Role of therapeutic inertia in glycemic control according to individualized objectives in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Results from CONCARDIA2.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic inertia (TI) is the lack of initiation or intensification of treatment when indicated. It contributes to the fact that more than a third of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) do not have adequate metabolic control. We set out to analyze the impact of TI during 4 years of follow-up in a cohort of T2D and its possible variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of a cohort of 297 TD2 patients. We considered TI when treatment was not modified during the 4 years, despite poor control. We contemplate uncontrolled those that did not meet their individualized HbA1c target. RESULTS: Uncontrolled patients: 87; age: 62.2 ±â€¯9.2; 58.7% men. We consider TI in 41.6% of the patients. Average HbA1c 8.22% in patients with treatment intensification of which 43.1% achieved their HbA1c goal, 29.8% were on monotherapy at the beginning, 29.8% double, 36.2% triple and 2,1% in quadruple therapy. There was more change in treatment in people with obesity (67.6 vs. 34.6%; P < 0.01) and the 6 of the study patients with cardiovascular events (P < 0.05). Metformin was part of the treatment in 97.1% of IT cases (vs. 76.6%; P < 0.01). Achievement of the HbA1c target was higher in patients receiving iSGLT2 (0 vs. 68.4%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In 2 out of 5 uncontrolled T2D patients, the treatment was not changed; this was more evident in those patients treated with metformin. Patients with obesity and presence of cardiovascular events seem to protect against IT. Those who were on iSGLT2 have an advantage in meeting their HbA1c target.

Análogos de GLP1 en los pacientes con sobrepeso u obesidad durante el confinamiento / GLP1 analogues among patients with overweight or obesity during lockdown

Antecedentes y objetivosUno de los potenciales efectos negativos de un confinamiento son los cambios en los patrones dietéticos y de estilo de vida, que pueden conllevar a una ganancia de peso. El objetivo fue ver los cambios sobre los hábitos higiénico-dietéticos y de patrones de ingesta en una situación de confinamiento y el impacto sobre el peso. Asimismo, ver si el estar bajo tratamiento con análogos de GLP1 (aGLP1) modificó estos parámetros.Material y métodosSe reclutó, de forma consecutiva, a 100 pacientes con sobrepeso/obesidad que acudieron a revisión al finalizar el confinamiento. Se diseñó una entrevista estructurada para ver los cambios en los hábitos dietéticos, rutinas y ejercicio.ResultadosEl 52% de los pacientes ganaron peso durante el confinamiento. El porcentaje de sujetos con historia activa de depresión o ansiedad fue superior entre el grupo de pacientes que ganó peso. El porcentaje de pacientes que empeoraron su hiperfagia ansiosa fue superior en aquellos que ganaron peso (71,2% vs. 10,6%; p<0,0001); lo mismo ocurrió con los atracones (92% vs. 10,6%; p<0,0001) y los cravings, dulces y salados (69,2% vs. 21,3% y 69,2% vs. 14,9%; p<0,0001 y p<0,0001, respectivamente). De los 48 pacientes que no ganaron peso, 30 estaban en tratamiento con aGLP1 (61,7%). El empeoramiento de los patrones anómalos de ingesta fue inferior entre los pacientes en tratamiento con aGLP-1.ConclusionesUn confinamiento es un período vulnerable para ganar peso, especialmente en aquellos pacientes con antecedentes psicopatológicos. Los aGLP1 consiguen controlar la ingesta emocional convirtiéndolos en una opción terapéutica valiosa.

GLP1 analogues among patients with overweight or obesity during lockdown. / Análogos de GLP1 en los pacientes con sobrepeso u obesidad durante el confinamiento.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the potential negative effects of a lockdown are changes in dietary and lifestyle patterns, which can lead to weight gain. Our objective was to assess the changes on dietary habits and eating patterns in a lockdown situation and their impact on weight. We aimed to determine whether the treatment with GLP1 analogues (aGLP1) could impact on these parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 100 overweight/obese patients were consecutively recruited for a review at the end of the lockdown. A structured interview was designed to see changes in dietary habits, routines and exercise. RESULTS: 52% patients gained weight during lockdown. The percentage of subjects with an active history of depression or anxiety was higher among the group of patients who gained weight. The percentage of patients who worsened their hyperphagia was higher in those who gained weight (71.2% vs. 10.6%; P<0.0001); similar results were observed with binge eating (92% vs. 10.6%; p<0.0001) and cravings, both sweet and salty (69.2% vs. 21.3% and 69.2% vs. 14.9%; p<0.0001 and p<0.0001 respectively). Of the 48 patients who did not gain weight, 30 were under aGLP1 treatment (61.7%). The worsening of abnormal eating patterns was lower among patients treated with aGLP-1. CONCLUSIONS: A lockdown is a vulnerable period to gain weight, especially in those patients with a psychopathological history. aGLP1 manage to control emotional eating, making them a valuable therapeutic option.

El efecto de los antihiperglicemiantes en los parámetros ecocardiográficos diastólicos y sistólicos / The effect of antihyperglycemic agents on diastolic and systolic echocardiographic parameters

Resumen La enfermedad metabólica diabetes mellitus tipo 2 ocasiona alteraciones en la estructura y en la funcionalidad miocárdica por diferentes mecanismos bioquímicos los cuales pueden ocasionar disfunción diastólica y sistólica, por lo cual el uso de los antihiperglicemiantes aparte de su efecto en la reducción de la hiperglicemia y la hemoglobina glicosilada, algunos han demostrado reducción en la mortalidad cardiovascular y de las hospitalizaciones por insuficiencia cardiaca, basado en estudios clínicos sobre este impacto en el miocardio. También se ha evaluado el efecto de estos fármacos por medio del ecocardiograma transtorácico. El objetivo de este articulo es analizar los valores de los parámetros ecocardiográficos sistólicos y diastólicos en pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 o alguna cardiopatía de base como antecedente de infarto al miocardio e insuficiencia cardiaca con el uso de metformina, sulfonilureas, los inhibidores de la dipeptidilpeptidasa 4 (sitagliptina, alogliptina y linagliptina, vildagliptina), los análogos de GLP1 (liraglutide, albiglutide y exenatide).

Abstract Metabolic disease type 2 diabetes mellitus causes alterations in both structure and myocardial functionality by different biochemical mechanisms which can cause diastolic and systolic dysfunction, which is why the use of antihyperglycemic agents apart from its effect in the reduction of hyperglycemia and glycosylated hemoglobin, some groups have shown reduction in cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure this based on clinical studies, by hypothesis, theories and pleiotropic mechanisms on this impact on the myocardium. On the other hand, the effect of these drugs on the myocardium has also been evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Therefore, the aim of this article is to analyze the values of systolic and diastolic echocardiographic parameters in type 2 diabetic patients or some underlying heart disease as a history of myocardial infarction and heart failure with the use of metformin, sulfonylureas, inhibitors of the dipeptidylpeptidase 4 (sitagliptin, alogliptin and linagliptin, vildagliptin), GLP1 analogues (liraglutide, albiglutide and exenatide).

Actualización del efecto de los antihiperglicemiantes en la función renal en diabetes mellitus tipo 2 / Update of the effect of antihyperglycemic agents on renal function in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Resumen La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 es una de las enfermedades metabólicas que afecta a diferentes órganos, uno en el cual es el riñón. Una de las principales complicaciones microvasculares es la nefropatía diabética, siendo la principal causa de insuficiencia renal crónica a nivel mundial. De ahí la importancia de las recomendaciones en la utilización o no de los fármacos antihiperglicemiantes, basadas en sus efectos beneficiosos a nivel de la función renal en relación con la tasa de filtración glomerular estimada y la relación albumina/creatinina en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y enfermedad renal. En estudios recientes se han evaluado antihiperglicemiantes con un impacto beneficioso a nivel de desenlaces cardiovascular y renal. En el presente artículo se revisan las acciones y los efectos de los diferentes grupos de medicamentos como la metformina, los inhibidores de la dipeptidil peptidasa 4, los agonistas de la GLP-1, tiazolidinedionas, sulfonilureas, inhibidores del cotransportador de sodio-glucosa tipo 2 e insulinas en la función renal en cuanto a las dosis de cada fármaco, tanto el uso de dosis establecidas, disminución de la dosis o el no uso del medicamento con base en el empeoramiento de la tasa de filtración glomerular estimada. Con respecto a la metodología aplicada para el desarrollo del artículo, se seleccionó artículos a partir de palabras claves como diabetes mellitus tipo 2, antihiperglicemiantes en la función renal, tasa de filtración glomerular estimada y relación albumina/creatinina; se emplearon artículos de revistas reconocidas que no superaran 5 años en su publicación, sin embargo, se utilizaron artículos que superaran este tiempo, dado que aportaban datos importantes para el artículo de revisión.

Abstract Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the metabolic diseases that affects different organs, one of which is the kidney. One of the main microvascular complications is diabetic nephropathy, being the main cause of chronic renal failure worldwide. Hence the importance of recommendations on the use or non-use of antihyperglycemic drugs based on their beneficial effects on kidney function, expressed by the estimated glomerular filtration rate and the albumin / creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and kidney disease. Recent studies have shown antihyperglycemic agents with beneficial impact in cardiovascular and renal endpoints. In the present article we will review the actions and effects of different groups of drugs such as metformin, inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4, GLP-1 agonists, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, SGLT-2 inhibitors and insulins in renal function in relation to the doses of each drug, both the use of established doses, reduction of the dose or non-use of the drug based on the worsening of the estimated glomerular filtration rate. With respect to the methodology applied for the development of the article, a selection of articles was made based on key words such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, antihyperglycemic agents in renal function, estimated glomerular filtration rate and albumin/ creatinine ratio. Prestigious journal articles were used with less than 5 years since its publication, however articles that exceed this time were used as they provided important data in the review article.

[Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: Beyond glycaemic control]. / Lixisenatida en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y obesidad: más allá del control glucémico.

AIM: To evaluate tolerance to lixisenatide and its effects on weight and metabolic control in type2 diabetes and obese patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Endocrinology clinics in Almeria, Granada and Malaga. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type2 diabetes and obesity. INTERVENTIONS: Response and tolerance to lixisenatide treatment. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and analytical data of the subjects were evaluated at baseline and after treatment. RESULTS: The study included 104 patients (51% women) with type2 diabetes and obesity (Almeria 18.3%; Granada 40.4%; Malaga 41.3%). The mean age was 58.4±10.5years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 11.2±6.7years. The patients were re-evaluated at 3.8±1.6months after treatment with lixisenatide. Significant improvements were found in weight (P<.001), body mass index (P<.001), waist circumference (P=.002), systolic blood pressure (P<.001), diastolic blood pressure (P=.001), fasting glucose (P<.001), HbA1c (P=.022), Total cholesterol (P<.001), LDL-cholesterol (P=.046), triglycerides (P=.020), hypertension drugs (P<.001), and lipids drugs (P<.001). No changes were observed in levels of amylase related to lixisenatide treatment, and 7.9% of patients did not tolerate it. CONCLUSIONS: Lixisenatide achieved significant improvements in anthropometric parameters, glycaemic control (fasting glucose and HbA1c), blood pressure and lipids. It was safe and well tolerated in most patients. In addition, there was a significant increase in the use of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy.