A shifting paradigm? A scoping review of the factors influencing recovery and rehabilitation in recent forensic research.

Forensic research and practice have historically focused on risk assessment and prevention. This risk-oriented paradigm is shifting towards a more recovery-oriented perspective. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of research on the factors influencing rehabilitation and recovery and discuss the recovery paradigm in a forensic setting. We performed a systematic search of the literature from the past 10 years, in Pubmed, Cinahl and PsycInfo, on recovery and rehabilitation. All types of study designs were included. Data was analysed and charted using an Excel template with various data items of interest. Clinical, personal, social, functional and forensic factors were found to be of influence on recovery and rehabilitation. A number of these overlapped with factors of influence on recidivism and desistance, others did not. Most studies on recovery and rehabilitation focused on a clinical forensic setting. This study provides an overview of the current body of knowledge on the factors influencing recovery and rehabilitation in forensic clients, and encourages researchers and practitioners in their focus on the recovery paradigm in forensic care. The body of evidence on rehabilitation and recovery is not yet as profound as that on recidivism and desistance. More knowledge on recovery trajectories for offenders in prison or ambulatory care, for example, is required.

[Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) as part of a community (health) network]. / FACT als onderdeel van wijkgerichte zorg in het (zorg)netwerk.

BACKGROUND: Community-based care for people with severe mental illness increasingly requires far-reaching cooperation between different domains. This cooperation must always be unique and local, and at the same time provide an answer to generic and nationally set goals.
AIM: Offering new insights on collaboration within and between domains.
METHOD: Reflection on developments in the social domain and specialist mental healthcare using relevant literature and recent (inter)national experiences.
RESULTS: It seems possible to provide better integral care by allowing FACT-teams to network together with Social Support partners (e.g. by sharing financial and/or human resources). In this process, networks of care for people with serious mental illness (SMI), develop over various phases and realize new partnerships. The model fidelity scale for FACT-teams was adjusted to facilitate that process. CONCLUSIONS The new FACT model fidelity scale is ready to allow FACT-teams to explore flexible local solutions for partnerships to realize the much-needed multi-domain integrated community care for people with SMI.

[Development of the renewed Flexible ACT scale: F-ACT fidelity 2017]. / De ontwikkeling van de vernieuwde Flexible ACT-schaal: F-ACT-s 2017.

BACKGROUND: An important model for the organisation of care for people with severe mental illness is flexible assertive community treatment (F-ACT). F-ACT combines case management with assertive crisis intervention. Quality control was implemented in 2008 using a model fidelity scale. Research has shown that the norms used for the F-ACT fidelity scale no longer correspond with current norms concerning restorative and evidence-based care, as established in treatment guidelines.
AIM: To develop a new model fidelity scale for F-ACT teams.
METHOD: Using knowledge of experts, relevant articles and feedback from professionals, researchers, interest groups and family members, a new model fidelity scale was developed: the F-ACTs 2017. The revised scale was tested by trained auditors in 21 F-ACT teams and adjusted in two pilot rounds.
RESULTS: In 2017 the final version was presented to the stakeholders and was approved by the board of auditors; the final version is currently in use. CONCLUSIONS With the availability of F-ACTs 2017, the (research) field has state-of-the-art instrument to monitor the quality of care of persons with severe mental illness. It uses field standards to evaluate the degree of model fidelity of teams that focus on patients with severe mental illness in a rapidly changing context.

[Model fidelity of flexible assertive community treatment (F-ACT) teams: five years of audit results]. / Modelgetrouwheid van flexible assertive community treatment(F-ACT)-teams: resultaten van vijf jaar auditeren.

BACKGROUND: The Flexible act (f-act) has been introduced in the Netherlands since 2004, alongside the Assertive Community Treatment (act) model. An estimate of 400 (f-)act teams concurrently provide care to approximately 70.000 people with serious mental illness. The ccaf has been assessing the model fidelity of act and f-act teams since 2009 to promote the quality and transparency of healthcare for clients with serious mental illness. OBJECTIVE To describe the state of implementation of f-act and associated trends in the Netherlands.
METHOD: Analysis of the ccaf database, which holds the data of audits conducted between 2009 and 2014.
RESULTS: The audits conducted by ccaf between 2009 and 2014 indicated an adequate implementation of f-act. The team foundations were well organized, featuring a multidisciplinary team structure, management of medication, practical support and investment in healthcare continuity, including during an admission. However, the results regarding participation and recovery were unsatisfactory. Furthermore, the results depicted a decline in the scores concerning a number of areas, including outreach and support of participation and recovery. CONCLUSIONS Although the data indicates an on average satisfactory implementation of f-act in the Netherlands, there are signs that the implementation of f-act is under pressure with relatively fewer home visits, a rising caseload and a reduced investment in recovery and participation. The findings are in accordance with the signs and arguments to adjust the emphasis on reducing hospital admissions, prioritizing the consolidation of outpatient care instead.

[Development of a fidelity scale for function assertive community treatment (FACT)]. / Ontwikkeling van een modelgetrouwheidsschaal voor functie-assertive community treatment (FACT).

BACKGROUND: Assertive community treatment (ACT) is one of the most important models for the care and treatment, in the community, of people with severe mental illness (SMI). ACT is concerned primarily with smi-patients who have the most complex problems and it provides care by means of intensive assertive outreach. Function act (FACT) provides care for the entire group of SMI - patients and combines the principles of case management and ACT. For a long time it has been possible to measure the degree of ACT model reliability using the facts reliability scale. Throughout this time, however, a reliability scale for FACT was not available. AIM: To develop a reliability scale for fact teams. METHOD: Using the knowledge of experts and feedback from fact teams it has been possible to develop a reliability scale for fact teams. The scale was tested and subsequently adapted as a result of 10 pilot trials performed by 10 fact teams. RESULTS: The definitive version of the scale was confirmed in 2008 and is currently used in the field. CONCLUSION: With the ACT and FACT reliability scales the research field now have two instruments with which teams working with SMI - patients can measure model reliability. The DACTS and FACTS provide opportunities for quality improvement and transparency.