Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 45(7): 598-603, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21757494

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The graft of choice in lower limb bypass surgery is the autologous saphenous vein (ASV). However, a prosthetic graft is needed in the absence of an ASV. In such situations, we used an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) pre-cuffed Dynaflo graft as supragenicular bypass or Distaflo graft as infragenicular or femorocrural bypass. In respect to the expanding possibilities of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), the indication for bypass surgery moved toward patients with advanced stages of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. For this reason, this study analyzed the current performances of these ePTFE grafts and ASV grafts with special attention to limb salvage. METHODS: In a retrospective study all patients who underwent peripheral bypass surgery between 2004 and 2008 were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to express primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates at 1 and 3 years. Log-rank tests were performed to compare graft types. RESULTS: A total of 272 grafts (ePTFE/ASV: 110/162) were performed in lower limb bypass surgery. The mean follow-up was 20.3 months. The secondary 3-year patency rates were for (n=78) supragenicular grafts (ePTFE/ASV: 45%/94%)*, for (n=124) infragenicular grafts (24%/74%), and 70 for femorocrural grafts (26%/52%). Limb salvage after 3 years was 59% in the ePTFE group versus 78% in the ASV group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In the current population of vascular patients where no PTA is possible and a peripheral bypass is necessary, the ASV remains the graft of first choice. However, the pre-cuffed ePTFE graft is a good alternative, especially in cases of critical limb ischemia, in respect to an acceptable limb salvage rate.


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Politetrafluoretileno , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Veia Safena/transplante , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/fisiopatologia , Constrição Patológica , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Seleção de Pacientes , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
2.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 40(5): 635-42, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20667751

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS: 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated postoperatively with a compression stocking (CS) (Group-1, n = 19) or with A-V (Group-2, n = 17). METHODS: Patients in treatment group-1 used a CS postoperatively during 1 week day and night, patients in group-2 were treated with A-V postoperatively at night during one week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points. RESULTS: Limb circumference has increased postoperatively on day 1 (CS 1.5%/A-V 1.4%), on day 4 (5.7%/6.3%), on day 7 (6.6%/6.1%), on day 14 (7.9%/7.7%) and on day 90 (5.8%/5.2%). Differences between treatment groups were not significant. A re-operation gives a significant 3.9% increase in circumference as compared to a first operation (95% CI: 1.5-6.4%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the extent of developed edema between the groups following PTFE femoropopliteal bypass surgery. A redo peripheral bypass operation results in significantly more postoperative oedema than a first-time performed bypass operation.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Edema/terapia , Dispositivos de Compressão Pneumática Intermitente , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Edema/etiologia , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Politetrafluoretileno , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação , Meias de Compressão
3.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 49(3): 311-6, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18446115

RESUMO

AIM: A large amount of Zenith endovascular stent complications is due to problems with the leg extensions. This kind of complication has never been reported in literature. The aim of this study was to monitor the complications of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with the Zenith endovascular graft occurred in the Amphia Ziekenhuis in Breda to see how many recurrences were due to leg extension. METHODS: The study enrolled all patients (N.=66) treated with the Zenith endograft in the period between October 2000 and September 2006. Mortality, complications and the number of reinterventions were analysed. Average age of the patients was 73.4 years, average follow-up was 24.5 months and average aneurysm size was 61.5 mm. Radiologic follow-up was performed by computed tomography scans and X-rays. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality rate was 0%. The overall mortality rate during follow-up was 3%. Ten patients required a total number of 12 reinterventions (15%). The average time for reintervention was 10 months after the primary operation. Mortality, complication and reintervention rates were comparable with those reported in the literature, but 75% of these reinterventions were related to the leg extensions. CONCLUSION: Authors observed that nine out of 12 complications which required reintervention were due to problems with one of the leg extensions. This is the first study that specifies clearly the percentage of problems with leg extensions in EVAR (75%). When placing a Zenith endovascular graft extra attention should be paid to optimal placement of the leg extensions.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Perna (Membro)/fisiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Desenho de Prótese , Recidiva , Reoperação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...