Interlaboratory diagnostic validation of conformation-sensitive capillary electrophoresis for mutation scanning.

BACKGROUND: Indirect alternatives to sequencing as a method for mutation scanning are of interest to diagnostic laboratories because they have the potential for considerable savings in both time and costs. Ideally, such methods should be simple, rapid, and highly sensitive, and they should be validated formally to a very high standard. Currently, most reported methods lack one or more of these characteristics. We describe the optimization and validation of conformation-sensitive capillary electrophoresis (CSCE) for diagnostic mutation scanning. METHODS: We initially optimized the performance of CSCE with a systematic panel of plasmid-based controls. We then compared manual analysis by visual inspection with automated analysis by BioNumerics software (Applied Maths) in a blinded interlaboratory validation with 402 BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset) and BRCA2 (breast cancer 1, early onset) variants previously characterized by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: With automated analysis, we demonstrated a sensitivity of >99% (95% CI), which is indistinguishable from the sensitivity for conventional sequencing by capillary electrophoresis. The 95% CI for specificity was 90%-93%; thus, CSCE greatly reduces the number of fragments that need to be sequenced to fully characterize variants. By manual analysis, the 95% CIs for sensitivity and specificity were 98.3%-99.4% and 93.1%-95.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CSCE is amenable to a high degree of automation, and analyses can be multiplexed to increase both capacity and throughput. We conclude that once it is optimized, CSCE combined with analysis with BioNumerics software is a highly sensitive and cost-effective mutation-scanning technique suitable for routine genetic diagnostic analysis of heterozygous nucleotide substitutions, small insertions, and deletions.

Clinical and molecular evaluation of probands and family members with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy.

PURPOSE: To describe the ophthalmic characteristics and to identify the molecular cause of FEVR in a cohort of Dutch probands and their family members. METHODS: Twenty families with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) comprising 83 affected and nonaffected individuals were studied. Based on the presence of an avascular zone, the clinical diagnosis was made and biometric data of the posterior pole of 57 patients and family members were obtained by the analysis of fundus photographs and compared with the data of 40 controls. The FZD4, LRP5, and NDP genes were screened for mutations in one affected individual per family. The segregation of the gene variants was studied in the corresponding families. RESULTS: Forty of 83 individuals showed an avascular zone, the most evident clinical sign of FEVR, five showed major signs of FEVR, and 38 persons were not clinically affected. Compared with the control subjects the patients with FEVR had a significantly larger disc-to-macula distance and a significantly smaller optic disc. In 8 of 20 families, a FZD4 mutation was identified, in 2 a mutation in the LRP5 gene, and in 2 a mutation in the NDP gene. Three known and five novel mutations were identified. Nonpenetrance was observed in 26% of the mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Significant anatomic differences were identified between the eyes of patients with FEVR with an avascular zone, when compared with those of the control subjects. In patients with an avascular zone, the optic disc was smaller and the disc-to-macula distance larger than in the control subjects. In 60% of the probands, mutations were identified in one of the three known FEVR genes.

Familial CHARGE syndrome and the CHD7 gene: a recurrent missense mutation, intrafamilial recurrence and variability.

CHARGE syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition that is caused by mutations in the CHD7 gene. Few familial cases of this syndrome have been reported and these were characterized by a wide clinical variability. We here report on five CHD7 mutation positive families and comment on their clinical features. We observed somatic and germline mosaicism as well as parent-to-child transmission of non-mosaic CHD7 mutations as causes of familial CHARGE syndrome. In one family with two affected sibs a somatic mutation was identified in lymphocytes of a clinically unaffected parent (2520G > A in exon 8). This is the second report of somatic CHD7 mosaicism in an unaffected parent. In two further families with affected siblings, we could not detect the mutation in parental lymphocytes suggesting germline mosaicism. The previously reported clinical variability was strikingly present in all five families. We find that alterations in CHD7 can result in a very mild phenotype, characterized by only a few minor symptoms of the CHARGE syndrome clinical spectrum. Such a mild phenotype was present in two families that shared the same 6322G > A missense mutation. These two families showed parent-to-child transmission. Phenotypically milder forms of CHARGE syndrome have a higher risk of transmission to multiple family members.

Hearing impairment in Dutch patients with connexin 26 (GJB2) and connexin 30 (GJB6) mutations.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the identification of mutations in the connexin 26 (GJB2) gene as the most common cause of recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss, the pattern of hearing impairment with these mutations remains inconsistent. Recently a deletion encompassing the GJB6 gene was identified and hypothesized to also contribute to hearing loss. We hereby describe the hearing impairment in Dutch patients with biallelic connexin 26 (GJB2) and GJB2+connexin 30 (GJB6) mutations. METHODS: The audiograms of patients who were screened for GJB2 and GJB6 mutations were analysed retrospectively. Standard statistical testing was done for symmetry and shape, while repeated measurement analysis was used to assess the relation between mutation and severity. Progression was also studied via linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 222 hearing-impaired individuals, 35 exhibited sequence variations; of these 19 had audiograms for study. Hearing loss in patients with biallelic "radical" (i.e. deletions, nonsense and splice site) mutations was significantly worse than in the wild type and heterozygotes (SAS proc GENMOD, p=0.013). The presence of at least one missense mutation in compound heterozygotes tends to lead to better hearing thresholds compared to biallelic radical mutations (p=0.08). One patient with the [35delG]+[del(GJB6-D13S1830)] genotype was severely impaired. Non-progressive hearing impairment was demonstrated in five 35delG homozygotes in individual longitudinal analyses. However a patient with the [299A>C]+[416G>A] genotype showed significant threshold progression in the lower frequencies. Findings on asymmetry and shape were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the hypothesis that severity is a function of genotype and its effect on the amino acid sequence. A bigger cohort is required to establish non-progressivity more definitively.