Repeat Rupture of a Giant Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm after EVAR.

INTRODUCTION: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are known to be associated with high fatal outcomes. Giant AAAs are often defined as having a maximum diameter over 13 cm. Large AAAs over 8 cm have demonstrated a yearly rupture rate of 30-50%, which explains the rarity of giant AAAs. Endovascular repair of ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) is increasingly advocated because of the shorter hospital stay and fewer post-operative complications. Nonetheless, outcomes regarding mortality and cost-effectiveness show a large variability and long-term outcomes are lacking. Few data have been published on treatment of giant AAAs and rAAAs; however, open surgery is generally the preferred option. REPORT: An 83 year old presented to the Emergency Department with a history of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an aorto-uni-iliac endograft and a femorofemoral crossover bypass. During follow up, this was complicated by a symptomatic type III endoleak, which was treated by endovascular repair. During the current admission, he presented with a re-rupture of his former aneurysm, which now was 18 cm diameter because of a type IA endoleak. Open surgical repair was performed and the post-operative course was without complications. DISCUSSION: The current case underlines the value of vascular surgeons being able to perform both open and endovascular surgery in rAAA.

Vascular access outcome in the elderly dialysis patient in combination with the quality of life.

PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective study on hemodialysis fistulae in patients aged 75 years and older. METHODS: Dialysis records of 2 hospitals were searched for patients of 75 years and older who had primary autologous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae (RCAVFs) and brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae (BCAVFs). Outcome measures were primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates. Also, quality of life (QOL) was measured. RESULTS: A total of 107 fistulae were placed in 90 patients; 65 (61%) RCAVFs and 42 (39%) BCAVFs were created. The primary patency rate (P = .026) and the primary-assisted patency rate (P = .016) of BCAVFs were significantly higher than that of RCAVFs. Secondary patency rates at 1 year (P = .01) and 2 years (P = .035) were higher in BCAVFs than in RCAVFs. CONCLUSIONS: The BCAVFs give significantly higher primary and primary-assisted patency rates and also significantly higher secondary patency rates at 1 and 2 years. Therefore, we suggest the placement of elbow fistulae in the elderly patients. The QOL was surprisingly high in this population despite a high mortality rate.

Anastomoses in the common femoral artery, vascular clips or sutures? A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: The Vessel Closure System (VCS) is commercially available since 1997. This clip system has proven to be successful for vascular anastomoses in access surgery. There is little experience with the VCS in peripheral vascular surgery. METHODS: A trial was conducted for patients with peripheral arterial disease, who required either a femoral artery endarterectomy or a peripheral bypass procedure. Patients were randomized into two groups: a VCS group, in which the proximal anastomoses were made using VCS clips; and a control group, in which both proximal and distal anastomoses were performed using Prolene sutures. Outcomes assessed were the speed of anastomosis and patency. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: In the VCS group, 12 patients underwent anastomoses using VCS clips. In the control group, 12 patients underwent vascular reconstruction using sutures. In the VCS group, the mean speed of anastomosis was 1.9 mm/min, whereas the mean speed in the control group was 2.5 mm/min; this was not significantly different (P = 0.096). After a follow-up of 12 months, there was no difference in patency. In the VSC group, two serious adverse events occurred, which required emergency surgery. CONCLUSION: Anastomosis in the femoral artery using VCS clips is not faster than that using running Prolene sutures, and in our small sample, two serious adverse events in the VCS group were observed. These results do not support the further use of vascular clips in peripheral vascular surgery.

Treatment for critical lower limb ischemia in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) has a poor outcome when left untreated. The benefits of revascularization in the very elderly might be limited because of co-morbidities and short life expectancy. Therefore, optimal management of CLI in the elderly is not straightforward. We analyzed treatment results for elderly patients with CLI (Rutherford 4 or 5/6) in our clinic. METHODS: Hospital charts of all patients>70 years of age diagnosed with Rutherford stage 4-6 peripheral arterial disease between January 2006 and December 2009 were reviewed. We divided patients into two age groups (70-79 and ≥80 years) to compare treatment results. Primary interventions were defined as conservative, endovascular, reconstructive surgery, and amputation. Outcome measures were mortality, reintervention, and major amputation rates. RESULTS: There were 191 patients [99 (52%) were women], median age 78.4 years, range 70-98 years. Altogether, 119 (62%) patients were aged 70-79 years, and 72 (38%) were ≥80 years. The primary intervention was equally divided over the two age groups (p=0.21). Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) classifications of aortoiliac lesions were not significantly different regarding intervention (p=0.62) or age (p=0.39). TASC II classification of femoropopliteal lesions was significantly different relative to intervention (p<0.01) but not different between age groups (p=0.68). Mortality rate after reconstructive surgery was significant higher in the oldest age group (p<0.01). After conservative treatment, endovascular treatment, or amputation, the mortality rates were not significantly different between the two age groups (respectively, p=0.06, p=0.33, p=0.76). Reintervention rate was 51% in the 70- to 79-year group compared to 32% in the ≥80-year group. After initial treatment, major amputations were performed in 10% in the 70- to 79-year group compared to 13% in the ≥80-year group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged≥80 years, surgical revascularization resulted in a significant higher mortality rate in our clinic, whereas primary conservative, endovascular treatment and amputation resulted in similar mortality in both age groups. When considering surgical revascularization in the very elderly, surgeons should focus on careful patient selection.

POSSUM predicts hospital mortality and long-term survival in patients with hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: Each year, some 18,000 Dutch residents, most of them elderly, suffer a hip fracture. These patients constitute a major, and increasing, healthcare problem with high mortality. In an ageing population, not only the incidence of hip fractures will increase but also comorbidity. Comorbidity is a major cause of high mortality. The physiologic and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) system predicts mortality and morbidity in surgical patients using physiologic and operative factors. METHODS: For 272 consecutive patients who were treated in our hospital for hip fractures, all complications were registered, and orthopedic POSSUM was performed. Total survival was registered with a mean follow-up of 58 months. Discriminating performance of POSSUM was estimated using receiver-operating curves. After validation, patients were divided into three equal large groups, termed low-risk group, intermediate-risk group, and high-risk group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were made of each group. RESULTS: Orthopedic POSSUM performed well in predicting mortality with an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.89) and morbidity with an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.90). Three groups that composed of 92 (low risk), 93 (intermediate risk), and 87 (high risk) patients differed significantly in inhospital mortality, all complications, severe complications, and total survival. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that the orthopedic POSSUM is an excellent predictor of inhospital mortality and long-term survival in patients suffering from hip fractures. It is a reasonable predictor of severe postoperative complications. The orthopedic POSSUM is a useful risk stratification and audit tool.