A comparison of sufentanil vs. remifentanil in fast-track cardiac surgery patients.

We retrospectively compared patients receiving remifentanil with patients receiving sufentanil undergoing fast-track cardiac surgery. After 1:1 propensity score matching there were 609 patients in each group. The sufentanil group had a significantly longer mean (SD) ventilation time compared with the remifentanil group; 122 (59) vs. 80 (44) min, p < 0.001 and longer mean (SD) length of stay in the recovery area; 277 (77) vs. 263 (78) min, p = 0.002. The sufentanil group had a lower mean (SD) visual analogue pain score than the remifentanil group; 1.5 (1.2) vs. 2.4 (1.5), p < 0.001 and consumed less mean (SD) piritramide (an opioid analgesic used in our hospital); 2.6 (4.7) vs. 18.9 (7.3) mg, p < 0.001. The results of our study show that although remifentanil was more effective in reducing time to tracheal extubation and length of stay in the recovery area, there was an increased requirement for postoperative analgesia when remifentanil was used.

Spinal cord protection in open- and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: critical review of current concepts and future perspectives.

Unresolved for over half a century now since the beginning of aortic surgery spinal cord injury (SCI) remains the most devastating complication after extensive open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA/A) repair. Over the past decade extensive research on spinal cord perfusion lead to a better understanding of previously unknown physiologic mechanisms involved in the suspension of the cord's arterial supply and the consecutive development of SCI underscoring the need for new concepts in treatment strategy and monitoring methods during and after TAA/A repair. Based on this knowledge, new treatment strategies in particular the staged-repair were developed. The first-in-man translation of this idea has just been published introducing the new concept: minimally invasive selective segmental artery coil-embolization. Another approach to overcome the most critical initial period after segmental artery occlusion due to stent graft deployment in the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta is temporary aneurysm sac perfusion, which also has recently been clinically trialed. Furthermore, the new non-invasive real-time monitoring method to record spinal cord viability by means of near-infrared spectroscopy of the paraspinal collateral network by means of near-infrared spectroscopy has also been suggested and successfully introduced in a pilot series to a clinical setting. This review addresses problems, unsolved questions and future perspectives regarding these three new concepts.

Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation.

In computed tomography (CT) evaluation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation area- and perimeter-based calculation of the aortic annulus diameter, the so-called effective annulus diameter (ED), is the preferred parameter for decision making regarding prosthesis sizes. Currently, it is unclear how relevant the differences between the two methods of measurement are and how they are influenced by the cardiac cycle. The aim of this study was to compare area- and perimeter-based measurements in computed tomography derived aortic annulus sizing. A total of 60 patients who underwent evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included in this study. All patients received pre-procedural ECG gated CT. The aortic annulus area and perimeter were measured and the derived ED compared using parametric statistics and Bland and Altman analysis. The mean patient age was 80.2 ± 4 years. Systolic aortic annulus area and perimeter were higher compared to diastolic results (mean difference area 12.8 ± 24 mm(2) and perimeter 0.72 ± 1 mm; p = 0.009-0.068). Both the area- and perimeter-based ED had a good agreement within two standard deviations for systolic and diastolic measurements. Effective diameter measurements derived from the area were significantly smaller compared to perimeter-based measurements (mean difference: systolic 0.72 ± 0.3 mm and diastolic 0.81 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). While the area-based ED was significantly influenced by the cardiac cycle with a mean difference of 0.4 ± 0.6 mm (p = 0.009), no significant difference was found for the perimeter-based ED (mean difference: 0.2 ± 0.4; p = 0.07). For patients undergoing CT evaluation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the perimeter-based effective annulus diameter provides a reliable parameter for annulus sizing without significant affection by the cardiac cycle and therefore facilitates annulus measurements with a single heart phase. However, perimeter-based diameters of the annulus are significantly larger than area-based diameters.

[Imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation]. / Bildgebung vor Transkatheteraortenklappenersatz.

Percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established alternative to open heart surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) unsuitable for conventional aortic valve replacement due to comorbidities with a high perioperative risk or contraindications. Preprocedural imaging plays a major role for adequate determination of indications and prosthesis selection, prosthesis sizing and therefore for a reduction of periprocedural complications. Besides Doppler echocardiography which is mainly used for grading of the severity of aortic valve stenosis and peri-interventional imaging, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is the imaging modality of choice. The CCT procedure not only allows for reliably assessment and measuring of the complex 3-dimensional geometry of the aortic root but also for the aorta and the peripheral vessels used as potential access paths.

Near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring of the collateral network prior to, during, and after thoracoabdominal aortic repair: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of non-invasive monitoring of the paraspinous collateral network (CN) oxygenation prior to, during, and after thoracoabdominal aortic repair in a clinical series. METHODS: Near-infrared spectroscopy optodes were positioned bilaterally-over the thoracic and lumbar paraspinous vasculature-to transcutaneously monitor muscle oxygenation of the CN in 20 patients (age: 66 ± 10 years; men = 11) between September 2010 and April 2012; 15 had open thoracoabdominal aortic repair (Crawford II and III), three had thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR; Crawford I), and two had a hybrid repair (Crawford II). CN oxygenation was continuously recorded until 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 5% (n = 1), 15% suffered ischemic spinal cord injury (SCI). Mean thoracic CN oxygenation saturation was 75.5 ± 8% prior to anesthesia (=baseline) without significant variations throughout the procedure (during non-pulsatile cooling on cardiopulmonary bypass and with aortic cross-clamping; range = 70.6-79.5%). Lumbar CN oxygenation (LbS) dropped significantly after proximal aortic cross-clamping to a minimum after 11.7 ± 4 minutes (74 ± 13% of baseline), but fully recovered after restoration of pulsatile flow to 98.5% of baseline. During TEVAR, stent-graft deployment did not significantly affect LbS. Three patients developed relevant SCI (paraplegia n = 1/paraparesis n = 2). In these patients LbS reduction after aortic cross-clamping was significantly lower compared with patients who did not experience SCI (p = .041). CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive monitoring of CN oxygenation prior to, during, and after thoracoabdominal aortic repair is feasible. Lumbar CN oxygenation levels directly respond to compromise of aortic blood circulation.

Role of preprocedural computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

UNLABELLED: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently considered an acceptable alternative for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis and a high perioperative risk or a contraindication for open surgery. The benefit of TAVI significantly outweighs the risk of the procedure in patients requiring treatment that are not suitable for open surgery, and leads to a lower mortality in the one-year follow-up. The absence of a direct view of the aortic root and valve remains a challenge for the transcatheter approach. While direct inspection of the aortic valve during open surgery allows an adequate prosthesis choice, it is crucial for TAVI to know the individual anatomical details prior to the procedure in order to assure adequate planning of the procedure and proper prosthesis choice and patient selection. Among the imaging modalities available for the evaluation of patients prior to TAVI, computed tomography (CT) plays a central role in patient selection. CT reliably visualizes the dimensions of the aortic root and allows a proper choice of the prosthesis size. The morphology of the access path and relevant comorbidities can be assessed. The present review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the value of CT in the evaluation of patients prior to TAVI. KEY POINTS: CT plays a central role in patient selection and planning prior to TAVI. ▶ CT reliably detects the dimensions of the aortic root including the size of the aortic annulus, the degree of valve calcification and the morphology of the access routes. ▶ CT provides a more accurate measurement of the aortic annulus than 2D TEE and CT is the only imaging modality that allows a risk assessment for paravalvular leakages based on the calcification of the aortic valve.

Role of preprocedural computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

UNLABELLED: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently considered an acceptable alternative for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis and a high perioperative risk or a contraindication for open surgery. The benefit of TAVI significantly outweighs the risk of the procedure in patients requiring treatment that are not suitable for open surgery, and leads to a lower mortality in the one-year follow-up. The absence of a direct view of the aortic root and valve remains a challenge for the transcatheter approach. While direct inspection of the aortic valve during open surgery allows an adequate prosthesis choice, it is crucial for TAVI to know the individual anatomical details prior to the procedure in order to assure adequate planning of the procedure and proper prosthesis choice and patient selection. Among the imaging modalities available for the evaluation of patients prior to TAVI, computed tomography (CT) plays a central role in patient selection. CT reliably visualizes the dimensions of the aortic root and allows a proper choice of the prosthesis size. The morphology of the access path and relevant comorbidities can be assessed. The present review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the value of CT in the evaluation of patients prior to TAVI. CT plays a central role in patient selection and planning prior to TAVI. CT reliably detects the dimensions of the aortic root including the size of the aortic annulus, the degree of valve calcification and the morphology of the access routes. KEY POINTS: CT plays a central role in patient selection and planning prior to TAVI. CT reliably detects the dimensions of the aortic root including the size of the aortic annulus, the degree of valve calcification and the morphology of the access routes. CT provides a more accurate measurement of the aortic annulus than 2D TEE and CT is the only imaging modality that allows a risk assessment for paravalvular leakages based on the calcification of the aortic valve.