Is Component-Specific Antibody Testing Sufficient to Replace the Oral Food Challenge in the Diagnostics of Peanut-Sensitized Children? A Proof-of-Concept Study.

(1) Peanut allergy is associated with high risk of anaphylaxis which could be prevented by oral immunotherapy. Patients eligible for immunotherapy are selected on the basis of a food challenge, although currently the assessment of antibodies against main peanut molecules (Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 6) is thought to be another option. (2) The current study assessed the relationship between the mentioned antibodies, challenge outcomes, skin tests and some other parameters in peanut-sensitized children. It involved 74 children, divided into two groups, based on their response to a food challenge. (3) Both groups differed in results of skin tests, levels of component-specific antibodies and peanut exposure history. The antibody levels were then used to calculate thresholds for prediction of challenge results or symptom severity. While the antibody-based challenge prediction revealed statistical significance, it failed in cases of severe symptoms. Furthermore, no significant correlation was observed between antibody levels, symptom-eliciting doses and the risk of severe anaphylaxis. Although in some patients it could result from interference with IgG4, the latter would not be a universal explanation of this phenomenon. (4) Despite some limitations, antibody-based screening may be an alternative to the food challenge, although its clinical relevance still requires further studies.

Prevalence of food allergy increased 1.7 times in the past 10 years among Japanese patients below 6 years of age.

BACKGROUND: While food allergy (FA) has been increasingly recognized as a growing public health burden worldwide, epidemiological studies on FA in Japan are limited. METHODS: This was a noninterventional, observational study using the administrative claims data from 2010 to 2019 (10 years). Patients with physician-diagnosed FA in Japan (prevalent cohort) were divided into high-risk or low-risk cohorts using adrenaline prescription. The high-risk cohort was further divided into anaphylaxis or nonanaphylaxis cohort based on the occurrence of anaphylaxis or a serious allergic reaction (SAR) during 1 year after adrenaline prescription. The primary objective was to examine yearly prevalence of FA. The secondary objectives were to describe demographics/clinical characteristics and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), to evaluate the number of occurrences of anaphylaxis/SAR in the high-risk cohort, and the impact of anaphylaxis/SAR on HCRU. RESULTS: The overall standardized prevalence rate was 0.325% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.311-0.339) in 2010 and 0.797% (95% CI, 0.790-0.804) in 2019 and predominant in patients age <6 years (preschool; 3.377% [95% CI, 3.229-3.525] in 2010 and 5.726% [95% CI, 5.663-5.789] in 2019). Majority of FA patients (>80%) were children/adolescent throughout the 10 years. While high-risk cohort was a relatively minor population (8.5% in the prevalent cohort in 2019), the occurrence of anaphylaxis/SAR in the high-risk cohort was 227,690/100,000 patient-years. Multivariate analysis showed a significant increase in HCRU variables in the anaphylaxis versus nonanaphylaxis cohort (e.g., 2.08 [95% CI, 2.05-2.11] times more FA-related outpatient visits). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of FA increased in a statistically significant way from 2010 to 2019; 1.7-fold increase was observed in patients <6 years old. Patients in the high-risk cohort appear to have suffered from frequent anaphylaxis/SAR, highlighting an unmet medical need for FA patients at "high-risk," considering the unavailability of approved medications to prevent anaphylaxis/SAR.

[A CASE OF FOOD-DEPENDENT EXERCISE-INDUCED ANAPHYLAXIS DUE TO POLISHED RICE].

A 14-year-old girl presented to our hospital with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA), possibly caused by rice. Despite experiencing four previous episodes of suspected FDEIA, she did not seek medical attention at her own discretion. On the fifth occurrence of symptoms, the general practitioner suspected FDEIA and referred the patient to our hospital. The only common factor in all five episodes was the consumption of rice, leading to the examination of the patient under suspicion of FDEIA caused by rice. Skin prick test results were positive for bran and polished rice, and exercise after consumption of polished rice resulted in anaphylaxis. Therefore, we diagnosed FDEIA caused by polished rice. Immunoblotting confirmed the presence of immunoglobulin E reacting with 14-16kDa rice bran protein in the patient's serum. The immunoblot inhibition test suggested that the rice bran protein to which the patient's serum reacted was also present in polished rice and no wash rice. As the patient may experience FDEIA after ingestion of no wash rice or rice flour, she was advised to eliminate these from her diet, treating them similarly to brown rice or polished rice.

A rare case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis caused by potato snacks.

A rare case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis caused by potato snacks is reported. Specific food triggers for anaphylaxis were identified by using the skin prick test, antigen analysis, and serum IgE assays. Four potato proteins were considered candidate antigens for food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

Exploring young adults' experiences with food allergy during their teenage years: A practice research study.

INTRODUCTION: Symptoms of anxiety, eating disorders and social isolation are prevalent among teenagers with food allergy compared to peers without. Treatment of teenagers with food allergy focus on preventing anaphylactic reactions, with little attention to promoting social and emotional well-being. The aim of the study was to explore young adults' perspectives on everyday life with food allergy during their teenage years to improve future clinical practice. METHODS: Critical psychological practice research. During a 2-day camp the perspectives of 10 young adults (18-23 years) were explored through participant observation and informal interviews. Three follow up interviews were conducted. A co-researcher group discussed preliminary results, clinical challenges and ways forward. RESULTS: Being together with peers with food allergy was crucial, fostering belonging and normalisation. The shift in responsibility of managing the risk feels overwhelming and stressful during teen age. Self-understanding was influenced when managing food allergy in social contexts, inducing feelings of burden and isolation. Acceptance and understanding from social relations became important for all participants, and they all underlined desire for being viewed as individuals rather than being defined by their allergy. CONCLUSION: Support from other peers with food allergy is crucial for the participants. Transition to independently managing risks introduces uncertainty and social constraints, affecting self-understanding and interactions. Clinicians should prioritise peer support and empower teenagers in managing the risk and psychosocial challenges.

A retrospective comparison of IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy management strategies in pediatric cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Complete avoidance of milk is the usual management for IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA). A baked milk ladder is a method of dietary advancement therapy in IgE-mediated CMPA in Ireland, while in Spain, avoidance of milk awaiting natural tolerance acquisition through an oral food challenge (OFC) is employed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of dietary advancement therapy using a milk ladder compared with complete avoidance of milk for managing IgE-mediated CMPA. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 371 pediatric patients from the population who have been treated for IgE-mediated CMPA between 2011 and 2020, with the milk ladder (Ireland) or complete avoidance followed by an OFC (Spain). The main outcome was the introduction of cow's milk. RESULTS: Milk ladder patients were 3.67 times more likely to succeed in comparison with milk avoidance (p < .001). Anaphylaxis during the treatment period occurred in 34 patients in the milk avoidance groups, while three patients in the milk ladder group experienced anaphylaxis due to accidental exposure to milk (p < .001). Failure to complete treatment was associated with a higher skin prick test in the milk avoidance group and a raised specific IgE in the milk ladder group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that compares outcomes of dietary advancement therapy to complete avoidance for CMPA management, demonstrating that cow's milk can be successfully and safely reintroduced using dietary advancement therapy using a milk ladder.

Legume Allergens Pea, Chickpea, Lentil, Lupine and Beyond.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: In the last decade, an increasing trend towards a supposedly healthier vegan diet could be observed. However, recently, more cases of allergic reactions to plants and plant-based products such as meat-substitution products, which are often prepared with legumes, were reported. Here, we provide the current knowledge on legume allergen sources and the respective single allergens. We answer the question of which legumes beside the well-known food allergen sources peanut and soybean should be considered for diagnostic and therapeutic measures. RECENT FINDINGS: These "non-priority" legumes, including beans, pea, lentils, chickpea, lupine, cowpea, pigeon pea, and fenugreek, are potentially new important allergen sources, causing mild-to-severe allergic reactions. Severe reactions have been described particularly for peas and lupine. An interesting aspect is the connection between anaphylactic reactions and exercise (food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis), which has only recently been highlighted for legumes such as soybean, lentils and chickpea. Most allergic reactions derive from IgE cross-reactions to homologous proteins, for example between peanut and lupine, which is of particular importance for peanut-allergic individuals ignorant to these cross-reactions. From our findings we conclude that there is a need for large-scale studies that are geographically distinctive because most studies are case reports, and geographic differences of allergic diseases towards these legumes have already been discovered for well-known "Big 9" allergen sources such as peanut and soybean. Furthermore, the review illustrates the need for a better molecular diagnostic for these emerging non-priority allergen sources to evaluate IgE cross-reactivities to known allergens and identify true allergic reactions.

Pru p 3-specific IgE affinity is crucial in severe peach-allergy patients.

Background: Peach allergy is common food allergen. Allergen components-specific antibodies of different isotypes in peach-allergy patients are poorly studied. Factors other than Pru p 3-sIgE levels may be related to severe symptoms. Objective: To evaluated peach component-specific-IgE, IgG1, and IgG4 characteristics in individuals with and without peach allergy, and Pru p 3-sIgE affinity in patients with different clinical symptoms. Methods: Fifteen healthy controls and 32 peach-allergy patients were enrolled. sIgE, sIgG1, and sIgG4 to 5 Escherichia coli-expressed peach-allergen components were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Pru p 3-sIgE affinity was measured in Pru p 3-sIgE-positive patients, using immunoadsorbance. Results: Patients were divided into oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and peach-induced anaphylaxis (PIA) groups. Serum Pru p 1-, Pru p 2-, Pru p 3-, Pru p 4-, and Pru p 7-sIgG1s were detected. Pru p 1- and Pru p 2-sIgG1 levels were higher in healthy controls, but Pru p 3-sIgG1 levels were significantly higher in peach-allergy patients. Pru p 1-, Pru p 3-, and Pru p 4-sIgG4-positivity was significantly greater among patients than among controls. Pru p 3 was the predominant allergen in peach-allergy patients. Allergen-sIgG1 and sIgG4 were similar between OAS and PIA patients. Pru p 3-sIgE levels were significantly higher in PIA patients, but Pru p 3-sIgE-positivity was similar in both groups. In Pru p 3-sIgE-positive patients, Pru p 3-sIgE affinity was significantly higher in PIA than OAS patients. Conclusions: Allergen-sIgG1 was associated with allergen exposure. Both Pru p 3-sIgE levels and affinity are key factors in severe peach-allergy patients.

Identifying patients at risk of anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal, systemic hypersensitivity reaction that warrants prompt diagnosis and management. It continues to be challenging to anticipate who may be at risk of a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction. Anaphylaxis can be caused by a range of allergens, such as certain foods, medications, latex, insect stings, etc. Cofactors that augment the severity of clinical symptoms and increase the risk of poor outcomes include exercise, stress, infectious diseases, underlying mast cell disease, active allergic disease such as asthma, advanced age, intake of certain medications, history of previous anaphylaxis, and delayed or missed administration of adrenaline. According to the European Anaphylaxis Registry, food is the major elicitor of anaphylaxis, especially eggs, cow milk, and nuts, in children and adolescents. Reaction to insect venom has also been noted in young adulthood. Early recognition of signs and symptoms and prompt treatment are crucial in anaphylaxis management to avoid serious and even fatal outcomes. It is crucial for both individuals and clinicians to identify the cause of anaphylaxis. Biomarkers of anaphylaxis, such as histamine, tryptase, platelet activation factor (PAF), chymase, carboxypeptidase A3, dipeptidyl peptidase I (DPPI), basogranulin, CCL-2, hsa-miR-451a, may be useful in diagnosis and management. The purpose of this review article is to present a comprehensive overview of current evidence and expert opinions regarding the risk factors that predispose individuals to anaphylaxis. Additionally, it provides insights into potential biomarkers and genetic markers for accurate diagnosis and management. This review underscores the significance of expert guidance in enhancing patient outcomes and enabling self-management of anaphylactic episodes.

Incidence of and risk factors for paediatric perioperative anaphylaxis in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaphylaxis is a serious and often life-threatening immediate hypersensitivity reaction. There are few published data on paediatric perioperative anaphylaxis (pPOA). We evaluated the incidence of and risk factors involved in the occurrence of pPOA within a large US national database. METHODS: Deidentified data from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014 were used to identify pPOA cases and to conduct a retrospective multivariate analysis of preselected independent variables. RESULTS: Among 3,601,180 surgeries and procedures in children aged 0-18 yr, 297 pPOA cases were identified for an incidence of one in 12,125 surgeries and procedures. Compared with controls, pPOA cases had an increased median length of stay (6 vs 2 days; P<0.001) and median hospital cost ($54 719 vs $5109; P<0.0001). The age groups between 6 and 12 yr (odds ratio [OR] 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-12.9; P<0.001) and 13 and 17 yr (OR 8.5; 95% CI 4.7-15.2; P<0.001) were associated with increased odds of pPOA. Transplant (OR 46.3; 95% CI 20.8-102.9; P<0.001), cardiac (OR 16.4; 95% CI 7.5-35.9; P<0.001), and vascular (OR 15.2; 95% CI 7.5-30.7; P<0.001) procedures posed the highest risk for pPOA. Chronic pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, and fluid and electrolyte disorders were also associated with pPOA (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.5-3.3; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pPOA was one in 12,125 cases. Risk factors included age, procedure type, and comorbidities.

[Recommendations for the management of latex allergy in pediatrics]. / Recomendaciones para el manejo de la alergia al látex en pediatría.

Latex allergy, or natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA), is a global health concern, even among the pediatric population, with symptoms varying in severity from mild to potentially life-threatening. Latex is derived from the Hevea Brasiliensis tree, producing twelve million tons annually for use in various everyday and medical products. Despite efforts to mitigate NRLA, its prevalence remains high, especially in at- risk groups such as children with spina bifida. Clinical manifestations include immediate and delayed symptoms, even anaphylactic reactions. Diagnosis involves a detailed medical history and specific tests. Prevention focuses on avoiding exposure, especially in medical and educational settings. Treatment, including immunotherapy, exhibits variable efficacy. NRLA has a strong negative impact on children's quality of life. The objective of this publication is to provide updated information and practical tools for the pediatrician's and allergist's practice.

La alergia al látex del caucho natural (ALCN) es un problema de salud global, incluso en población pediátrica, con síntomas de gravedad variable, desde leves hasta potencialmente mortales. El látex se obtiene del árbol Hevea brasiliensis; se producen doce millones de toneladas anuales que se utilizan en diversos productos cotidianos y médicos. A pesar de los esfuerzos para mitigar la ALCN, su prevalencia sigue siendo alta, especialmente en grupos de riesgo, como niños con espina bífida. Las manifestaciones clínicas incluyen síntomas inmediatos y retardados, hasta reacciones anafilácticas. El diagnóstico requiere una historia clínica detallada y pruebas específicas. La prevención se centra en evitar la exposición, especialmente en entornos médicos y escolares. El tratamiento, incluida la inmunoterapia, muestra eficacia variable. La ALCN tiene un fuerte impacto negativo en la calidad de vida. El objetivo de esta publicación es proveer información actualizada y herramientas prácticas para el consultorio del pediatra y el alergólogo.

A case of paradoxical vocal cord movement misdiagnosed as anaphylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is a severe and life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. The most frequently encountered causes are foods, drugs, and bee venom, but anaphylaxis may also occur idiopathically. Paradoxical vocal cord movement (PVCM), is a cause of upper airway obstruction due to abnormal adduction of vocal cords during inspiration and, to some degree on expiration. It may be misdiagnosed as asthma or anaphylaxis, and there may be delays in diagnosis. CASE REPORT: We present a 20-year-old male patient with coexistence of urticaria and stridor findings who was evaluated and treated as having idiopathic anaphylaxis but then was diagnosed with PVCM after recurrence of stridor attacks. CONCLUSION: It is useful to bear the diagnosis of PVCM in mind in patients with recurrent and unexplained stridor or in patients with stridor that does not improve despite treatment for another diagnosis such as anaphylaxis. This way, administration of epinephrine, high-dose corticosteroids and interventions such as intubation or tracheostomy can be avoided.

Anaphylaxis as an Unusual Cause of Shock in the Trauma Setting: A Case Report.

Anaphylactic shock is the most severe form of an acute systemic allergic reaction and can be potentially lethal if left untreated. Here, we present the case of a 51-year-old male with no significant medical history, who arrived at our hospital's emergency trauma bay following a motor vehicle accident caused by a sudden onset of malaise while driving. Upon arrival, the patient's airway was patent, but he reported a sensation of a foreign body in his larynx. He also had an oxygen saturation of 88%, although no abnormal breath sounds were auscultated. The patient was also hypotensive and tachycardic, with no favorable response after crystalloid administration. He had no neurological alterations but was diaphoretic, with hives spreading across his trunk and all four extremities. Upon further interrogation, we identified that he had consumed diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), 45 minutes before the driving incident. Prompt recognition and management of the anaphylactic shock were initiated alongside the assessment and treatment of the traumatic injuries. This case highlights the importance of considering unusual causes of shock in trauma patients. It underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to patient care in trauma settings, where multiple etiologies of shock should be considered and managed simultaneously.

Incidence and influencing factors of cephalosporin-induced anaphylaxis: a multicenter cross-sectional study. / é™è„‰æ³¨å°„å¤´å­¢èŒç´ ç±»è¯ç‰©æ‚£è€ è¿‡æ•ååº”å‘ç”ŸçŽ‡åŠå ¶å½±å“å› ç´ çš„å¤šä¸­å¿ƒä¸´åºŠç ”ç©¶.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and influencing factors of allergic reactions to cephalosporins. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 29 medical institutions in Zhejiang Province was conducted from April 2021 to June 2021. The incidence of allergic reactions to cephalosporins was investigated. The influencing factors of cephalosporin-induced allergic reactions were analyzed by Poisson regression. RESULTS: A total of 56 155 patients were included in this study. The total incidence of allergic reactions to cephalosporin was 1.67 ‰, the highest incidences of anaphylaxis occurred in ceftizoxime (4.27‰), followed by ceftriaxone (3.49‰) and cefotaxime (2.40‰). There was no significant difference in the incidence of allergic reactions between patients with negative skin tests and those without skin tests (1.75‰ vs. 1.63‰, RR=1.07, 95%CI:0.70-1.63, P> 0.05). Poisson regression showed that body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/cm2 (RR=2.43, 95%CI: 1.23-4.82, P<0.01) and history of ß-lactam antibiotics allergy (RR=33.88, 95%CI: 1.47-781.12, P<0.05) increased cephalosporin-induced anaphylaxis. Compared with cefuroxime, the risk of allergic reactions was increased for ceftriaxone (RR=3.08, 95%CI: 1.70-5.59, P<0.01), ceftazidime (RR=1.89, 95%CI: 1.03-3.47, P<0.05), and ceftriaxone (RR=3.74, 95%CI: 1.64-8.50, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lower BMI and history of ß-lactam antibiotics allergy increase the risk of cephalosporin allergic reactions, and the routine skin test may not reduce the occurrence of allergic reactions to cephalosporins.

Prior Bariatric Surgery Predicts Lower Life-Threatening Morbidity in Patients Admitted for Acute Allergic Reaction and Anaphylaxis: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2005-2018.

PURPOSE: Acute allergic reactions may occur in susceptible individuals following exposure to various allergens. Obesity is linked to allergic reactions, and weight loss from bariatric surgery may attenuate the severity of certain conditions such as airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma. This retrospective observational study investigates associations between prior bariatric surgery and lower risk for life-threatening conditions in patients hospitalized with acute allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with morbid obesity and admitted to US hospitals with acute allergic reactions/anaphylaxis were included. All data were extracted from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2005-2018. Patients without information on in-hospital mortality, discharge destination, hospital costs, and length of stay (LOS) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on prior bariatric surgery or not. All diagnoses were verified through ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Between-group differences and associations between variables were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: After matching, patients with prior bariatric surgery had significantly lower proportions of any life-threatening morbidity (37.2% vs. 47.4%), respiratory distress or failure (11.2% vs. 17.0%), pneumonia or severe infection (7.4% vs. 10.2%), sepsis/septic shock (15.2% vs. 20.9%), intubation and mechanical ventilation (11.2% vs. 14.6%), prolonged LOS (10.3% vs. 20.6%) and unfavorable discharge (6.9% vs. 12.5%) than those without prior bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: Prior bariatric surgery predicts a lower risk of life-threatening morbidity and prolonged LOS among adults hospitalized for acute allergic reaction and anaphylaxis. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm the present findings and reveal underlying mechanisms.

Epidemiology and Triggers of Severe Perioperative Anaphylaxis: An 8-Year Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the features, rescue measures, outcomes, re-allergic reactions, and independent risk factors associated with severe anaphylaxis during surgery. DESIGN: Instances of severe perioperative anaphylaxis were identified through perioperative electronic records, adverse event reporting records, and surveys of anesthesiologists. Confirmed cases were randomly matched 4:1 with control cases on the same operation day. Patient risk factors, surgery type, anesthetic technique, and perioperative medications, fluids, and blood transfusions were given in instances of severe perioperative anaphylaxis were compared with control cases. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in China. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing surgery and anesthesia in the operating room from January 2014 to February 2022. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence and the independent risk factors for severe perioperative anaphylaxis. MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients experienced severe perioperative allergic responses during the 266,033 surgeries performed, with an incidence rate of 3.6 per 10,000. Three of 97 anaphylaxis patients experienced a severe allergic reaction again during the second surgery. The nested case-control study revealed that the independent triggers during surgery were allergy history (odds ratio 5.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-11.68; p < 0.001), cisatracurium use (odds ratio 5.03; 95% CI, 1.22-20.70; p < 0.001), hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 use (odds ratio 5.36; 95% CI, 2.99-9.60; p =0.025), and allogeneic plasma (odds ratio 11.02; 95% CI, 3.78-35.95; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative severe anaphylaxis is a rare but life-threatening complication. Previous allergic history, cisatracurium, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, and allogeneic plasma may be the independent triggers. Early diagnosis of anaphylaxis and the timely administration of epinephrine are critical to allergic treatment. Avoiding exposure to allergens is effective for preventing severe allergic responses and the efficacy of glucocorticoids and antihistamines is controversial.

Early-life risk factors which govern pro-allergic immunity.

Allergic diseases affect up to 40% of the global population with a substantial rise in food allergies, in particular, over the past decades. For the majority of individuals with allergy fundamental programming of a pro-allergic immune system largely occurs in early childhood where it is crucially governed by prenatal genetic and environmental factors, including their interactions. These factors include several genetic aberrations, such as filaggrin loss-of-function mutations, early exposure to respiratory syncytial virus, and various chemicals such as plasticizers, as well as the influence of the gut microbiome and numerous lifestyle circumstances. The effects of such a wide range of factors on allergic responses to an array of potential allergens is complex and the severity of these responses in a clinical setting are subsequently not easy to predict at the present time. However, some parameters which condition a pro-allergic immune response, including severe anaphylaxis, are becoming clearer. This review summarises what we currently know, and don't know, about the factors which influence developing pro-allergic immunity particularly during the early-life perinatal period.

An Anaphylactic Encounter With Ferric Gluconate Infusion: A Case Report.

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a prevalent condition globally, often necessitating intravenous iron therapy. We present a case of a 71-year-old female with IDA who experienced a severe anaphylactic reaction shortly after commencing a sodium ferric gluconate complex infusion. Prompt cessation of the infusion and administration of epinephrine with steroids led to rapid recovery. This case underscores the importance of recognizing and managing rare yet potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions to intravenous iron formulations, highlighting the need for vigilance among healthcare providers.