Lessons learned in a decade: Medical-toxicological view of tattooing.

Tattooing has been part of the human culture for thousands of years, yet only in the past decades has it entered the mainstream of the society. With the rise in popularity, tattoos also gained attention among researchers, with the aim to better understand the health risks posed by their application. 'A medical-toxicological view of tattooing'-a work published in The Lancet almost a decade ago, resulted from the international collaboration of various experts in the field. Since then, much understanding has been achieved regarding adverse effects, treatment of complications, as well as their regulation for improving public health. Yet major knowledge gaps remain. This review article results from the Second International Conference on Tattoo Safety hosted by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) and provides a glimpse from the medical-toxicological perspective, regulatory strategies and advances in the analysis of tattoo inks.

[A permanent discoloration of the skin surrounding a tattoo]. / Een persisterende verkleuring rond een tatoeage.

A 64-year-old man visited the dermatology department because of an asymptomatic discoloration of the skin surrounding a tattoo. Based on the clinical presentation we diagnosed a 'blow-out', which is a chronic halo around a recently placed tattoo caused by diffusion of tattoo inks in the lower dermis or subcutis.

Assessment of cytotoxicity and sensitization potential of intradermally injected tattoo inks in reconstructed human skin.

BACKGROUND: The number of people within the European population having at least one tattoo has increased notably, and with it the number of tattoo-associated clinical complications. Despite this, safety information and testing regarding tattoo inks remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess cytotoxicity and sensitization potential of 16 tattoo inks after intradermal injection into reconstructed human skin (RHS). METHODS: Commercially available tattoo inks were injected intradermally into RHS (reconstructed epidermis on a fibroblast-populated collagen hydrogel) using a permanent makeup device. RHS biopsies, tissue sections, and culture medium were assessed for cytotoxicity (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay [MTT assay]), detrimental histological changes (haematoxylin and eosin staining), and the presence of inflammatory and sensitization cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1α, IL-8, IL-18; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). RESULTS: Varying degrees of reduced metabolic activity and histopathological cytotoxic effects were observed in RHS after ink injection. Five inks showed significantly reduced metabolic activity and enhanced sensitization potential compared with negative controls. DISCUSSION: Using the RHS model system, four tattoo inks were identified as highly cytotoxic and classified as potential sensitizers, suggesting that allergic contact dermatitis could emerge in individuals carrying these inks. These results indicate that an RHS-based assessment of cytotoxicity and sensitization potential by intradermal tattoo ink injection is a useful analytical tool to determine ink-induced deleterious effects.

Cutaneous non-allergic complications in tattoos: An overview of the literature.

Tattooing is creating a permanent design by placing exogenous pigment particles and additives into the dermis. An adverse reaction may occur due to the act of tattooing and subsequent application of aftercare products. Numerous articles report the wide spectrum of adverse reactions related to tattooing, ranging from superficial infections and vasculitis to Koebner triggered autoimmune diseases. These reactions have different time of onset of symptoms, appearing immediately after placement of the tattoo until several years later. In this article we will give an overview of cutaneous non-allergic adverse reactions of tattoos.

[Morgellons, a 'socially transmitted' disease]. / Morgellons, een 'sociaal overdraagbare' aandoening.

BACKGROUND: Morgellons disease is a controversial condition characterised by a great variety of skin-related symptoms such as wounds, itch and pain and whereby the patient strongly believes these are caused by threads or fibres penetrating the skin. The subject is often discussed in social media, which leads to increasing numbers of patients who think they have the condition. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 56-year-old woman had been suffering for three years of compulsive behaviour involving her hair and scratching her skin. She was convinced there were threads running under her skin. She had self-diagnosed 'Morgellons disease'. Psychodermatological treatment led to reduced symptoms. CONCLUSION: The majority of medical practitioners believe that Morgellons disease is a type of delusional infestation. Even though there are some medical and non-medical practitioners who take the position that there is an infectious cause, such a cause has never been found.

Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin-18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model.

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the number of people with ≥1 tattoo has increased noticeably within the European population. Despite this, limited safety information is available for tattoo inks. OBJECTIVES: To test the skin sensitization potential of 5 tattoo inks in vitro by using reconstructed human skin (RHS) and the contact sensitization biomarker interleukin (IL)-18. METHODS: Two red and 3 black tattoo inks, 1 additive (Hamamelis virginiana extract) and 1 irritant control (lactic acid) were tested. The culture medium of RHS (reconstructed epidermis on a fibroblast-populated collagen hydrogel) was supplemented with test substances in a dose-dependent manner for 24 hours, after which cytotoxicity (histology; thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay) and skin sensitization potential (IL-18 secretion; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were assessed. RESULTS: All but 1 ink showed cytotoxicity. Notably, 1 red ink and 1 black ink were able to cause an inflammatory response, indicated by substantial release of IL-18, suggesting that these inks may be contact sensitizers. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro RHS model showed that 4 tattoo inks were cytotoxic and 2 were able to cause an inflammatory IL-18 response, indicating that an individual may develop allergic contact dermatitis when exposed to these tattoo inks, as they contain contact sensitizers.

[A boy with a chronic swelling of the upper lip]. / Een jongen met chronische zwelling van de bovenlip.

A 14-year-old boy developed a chronic painless swelling of the upper lip. Histology of a skin biopsy showed non-necrotizing tuberculoid granulomas. The diagnosis cheilitis granulomatosa was made.