorthalidone treatment, the effect of 2 weeks of additional therapy with the converting enzyme inhibitor (CEI) enalapril on blood pressure and body fluid volumes has been evaluated. The objective was to examine the influence of a diuretic-stimulated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) on haemodynamics and body fluid volume. Mean arterial pressure (MAP -21%), total peripheral resistance index (TPRI -22%) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC -39%) were decreased, and plasma renin activity (PRA 660%) was increased. The average heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), plasma volume (PV), blood volume (BV), extracellular fluid volume (ECFV) and body weight (BW) remained unchanged. A negative correlation was found between the per cent changes in ECFV and PAC. Thus, body fluid volumes during chronic diuretic treatment are well preserved even when the RAAS with its sodium retaining properties is suppressed by CEI. Possible mechanisms are a volume (not angiotensin II) - dependent stimulation of aldosterone and a fall in blood pressure.

Influence of nicardipine on blood pressure, renal function and plasma aldosterone in normotensive volunteers.

The influence of the calcium antagonist nicardipine on intrarenal sodium handling and angiotensin II induced secretion of aldosterone was investigated in 18 normotensive volunteers after the first dose and after 1 week of treatment (20 mg three times daily). A short-lasting natriuresis was observed, which was caused by a decreased reabsorption of sodium localised in both proximal and distal tubules. Log plasma renin activity (PRA) fell significantly on each day during angiotensin II infusion, while log-plasma aldosterone (PA) rose significantly. The log PRA/log PA ratio was increased during nicardipine treatment. The secretion of aldosterone, induced by angiotensin II, was not influenced by nicardipine treatment. No effect of the drug on adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin II was found.

Antihypertensive and renal effects of nicardipine.

Both the acute blood pressure lowering and renal effects of the calcium antagonist nicardipine and those after 1 week's treatment were investigated in 10 normotensive volunteers and in 10 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After 1 week of placebo, nicardipine was administered orally for 1 week (20 mg three times daily), Investigations, done on the first and last day of nicardipine treatment were compared with those on the last day of placebo. During water loading, nicardipine increased urinary volume and urinary excretion of sodium significantly after 1 week nicardipine treatment. In the normotensive group the natriuretic effect was caused by a decrease of fractional proximal and distal reabsorption of sodium. In the hypertensive group the natriuresis was achieved mainly by an increase of the rate of glomerular filtration (GFR) and also by a slight distal effect. Our results show that nicardipine had natriuretic effects. There were trends suggesting that the renal effects may differ between patients with essential hypertension and normotensive volunteers, but the findings might also be related to differences in age between the groups.