Long-term Outcome of Reexploration for Bleeding After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the influence of reexploration for bleeding and blood product requirement after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single-center institution. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent CABG between January 1998 and December 2019 were included. INTERVENTIONS: The parameters were analyzed to assess the association between reexploration for bleeding and long-term mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality up to the end of follow-up (June 1, 2021). The secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality, duration of admission, blood product transfusion, postoperative use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, deep sternal wound infection, myocardial infarction, and neurologic complications. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between reexploration and blood product use and all-cause mortality. Median follow-up was 9.7 years (IQR 5.1-14.6). In total, 576 out of 21,346 (2.7%) patients were reexplored for bleeding. Thirty-day mortality was 6.2% v 1.6% for the reexplored versus not reexplored patients. Reexploration for bleeding was not significantly correlated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.029; p = 0.068). On the other hand, blood product transfusion (HR = 1.135; p < 0.001), and in particular, packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion (HR = 1.139; p < 0.001), was significantly associated with higher long-term mortality. After multivariate Cox regression using ≥5 pRBC transfused as a cut-off point, reexploration for bleeding was not significantly associated with long-term mortality (HR 0.982; p = 0.813). Receiving ≥5 pRBCs was significantly associated with higher long-term mortality (HR 1.249; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reexploration for bleeding was significantly associated with higher 30-day mortality but not with long-term mortality. Poorer long-term mortality was attributed to patient characteristics and higher use of postoperative blood products.

Does removal of steel wires relieve post-sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery?

BACKGROUND: Post-sternotomy pain in the absence of cardiac ischemia and sternal instability is most commonly due to the sternal wire sutures or a protruding wire. We performed a retrospective study to investigate the effect of removal of the steel wires for relief of post-sternotomy pain. METHODS: All 206 patients who underwent sternal wire removal in our institution from January 2003 through August 2011 were included in this study. Alive patients were contacted by telephone to inquire about the fate of their pain. Accordingly, patients were classified into 4 groups: group 1 were free of symptoms; group 2 were satisfied, significantly better than before wire removal; group 3 had unchanged symptoms; and group 4 had worsening of pain after wire removal. RESULTS: After excluding patients who died during the follow-up and those who had sternal instability and wound infection, 186 patients were available for the questionnaire. Complete relief of pain occurred in 83% of these patients, and 10% had improvement of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend removal of the steel wires in patients with persistent chest pain after median sternotomy, when sternal instability, mediastinitis, and cardiac causes such as ischemia are excluded.