In vitro measurement of flow rate variability in neonatal IV therapy with and without the use of check valves.

BACKGROUND: In multi-infusion IV therapy, the actual volume delivered to the neonate can vary over time. To reduce flow rate variability, check valves can be used. A check valve allows flow through the valve in only one direction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate flow rate variability in a low flow dual-infusion setup with and without check valves. METHODS: The effect of changing the height of and adding syringes to the IV-administration set was tested with and without check valves in an in vitro dual-infusion setup with in-line flow meters. The pre-programmed flow rates were 2.5 and 0.1 ml/h. RESULTS: Twenty-four tests of 90 minutes were performed. Time to reach 75% of the pre-programmed 0.1 ml/h flow rate was >20 minutes. The highest total delivered volume during a test was (mean ± SD) 56 ± 8% of the expected delivery for tests without check valves, and diminished to 12 ± 24% of the expected delivery for check valves with a higher opening pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The actual flows and the total delivered volume in low flow dual-infusion setups are less than expected on the pre-programmed flow-rate. These findings emphasize the need for the development of more accurate delivery systems for drugs and fluids in neonatology. Caregivers should be aware of these findings, and optimise the delivery of IV substances by making use of check valves with low opening pressures and by minimising compliance and volume of the IV-administration set. Furthermore, changes in the relative height between pumps and catheter tip should be minimized.

Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Radiographs are an essential adjunct to the clinical examination for periodontal diagnoses. Over the past few years, digital radiographs have become available for use in clinical practice. Therefore, the present study investigated whether measuring alveolar bone loss, using digital radiographs with a newly constructed dental image analyzer tool was comparable to the conventional method, using intra-oral radiographs on film, a light box and a Schei ruler. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Alveolar bone loss of the mesial and distal sites of 60 randomly selected teeth from 12 patients with periodontitis was measured using the conventional method, and then using the dental image analyzer tool, by five dentists. The conventional method scored bone loss in categories of 10% increments relative to the total root length, whereas the software dental image analyzer tool calculated bone loss in 0.1% increments relative to the total root length after crucial landmarks were identified. RESULTS: Both methods showed a high interobserver reliability for bone loss measurements in nonmolar and molar sites (intraclass correlation coefficient > or = 0.88). Also, a high reliability between both methods was demonstrated (intraclass correlation coefficient nonmolar sites, 0.98; intraclass correlation coefficient molar sites, 0.95). In addition, the new dental image analyzer tool showed a high sensitivity (1.00) and a high specificity (0.91) in selecting teeth with > or = 50% or < 50% alveolar bone loss in comparison with the conventional method. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that, if digital radiographs are available, the dental image analyzer tool can reliably replace the conventional method for measuring alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.