The structured ambulatory post-stroke care program for outpatient aftercare in patients with ischaemic stroke in Germany (SANO): an open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ischaemic stroke are at risk of recurrent stroke. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of a structured ambulatory post-stroke care programme versus usual care on recurrent vascular events and death and control of cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We did a prospective, open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial (SANO) at stroke centres in regions of Germany. A cluster was defined as a region in which acute stroke care is provided by a participating stroke centre. Patients were eligible for participation if they were aged 18 years or older, had no severe disabilities before the index stroke (modified Rankin scale 0-1), had at least one modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, and presented within 14 days of symptom onset of their first ischaemic stroke. The participating regions were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention and control group (usual care) by the statistician using block randomisation (block sizes of six), stratified by rural and urban regions. In intervention regions, a cross-sectoral multidisciplinary network was established to provide a 1-year organisational and patient-centred intervention. Due to the type of intervention, masking of participants and study physicians was not possible. Endpoint adjudication was performed by an independent endpoint adjudication committee who were masked to cluster allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death within 12 months after baseline assessment, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all patients who did not withdraw consent and completed the primary endpoint assessment at 12 months. This study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015322. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2019 and Dec 22, 2020, 36 clusters were assessed for eligibility, of which 30 were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=15 clusters) or control group (n=15 clusters). No clusters dropped out of the study. 1203 (86%) of 1396 enrolled patients in the intervention group and 1283 (92%) of 1395 enrolled patients in the control group were included in the mITT population. The primary endpoint was confirmed in 64 (5·3%) of 1203 patients in the intervention group and 80 (6·2%) of 1283 patients in the control group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·80 [95% CI 0·49-1·30]; adjusted OR [aOR] 0·95 [95% CI 0·54-1·67]). All-cause deaths occurred in 31 (2·4%) of 1203 patients in the intervention group and 12 (1·0%) of 1283 patients in the control group. The incidence of serious adverse events was higher in the intervention group (266 [23·1%] of 1151) than the control group (106 [9·2%] of 1152). Falls (134 [11·4%] of 1203 patients in the intervention group; 39 [3·3%] of 1152 patients in the control group), hypertensive crisis (55 [4·7%]; 34 [2·8%]), and diagnosis of depression (51 [4·3%]; 13 [1·1%]) were the most frequent adverse events in both groups. No differences were identified in the rate of readmission to hospital between groups. INTERPRETATION: No differences were identified between patients with ischaemic stroke in the intervention group and control group with regard to the incidence of vascular events 1 year after baseline assessment, despite positive effects with regard to the control of some cardiovascular risk factors. Longer-term effects and other potentially favourable effects on stroke-related sequelae and quality of life require further evaluation. FUNDING: Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee.

Lessons learned in stroke care during COVID-19 pandemic and preparing for future pandemics in the MENA+ region: A consensus statement from the MENA+-SINO.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted stroke care services at multiple levels. There was a decline in acute stroke admissions. Fewer interventions have been performed. Increased "door-to-needle times and "door-to-groin puncture" during this pandemic. These factors combined have led to declining in the favoured outcomes of stroke patients' globally. Yet this pandemic permits an opportunity for higher preparedness for future pandemics. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: This paper aims to shed light on the main lessons learned in the field of stroke care during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Here we are presenting proposals and initiatives for better preparedness in future similar emergencies. These proposals are based primarily on literature review of COVID-19 publications, as well as the first-hand experience gained during the first wave at the regional level. In addition to the consensus and collective ride of stroke experts in the Middle East North Africa Stroke and Interventional Neurotherapies Organization (MENA+-SINO) and interaction and collaboration with international stroke specialists from the Stroke World Organization (WSO), European Stroke Organization (ESO) and stroke and COVID-19 papers authors. CONCLUSION: Stroke care is very complex, particularly in the initial hours after onset of symptoms. A successful outcome requires very close collaboration between clinical personnel from multiple specialties. Preparedness for future pandemics requires the improvement of care plans that allow for rapid assessment of stroke patients and ensuring that regular 'mock exercises' familiarize quintessential services that care for the stroke patients.

Trial design and pilot phase results of a cluster-randomised intervention trial to improve stroke care after hospital discharge - The structured ambulatory post-stroke care program (SANO).

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies showed insufficient control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and high stroke recurrence rates among ischemic stroke patients in Germany. Currently, no structured secondary prevention program exists in clinical routine. We present the trial design and pilot phase results of a complex intervention to improve stroke care after hospital discharge in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SANO is a cluster-randomized trial with 30 participating regions across Germany aiming to enrol 2,790 patients (drks.de, DRKS00015322). Study intervention combines both structural and patient-centred elements. Study development was based on the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. In 15 intervention regions, a cross-sectoral multidisciplinary network is established to enhance CVRF control as well as detection and treatment of post-stroke complications. Recommendations on CVRF are based on high-quality secondary prevention guidelines. Study physicians use motivational interviewing and agree with patients on therapeutic targets. While hospitalised, patients also receive dietary counselling and a health-passport to track their progress. During regular visits, CVRF management and potential complications are monitored. The intervention is compared to 15 regions providing usual care. The primary endpoint is the combination of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction and death assessed 12 months after enrolment and adjudicated in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in a pilot phase that demonstrated feasibility of patient recruitment and study procedures. CONCLUSION: SANO is investigating a program to reduce outcome events after ischemic stroke by implementing a complex intervention. If successful, the program may be implemented in routine care on national level in Germany.

The transcatheter aortic valve implementation (TAVI)--a qualitative approach to the implementation and diffusion of a minimally invasive surgical procedure.

BACKGROUND: The transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a minimally invasive surgical procedure to treat patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, showed a rapid diffusion in Germany compared to the international level. The aim of this study is to identify and analyze factors affecting the implementation and diffusion of the procedure in hospitals using a qualitative application of the diffusion of innovations theory. METHODS: We conducted problem-centered interviews with cardiologists and cardiac surgeons working in German hospitals. The multi-level model "diffusion of innovations in health services organizations" developed by Greenhalgh et al. was used to guide the research. Data was analyzed using content and a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Among the ten participants who were interviewed, we found both barriers and facilitators related to the innovation itself, system readiness and antecedents, communication and influence, and the outer context. Key issues were the collaboration between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons, reimbursement policies, requirements needed to conduct the procedure, and medical advantages of the method. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that there are multiple factors influencing the diffusion of TAVI that go beyond the reimbursement and cost issues. The diffusion of innovations model proved to be helpful in understanding the different aspects of the uptake of the procedure. A central theme that affected the implementation of TAVI was the collaboration and competition between involved medical departments: cardiology and cardiac surgery. Against this background, it seems especially important to moderate and coordinate the cooperation of the different medical disciplines.