Towards an ICF- and IMMPACT-based pain vocational rehabilitation core set in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: For clinical use and research of pain within the context of vocational rehabilitation, a specific core set of measurements is needed. The recommendations of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) brief Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) and those of Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) cover two broad areas. These two sources can be integrated when made applicable to vocational rehabilitation and pain. Objective To develop a core set of diagnostic and evaluative measures specifically for vocational rehabilitation of patients with subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain, while using the brief ICF core set for VR as the reference framework in VR, and the IMMPACT recommendations in the outcome measurements around pain. METHODS: Three main steps were taken. The first step was to remove irrelevant and duplicate domains of the brief ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation and the IMMPACT recommendations around pain. The second step was to match the remaining domains with existing instruments or measures. Instruments were proposed based on availability and its proven use in Dutch practice and based on proof of sufficient clinimetric properties. In step 3, the preliminary VR-Pain core set was presented to 3 expert panels: proposed users, Dutch pain rehabilitation experts, and international VR experts. RESULTS: Experts agreed with the majority of the proposed domains and instruments. The final VR-Pain Core Set consists of 18 domains measured with 12 instruments. All instruments possessed basic clinimetric properties. CONCLUSION: An agreed-upon VR-Pain Core Set with content that covers relevant domains for pain and VR and validated instruments measuring these domains has been developed. The VR-Pain Core Set may be used for regular clinical purposes and research in the field of vocational rehabilitation and pain, but adaptations should be considered for use outside the Netherlands.

How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate how many people return to work (RTW) after acquiring brain injury (ABI) due to traumatic or non-traumatic causes. Secondary objectives were to investigate the differences in outcome between traumatic and non-traumatic causes, the development of RTW over time and whether or not people return to their former job. METHODS: A systematic literature search (1992-2008) was performed using terms of ABI and RTW. The methodological quality of the studies was determined. An overall estimation of percentage RTW 1 and 2 years post-injury was calculated by data pooling. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Finally, 49 studies were included. Within 2 years post-injury, 39.3% of the subjects with non-traumatic ABI returned to work. Among people with traumatic ABI, 40.7% returned to work after 1 year and 40.8% after 2 years. No effect of cause or time since injury was found. Some people with traumatic ABI who returned to work were not able to sustain their job over time. Changes of occupation and job demands are common among people with ABI. CONCLUSIONS: About 40% of the people with traumatic or non-traumatic ABI are able to return to work after 1 or 2 years. Among those with acquired traumatic brain injury a substantial proportion of the subjects were either not able to return to their former work or unable to return permanently.

Prognostic factors of return to work after acquired brain injury: a systematic review.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into the prognostic and non-prognostic factors of return to work (RTW) in people with traumatic and non-traumatic acquired brain injury (ABI) who were working before injury. METHODS: A systematic literature search (1992-2008) was performed, including terms for ABI, RTW and prognostic factors. The methodological quality of the studies was determined. Evidence was classified as strong (positive, negative or no), weak or inconsistent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Following classification of the studies, 22 studies were included. Strong evidence was found that 'gender' and 'anatomic location' were not associated with RTW after non-traumatic ABI and that both 'injury severity' (classified by the Glascow Coma Scale) and 'suffering from depression' or 'anxiety' were not associated with RTW after traumatic ABI. In addition strong evidence was found for the negative prognostic value on RTW of the 'inpatient length of stay', after traumatic ABI. Weak evidence was found for the three trainable/treatable factors 'ability to perform activities of daily living', 'residual physical deficits/higher disability level' and 'number of associated injuries'. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence was found that six variables either had no association or a negative association with RTW. It is recommended to focus in rehabilitation on the factors for which weak evidence was found but that are trainable/treatable with the goal of improving the process of vocational rehabilitation.

Physical capacity and walking ability after lower limb amputation: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the influence of physical capacity on regaining walking ability and the development of walking ability after lower limb amputation. DESIGN: A systematic search of literature was performed. The quality of all relevant studies was evaluated according to a checklist for statistical review of general papers. SUBJECTS: Lower limb amputees. MAIN MEASURES: Physical capacity (expressed by aerobic capacity, anaerobic capacity, muscle force, flexibility and balance) and walking ability (expressed by the walking velocity and symmetry). RESULTS: A total of 48 studies that complied with the inclusion criteria were selected. From these studies there is strong evidence for deterioration of two aspects of physical capacity (muscle strength and balance) and of two aspects of walking ability (walking velocity and symmetry) after lower limb amputation. Strong evidence was found for a relation between balance and walking ability. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence was only found for a relation between balance and walking ability. Evidence about a relation between other elements of physical capacity and walking ability was insufficient. Training of physical capacity as well as walking ability during rehabilitation following lower limb amputation should not be discouraged since several parameters have been shown to be reduced after amputation, although their relation to regaining walking ability and to the development of walking ability remains unclear.

Usability of gait analysis in the alignment of trans-tibial prostheses: a clinical study.

The purpose of the study was to investigate which systematic effects of prosthetic misalignment could be observed with the use of the SYBAR system. The alignment of the prosthesis of five well-trained unilateral trans-tibial amputees was changed 15 degrees in magnitude in varus, valgus, flexion, extension, endorotation, exorotation, dorsal flexion, and plantar flexion. Subjects walked over a distance of 8 m at a self-selected walking speed with the alignment of the prosthesis as it was at the start of the experiment (reference) and with each changed alignment. Two video cameras (frontal and sagittal) and a force plate of the SYBAR system (Noldus Information Technology, The Netherlands) were used to capture gait characteristics of the subjects. Temporal and spatial characteristics, the magnitude and timing of the ground reaction force (GRF), and the external joint moments were derived from these data. Despite the substantial perturbations to prosthetic alignment, only a few effects were observed in the temporal and spatial characteristics of gait, the magnitude and timing of the GRF, and the external joint moments. Only the pattern of the ground reaction force in the mediolateral direction and the joint moment around the ankle in the frontal plane during terminal stance showed a systematic effect when the alignment was set into varus and valgus or exorotation. It was concluded that using the SYBAR system in this study revealed little effect of perturbations in prosthetic alignment, for this group of patients, and for the selected parameters. It was questioned whether this is due to the relatively low resolution of the SYBAR system or the capacity of the well-trained subjects to compensate for the disturbance in alignment. It was suggested that the usability of the SYBAR system in clinical settings should be further explored.