Do emotion regulation difficulties affect outcome of intensive trauma-focused treatment of patients with severe PTSD?

Background: There is ongoing debate as to whether emotion regulation problems should be improved first in order to profit from trauma-focused treatment, or will diminish after successful trauma processing. Objective: To enhance our understanding about the importance of emotion regulation difficulties in relation to treatment outcomes of trauma-focused therapy of adult patients with severe PTSD, whereby we made a distinction between people who reported sexual abuse before the age of 12, those who were 12 years or older at the onset of the abuse, individuals who met the criteria for the dissociative subtype of PTSD, and those who did not. Methods: Sixty-two patients with severe PTSD were treated using an intensive eight-day treatment programme, combining two first-line trauma-focused treatments for PTSD (i.e. prolonged exposure and EMDR therapy) without preceding interventions that targeted emotion regulation difficulties. PTSD symptom scores (CAPS-5) and emotion regulation difficulties (DERS) were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and six month follow-up. Results: PTSD severity and emotion regulation difficulties significantly decreased following trauma-focused treatment. While PTSD severity scores significantly increased from post-treatment until six month follow-up, emotion regulation difficulties did not. Treatment response and relapse was not predicted by emotion-regulation difficulties. Survivors of childhood sexual abuse before the age of 12 and those who were sexually abused later in life improved equally well with regard to emotion regulation difficulties. Individuals who fulfilled criteria of the dissociative subtype of PTSD showed a similar decrease on emotion regulation difficulties during treatment than those who did not. Conclusion: The results support the notion that the severity of emotion regulation difficulties is not associated with worse trauma-focused treatment outcomes for PTSD nor with relapse after completing treatment. Further, emotion regulation difficulties improved after trauma-focused treatment, even for individuals who had been exposed to early childhood sexual trauma and individuals with dissociative subtype.

Antecedentes: hay un debate en curso sobre si los problemas de regulación de las emociones deben mejorar primero para beneficiarse del tratamiento centrado en el trauma o si disminuirán después del procesamiento exitoso del trauma.Objetivo: mejorar nuestra comprensión sobre la importancia de las dificultades de la regulación emocional en relación con los resultados del tratamiento de la terapia centrada en el trauma de pacientes adultos con trastorno de estrés postraumático grave, para lo cual hicimos una distinción entre las personas que informaron abuso sexual antes de los 12 años, aquellas que tenían 12 o más años al inicio del abuso, personas que cumplieron con los criterios para el subtipo disociativo de TEPT y aquellos que no lo hicieron.Métodos: Sesenta y dos pacientes con trastorno de estrés postraumático grave fueron tratados mediante un programa de tratamiento intensivo de ocho días, que combina dos tratamientos de primera línea centrados en el trauma para el trastorno de estrés postraumático (exposición prolongada y EMDR) sin intervenciones previas dirigidas a las dificultades de regulación emocional. Los puntajes de síntomas de TEPT (CAPS-5) y las dificultades de regulación emocional (DERS) se evaluaron antes, después del tratamiento y a los seis meses de seguimiento.Resultados: la severidad del TEPT y las dificultades de regulación emocional disminuyeron significativamente después del tratamiento centrado en el trauma. Si bien los puntajes de severidad del TEPT aumentaron significativamente desde el postratamiento hasta los seis meses de seguimiento, las dificultades de regulación emocional no lo hicieron. La respuesta al tratamiento y la recaída no fueron precedidas por las dificultades de regulación de las emociones. Los sobrevivientes de abuso sexual infantil antes de los 12 años y aquellos que fueron abusados sexualmente más tarde en la vida mejoraron igualmente bien con respecto a las dificultades de regulación de las emociones. Las personas que cumplieron con los criterios del subtipo disociativo de TEPT mostraron una mayor disminución en las dificultades de regulación emocional durante el tratamiento que aquellos que no lo hicieron.Conclusión: Los resultados apoyan la noción de que la gravedad de las dificultades de regulación de las emociones no se asocia con peores resultados del tratamiento centrado en el trauma para el TEPT ni con recaídas después de completar el tratamiento. Además, las dificultades de regulación de las emociones mejoraron después del tratamiento centrado en el trauma, incluso para las personas que habían estado expuestas a traumas sexuales en la primera infancia y las personas con subtipo disociativo.

Addition of routinely measured blood biomarkers significantly improves GRACE risk stratification in patients with myocardial infarction.

AIM: To investigate whether blood biomarkers measured routinely at hospital admission in myocardial infarction (MI) patients can improve the admission GRACE score for the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and non-fatal MI at 6 months. METHODS: 2055 patients treated for MI in the Northwest clinics, the Netherlands, between 2013 and 2016 were examined. As part of the prevailing MI treatment protocol, 19 biomarkers were measured and the GRACE score was ascertained. Information on the composite endpoint was derived from municipal registries and electronic medical records. We applied elastic net logistic regression (LR) analysis to select biomarkers that had statistically significant additive prognostic value on top of the GRACE score. We then studied the prognostic performance of the LR model containing the GRACE score and the selected biomarkers. RESULTS: At six months follow-up 143 (6.96%) reached the composite endpoint. Nine variables were included in the final LR model: GRACE score, urea, sodium, potassium, alkaline phosphatase, LDL cholesterol, glucose, hemoglobin and C-reactive protein. This extended GRACE score model showed improved discrimination (C-statistic 0.76 vs 0.70, p = <0.001) and classification (continuous net reclassification index 0.49, p < 0.001) compared with the GRACE score only. CONCLUSION: The ability of the GRACE score for detecting MI patients at high risk for mortality or MI within 6 months, was significantly improved by adding several biomarkers measured routinely at admission.