Thyroid imaging reporting and data system with MRI morphological features for thyroid nodules: diagnostic performance and unnecessary biopsy rate.

BACKGROUND: To assess MRI-based morphological features in improving the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) for categorizing thyroid nodules. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 728 thyroid nodules (453 benign and 275 malignant) that postoperative pathology confirmed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find independent predictors of MRI morphological features in benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The improved method involved increasing the ACR-TIRADS level by one when there are independent predictors of MRI-based morphological features, whether individually or in combination, and conversely decreasing it by one. The study compared the performance of conventional ACR-TIRADS and different improved versions. RESULTS: Among the various MRI morphological features analyzed, restricted diffusion and reversed halo sign were determined to be significant independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules (OR = 45.1, 95% CI = 23.2-87.5, P < 0.001; OR = 38.0, 95% CI = 20.4-70.7, P < 0.001) and were subsequently included in the final assessment of performance. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for both the conventional and four improved ACR-TIRADSs were 0.887 (95% CI: 0.861-0.909), 0.945 (95% CI: 0.926-0.961), 0.947 (95% CI: 0.928-0.962), 0.945 (95% CI: 0.926-0.961) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.932-0.965), respectively. The unnecessary biopsy rates for the conventional and four improved ACR-TIRADSs were 62.8%, 30.0%, 27.1%, 26.8% and 29.1%, respectively, while the malignant missed diagnosis rates were 1.1%, 2.8%, 3.7%, 5.4% and 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI morphological features with ACR-TIRADS has improved diagnostic performance and reduce unnecessary biopsy rate while maintaining a low malignant missed diagnosis rate.

Diagnostic Accuracy of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting Data System: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting Data System (ACR TI-RADS) in identifying nodules that need to undergo fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and identify specific thyroid ultrasound characteristics of nodules associated with thyroid malignancy in Filipinos in a single tertiary center. Methodology: One hundred seventy-six thyroid nodules from 130 patients who underwent FNAB from January 2018 to December 2018 were included. The sonographic features were described and scored using the ACR TI-RADS risk classification system, and the score was correlated to their final cytopathology results. Results: The calculated malignancy rates for TI-RADS 2 to TI-RADS 5 were 0%, 3.13%, 7.14%, and 38.23%, respectively, which were within the TI-RADS risk stratification thresholds. The ACR TI-RADS had a sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 54%, LR + of 1.95 and LR - of 0.194, NPV of 97.7%, PPV of 19.1%, and accuracy of 58%. Conclusion: The ACR TI-RADS may provide an effective malignancy risk stratification for thyroid nodules and may help guide the decision for FNAB among Filipino patients. The classification system may decrease the number of unnecessary FNABs for nodules with low-risk scores.

Impact of ultrasound elastography in evaluating Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules with histopathological correlation.

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the gold standard method recommended in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Bethesda IV cytology results are identified in 7-9% of nodules investigated through FNA, with reported malignancy rate in a wide range of 10-40%. The recommended treatment is either surgical or risk additional molecular testing before surgery. However, a large number of nodules belonging to this category (60-80%) are observed to be benign after surgical excision, which can put the patient at risk of unnecessary surgical morbidity. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound, the ACR TI-RADS score and elastography in cases of Bethesda IV cytology on FNA. Methods: We evaluated ninety-seven consecutive cases with Bethesda category IV results on FNA by using conventional B-mode ultrasound, qualitative strain or shear-wave elastography (Hitachi Preirus Machine, Hitachi Inc., Japan and Aixplorer Mach 30 Supersonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) and all nodules were classified according to the ACR TI-RADS system. Conventional ultrasound was used to categorize the nodules as potentially malignant based on the following features: hypoechogenicity, inhomogeneity, a taller than wide shape, irregular margins, presence of microcalcifications, an interrupted thyroid capsule and suspicious cervical lymph nodes. Elastography classified nodules with increased stiffness as suspicious for malignancy. Results: We considered pathology results as the gold standard diagnosis, finding that 32 out of 97 nodules were carcinomas (33%) and 65 out of 97 were benign nodules (67%). The benign group included twenty cases of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP). Finally, we compared ultrasound data with pathology results, which showed that nineteen out of the 32 malignant nodules presented with increased stiffness on elastography (p=0.0002). On conventional ultrasound, we found that microcalcifications (p=0.007), hypoechogenicity and irregular margins (p=0.006) are features which can distinguish between benign and malignant nodules with statistical significance. Discussion: Integrating elastography as a parameter of the ACR TI-RADS score in the evaluation of Bethesda category IV nodules showed a sensitivity of 90.62% in detecting thyroid cancer cases (p=0.006). We can conclude that elastographic stiffness as an addition to high risk features observed on conventional ultrasound improves the detection of malignant nodules in cases with Bethesda IV cytology.

Comparison of ultrasound risk stratification systems for pediatric thyroid nodules.

Background: There is currently insufficient data to validate adult-based US risk stratification systems (RSSs) for the identification of malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric population. Methods: From October 2016 and May 2023, 173 thyroid nodules of pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) with definitive pathology results and ultrasound (US) examination within 1 month before surgery or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy in our institution were enrolled in this study. The clinical and US characteristics of these nodules were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines. The diagnostic performance of US-based FNA criteria (original and simulating) of the three guidelines in thyroid cancer detection was estimated. Results: The three RSSs had similar AUC according to the categories(0.849-0.852, all P > 0.05). When combined with the original FNA criteria of the three RSSs to manage the nodules, the FNA rate of ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS were significantly less than ATA guidelines (53.18% vs. 64.63%, P < 0.05, and 52.60% vs. 64.63%, P < 0.05). The missed malignancy rate (MMR) and unnecessary FNA rate (UFR) of ATA guidelines (50.00%, 35.85%) was highest among the three RSSs, followed by the C-TIRADS (37.80%, 19.57%) and the ACR-TIRADS (37.04%, 19.57%). When nodules < 1 cm with the highest category in each RSS biopsied, that is when using the simulating FNA thresholds, the MMR was reduced overall (all P < 0.001), without a change in the UFR (all P > 0.05). All the three RSSs showed a substantial improvement in accuracy and malignant detection rate (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: The ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines showed high missed malignancy rates when using their original recommended FNA criteria. When nodules < 1 cm with the highest category in each RSS biopsied, the missed malignancy rate of each RSS was decreased. Decreasing the FNA thresholds for highly suspicious malignant nodules may therefore be an effective means of managing malignant thyroid nodules in pediatric patients.

Comparative evaluation of shear wave elastography elasticity values in thyroid nodules with cytology results and TI-RADS scoring in differentiation of benign-malignant nodules.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules and their correlation with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS). METHODS: This prospective study included 370 thyroid nodules in 308 patients aged 18-70 years. All the patients underwent B-mode ultrasound (US), Doppler examination, and SWE and were given an ACR TI-RADS risk score before fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and/or surgery. The correlation between SWE parameters and ACR TI-RADS categories was investigated statistically and compared with histopathologic results. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of SWE was evaluated to distinguish malignant and benign thyroid nodules. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five of the 370 thyroid nodules were malignant, and 235 nodules were benign. The mean shear wave velocity (SWV) value of the malignant nodules (3.70 ± 0.98 m/s) was statistically higher than that of the benign nodules (2.70 ± 0.37 m/s). The best cutoff value of the mean SWV for differentiating benign and malignant nodules was found to be 2.94 m/s (sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 89.9%, positive predictive value 81.3%, negative predictive value 94.1%, p < 0.001). The average score of the nodules according to the ACR TI-RADS was 3.57 ± 1.83 in benign nodules and 7.38 ± 2.69 in malignant nodules (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that combining SWE and TI-RADS improves the specificity of TI-RADS alone in differentiating benign and malignant nodules.

Benign thyroid nodules classified as ACR TI-RADS 4 or 5: Imaging and histological features.

BACKGROUND: American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) being most widely applied in clinical practice, there is an overlap in US imaging manifestations between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the imaging and histological characteristics of pathological benign thyroid nodules categorized as American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) 4 or 5, and to explore the correlation between the suspicious sonographic signs resulting in the misdiagnoses and the histopathological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 227 benign thyroid nodules (215 patients) in ACR TI-RADS 4 or 5 sampled through surgical excision were analyzed between December 2020 and August 2022. We retrospectively reread the ultrasound (US) images of the pathological discordant cases, after which we performed a systematic analysis focusing on the histopathological characteristics of thyroid lesions and recorded the findings. Qualitative US features and pathological significance of the thyroid nodules were analyzed using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The pathological type of 227 thyroid nodules (n = 103 in ACR TI-RADS 4 and n = 124 in ACR TI-RADS 5) was nodular goiter together with other histopathological features, namely, fibrosis (n = 103, 45.4 %), calcification (n = 70, 30.8 %), adenomatous hyperplasia (n = 31, 13.7 %), follicular epithelial hyperplasia (n = 23, 10.1 %), Hashimoto's thyroiditis (n = 18, 7.9 %), and cystic degeneration (n = 16, 7.1 %). Fibrosis was the most common histopathological feature in both ACR TI-RADS 4 (n = 42, 40.8 %) and 5 (n = 61, 49.2 %) categories of benign thyroid nodules. Thyroid nodules with fibrosis demonstrated sonographic features of "taller than wide" (p < 0.05), while lesions with follicular epithelial hyperplasia were likely to be detected with irregular and/or lobulated margins and very hypoechoic on US (p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSION: Benign thyroid nodules with histopathological findings such as fibrosis are associated with suspicious US features, which may give inappropriately higher TIRADS stratification.

Dual-modal radiomics nomogram based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound to improve differential diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary biopsy rate in ACR TI-RADS 4-5 thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS, TR) 4 and 5 thyroid nodules (TNs) demonstrate much more complicated and overlapping risk characteristics than TR1-3 and have a rather wide range of malignancy possibilities (> 5%), which may cause overdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. This study was designed to establish and validate a dual-modal ultrasound (US) radiomics nomogram integrating B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging to improve differential diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) rates in TR 4-5 TNs. METHODS: A retrospective dataset of 312 pathologically confirmed TR4-5 TNs from 269 patients was collected for our study. Data were randomly divided into a training dataset of 219 TNs and a validation dataset of 93 TNs. Radiomics characteristics were derived from the BMUS and CEUS images. After feature reduction, the BMUS and CEUS radiomics scores (Rad-score) were built. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted incorporating both Rad-scores and clinical/US data, and a radiomics nomogram was subsequently developed. The performance of the radiomics nomogram was evaluated using calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness, and the unnecessary FNAB rate was also calculated. RESULTS: BMUS Rad-score, CEUS Rad-score, age, shape, margin, and enhancement direction were significant independent predictors associated with malignant TR4-5 TNs. The radiomics nomogram involving the six variables exhibited excellent calibration and discrimination in the training and validation cohorts, with an AUC of 0.873 (95% CI, 0.821-0.925) and 0.851 (95% CI, 0.764-0.938), respectively. The marked improvements in the net reclassification index and integrated discriminatory improvement suggested that the BMUS and CEUS Rad-scores could be valuable indicators for distinguishing benign from malignant TR4-5 TNs. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that our developed radiomics nomogram was an instrumental tool for clinical decision-making. Using the radiomics nomogram, the unnecessary FNAB rate decreased from 35.3 to 14.5% in the training cohort and from 41.5 to 17.7% in the validation cohorts compared with ACR TI-RADS. CONCLUSION: The dual-modal US radiomics nomogram revealed superior discrimination accuracy and considerably decreased unnecessary FNAB rates in benign and malignant TR4-5 TNs. It could guide further examination or treatment options.

Incorporation of CEUS and SWE parameters into a multivariate logistic regression model for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative analysis parameters combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) quantitative parameters in the differentiation of benign and malignant ACR TI-RADS category 4 thyroid nodules and to provide a more effective reference for clinical work. METHODS: We analyzed 187 category 4 nodules, including 132 nodules in the development cohort and 55 nodules in the validation cohort, divided the development cohort into benign and malignant groups, and analyzed the differences in all CEUS and SWE quantitative parameters between the two groups. We selected the highest AUC of the two parameters, performed binary logistic regression analysis with the ACR TI-RADS score and constructed a diagnostic model. ROC curves were applied to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS: 1) The diagnostic model had an AUC of 0.926, sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 86.8%, diagnostic threshold of 3, accuracy of 87.12%, positive predictive value of 86.15%, and negative predictive value of 88.06%. 2) The diagnostic model had an AUC of 0.890 in the validation cohort, sensitivity of 81.5%, specificity of 79.6%, and accuracy of 80.00%. CONCLUSION: The combined multiparameter construction of the nodule diagnostic model can effectively improve the diagnostic efficacy of 4 types of thyroid nodules and provide a new reference index for clinical diagnostic work.

Study on diagnosing thyroid nodules of ACR TI-RADS 4-5 with multimodal ultrasound radiomics technology.

BACKGROUND: Explore the feasibility of using the multimodal ultrasound (US) radiomics technology to diagnose American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 4-5 thyroid nodules. METHOD: This study prospectively collected the clinical characteristics, conventional, and US elastography images of 100 patients diagnosed with ACR TI-RADS 4-5 nodules from May 2022 to 2023. Independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules were extracted and screened using methods such as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression (LR) model, and a multimodal US radiomics combined diagnostic model was established. Using a multifactorial LR analysis and a Rad-score rating, the predictive performance was validated and evaluated, and the final threshold range was determined to assess the clinical net benefit of the model. RESULTS: In the training set, the US radiomics combined predictive model area under curve (AUC = 0.928) had higher diagnostic performance compared with clinical characteristics (AUC = 0.779), conventional US (AUC = 0.794), and US elastography model (AUC = 0.852). In the validation set, the multimodal US radiomics combined diagnostic model (AUC = 0.829) also had higher diagnostic performance compared with clinical characteristics (AUC = 0.799), conventional US (AUC = 0.802), and US elastography model (AUC = 0.718). CONCLUSION: Multi-modal US radiomics technology can effectively diagnose thyroid nodules of ACR TI-RADS 4-5, and the combination of radiomics signature and conventional US features can further improve the diagnostic performance.

Radiofrequency ablation for thyroid Bethesda III nodules: preliminary results.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for thyroid nodules with cytological atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS, Bethesda III). Materials and methods: A total of 28 adults presenting with 30 initial Bethesda III nodules underwent thyroid RFA at a single medical center. Thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV or V according to the second aspiration were excluded. All RFA procedures were performed using the free-hand, 'moving-shot' technique under local anesthesia. Clinical features and demographics, RFA details, nodule volume reduction rate (VRR), and complications were analyzed. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.6 years, 82.1% of whom were females. Mean nodule volumes at pre-RFA, and at 6 months and 12 months post-RFA were 7.92, 2.42, and 1.25 mL, respectively, with a VRR of 77.9% at 6 months, and 87.4% at 12 months. Post-RFA complications were noted in two patients, one with transient vocal cord palsy and another with isthmus minor rupture. Conclusion: RFA may be another safe alternative except for active surveillance or surgical excision for AUS/FLUS nodules with low-suspicion Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System features for patients who are unsuitable or strongly refuse surgery. Long-term results remain uncertain, thus further follow-up study is necessary.

Diagnostic performance of a new two-dimensional shear wave elastography expression using siemens ultrasound system combined with ACR TI-RADS for classification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A prospective multi-center study.

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a new two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) method using a Siemens ultrasound system and its combination with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods: Conventional ultrasound images and 2D-SWE (E-whole-mean and E-stiffest-mean) were prospectively analyzed in 593 thyroid nodules from 543 patients. Nodules were divided into diameter (D) ≤10 mm and D > 10 mm groups and graded using ACR TI-RADS. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted using pathological findings as the gold standard. Diagnostic performance was compared among 2D-SWE, ACR TI-RADS, and their combination. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for E-whole-mean was higher than that for E-stiffest-mean (0.858 vs. 0.790, P < 0.001), which indicated that it was the better 2D-SWE parameter for differentiating malignant nodules from benign nodules with an optimal cut-off point of 11.36 kPa. In the all-sizes group, the AUC for E-whole-mean was higher than that for ACR TI-RADS (0.858 vs. 0.808, P < 0.001). The combination of E-whole-mean and ACR TI-RADS resulted in a higher AUC (0.929 vs. 0.858 vs. 0.808, P < 0.001), sensitivity (87.0% vs. 80.3% vs. 85.2%), specificity (85.1% vs. 74.0% vs. 73.6%), accuracy (86.3% vs. 78.1% vs. 81.1%), positive predictive value (91.5% vs. 85.1% vs. 85.6%), and negative predictive value (78.0% vs. 67.0% vs. 72.9%) compared to E-whole-mean or ACR TI-RADS alone. The AUC for the combination of 2D-SWE and ACR TI-RADS was superior to that for E-whole-mean or ACR TI-RADS alone in both D ≤ 10 mm and D > 10 mm groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: As the better 2D-SWE parameter, E-whole-mean had a higher diagnostic power than ACR TI-RADS and enhanced the diagnostic performance of ACR TI-RADS when identifying benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The combination of E-whole-mean and ACR TI-RADS improved the diagnostic performance compared to using ACR TI-RADS alone, providing a new and reliable method for the clinical diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Radiofrequency ablation for thyroid Bethesda III nodules: preliminary results.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for thyroid nodules with cytological atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS, Bethesda III). Materials and methods: A total of 28 adults presenting with 30 initial Bethesda III nodules underwent thyroid RFA at a single medical center. Thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV or V according to the second aspiration were excluded. All RFA procedures were performed using the free-hand, 'moving-shot' technique under local anesthesia. Clinical features and demographics, RFA details, nodule volume reduction rate (VRR), and complications were analyzed. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.6 years, 82.1% of whom were females. Mean nodule volumes at pre-RFA, and at 6 months and 12 months post-RFA were 7.92, 2.42, and 1.25 mL, respectively, with a VRR of 77.9% at 6 months, and 87.4% at 12 months. Post-RFA complications were noted in two patients, one with transient vocal cord palsy and another with isthmus minor rupture. Conclusion: RFA may be another safe alternative except for active surveillance or surgical excision for AUS/FLUS nodules with low-suspicion Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System features for patients who are unsuitable or strongly refuse surgery. Long-term results remain uncertain, thus further follow-up study is necessary.

The diagnostic value of ultrasound on different-sized thyroid nodules based on ACR TI-RADS.

OBJECTIVES: The thyroid nodule is one of the most common endocrine system diseases. Risk classification models based on ultrasonic features have been created by multiple professional societies, including the American College of Radiology (ACR), which published the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in 2017. The effect of the size in the diagnostic value of ultrasound remains not well defined. The purposes of our study aims to explore diagnostic value of the ACR TI-RADS on different-sized thyroid nodules. METHODS: A total of 1183 thyroid nodules were selected from 952 patients with thyroid nodules confirmed by surgical pathology from January 2021 to October 2022. Based on the maximum diameters of the nodules, they were stratified into groups A ( ≤ 10 mm), B ( > 10 mm, < 20 mm) and C ( ≥ 20 mm). The ultrasonic features of the thyroid nodules in each group were evaluated and scored based on ACR TI-RADS, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off value for the ACR TI-RADS scores and categories in each group. Finally, the diagnostic efficacy of ACR TI-RADS on different-sized thyroid nodules was analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1183 thyroid nodules, 340 were benign, 10 were low-risk and 833 were malignant. For the convenience of statistical analysis, low-risk thyroid nodules were classified as malignant in this study. The ACR TI-RADS scores and categorical levels of malignant thyroid nodules in each group were higher than those of benign ones (p < 0.05). The areas under the ROCs (AUCs) plotted based on scores were 0.741, 0.907, and 0.904 respectively in the three groups, and the corresponding optimal cut-off values were > 6 points, > 5 points and > 4 points respectively. While the AUCs of the ACR TI-RADS categories were 0.668, 0.855, and 0.887 respectively in each group, with the optimal cut-off values were all > TR4. Besides, for thyroid nodules of larger sizes, ACR TI-RADS exhibited weaker sensitivity with lower positive prediction value (PPV), but the specificity and negative prediction value (NPV) were both higher, presenting with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For thyroid nodules of different sizes, the diagnostic efficacy of ACR TI-RADS varies as well. The system shows better diagnostic efficacy on thyroid nodules of > 10 mm than on those ≤ 10 mm. Considering the favorable prognosis of thyroid microcarcinoma and the low diagnostic efficacy of ACR TI-RADS on it, the scoring and classification of thyroid micro-nodules can be left out in appropriate cases, so as to avoid the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma to a certain extent.

Diagnostic Performance of ACR TI-RADS and ATA Guidelines in the Prediction of Thyroid Malignancy: A Prospective Single Tertiary Center Study and Literature Review.

AIM: This study sought to compare two common risk stratification systems in terms of their diagnostic performance for the evaluation of thyroid malignancy. METHODS: The American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines were compared among 571 thyroid nodules with definitive fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology or postoperative histopathology. Ultrasound characteristics such as composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, size, and vascularity were assessed for each thyroid nodule. Diagnostic performance measures were determined and compared through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Of 571 nodules, 65 (11.4%) were malignant. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.691, 49.2%, 84.9%, 29.6%, and 92.8% for ATA guideline, and 0.776, 72.3%, 79.2%, 30.9%, and 95.7%, for ACR TI-RADS, respectively. ACR TI-RADS was more sensitive (p = 0.003), while the ATA guideline was more specific (p < 0.001). DCA demonstrated that the ACR TI-RADS provided a greater net benefit than the ATA guideline. In addition, the net reduction in unnecessary biopsies is higher for ACR TI-RADS than ATA guidelines. The total number of indicated biopsies and unnecessary FNA rates were lower in ACR TI-RADS compared to ATA guideline (293 vs. 527 and 80.2 vs. 87.8). ACR TI-RADS presented no biopsy indication in seven malignant nodules (all categorized as TR2), whereas ATA guideline missed one. Hypoechogenicity was the most significant predictor of malignancy (OR = 8.34, 95% CI: 3.75-19.45), followed by a taller-than-wide shape (OR = 6.73, 95% CI: 3.07-14.77). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that each system has particular advantages in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. ACR TI-RADS reduces unnecessary FNA rates, however, malignant nodules categorized as TR2 might be missed using this system. Further evaluation of this group of nodules using Doppler and other ultrasound modalities is recommended.

Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: The performance in evaluating thyroid nodules on ultrasound varies across different risk stratification systems, leading to inconsistency and uncertainty regarding diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Objective: Comparing diagnostic performance of detecting thyroid cancer among distinct ultrasound risk stratification systems proposed in the last five years. Evidence acquisition: Systematic search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to find relevant research up to December 8, 2022, whose study contents contained elucidation of diagnostic performance of any one of the above ultrasound risk stratification systems (European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System[Eu-TIRADS]; American College of Radiology TIRADS [ACR TIRADS]; Chinese version of TIRADS [C-TIRADS]; Computer-aided diagnosis system based on deep learning [S-Detect]). Based on golden diagnostic standard in histopathology and cytology, single meta-analysis was performed to obtain the optimal cut-off value for each system, and then network meta-analysis was conducted on the best risk stratification category in each system. Evidence synthesis: This network meta-analysis included 88 studies with a total of 59,304 nodules. The most accurate risk category thresholds were TR5 for Eu-TIRADS, TR5 for ACR TIRADS, TR4b and above for C-TIRADS, and possible malignancy for S-Detect. At the best thresholds, sensitivity of these systems ranged from 68% to 82% and specificity ranged from 71% to 81%. It identified the highest sensitivity for C-TIRADS TR4b and the highest specificity for ACR TIRADS TR5. However, sensitivity for ACR TIRADS TR5 was the lowest. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under curve (AUC) were ranked first in C-TIRADS. Conclusion: Among four ultrasound risk stratification options, this systemic review preliminarily proved that C-TIRADS possessed favorable diagnostic performance for thyroid nodules. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, CRD42022382818.

Analysis of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria and Its Correlation With the Pathological Results.

Introduction Thyroid nodules are frequently encountered and may be discovered roughly in around 4-8% of individuals by clinical palpation. Aim The present study aims to analyze the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) classification and assess the validity of each criterion in predicting malignancy. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research from June 2020 to October 2021. Fifty patients who presented to the outpatient clinic with thyroid swelling got an ultrasound (USG) neck performed followed by either fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or thyroidectomy. They were included in the study and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results Among 50 patients considered for the study, 36 were females. The mean age for malignant patients is 46 years with a standard deviation (SD) of 15, and for benign lesions is 47 years with an SD of 1. Most of the patients were TIRADS 4, which has a 56.2% risk of malignancy. The pathological results show a significant difference in ACR (American College of Radiology) TIRADS and echogenic foci between FNAC. The present study's solid composition showed a sensitivity of 25% and specificity of 75%, with an odds ratio of 0.90 in picking up malignant nodules. The shape of a nodule taller than wider, a malignant feature, showed a specificity of 92.3%. Punctate echogenic foci showed a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 76.9% with a statistical significance of p-value 0.048. Conclusion TIRADS scoring avoids unessential invasive techniques for lower TIRADS scores. Certain criteria are more specific in recognizing malignant nodules. Proportional priority shall be given to certain criteria over others, and not all criteria should be considered.

Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.

Background: To compare the diagnostic performance in determining the malignancy of thyroid nodules and the fine needle aspiration (FNA) recommendations of the guidelines set forth by the Superficial Organ and Vascular Ultrasound Group of the Society of Ultrasound in Medicine of the Chinese Medical Association in 2020 [2020 Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS)], the American College of Radiology in 2017 (2017 ACR-TIRADS) and the American Thyroid Association in 2015 (2015 ATA guidelines). Methods: From January 2021 to December 2021, 1,228 thyroid nodules with definitive postoperative histopathology and ultrasound (US) examination within 3 months before surgery in Shantou Central Hospital were enrolled in this study. We collected the data in 2022. The participants formed a consecutive series. The clinical and US features of the nodules were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the 2020 C-TIRADS, the 2017 ACR-TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guidelines. The diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA rates of the three guidelines were calculated. Results: The 2017 ACR-TIRADS had the highest diagnostic performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.938], followed by the 2020 C-TIRADS (AUROC 0.933) and the 2015 ATA guidelines (AUROC 0.928). The ATA guidelines had the highest specificity (93.38%), accuracy (92.10%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (80.56%) among the three guidelines. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) among the three guidelines. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of the FNA recommendations based on the C-TIRADS were 84.25%, 58.76%, 38.92%, 92.28% and 64.82%, respectively, which were higher than those of the ACR-TIRADS (57.53%, 42.94%, 23.93%, 76.43% and 46.42%, respectively) and the ATA guidelines (62.67%, 13.25%, 18.39%, 53.22% and 25.00%, respectively). Compared with the ACR-TIRADS (76.07%) and the ATA guidelines (81.61%), the C-TIRADS showed advantages in the unnecessary FNA rate (61.08%), especially in nodules larger than 20 mm. Conclusions: The 2020 C-TIRADS, the 2017 ACR-TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guidelines can effectively predict the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Compared with the 2017 ACR-TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guidelines, the 2020 C-TIRADS may offer a meaningful reduction in FNA recommendations with the highest efficacy in distinguishing thyroid carcinoma.

Implementation strategies to support ultrasound thyroid nodule risk stratification: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound risk stratification can improve the care of patients with thyroid nodules by providing a structured and systematic approach for the evaluation of thyroid nodule features and thyroid cancer risk. The optimal strategies to support implementation of high quality thyroid nodule risk stratification are unknown. This study seeks to summarise strategies used to support implementation of thyroid nodule ultrasound risk stratification in practice and their effects on implementation and service outcomes. METHODS: This is a systematic review of studies evaluating implementation strategies published between January 2000 and June 2022 that were identified on Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane, Scopus, or Web of Science. Screening of eligible studies, data collection and assessment for risk of bias was completed independently and in duplicate. Implementation strategies and their effects on implementation and service outcomes were evaluated and summarised. RESULTS: We identified 2666 potentially eligible studies of which 8 were included. Most implementation strategies were directed towards radiologists. Common strategies to support the implementation of thyroid nodule risk stratification included: tools to standardise thyroid ultrasound reports, education on thyroid nodule risk stratification and use of templates/forms for reporting, and reminders at the point of care. System based strategies, local consensus or audit were less commonly described. Overall, the use of these strategies supported the implementation process of thyroid nodule risk stratification with variable effects on service outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of thyroid nodule risk stratification can be supported by development of standardised reporting templates, education of users on risk stratification and reminders of use at the point of care. Additional studies evaluating the value of implementation strategies in different contexts are urgently needed.

The sensitivity of TIRADS scoring on ultrasonography in the management of thyroid nodules.

Objective: To determine the sensitivity of ACR-TIRADS scoring by comparing its results with those obtained on biopsy of respective specimens. Method: This prospective study including N=205 patients with thyroid nodules was conducted in ENT Department of MTI Hayatabad Medical complex, Peshawar during the period from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2022. Preoperative ultrasonography with assigning of TIRADS scores was performed in all patients. Appropriate thyroidectomies were performed in these patients and specimen biopsied. Pre-op TIRADS scores were compared with biopsy results. To determine the sensitivity of TIRADS, TR1 and TR2 were considered 'benign' and TR3, TR4, TR5 were considered 'malignant' for comparison with biopsy results. Results: The mean age of patients was 37.68 years with standard deviation of ±11.52. The M: F ratio was 1:3.5. Nineteen patients (9.27%) had solitary thyroid nodules & 186 (90.73%) had multinodular goiters. TIRADS scoring was benign for 171 (83.41%) and malignant for 34 (16.58%) nodules. The biopsy results revealed 180 (87.80%) nodules to benign and the rest as malignant. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were calculated at 80%, 92.77% and 91.21% respectively. Chi square test and p-value determination showed that there was a strong positive concordance between TIRADS scores & biopsy results which is highly significant (p=.001). Conclusion: The Ultrasonographic ACR-TIRADS scoring and risk stratification system is highly sensitive for detecting malignancy in thyroid nodules. It is, therefore, a reliable technique in the initial assessment of thyroid nodules and decisions can safely be based on its results. In cases of doubt, clinical judgment should be exercised before making final decision.