Heightened response to positive facial cues as a potential marker of resilience following childhood adversity.

Background: Childhood maltreatment profoundly influences social and emotional development, increasing psychiatric risk. Alterations in the implicit processing of threat-related cues following early abuse and neglect represent a marker of mental health vulnerability. Less is known about how early adversity influences the perception of positive social cues, despite their central role in establishing and maintaining social interactions and their association with better mental health outcomes.Methods: The sample consisted of 42 children and adolescents with substantiated childhood maltreatment experiences and 32 peers (mean age 13.3), matched on age, pubertal status, gender, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and cognitive ability. A computerised experimental task assessed the perceived emotional intensity of positive (happy) and negative (fearful) facial expressions. Mental health symptoms were measured via self- and parental reports, and perceived social support was self-reported.Results: The experience of abuse and neglect was associated with heightened perceived intensity of positive facial cues. Cross-sectional post-hoc moderation and mediation analyses, employing a model-building approach, revealed that in maltreatment-exposed participants: (i) their increased response to positive facial cues was associated with lower symptoms; (ii) the presence of social support accounted for their heightened perceived intensity of positive facial cues; (iii) the presence of social support putatively contributed to lower symptoms by increasing the perceived intensity of positive facial cues. No group differences in perceived intensity of negative expressions were observed.Conclusions: These findings provide fresh insight into how positive faces are processed following maltreatment experience in childhood. Maltreatment experience was found to be associated with heightened perceived intensity of happy faces, which in turn was associated with better mental health and greater levels of social support. This suggests that heightened saliency of positive emotions acts protectively in children with maltreatment experience.

The impact of childhood maltreatment on perceiving positive social cues, especially explicit emotional intensity appraisal, is less understood compared to the extensive focus on its role in processing threat-related cues and psychiatric risk.In this study, we found that maltreatment experience was associated with heightened perceived intensity of happy faces, which in turn was associated with better mental health and greater levels of social support.These findings suggest that heightened saliency of positive emotions may act protectively in children with maltreatment experience.

Internalizing Problems in Adopted Eastern European Adolescents: The Role of the Informant, Early Adversity and Post-Adoption Processes / Problemas Internalizantes en Adolescentes Adoptados de Europa del Este: el Rol del Informante, la Adversidad Temprana y los Procesos Post-adopción

Background: Internationally adopted children who suffered early institutionalization are at risk of a late onset of internalizing problems in adolescence. Both pre-adoption, adversity-related, and post-adoption factors predict variability in internalizing problems in this population. Previous studies have suggested different patterns of parent- adolescent informant discrepancies in adoptive dyads. Method: We analyzed internalizing problems among 66 adolescents internationally adopted from Russia to Spanish families using both the parent- and self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and comparing them with a low-risk, community group (n = 30). We assessed pre-adoption and post-adoption factors and evaluated cross-informant discrepancies. Results: Internationally adopted adolescents exhibited more internalizing problems by parent-report than community adolescents, but there were no differences by self-report. Adopted youth showed no discrepancies between parent and self-report, whereas community adolescents reported more internalizing symptoms than their parents. Pre-adoption adversity-related factors predicted parent-reported internalizing problems, while post-adoption factors predicted self-reported internalizing problems. Conclusions: Parent-adolescent informant discrepancies in adopted adolescents from Eastern Europe for internalizing symptoms were lower than in community adolescents. Both adversity-related factors and the lived experience of adoption may influence the development of internalizing symptoms in internationally adopted adolescents.(AU)

Antecedentes: Los niños y niñas adoptados internacionalmente están en riesgo de desarrollar problemas emocionales en la adolescencia. Factores relacionados con la adversidad y con procesos post-adopción predicen variabilidad en problemas internalizantes en esta población. Estudios previos sugieren también diferentes patrones de discrepancias entre informantes en diadas adoptivas. Método: Analizamos los problemas internalizantes en 66 adolescentes adoptados de Rusia a familias españolas, usando el Cuestionario de Capacidades y Fortalezas y comparándoles con un grupo adolescentes de la comunidad (n = 30). Evaluamos factores pre- y post-adopción y discrepancias entre informantes (autoinforme e informe parental). Resultados: Los adolescentes adoptados mostraron más problemas internalizantes por informe parental que los adolescentes comunitarios, pero no hubo diferencias por autoinforme. En el grupo adoptado no hubo discrepancias entre informantes, mientras que el grupo de comparación reportó más síntomas internalizantes que sus progenitores. Factores relacionados con la adversidad predijeron problemas internalizantes por informe parental, mientras que factores post-adopción predijeron problemas internalizantes por autoinforme. Conclusiones: Las discrepancias entre informantes en problemas internalizantes fueron menores en adolescentes adoptados que en adolescentes de la comunidad. Tanto factores relacionados con laadversidad como con la vivencia de la adopción pueden influir en el desarrollo de problemas internalizantes en adolescentes adoptados internacionalmente.(AU)

Trastorno límite de la personalidad (TLP), experiencias adversas tempranas y sesgos cognitivos: una revisión sistemática

Introducción: La investigación actual y los artículos rastreados sobre adversidad temprana y sesgos cognitivos en pacientes con trastorno límite de la personalidad (TLP) evidencian la relación entre estas variables y la gravedad de los síntomas clínicos de este trastorno. Objetivo: Revisar sistemáticamente la evidencia de la relación entre adversidad temprana, sesgos cognitivos y agudización de los síntomas del TLP. El vacío investigativo tiene que ver con el tipo específico de adversidad temprana y su relación con el tipo específico de sesgos cognitivos y el curso del TLP de pacientes con este diagnóstico. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura y para reportar la evidencia se utilizó la versión 2020 de la declaración Prisma. Las bases de datos consultadas fueron Scopus, Pubmed, Web of Science y PsycInfo. En la búsqueda también se incluyeron bases de datos de literatura gris como Google Académico, Open Gray y WorldCat. Resultados: En total se incluyeron en el estudio 13 artículos que satisficieron criterios de originalidad, temática estudiada (adversidad temprana, funcionamiento cognitivo y sintomatología límite) y población indicada (pacientes con diagnóstico de TLP). Conclusiones: Si bien existe evidencia de que la adversidad temprana en general es un factor de riesgo para el TLP, se necesita más investigación para comprender los tipos específicos de adversidad que pueden estar más fuertemente relacionados con el desarrollo del TLP. Si bien algunos estudios han identificado sesgos cognitivos en individuos con TLP, poco se conoce sobre el modo en que estos sesgos se desarrollan y cambian con el tiempo, o según la etapa de exposición del paciente a la adversidad temprana.

Introduction: Current research and articles on early adversity and cognitive biases in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) demonstrate the relationship between these variables and the severity of the clinical symptoms of this disorder. Objective: The aim was to systematically review the evidence of the relationship between early adversity, cognitive biases, and exacerbation of symptoms of borderline personality disorder. The research gap concerns the particular type of early adversity and its relationship with the specific type of cognitive biases and the course of BPD in patients with this diagnosis. Methodology: We conducted a systematic literature review, and the Prisma statement version 2020 was used to report the evidence. The databases consulted were Scopus, Pubmed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. Gray literature databases, such as Google Scholar, Open Gray, and WorldCat, were also included in the search. Results: We included 13 articles in the study that met the criteria for originality, studied theme (early adversity, cognitive functioning, and borderline symptomatology), and target population (patients diagnosed with a personality disorder). Conclusions: We found that while there is evidence that early adversity, in general, is a risk factor for BPD, further research is needed to understand the specific types of adversity that may be more strongly related to the development of BPD. In addition, although some studies have identified cognitive biases in individuals with BPD, little is known about how these biases develop and change over time or according to the stage of the patient's exposure to early adversity.

The Youth and Childhood Adversity Scale: a step towards developing a new measure of adversity and its severity.

Background: Early adversity (EA) can contribute to the onset, manifestation, and course of various mental disorders. Measuring EA is still conceptually and psychometrically challenging due to issues such as content coverage, item-wording, scaling methods, and validation procedures. Further, despite research demonstrating the importance of the severity of EA, most EA scales solely focused on the 'presence-versus-absence' indicator of adverse events.Objective: To address these potentially relevant gaps, we have developed a 13-item measure of EA, the Youth and Childhood Adversity Scale (YCAS). Beyond a dichotomous assessment of whether a set of adverse events have been experienced, this scale also assesses the respective severity of these events.Methods: We evaluated the YCAS in a sample of 596 adolescent students (ages 16-19) and a second sample of 451 medical students (ages 18-30+). Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying structure as proposed by the data, which was then tested with confirmatory factor analysis. We psychometrically assessed both factor scores and sum scores.Results: In both samples, a one-factorial solution was found for both responses to dichotomous items and severity items. Item loadings had a broad range, with minimum loadings of .1-.2 and maximum loadings of .7-.9. Irrespective of the response type, this factor exhibited good reliability (omega total, range: .80 - .89) and was associated with a range of mental-health outcomes, self-esteem, and childhood maltreatment. The fit of the model resembling sum scores was not satisfactory, but the sum score reliability (coefficient alpha, range: .78 - .89) was acceptable and most of the associations with the validation measures held.Conclusions: The YCAS allows an efficient, reliable, and valid assessment of EA and its severity. It covers a reasonable breadth of events, whilst simultaneously being parsimonious. We discuss next steps of how to improve this measure to fully capture the complexity of EA.

We present the Youth and Childhood Adversity Scale (YCAS), measuring the presence and severity of adversities.Both yes/no and severity ratings had a 1-factor solution of good reliability and validity.Further refinement of the YCAS, eg improved content breadth, is suggested.

¿En qué medida la adversidad temprana y la depresión explican la satisfacción de pareja? / How does early adversity and depression explain satisfaction of a couple?

Las experiencias adversas durante la infancia pueden constituirse en eventos traumáticos que impactan la calidad de los vínculos y la salud mental a lo largo del ciclo vital, siendo la depresión un trastorno frecuente en quienes reportan estas vivencias. La depresión ha sido asociada positivamente a la adversidad temprana y negativamente con la satisfacción de pareja durante la adultez, pero se desconoce el valor explicativo de la adversidad temprana y la depresión en los niveles de satisfacción de pareja. Considerando estos antecedentes, se desarrolló un estudio transversal, correlacional y comparativo en 160 madres y padres chilenos(as). Los resultados mostraron altos niveles de satisfacción de pareja y una asociación positiva entre las experiencias adversas y la depresión en padres y madres. Las madres presentaron mayores puntajes que los padres en depresión [t(79) =4.72, p<.001] y en experiencias adversas tempranas [t(79)= 3.468, p<.001], explicando la depresión materna y paterna junto a la satisfacción de pareja paterna un 51.8% de la satisfacción de pareja en las mujeres. En cuanto a los padres, su sintomatología depresiva y la satisfacción de la madre, explicaron un 58.9% de su satisfacción de pareja. Se discute la relevancia y las implicancias clínicas de los resultados

Adverse experiences in childhood are often traumatic events that affect relationships and mental health throughout the life cycle, with depression being a prevalent disorder in those who report them. Although depression has been positively associated with early adver-sity and negatively with couple satisfaction during adulthood, there are no studies that evaluate the explanatory value of both variables at the level of couple satisfaction. Therefore, a cross-sectional, correlational and comparative study was carried out in 160 fathers and mothers. The results showed high levels of couple satisfaction and a positive association between childhood adverse experiences and depression in parents. Mothers showed higher scores than fathers in depression [t(79) = 4.72; p <, 001] and in childhood adverse experiences [t(79) = 3,468 p <.001]. Moreover, for them, depression explained 53% of couple satisfaction. As for the father, a depressive symptomatology, childhood adverse experiences and the mother's depressive symptomatology explained 35% of his couple satisfaction