Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in High-risk Children: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines, children with high-risk conditions remain vulnerable to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). This study sought to describe IPD prevalence, vaccination and outcomes among high-risk children. METHODS: We used International Classification of Disease10 discharge and microbiology codes to identify patients hospitalized for IPD at a large pediatric hospital from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. Patients were considered high-risk if they had: primary immunodeficiency, asplenia, transplant, active malignancy, sickle cell disease, cochlear implant, nephrotic syndrome, chronic lung disease, cerebrospinal fluid leak, HIV or used immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: In total 94 high-risk patients were hospitalized for IPD. The most common high-risk conditions included malignancy (n = 33, 35%), solid-organ or bone marrow transplant (n = 17, 18%) and sickle cell disease (n = 14, 15%). Bacteremia was the most common presentation (n = 81, 86%) followed by pneumonia (n = 23, 25%) and meningitis (n = 9, 10%). No deaths occurred. Of 66 patients with known pneumococcal vaccination status, 15 (23%) were unvaccinated, and 51 (77%) received at least one dose of a pneumococcal vaccine; 20 received all four recommended pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) doses. Only three children received PPSV23. Of 20 children with no or partial (<3 doses) immunization, 70% (14) of IPD episodes were due to vaccine-preventable serotypes. Of 66 known IPD serotypes, 17% (n = 11) were covered by PCV13, 39% (n = 26) were covered by PPSV23 and 39% (n = 26) were nonvaccine serotype. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of effective pneumococcal vaccines, IPD persists among children with high-risk conditions. Improving PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccination could significantly reduce IPD; most episodes were due to vaccine-preventable serotypes in incompletely immunized patients.

Long-Term Mental Health Outcomes in Mothers and Siblings of Children With Cancer: A Population-Based, Matched Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Although a diagnosis of childhood cancer can have a profound effect on the entire family unit, its impact on the long-term mental health of family members is not well characterized. METHODS: A provincial childhood cancer registry in Ontario, Canada, was linked to birth records to identify separate population-based cohorts of mothers and siblings of children diagnosed with cancer between 1998 and 2014. The mother and sibling cohorts were matched to corresponding population controls and linked to health services data. The rate of mental health-related outpatient visits (family physician, psychiatrist) and the incidence of severe psychiatric events (psychiatric emergency department visit, psychiatric hospitalization, suicide) were compared between mothers and siblings and their controls. Possible predictors of mental health outcomes were examined, including demographics, characteristics of the cancer-affected child, and cancer treatment. RESULTS: We identified 4,773 mothers and 7,897 siblings of children diagnosed with cancer during the study period. Compared with controls, both groups experienced elevated rates of outpatient visits (mothers: rate ratio [RR], 1.4; P < .0001; siblings: RR, 1.1; P < .0001). The risk of severe psychiatric events was not increased in either cohort. Mother and sibling demographic factors associated with increased risk of adverse mental health included younger maternal age at cancer diagnosis, low socioeconomic status, and rural residence among mothers and older sibling age among siblings. Treatment-related variables pertaining to the cancer-affected child were not associated with mental health outcomes. Mental health outcomes clustered within families. CONCLUSION: Both mothers and siblings experience elevated and prolonged need for mental health-related health care as compared with the general population. Demographic risk factors predict subpopulations at highest risk. Increased psychosocial support for family members during and after cancer therapy is warranted.

Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder in parents of children with cancer: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: For parents, a diagnosis of cancer in their child is a traumatic experience. However, there is conflicting evidence about the risk of developing mental illness among parents following diagnosis. Our objective was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of mental illness in parents of children with cancer. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify articles describing the prevalence of anxiety, depression, or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in parents of pediatric cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Subgroup analyses by gender and phase of cancer experience were selected a priori. Studies were reviewed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Of 11 394 articles identified, 58 met inclusion criteria. Reported prevalence was highly heterogeneous, ranging from 5% to 65% for anxiety (pooled prevalence 21% [95% CI, 13%-35%]), 7% to 91% for depression (pooled prevalence 28% [95% CI, 23%-35%]), and 4% to 75% for PTSD (pooled prevalence 26% [95% CI, 22%-32%]). Prevalence was consistently higher than noncancer parental controls. Heterogeneity was not explained by parental gender or child's cancer phase and was instead likely due to significant methodological differences in measurement tools and defined thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of children with cancer have a higher prevalence of anxiety, depression, and PTSD compared with population controls. Yet, the reported prevalence of mental illness was highly variable, hampering any conclusive findings on absolute prevalence. To better understand the risk of long-term mental illness in this population and target interventions, future studies must adhere to standardized reporting and methods.