Prediction of Hearing Loss Due to Cisplatin Chemoradiotherapy.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with head and neck cancer may experience chemoradiotherapy-induced hearing loss, but the weighing of involved variables has been subjective. Identification of patient and treatment characteristics to predict the absolute posttreatment hearing level is important for effective counseling of patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To predict treatment-induced hearing loss among patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at The Netherlands Cancer Institute. One hundred and fifty-six patients with head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy as the primary treatment modality from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2011, were enrolled. Follow-up was complete on March 1, 2012, and data were analyzed from April 1, 2011, through November 5, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: High-dose intravenously administered cisplatin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, was administered in 3 courses on days 1, 22, and 43 during 7 weeks of radiotherapy (total radiation dose, 70 Gy in 35 fractions). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Posttreatment bone conduction hearing threshold at pure-tone average frequencies of 1, 2, and 4 kHz, based on pure-tone audiometry after completion of treatment. Predictors included baseline hearing levels, radiation dose to the cochlea, and cisplatin dose. A multilevel mixed-effects linear regression model for predicting whether or not posttreatment hearing was at least 35 dB was established, and cross-validated sensitivity and specificity were obtained. RESULTS: Of 156 patients who received high-dose concomitant chemoradiotherapy, 15 were missing the exact radiation dose to the cochlea and 41 had no data on posttreatment pure-tone audiometry. Nineteen patients had a hearing level of at least 35 dB for at least 1 ear before the treatment. The remaining 81 patients (162 ears) had a total cumulative cisplatin dose ranging from 315 to 600 (median, 546) mg. The radiation dose to the cochlea ranged from 1.1 to 70.9 (median, 13.6) Gy. Based on data from the 81 patients (162 ears), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68, with a sensitivity of 29% (95% CI, 13%-51%) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI, 88%-100%), resulting in a positive predictive value of 78%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient and treatment characteristics can be used to predict hearing level after concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. This step may constitute the first in evidence-based individual counseling for treatment-induced hearing loss.

Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with head and neck cancer after chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Both radiotherapy (RT) and cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with head and neck cancer may cause sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The purpose of this review was to provide more insight into SNHL because of CRT compared to RT. METHODS: Comprehensive search of Medline and Embase with the terms "radiotherapy" combined with "ototoxicity," "head and neck squamous cell carcinoma," and synonyms. RESULTS: Of the 2507 studies found, 21 were included in this study. Pooled analysis could not be committed because of heterogeneity. Incidence rates of SNHL after RT and CRT varied considerably, with percentages ranging from 0% to 43% and 17% to 88%, respectively. Factors that influenced the risk of SNHL were radiation dose to the cochlea, follow-up time, age, baseline hearing level, and cisplatin dose. CONCLUSION: The wide range of SNHL incidence rates makes it impossible to draw any conclusions on the severity of RT- and CRT-induced ototoxicity. To allow for future comparison of study outcomes, development of uniform criteria is of utmost importance.

Cochlea sparing effects of intensity modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers patients: a long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Radiation to the inner ear may lead to (irreversible) sensorineural hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of radiotherapy on hearing in patients treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), sparing the inner ear from high radiation dose as much as possible. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 101 patients with head and neck cancer were treated with IMRT. Audiometry was performed before, short-term, and long-term after treatment. Data were compared to normal hearing levels according to the International Organisation for Standardization (ISO). Statistical analysis was done using repeated measurements. None of the patients received chemotherapy. RESULTS: In 36 patients an audiogram at long-term follow-up (median 7.6 years) was available. The mean dose to the cochlea was 17.8 Gy (1.0-66.6 Gy). A hearing deterioration of 1.8 dB at Pure Tone Average (PTA) 0.5-1-2 kHz (p = 0.11), 2.3 dB at PTA 1-2-4 kHz (p = 0.02), and 4.4 dB at PTA 8-10-12.5 kHz (p = 0.01) was found. According to the ISO, the expected age-related hearing loss was 2.7, 4.8, and 8.8 dB at PTA 0.5-1-2 kHz, 1-2-4 kHz, and 8-10-12.5 kHz, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After IMRT with radiation dose constraint to the cochlea, potential long-term adverse effects of IMRT remained subclinical. The progressive hearing loss over time was mild and could be attributed to the natural effects of ageing. Therefore, we recommend that a dose constraint to the cochlea should be incorporated in the head and neck radiotherapy protocols.

Long-term hearing loss after chemoradiation in patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine whether concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT)-induced hearing loss is progressive over time or not. STUDY DESIGN: Long-term (LT) follow-up study. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, 158 patients with head and neck cancer were treated with intravenous (IV) CCRT (n = 80) or intraarterial CCRT (n = 78). Audiometry was performed before, short-term (ST), and LT posttreatment. Differences in hearing were assessed with a multivariable linear regression analysis, incorporating the effect of aging. RESULTS: Long-term audiometry (median 4.5 years) was available in 67 patients (42%). At ST follow-up, a deterioration of 21.6 decibel was seen compared to baseline at pure-tone averages (PTA) 8-10-12.5 kHz. At LT follow-up, this deterioration further increased with 5 decibel (P = 0.005). Only in CCRT-IV patients was a significant progressive treatment-induced hearing loss seen, at PTA 8-10-12.5 kHz (P = 0.005), PTA 1-2-4 kHz air conduction (P = 0.014), and PTA 0.5-1-2 kHz bone conduction (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: CCRT-induced hearing impairment was progressive over time, especially in higher frequencies and only in CCRT-IV patients, with a modest deterioration of 5 decibel 4.5 years post-treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

A new grading system for ototoxicity in adults.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to propose an ototoxicity grading system sensitive to the effect of ototoxicity on specific daily life situations like speech intelligibility and the perception of ultra-high sounds and to test its feasibility compared to current criteria. METHODS: Pure tone averages (PTAs) for speech perception (1-2-4 kHz) and ultra-high frequencies (8-10-12.5 kHz) were incorporated. Threshold shift and hearing level posttreatment were taken into account. Criteria were tested on head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy ([C]RT) and compared with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria (ASHA). RESULTS: Grades 1 and 2 were based on threshold shifts from baseline (in dB) and subjective complaints. Grades 3 and 4 were defined as treatment-induced hearing loss of ≥ 35 dB at PTA 1-2-4 kHz and ≥ 70 dB at PTA 1-2-4 kHz, respectively. In high-dose cisplatin CRT incidences by the new criteria, CTCAEv4 and ASHA were comparable (78%-88%). In RT and low-dose cisplatin CRT, incidences were 36% to 39% in the new criteria versus 22% to 53% in CTCAEv4 and ASHA. CONCLUSION: The new criteria show an increased sensitivity to ototoxicity compared to CTCAEv4 and ASHA and provide insight into the effect of hearing loss on certain daily life situations. The new grading system seems feasible for clinic and research purposes.

Canalplasty: the technique and the analysis of its results.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique for canalplasty as performed in the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands and to present the results of this technique. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent a canalplasty prodedure between 2001 and 2010 were reviewed for indication for surgery, side of surgery, age at the time of surgery, gender, smoking habits, surgical outcome, results of pure tone audiometry pre-and post-operatively and the occurrence of complications. RESULTS: 193 canalplasty procedures with or without more extensive otosurgery in 174 patients were performed for various indications in the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands between 2001 and 2010. Complete re-epithelialization took approximately 6.7 weeks and was influenced by smoking and the surface needed to re-epithelialize. Complications occurred in 28.0% of cases, of which most (98%) could be regarded as transient. No significant changes in pure tone bone conduction levels at 1, 2 and 4 kHz were observed. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study shows that technique for canalplasty as used in the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands can be used for a wide variety of indications, highlighting its added value in otosurgery.