Albumin levels predict prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: With the development of therapy and prognostic criteria for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), the prognostic value of serum albumin level has remained in dispute. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of pre-treatment albumin in predicting the prognosis of mRCC patients in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments. METHODS: The qualitative and quantitative synthesis was conducted of studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception of these databases to July 19, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from studies comparing different levels of pre-treatment serum albumin (as a dichotomous or continuous variable) in mRCC patients treated with TKI agents. RESULTS: Within 5,638 primitive records, 16 were eligible and 14 had adequate data for quantitative analysis (N = 2,863 participants). Random-effects meta-analysis showed that lower albumin was related to poorer OS (dichotomous: HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.64-2.46, P < 0.001, I2 = 28.8%; continuous: HR =0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00, P = 0.040, I2 = 67.5%) and PFS (dichotomous: HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.01, P = 0.029, I2 = 57.4%; continuous: HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98, P = 0.023, I2 = 93.3%). CONCLUSION: Lower pre-treatment serum albumin level is an independent adverse predictor of prognosis of mRCC patients receiving TKI therapy. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020196802 Sep. 2nd, 2020.

Temporal trends of adverse events and costs of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Aims: To assess grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and costs of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Individual patient data from the all treated population in the CheckMate 214 trial (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 547; sunitinib, n = 535) were used to calculate the number of AEs. AE unit costs were obtained from US 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and inflated to 2020 values. Results: The proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs decreased over time. Patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab had lower average per-patient all-cause grade 3/4 AE costs versus sunitinib (12-month: US$15,170 vs US$20,342; 42-month: US$19,096 vs US$27,473). Conclusion: Treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with lower grade 3/4 AE costs than sunitinib.

Immunotherapy combinations are now accepted as safe and effective first-line treatment options for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This study used patient data from the CheckMate 214 clinical trial to evaluate the temporal trends and costs related to grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) among patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib. We found that the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs decreased over time and that patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab had lower AE costs compared with those treated with sunitinib (at 42 months: US$19,096 vs US$27,473 per patient). As such, nivolumab plus ipilimumab may represent a treatment option that may reduce both the clinical and economic burden among patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Preliminary experience in guiding individualized targeted therapy of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma with gene detection technology / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective To explore the efficacy and tolerance of adverse reactions of gene detection technique in guiding individualized targeted therapy for advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 62 patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma before and after receiving targeted drug treatment in our department from October 2015 to October 2017.Among the 62 patients,there were 36 males and 26 females,with an average age of (54 ± 13) years old.16 patients were treated with sunitinib,20 patients were treated with sorafenib and 26 patients were treated with pazopanib.A total of 28 patients (individualized group) were selected to receive targeted drug according to the results of gene detection,and 34 patients were treated with targeted drug empirically (empirical group).In individualized group,there were 17 males and 11 females with the average age of (51.3 ± 15.6) years old.20 patients accepted the operation.The distant metastasis included bone metastasis in 21 cases,lung metastasis in 7 cases,liver metastasis in 16 cases,epidermal metastasis in 4 cases and lymphatic metastasis in 14 cases.According to risk of MSKCC,the case number of low risk,moderate risk and high risk were 15,7,6,respectively.7 patients were treated with sunitinib,8 patients were treated with sorafenib and 13 patients were treated with pazopanib.In empirical group,there were 19 males and 15 females with the average age of (56.3 ± 10.1) years old.22 patients accepted the operation.The distant metastasis included bone metastasis in 20 cases,lung metastasis in 5 cases,liver metastasis in 13 cases,epidermal metastasis in 3 cases and lymphatic metastasis in 15 cases.According to risk of MSKCC,the case number of low risk,moderate risk and high risk were 20,g,6,respectively.9 patients were treated with sunitinib,12 patients were treated with sorafenib and 13 patients were treated with pazopanib.The baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients,including gender,age,whether operation was performed,site of metastasis,and risk of MSKCC,didn't show significant difference.Patients in both groups received the standard treatment regimen and the follow-up duration was 4-26 months to observe the efficacy,progression-free survival and tolerance to adverse reactions of the targeted therapy.Results After 12 months of treatment,15 patients in the individualized group was recorded objective remission.7 patients in the empirical group was recorded objective remission,as well.The tumor control efficacy of the individualized group was significantly better than that of the empirical group (46.4％ vs.20.6％,P =0.03).Meanwhile,the median progression-free survival time (15.2 months,3.7-24.2 months) in the individualized group was significantly longer than that in the empirical group (12.1 months,2.8-22.1 months) (P =0.009).Compared with the empirical group,the higher incidence of targeted treatment-related adverse reactions occurred in the individualized group,including thrombocytopenia (46.4％ vs.17.6％ P =0.014),leukopenia (46.4％ vs.17.6％ P =0.005),hypertension (71.4％ vs.44.1％,P =0.031) and hypothyroidism(60.7％ vs.29.4％,P=0.013).Conclusions Compared with the patients with empirical drugs,the application of gene detection technique to select individualized targeted drugs for the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cancer is obvious curatively effective,and to a certain extent extends the progression-free survival time of patients.