Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Post-Traumatic Arthrosis Undergoing Open or Arthroscopic Talocrural Arthrodesis-A Retrospective Cohort With Prospective Follow-Up.

Fusion remains the gold standard for post-traumatic osteoarthritis after ankle fractures in many institutes. Patient-reported outcomes on long-term quality of life and functionality of talocrural arthrodesis remain relatively unknown. In literature, low patient numbers and inadequate outcome measures provide a poor foundation for patient expectation management. Additionally, the surgical approach is often omitted. This study presents a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent open or arthroscopic talocrural arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis between 2008 and 2019 with prospective follow-up by questionnaire. Participants completed the EuroQol 5-dimensional 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3LTM), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VASTM), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score Dutch Language Version (FAOS-DLV), and 4 additional questions. Thirty-five patients were included in the cohort and 32 were included for follow-up. Trauma mechanism was mainly a low fall or motor vehicle accident causing a talocrural fracture-dislocation in most cases. For open versus arthroscopic treatment respectively, patients reported a median EQ-5D-3LTM index of 0.775 and 0.775, EQ-VASTM of 80 and 88, FAOS-DLV of 57.0 and 63.9, and satisfaction of 90 and 88 out of 100 after a median of 6.0 and 6.5 years. This study is unique as it is the largest series on patient-reported outcomes in patients with post-traumatic arthrosis with validated questionnaires. In general, patients were satisfied with relatively high questionnaire scores, especially concerning pain and daily living. These functional scores are of importance when setting patient expectations regarding talocrural arthrodesis and recovery. Additionally, the subscale values may help preoperatively in weighing the intervention's advantages and disadvantages for individual patients.

Evaluating the Military Medical Evacuation Chain: Need for Expeditious Evacuation Out of Theater?

BACKGROUND: An important factor within the military medical logistical chain is the capability of expeditious evacuation from point of injury, through a Medical Treatment Facility, to the country of residence where highest level of care can be provided. Although many factors can relate to patient outcome, the evaluation of the medical evacuation chain related to long-term patient outcome can be important for investigating possibilities for performance improvement in this domain. This article aims to provide a means to evaluate the quality of care of the medical evacuation chain. METHODS: Repatriated service members from the Afghan theater between 2004 and 2014 were invited to participate in a survey concerning functional outcome and quality of life using Lower Extremity Functional Scale, Short Form health survey 36, and EuroQol-6D questionnaires. Possible associations between these outcomes were analyzed in respect to duration of medical evacuation from point of injury to arrival in the Dutch military hospital. The duration was dichotomized into within and after 72 hours. Ordinal regression was used to analyze a possible association with duration as a continuous variable. FINDINGS: Sixty percent (28/47) of battle casualties arrived in The Netherlands within 72 hours. For the nonbattle injury cohort this was 30% (7/23). Of those who became ill, 18% (5/28) was evacuated in 72 hours. No significant independent associations between interval duration and measured outcomes were found. CONCLUSION: Repatriated battle casualties had lower outcome scores compared to the disease nonbattle injured service members. Significant differences in functional outcome and quality of life with respect to evacuation duration were not found. Specialized tactical evacuation and en route care capability during strategic evacuation contributed to relative high standards of care. Combined with our results, this could implicate that delivery of the right care to the right patient at the right time is a justifiable paradigm. The main focus of the medical support organization is to offer the highest level of care per echelon as soon as possible in conjunction with facilitating maximum social support through expeditious evacuation out of theater. Further research using semistructured interviews among the direct circle around battle casualties, including caregivers, is needed to provide insight into these complex matters.

Amputation: Not a failure for severe lower extremity combat injury.

INTRODUCTION: The use of improvised explosive devices is a frequent method of insurgents to inflict harm on deployed military personnel. Consequently, lower extremity injuries make up the majority of combat related trauma. The wounding pattern of an explosion is not often encountered in a civilian population and can lead to substantial disability. It is therefore important to study the impact of these lower extremity injuries and their treatment (limb salvage versus amputation) on functional outcome and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All Dutch repatriated service members receiving treatment for wounds on the lower extremity sustained in the Afghan theater between august 2005 and August 2014, were invited to participate in this observational cohort study. We conducted a survey regarding their physical and mental health using the Short Form health survey 36, EuroQoL 6 dimensions and Lower Extremity Functional Scale questionnaires. Results were collated in a specifically designed electronic database combined with epidemiology and hospital statistics gathered from the archive of the Central Military Hospital. Statistical analyses were performed to identify differences between combat and non-combat related injuries and between limb salvage treatment and amputation. RESULTS: In comparison with non-battle injury patients, battle casualties were significantly younger of age, sustained more severe injuries, needed more frequent operations and clinical rehabilitation. Their long-term outcome scores in areas concerning well-being, social and cognitive functioning, were significantly lower. Regarding treatment, amputees experienced higher physical well-being and less pain compared to those treated with limb salvage surgery. CONCLUSION: Sustaining a combat injury to the lower extremity can lead to partial or permanent dysfunction. However, wounded service members, amputees included, are able to achieve high levels of activity and participation in society, proving a remarkable resilience. These long-term results demonstrate that amputation is not a failure for casualty and surgeon, and strengthen a life before limb (damage control surgery) mindset in the initial phase. For future research, we recommend the use of adequate coding and injury scoring systems to predict outcome and give insight in the attributes that are supportive for the resilience that is needed to cope with a serious battle injury.