[A fresh look at psychiatric disorders]. / Een veranderende kijk op psychiatrische stoornissen.

BACKGROUND: The a-theoretical approach to psychiatric disorders, introduced via dsm iii, has had a tremendous impact. It has stimulated a large body of research, facilitated by the concurrent development of new techniques in genetics, neuro-imaging and neuropsychology. However, the research results of the last twenty years or so have cast doubt on the validity of the clinical categories set out in dsm iii. AIM: To develop a new view on developmental pathways in psychopathology, clinical assessment and scientifically acceptable classification. METHOD: In this article we review the state of the art with regard to underlying endophenotypes at the level of brain and neurotransmitter functioning and neuropsychology and we consider the effect of social determinants on the developments of psychopathology. RESULTS: Our results show that neither genotypes and endophenotypes, nor brain mechanism, nor neuropsychological deviances have a one-to-one correlation with clinical categories as defined in even the dsm 5. CONCLUSION: dsm-5 provides a range of possibilities for classifying psychiatric disorders at symptom level. But these categories seem to be less distinct than was at first assumed. Recent research has shown that there is a great deal of overlap at the genetic, epigenetic and endophenotype level. This calls for more emphasis on individual assessment and diagnostics in both clinical practice and scientific research. More attention needs to be given to the dimensions of emotion and behavior, vulnerability and resilience. This type of approach, involving genotypes, endophenotypes, epigenetics and brain functioning, could help to elucidate the interaction between these various levels and/or explain the underlying mechanisms of psychiatric disorders.

[The challenge of staging developmental disorders]. / Stagering: een ontwikkelingspuzzel.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of our current knowledge, developmental disorders can be divided into the following stages: stage 0: normal variation, stage 1: simple disorder of moderate severity, stage 2: complicating co-morbidity and/or harmful background circumstances, and stage 3: serious disorder with harmful background circumstances. AIM: To describe the current views on prognostic aspects of staging from a developmental perspective. METHOD: The study is based on a critical review of the relevant literature. RESULTS: The current division into stages is still insufficiently predictive, partly because development is a flexible process with risks, chances and second chances. All psychiatric disorders are in essence developmental disorders that arise in the course of development as a result of the interaction between predisposition and background circumstances. As from the very first meiosis the hereditary predisposition is subject to influences in the womb environment. The forming of networks in the brain, the distribution of neurotransmitters and the neurological profile are influenced by the genetic potential for chances and risks and are all a result of interactions. This complicated developmental history raises questions about the specificity of current clinical syndromes. CONCLUSION: In time there is likely to be a much more accurate staging system. This will come about if, as a result of the analysis of large pooled databases, it becomes possible to make a better assessment of the relative risks of genetic configurations, brain connections, stress regulation in the brain, neuropsychological profiles and behavioural and emotional forms of expression in the light of the interactions that occur with the aforementioned background circumstances.