Motives of Dutch men who have sex with men for daily and intermittent HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis usage and preferences for implementation: A qualitative study.

Although PrEP is not yet registered in Europe, including the Netherlands, its approval and implementation are expected in the near future. To inform future pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation, this study aimed to gain insight into motives and preferences for daily or intermittent PrEP use among Dutch HIV-negative men having sex with men (MSM).Between February and December 2013, semistructured interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached (N = 20). Interviews were analyzed using the Grounded Theory approach.Motives for (not) using daily PrEP were based on beliefs about PrEP efficacy and side effects, preferences for other prevention strategies, self-perceived HIV risk, self-perceived efficacy of PrEP adherence, beliefs about possible benefits (e.g., anxiety reduction, sex life improvement), and barriers of PrEP use (e.g., costs, monitoring procedures). The perceived benefits of intermittent versus daily PrEP use were the lower costs and side effects and the lower threshold to decision to start using intermittent PrEP. Barriers of intermittent PrEP versus daily PrEP use were the perceived need to plan their sex life and adhere to multiple prevention strategies. Although some perceived PrEP as a condom substitute, others were likely to combine PrEP and condoms for sexually transmitted infections (STI) prevention and increased HIV protection. Participants preferred PrEP service locations to have specialized knowledge of HIV, antiretroviral therapy, sexual behavior, STIs, patients' medical background, be easily approachable, be able to perform PrEP follow-up monitoring, and provide support.To maximize the public health impact of PrEP, ensuring high uptake among MSM at highest risk is important. Therefore, targeted information about PrEP efficacy and side effects need to be developed, barriers for accessing PrEP services should be minimized, and perceived self-efficacy to use PrEP should be addressed and improved. To prevent increases in STIs, condom use should be monitored and PrEP should be integrated into routine STI screening and counseling.

What do Dutch MSM think of preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV-infection? A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Although preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not registered in Europe, including the Netherlands, its approval and implementation are expected in the near future. We aimed to gain insight into PrEP awareness and the intention to use PrEP among MSM. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study among 448 HIV-negative participants of the Amsterdam Cohort Study who completed a questionnaire concerning behavior and PrEP between 2012 and 2013. METHODS: Characteristics, PrEP awareness, and intention to use PrEP were described and multinomial logistic regression was used to identify determinants of a medium and high intention to use PrEP. RESULTS: PrEP awareness was 54%, but only 13% reported a high intention to use PrEP. High-risk MSM were more likely to have a medium [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.97)] or high [aOR: 3.92 (95% CI 1.68-9.15)] intention to use PrEP than low-risk MSM, as were MSM with higher perceptions of self-efficacy to use PrEP [high intention: aOR: 6.15 (95% CI 2.50-15.09)] and higher perceptions of relief due to PrEP [medium intention: aOR: 2.67 (95% CI 1.32-5.40); high intention: aOR: 14.87 (95% CI 5.98-37.01)] than MSM with lower perceptions. MSM with higher perceptions of shame about using PrEP [medium intention: aOR: 0.35 (95% CI 0.19-0.62); high intention: aOR: 0.22 (95% CI 0.07-0.71)] or with more worries about side-effects were less likely to have a high [aOR: 0.18 (95% CI 0.06-0.54)] or medium [aOR: 0.29 (95% CI 0.12-0.72)] intention to use PrEP. CONCLUSION: The overall intention to use PrEP was relatively low, but higher among high-risk MSM. If PrEP implementation among high-risk MSM in the Netherlands becomes reality, PrEP awareness should be increased and psychosocial determinants that will influence uptake should be addressed.