Effect of an antibiotic checklist on length of hospital stay and appropriate antibiotic use in adult patients treated with intravenous antibiotics: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Quality indicators (QIs) have been developed to define appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. We evaluated whether a checklist based on these QIs affects appropriate antibiotic use and length of hospital stay. METHODS: An antibiotic checklist for patients treated with intravenous antibiotics was introduced in nine Dutch hospitals in a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Prophylaxis was excluded. We included a random sample before (baseline), and all eligible patients after (intervention) checklist introduction. Baseline and intervention outcomes were compared. Primary endpoint was length of stay (LOS), analysed by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints, including QI performances, QI sum score (performance on all QIs per patient), and quality of checklist use, were analysed per protocol. RESULTS: Between 1 November 2014 and 1 October 2015 we included 853 baseline and 5354 intervention patients, of whom 993 (19%) had a completed checklist. The LOS did not change (baseline geometric mean 10.0 days (95% CI 8.6-11.5) versus intervention 10.1 days (95% CI 8.9-11.5), p 0.8). QI performances increased between +3.0% and +23.9% per QI, and the percentage of patients with a QI sum score above 50% increased significantly (OR 2.4 (95% CI 2.0-3.0), p<0.001). Higher QI sum scores were significantly associated with shorter LOS. Discordance existed between checklist-answers and actual performance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an antibiotic checklist resulted in a significant increase in appropriateness of antibiotic use, but not in a reduction of LOS. Low overall checklist completion rates and discordance between checklist-answers and actual provided care might have attenuated the impact of the checklist.

[Long-term complications of bariatric surgery]. / Langetermijncomplicaties van bariatrische chirurgie: het mes snijdt aan twee kanten.

The prevalence of morbid obesity is increasing, with a corresponding increase in the demand for bariatric surgery, a proven effective treatment option. Bariatric surgery has potentially severe complications, including micro- and macronutrient deficiencies. Additionally, stenosis and ulceration of the anastomosis, reflux oesophagitis, cholelithiasis, steatohepatitis and altered pharmacokinetics and -dynamics may occur. Doctors in both the hospital setting and general practice will be increasingly confronted with the occasionally adverse long-term effects of bariatric surgery. Early detection, efficient follow-up and a multidisciplinary team approach are crucial in preventing and adequately treating the complications of bariatric surgery.

Risk estimations and treatment decisions in early stage breast cancer: agreement among oncologists and the impact of the 70-gene signature.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision-making in patients with early stage breast cancer requires adequate risk estimation by medical oncologists. This survey evaluates the agreement among oncologists on risk estimations and adjuvant systemic treatment (AST) decisions and the impact of adding the 70-gene signature to known clinico-pathological factors. METHODS: Twelve medical oncologists assessed 37 breast cancer cases (cT1-3N0M0) and estimated their risk of recurrence (high or low) and gave a recommendation for AST. Cases were presented in two written questionnaires sent 4 weeks apart. Only the second questionnaire included the 70-gene signature result. RESULTS: The level of agreement among oncologists in risk estimation (κ=0.57) and AST recommendation (κ=0.57) was 'moderate' in the first questionnaire. Adding the 70-gene signature result significantly increased the agreement in risk estimation to 'substantial' (κ=0.61), while agreement in AST recommendations remained 'moderate' (κ=0.56). Overall, the proportion of high risk was reduced with 7.4% (range: 6.9-22.9%; p<0.001) and the proportion of chemotherapy that was recommended was reduced with 12.2% (range: 5.4-29.5%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Oncologists' risk estimations and AST recommendations vary greatly. Even though the number of participating oncologists is low, our results underline the need for a better standardisation tool in clinical decision-making, in which integration of the 70-gene signature may be helpful in certain subgroups to provide patients with individualised, but standardised treatment.