Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 3036-3041, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-843085

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate t he methodology quality of published systematic review/Meta-analysis of antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression. METHODS :Retrieved from Cochrane Library ,PubMed,Embase, SinoMed,CNKI,Wanfang database ,VIP,CBM and other databases ,systematic review/Meta-analysis of antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression were collected during the inception to Dec. 2019. After literature screening and data extraction , methodology quality of included literatures were evaluated by using the AMSTAR scale. RESULTS :A total of 33 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were included ,involving 523 RCTs and 41 020 patients. Average score of AMSTAR methodological quality evaluation was 6.76. Citalopram ,duloxetine and paroxetine were effective for the therapy of post-stroke depression ,but the conclusions about the effectiveness among antide-pressants were not consistents. The ADR incidence of Paroxetine was low. It was not clear that sertraline and citalopram may improve the neurological function of patients. CONCLUSIONS :The methodological quality of systematic review/Meta-analysis of antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression is medium ,and the conclusions about the effectiveness of antidepressants ,improvement of daily life ability and the recovery of neurological function are still controversial.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 975-979, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-817025

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To conduct methodology/reporting quality reevaluation for Meta-analysis/systematic evaluation of anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Retrieved from the Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, CBM, Wanfang database and CNKI during data base establishment to Nov. 2018, Meta-analysis/systematic evaluations of anti-TNF-αmonoclonal antibody in the treatment of ulcerative colitis were collected. After data extraction of literatures that meet the inclusion criteria, methodological quality and reporting quality of included studies were evaluated by using AMSTAR scale and the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Fourteen literatures of Meta-analysis/systematic evaluation were included. The average score of AMSTAR methodology quality (full score of 11 points) was 6.89, with medium methodological quality. PRISMA score (full score of 27 points) ranged from 15 to 26.5. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis/systematic evaluations of anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody for ulcerative colitis have poor methodological and reporting quality.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...