Prevalence and characteristics of patients in a vegetative state in Dutch nursing homes.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the prevalence of vegetative state in Dutch nursing homes, describe the patient characteristics, and highlight the possible influence of medical decisions at the end of life. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. The vegetative state was defined according to the Multi Society Task Force on PVS. All Dutch nursing homes were approached to provide data on patients in a vegetative state. In cases of doubt, the researcher discussed the diagnosis with the patient's physician and, if necessary, examined the patient. Information on patients in a vegetative state in care between 2000 and September 2003 and end of life decisions for them were also recorded. RESULTS: All nursing homes and physicians participated. After assessment of 12 doubtful patients, 32 met the criteria of vegetative state lasting longer than one month, a prevalence of 2/1,000,000. Of these, 30 patients' data were analysed: age 9-90 years; 73% female; duration of vegetative state 2 months-20 years (26 surviving >1 year, 13 >5 years). Stroke was the commonest cause. Between 2000 and September 2003, there were 76 patients in a vegetative state in care of whom 34 died of complications and nine after withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of vegetative state in Dutch nursing homes has been established for the first time. The figures are lower than suggested in the literature. The study included a heterogeneous group of patients, of which a substantial number survived for many years. The results cannot be explained by a policy of systematically withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration.

[Allowing a patient in a vegetative state to die in hospital under the direction of a nursing-home physician]. / Het laten sterven van een patiënt in een vegetatieve toestand in het ziekenhuis met de verpleeghuisarts als hoofdbehandelaar.

In the case of a 52-year-old man, who was in a vegetative state after resuscitation following an unwitnessed cardiac arrest, the nursing-home physician assumed responsibility for the total treatment in a transfer unit of the hospital. His systematic, multidisciplinary approach enabled direction of the complex situation in which many medical and paramedical personnel were involved. When an airway infection occurred as a complication shortly after responsibility for the patient had been assumed, the nursing-home physician could take a well-considered decision to withdraw medical treatment on the basis of the treatment plan which had been formulated in a short time and contact with the family. In clinical practice it is difficult to determine the most appropriate moment to withdraw all medical therapy, including artificial nutrition and hydration, in order to prevent a hopeless vegetative state. This case illustrates how hospital physicians and nursing-home physicians may cooperate during the 'waiting phase' of the clinical course of a vegetative state. A hopeless vegetative state can be prevented by using these transmural possibilities for cooperation, including an early input of knowledge and experience about the long-term course of a vegetative state.

[Diagnosis of vegetative state as a basis for medical treatment on the borderline between life and death]. / Diagnostiek van vegetatieve toestand als basis voor medisch handelen op de grens van leven en dood.

The term 'vegetative state' is most appropriate for the state which develops when patients open their eyes after a comatose phase, without regaining consciousness. The definition and the diagnostic criteria from the Multi Society Task Force on Persistent Vegetative State are usable for the clinical practice in the Netherlands. The vegetative state must be differentiated from coma, locked-in syndrome and minimally conscious state. A systematic, multidisciplinary approach under the direction of a physician is key to diagnosing vegetative state. To this end, a clinical assessment is recommended with reassessment and verification of the diagnosis at appropriate moments. Careful observation remains the fundamental to the diagnosis.