Has the open surgical approach in colorectal cancer really become uncommon?

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. Surgery is mandatory to treat patients with colorectal cancer. Can colorectal cancer be treated in laparoscopy? Scientific literature has validated the oncological quality of laparoscopic approach for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized non-inferiority trials with good remote control have answered positively to this long-debated question. Early as 1994, first publications demonstrated technical feasibility and compliance with oncological imperatives and, as far as short-term outcomes are concerned, there is no difference in terms of mortality and post-operative morbidity between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches, but only longer operating times at the beginning of the experience. Subsequently, from 2007 onwards, long-term results were published that demonstrated the absence of a significant difference regarding overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, local and distant recurrence rates between open and minimally invasive surgery. In this editorial, we aim to summarize the clinical and technical aspects which, even today, make the use of open surgery relevant and necessary in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

A Multicenter Analysis of Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection for Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Background/Aim: Recent research has demonstrated that laparoscopic multivisceral resection (MVR) for advanced colorectal cancer is safe, practicable, and yields satisfactory oncological results, which is in line with the growing usage of laparoscopic surgery. The effectiveness of laparoscopic MVR is still debatable, though. The goal of this study was to compare the short- and long-term results of patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with open MVR with laparoscopic procedures. Patients and Methods: Data on 3,571 consecutive patients hospitalized at the Kyushu University National Kyushu Cancer Center for colorectal cancer surgery between 2004 and 2020 were gathered retrospectively. In the end, 84 individuals with advanced colorectal cancer who had a colectomy with MVR were examined. We evaluated invasiveness in terms of complications, blood loss, and operating time. Recurrence-free survival rates and overall 5-year survival were among the oncological outcomes. Results: Of the 84 patients examined, 29 underwent laparoscopic treatment, and 55 underwent open treatment. The laparoscopic surgery group experienced shorter hospital stays (15 vs. 18 days, p<0.05) and much less blood loss (median volume: 167 vs. 1,058 g, p<0.005) than the open surgery group. Following the exclusion of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer from the study (groups undergoing laparoscopic surgery, n=25; open surgery, n=38), the groups displayed comparable pathologic results and no discernible variations in either the 5-year overall survival (p=0.87) or recurrence-free survival (p=0.86). Conclusion: In certain individuals with advanced colorectal cancer, a laparoscopic method of manipulation with MVR may be less invasive than an open method without compromising the prognosis.

Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for the therapy of locally advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

The goal of the present study was to appraise the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), as relevant data on its usage in this setting are lacking. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 100 patients with locally advanced CRC who received either neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX (N=50) or neoadjuvant XELOX alone (N=50). Radiological response and pathological complete response rates were evaluated. Furthermore, the researchers obtained data pertaining to disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, as well as adverse events. The consequences of the present study indicated that the neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX treatment approach yielded higher rates of radiological objective response (86.0 vs. 68.0%, P=0.032) and major pathological response (46.0 vs. 22.0%, P=0.011) compared with XELOX alone. These findings were further confirmed through multivariate logistic regression analyses (P=0.037 and P=0.008, respectively). Interestingly, the neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX treatment approach significantly prolonged DFS when compared with XELOX alone (P=0.033). In summary, the administration of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with XELOX demonstrates superiority over the use of XELOX alone in terms of achieving a more favorable pathological response and a longer duration of DFS in patients diagnosed with locally advanced CRC.

Clinical implications of PD-L1 expression and pathway-related molecular subtypes in advanced Asian colorectal cancer patients.

The expression level of PD-L1 does not accurately predict the prognosis of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but it still reflects the tumor microenvironment to some extent. By stratifying PD-L1 status, gene subtypes in PD-L1 positivity-related pathological pathways were analyzed for their relationship to MSI or TMB to provide more individualized treatment options for CRCs. A total of 752 advanced CRCs were included, and their genomic variance was measured by a targeted next generation sequencing panel in this study. MSI and TMB were both measured by NGS, while PD-L1 expression level was measured using the PD-L1 colon 22C3 pharmDx kit. We found RTK/RAS pathway was positively related to high PD-L1 expression, with BRAF V600E and most KRAS mutations (G12 and G13) subtypes showing a significant correlation. Conversely, the Wnt and p53 pathways were negatively related to high PD-L1 expression, with APC C-terminal alterations and other non-inactivation mutations in TP53 making a primary contribution with significant statistical significance. Major subtypes showing a significantly higher proportion of TMB-H or MSI-H were irrespective of PD-L1 status. These findings demonstrate pathological pathways associated with high PD-L1 expression, suggesting that pathway-induced oncogenic constructive PD-L1 upregulation may be the reason for the corresponding patients' primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), rather than a lack of pre-existing immune responses.

Herbal medicine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Chinese herbal medicine is increasingly used as complementary therapy to manage nausea and vomiting in different cultures. One such herbal recipe is the Hezhong granules, which contain classical antiemetic formulations, and are commonly used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Modern pharmacological studies have shown that the key components of Hezhong granules, including Pinellia ternata (Thunb.), Evodia rutaecarpa (Juss.), and Zingiber officinale exhibit significant antiemetic and antitumor properties. Despite this promising evidence, controlling CINV remains a significant challenge in cancer treatment. Moreover, there is a lack of scientifically designed clinical trials to validate the efficacy and safety of classical antiemetic formulas for CINV interventions. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Hezhong granules in preventing CINV in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This study was conducted between October 2020 and February 2022 in 12 hospital wards in Southwest China. In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled patients with advanced CRC who received fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the Hezhong granule group (receiving a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and Hezhong granules) or the placebo group (receiving a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and placebo) during the first and second courses of chemotherapy. A 5-day diary was provided to all patients. Acute and delayed CINV were defined as CINV occurring within 24 h or between 24 and 120 h after the start of treatment. The primary endpoints were complete response rate (CRR, defined as the proportion of patients without nausea/vomiting) and objective response rate (ORR, defined as the proportion of patients without nausea/vomiting plus mild nausea/vomiting) for both acute and delayed CINV. Secondary endpoints were the daily rates of CINV events and Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). To identify the predictors of CINV, we conducted multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial, number ChiCTR2100041643. RESULTS: A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned, of whom 112 (56/56) completed two cycles and were included in the full analysis. In the acute phase, there were minor improvements in the Hezhong granule group, but there were no significant differences in the CRRs for nausea and vomiting (mean difference:10.7 %, P = 0.318, 0.324), while the ORRs increased by approximately 17.5 % (mean difference:16.1 %, P = 0.051; 17.9 %, P = 0.037, respectively). In the delayed phase, significant improvements of approximately 20 % were observed in both the CRRs (mean difference:19.6 %, P = 0.053; 21.4 %, P = 0.035) and ORRs (mean difference:17.9 %, P = 0.037, 0.043) for nausea and vomiting. Additionally, the daily rate of CINV events showed a mean difference of 19 % (P < 0.05). According to FLIE scores, approximately 70 % of patients who received Hezhong granules reported an improvement in their quality of life, with CINV symptoms having"no impact on daily life (NIDL)". No serious adverse events were attributed to herbal medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Hezhong granules proved to be both effective and well-tolerated in preventing CINV in patients with advanced CRC, with notable benefits in preventing delayed CINV. These promising results set the stage for subsequent phase III clinical trials and experimental research on Hezhong Granules.

Mediating role of resilience between family functioning and quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

To better understand the relationship between family functioning, resilience, and quality of life (including physical and mental component score, PCS and MCS) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) to predict and improve their quality of life.A cross-sectional study was conducted in which a total of 165 patients with advanced colorectal cancer participated in a one-time survey. Measures included the Family Functioning Assessment Device, the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the SF-12 Health Survey Assessment Scale. The data analysis methods included descriptive analysis, pearson's correlation analysis, t-tests, and nonparametric tests.Of the patients with advanced CRC, 47.27% and 72.73% had moderate or low mental and physical health components, respectively. The results indicated that in patients with advanced CRC, family function was negatively correlated with resilience (p < 0.01), family functioning was negatively correlated with MCS (p < 0.01), and resilience was positively correlated with PCS (p < 0.05) and MCS (p < 0.01). The mediating analysis revealed that family functioning regulated MCS through resilience (effect value = 13.17%).Our findings suggest that the MCS of patients with advanced CRC is influenced by both family functioning and resilience. PCS in patients with advanced CRC appears to be influenced by resilience but not by family functioning.

The Role of Prophylactic and Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Prevention of Peritoneal Metastases in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a locoregional therapy that may be combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) to treat patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases (PM). In recent years, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the role of prophylactic or adjuvant HIPEC in preventing the development of PM in patients with high-risk colorectal cancer: PROPHYLOCHIP and COLOPEC evaluated adjuvant HIPEC, and HIPECT4 studied concurrent HIPEC and CRS. Although PROPHYLOCHIP and COLOPEC were negative trials, a great deal may be learned from their methodology, outcome measures, and patient selection criteria. HIPECT4 is the first RCT to show a clinical benefit of HIPEC in high-risk T4 colorectal cancer, demonstrating improved locoregional disease control with the addition of HIPEC to CRS with no increase in the rate of complications. This review critically examines the strengths and limitations of each major trial and discusses their potential impact on the practice of HIPEC. Several additional ongoing clinical trials also seek to investigate the role of HIPEC in preventing PM in advanced colorectal cancer.

Single-cell analysis reveals cellular reprogramming in advanced colon cancer following FOLFOX-bevacizumab treatment.

Introduction: The combination of FOLFOX and bevacizumab (FOLFOX-Bev) is a promising treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the response of the tumor microenvironment to FOLFOX-Bev is still largely unexplored. Methods: We conducted single-cell transcriptomic analysis of CRC samples derived from a patient before and after treatment to gain insights into the cellular changes associated with FOLFOX-Bev treatment. Results: We found that cancer cells with high proliferative, metastatic, and pro-angiogenic properties respond better to FOLFOX-Bev treatment. Moreover, FOLFOX-Bev enhances CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity, thereby boosting the anti-tumor immune response. Conversely, FOLFOX-Bev impairs the functionality of tumor-associated macrophages, plasma cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts, leading to a decrease in VEGFB-mediated angiogenesis. Furthermore, FOLFOX-Bev treatment reset intercellular communication, which could potentially affect the function of non-cancer cells. Discussion: Our findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the response of advanced CRC to FOLFOX-Bev treatment and highlight potential targets for improving the efficacy of this treatment strategy.

Assessing demographic and socioeconomic factors in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine the socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) presentation at our institution. METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2018, patients that underwent CRC surgery at our institution were included and retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine independent risk factors for presenting with advanced CRC. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients were included, 53.5% presented with advanced CRC. The multivariate analysis identified that living in a rural area (odds ratio [OR] = 5.25; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.27-12-10; p < 0.001), weight loss (OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.35-4.09; p = 0.002), needing emergency surgery (OR = 4.68; 95% CI: 1.25-17.49; p = 0.022), location in the rectum in comparison with colon (OR = 2.66; 95% CI: 1.44-4.91; p = 0.002), and location in the mid rectum (OR = 6.10; 95% CI: 2.31-16.12; p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of advanced CRC stage at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower socioeconomic status, with symptoms, and needing emergency surgery were associated with advanced CRC stage at presentation. Special interventions to improve access to care in this population should be planned to enhance CRC outcomes.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo del presente estudio es determinar los factores socioeconómicos y demográficos asociados con la presentación de cáncer colorrectal (CCR) en etapas avanzadas en nuestra institución. MÉTODOS: De Enero 2009 a Enero 2018, aquellos pacientes operados por CCR fueron incluidos y analizados de forma retrospectiva. Se realizó análisis de regresión logística para determinar los factores de riesgo independientes para presentar CCR avanzado. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 277 pacientes, de los cuales 53.5% se diagnosticaron con CCR avanzado. En el análisis multivariable: vivienda en zona rural (OR = 5.25; 95% CI: 2.27-12-10; p < 0.001), pérdida de peso (OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.35-4.09; p = 0.002), necesidad de cirugía de urgencia (OR = 4.68; 95% CI: 1.25-17.49; p = 0.022), tumores en recto (OR = 2.66; 95% CI: 1.44-4.91; p = 0.002), fueron factores asociados a mayor probabilidad de presentación avanzada del CCR. CONCLUSIONES: Pacientes con nivel socioeconómico bajo, aquellos que acuden sintomáticos, y los que requieren de inicio cirugía de urgencia, fueron factores asociados a presentaciones avanzadas de CCR. Se requieren intervenciones especiales para mejorar el acceso a un diagnóstico temprano y oportuno en estos grupos poblacionales.

Retrospective efficacy analysis of olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent malignancy of the digestive tract worldwide, characterized by a significant morbidity and mortality rate and subtle initial symptoms. Diarrhea, local abdominal pain, and hematochezia occur with the development of cancer, while systemic symptoms such as anemia and weight loss occur in patients with advanced CRC. Without timely interventions, the disease can have fatal consequences within a short span. The current therapeutic options for colon cancer include olaparib and bevacizumab, which are widely utilized. This study intends to evaluate the clinical efficacy of olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced CRC, hoping to provide insights into advanced CRC treatment. AIM: To investigate the retrospective efficacy of olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced CRC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 82 patients with advanced colon cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China between January 2018 and October 2019. Among them, 43 patients subjected to the classical FOLFOX chemotherapy regimen were selected as the control group, and 39 patients undergoing treatment with olaparib combined with bevacizumab were selected as the observation group. Subsequent to different treatment regimens, the short-term efficacy, time to progression (TTP), and incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. Changes in serum-related indicators [vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloprotein-9 (MMP-9), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)] and tumor markers [human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199)] levels before and after treatment were compared between the two groups at the same time. RESULTS: The objective response rate was discovered to be 82.05%, and the disease control rate was 97.44% in the observation group, which were significantly higher than the respective rates of 58.14% and 83.72% in the control group (P < 0.05). The median TTP was 24 mo (95%CI: 19.987-28.005) in the control group and 37 mo (95%CI: 30.854-43.870) in the observation group. The TTP in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, and the difference held statistical significance (log-rank test value = 5.009, P = 0.025). Before treatment, no substantial difference was detected in serum VEGF, MMP-9, and COX-2 levels and tumor markers HE4, CA125, and CA199 levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). Following treatment with different regimens, the above indicators in the two groups were remarkably promoted (P < 0.05), VEGF, MMP-9, and COX-2 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05), and HE4, CA125, and CA199 levels were also lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Vis-à-vis the control group, the total incidence of gastrointestinal reactions, thrombosis, bone marrow suppression, liver and kidney function injury, and other adverse reactions in the observation group was notably lowered, with the difference considered statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced CRC demonstrates a strong clinical effect of delaying disease progression and reducing the serum levels of VEGF, MMP-9, COX-2 and tumor markers HE4, CA125 and CA199. Moreover, given its fewer adverse reactions, it can be regarded as a safe and reliable treatment option.

Oral fruquintinib combined with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium for advanced colorectal cancer to obtain longer progression-free survival: A case report.

BACKGROUND: After the failure of second-line standard therapy, effective treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer are limited, and the duration of remission cannot meet clinical needs. In addition, associated drug toxicity may lead to treatment interruption that may affect patient outcomes. Therefore, more safe, effective and convenient treatments are urgently needed. CASE SUMMARY: Here, we describe a patient with advanced colorectal cancer with multiple metastases in both lungs. Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine was given as the first-line treatment, and bevacizumab combined with irinotecan was given as the second-line treatment after disease progression. However, treatment was interrupted due to recurrent grade 2 nausea and grade 1 diarrhea. He received targeted therapy with fruquintinib starting on August 26, 2020 and responded well for 12 mo. After slow progression of the lung metastases, progression-free survival was again achieved over 13.5 mo by continued treatment of fruquintinib in combination with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium chemotherapy. Overall treatment duration was more than 25.5 mo. The treatments delayed tumor progression, reduced drug side effects, maintained a good quality of life, and further extended overall survival. CONCLUSION: This case report detailed preliminary evidence showing that the combination of fruquintinib with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium chemotherapy double oral therapy may result in longer progression-free survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Different doses of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to explore the incremental benefit of bevacizumab (Bev) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with different doses. METHODS: A literature search of eight electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, Chinese Biomedical Database, VIP medicine information, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) was conducted from database creation to December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared Bev at various dosages + chemotherapy (CT) versus placebo (or blank control) + CT were selected. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were integrated first by pooled analysis. The likelihood of ideal dosage of Bev was then ranked using random effects within Bayesian analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six RCTs involving 18,261 patients met the inclusion criteria. OS increased significantly after using 5 mg (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00) and 10 mg dosages of Bev (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85) with CT, but statistical significance was not attained for the 7.5 mg dose (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). A significantly increased in PFS with doses of 5 mg (HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.83), 7.5 mg (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.00), and 10 mg (HR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68). ORR distinctly increased after 5 mg (RR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55), 7.5 mg (RR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50), and10 mg (RR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.84) doses were administered. Grade ≥ 3 AEs increased clearly in 5 mg (RR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) compared to 7.5 mg (RR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.35) and 10 mg (RR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.36). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that 10 mg Bev obtained the maximum time of OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CrI 0.58 to 0.97; probability rank = 0.05) indirectly compared to 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev. Compared with 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev, 10 mg Bev also holds the longest duration for PFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.43 to 0.82; probability rank = 0.00). In terms of ORR, 10 mg Bev holds the maximum frequency (RR: 2.02, 95% CrI 1.52 to 2.66; probability rank = 0.98) in comparison to 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev clearly. For grade ≥ 3 AEs, 10 mg Bev has the maximum incidence (RR: 1.15, 95% CrI 0.95 to 1.40, probability rank = 0.67) in comparison to other doses of Bev. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that 10 mg dose Bev could be more effective in treating advanced CRC in efficacy, but 5 mg Bev could be more safer in terms of safety.

Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in patients aged 75 years or older with advanced colorectal cancer treated using traditional Chinese medicine: an observational retrospective study.

Limited evidence suggests that elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) may benefit from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of TCM in old ACRC patients treated in the Oncology Department of Xiyuan Hospital between January 2012 and December 2021. The clinical characteristics of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Their progression-free survival (PFS) and total duration of TCM therapy (TTCM) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Forty-eight patients (F:M 13:35) with a mean age of 78.75 ± 2.99 years (range, 75-87) met the inclusion criteria. There were 18 cases of rectal cancer and 30 of colon cancer. The median PFS was 4 months (range, 1-26; 95% CI 3.26-4.73). The median TTCM was 5.5 months (range, 1-50; 95% CI 1.76-8.24). Subgroup analysis revealed that PFS and TTCM were shorter in patients with bone metastases and an ECOG performance status score of 2-3 (p < 0.05). No hematological toxicity or serious adverse reactions occurred during the study period. This real-world study demonstrates that TCM may be a potentially beneficial therapy for old ACRC patients, including when the ECOG performance status score is 2-3.

Chronomodulated Administration of Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In this systematic review, the efficacy and safety of chronomodulated chemotherapy, defined as the delivery of chemotherapy timed according to the human circadian rhythm, were assessed and compared to continuous infusion chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Electronic English-language studies published until October 2020 were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chronomodulated chemotherapy with non-chronomodulated (conventional) chemotherapy for the management of advanced colorectal cancer were included. The main outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and system-specific and overall toxicity related to chemotherapy. Electronic databases including Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review were searched. In total, seven RCTs including 1,137 patients were analysed. Males represented 684 (60%) of the study population. The median age was 60.5 (range = 47.2-64) years. There was no significant difference between chronomodulated and conventional chemotherapy in ORR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.87-1.53). Similarly, there was no significant difference in gastrointestinal toxicity under the random effect model (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.68-1.51). No significant difference was found regarding neurological and skin toxicities (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.32-1.270 and RR = 2.11, 95% CI = 0.33-13.32, respectively). However, patients who received chronomodulated chemotherapy had less haematological toxicity (RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.27-0.48). In conclusion, there was no overall difference in ORR or haematologic toxicity between chronomodulated and non-chronomodulated chemotherapy used for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Chronomodulated chemotherapy can be considered in patients at high risk of haematological toxicities.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study.

Background: Fruquintinib and regorafenib have been approved for the third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in China. However, at present, there is a lack of head-to-head clinical trials on the comparison of efficacy and safety between the two drugs. Materials and methods: The data of patients with mCRC who were treated with fruquintinib or regorafenib after the standard chemotherapy in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from October 2018 to November 2021 were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. The secondary endpoints were the appropriate sequence, objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of fruquintinib and regorafenib. Results: A total of 105 patients were enrolled in this study. The ORR of fruquintinib group (n=55) and regorafenib group (n=50) were 6.1% and 2.0%; the DCR were 65.3% and 54.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in median OS (mOS) and PFS (mPFS) between the two groups (mOS:14.2 vs12.0 months, p=0.057; mPFS:4.4 vs 3.5 months, p=0.150). Combined immunotherapy showed a synergistic effect. The mPFS and mOS of fruquintinib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy were longer than those of fruquintinib monotherapy (mPFS:5.9 vs 3.0 months, p=0.009; mOS:17.5 vs 11.3 months, p=0.008). The mOS of patients treated with regorafenib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy was 14.8 months higher than that of regorafenib monotherapy (p=0.045). When combined with anti-PD-1 therapy, the mPFS and mOS of fruquintinib was significantly longer than regorafenib (mPFS:5.9 vs 3.8 months, p=0.018; mOS:17.5 vs 14.8 months, p=0.044). In the treatment sequence, the OS of patients treated with regorafenib and then fruquintinib was significantly longer than that of the reverse treatment sequence (15.0 vs 8.3 months, p=0.019). The adverse reactions were generally similar, but the incidence of hand-foot syndrome of regorafenib was higher than that of fruquintinib, while fruquintinib was more prone to grade 3 hypertension. Conclusion: Fruquintinib monotherapy showed better disease control rate and objective remission rate in the post-line therapy of metastasis colorectal cancer. Notably, the combination of PD-1 immunotherapy brought the additional effect, especially in the fruquintinib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Patients treated with regorafenib and then fruquintinib was significantly longer than that of the reverse treatment sequence. The toxicity of fruquintinib and regorafenib are similar.

Patient-reported motor chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy impacts function in advanced colorectal cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy limits cancer survivors' compliance with chemotherapy and impaired function. This study aimed to examine separate impacts of clinician-assessed, patient-reported sensory and motor chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy on physical/role function and functional interference in advanced colorectal cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: A cross-sectional, correlational design utilizing convenience sampling enrolled 75 stage III or IV colorectal cancer adults undergoing chemotherapy. Participants filled out the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, Identification Pain Questionnaire, and Peripheral Neuropathy Scale. Then, a trained research nurse conducted a brief neurological assessment using the Total Neuropathy Scale - clinical version. RESULTS: The prevalence of sensory and motor chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy was from 34.7% to 54.7% and from 16.0% to 17.3%, respectively. Further, 20% of participants suffered from neuropathic pain. A low correlation between clinician-assessed and patient-reported chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy was detected. The function was significantly impacted by patient-reported motor chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: This study was superior in utilizing the brief and valid patient-reported and clinician-assessed tools to measure sensory and motor chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Moreover, the identification of patient-reported motor symptoms has the largest influence on function in advanced colorectal cancer survivors. Nurses may use the brief and easily administered tools in clinical settings for effective screening and early detection of motor and sensory chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy to prevent functional decline in advanced colorectal cancer survivors. However, this study was still limited because of the cross-sectional design, small sample size, sample heterogeneity, and recruiting participants from only one medical center.

Does Pathological T-Factor Affect Long-term Prognosis of Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) has poor long-term outcomes. Our hypothesis was that the pathological tumor depth would affect postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent multivisceral resection with clear margins (R0). The aim of this study was to analyze short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent multivisceral resection for LACC, comparing between T3 and T4 stages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a propensity score-matched, retrospective study. All 8,764 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between April 2007 and January 2021 at the Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were screened; 572 underwent multivisceral resection for LACC. We compared the T3 and T4 groups to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (hazard ratio=1.344, 95% confidence interval=0.638-2.907, p=0.33). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly worse for the T4 group than for the T3 group (hazard ratio=3.162, 95% confidence interval=1.077-11.44), p=0.037). To determine the association between American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, transfusion, pathological T and OS, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses. ASA, transfusion, and pathological T-stage were associated with worse OS in univariate analysis (T4 vs. T3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that postoperative complications and DFS of the T4 group were similar to those of the T3 group of locally advanced colorectal cancer treated with laparoscopic multivisceral resection. However, OS was worse in the T4 group compared with the T3 group. Multivariate risk factors for poor OS were ASA>2, transfusion, and T4 stage.

Survival comparison of first-line treatment regimens in patients with braf-mutated advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis, and treatment options that can improve outcome are still under investigation. The purpose of this study was to discuss the differences of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced CRC who were treated with chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy in advanced first-line therapy. METHODS: Grouping of 61 patients according to first-line treatment regimen (chemotherapy alone/chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare OS and PFS. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to measure the risk of first-line medication therapies while correcting for confounding factors that may affect PFS and OS. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OS between patients treated with chemotherapy alone and those treated with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (P = 0.93; HR, 1.027; 95% CI, 0.555-1.901). Likewise, there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (P = 0.29; HR, 0.734; 95% CI, 0.413-1.304). Subgroup analysis showed that OS and PFS of different treatment regimens were not significantly different among subgroups. Multivariate analysis suggested that surgical treatment of primary tumor (P = 0.001; HR, 0.326; 95% CI, 0.169-0.631) and presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.009; HR, 2.399; 95% CI, 1.242-4.635) may serve as independent prognostic indicators in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC. Surgical treatment of the primary tumor (P = 0.041; HR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.280-0.974) was significantly associated with PFS too. CONCLUSION: For patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced CRC, chemotherapy alone did not differ significantly in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy + bevacizumab for advanced first-line therapy. Chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy did not render a survival benefit to these patients, demonstrating that the importance of developing new treatment options for this population.