Association of Food Desert Residence and 5-Year Mortality in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Resection.

INTRODUCTION: Food desert (FD) residence has emerged as a risk factor for poor outcomes in breast, colon and esophageal cancers. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine FD residence as an associated risk factor in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anatomic lung resection (ALR). METHODS: All consecutive ALRs for stage I-III NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2017 at a single institution were reviewed. The primary exposure of interest was FD residence as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture. The primary outcome was 5-y overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-d complications and 1- and 3-y mortality. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to model factors associated with each outcome, adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 348 ALRs were included, with 101 (29%) patients residing in an FD. In the unadjusted Cox model, those residing in FD had an associated lower 5-year mortality risk compared to those not residing in an FD (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (0.33-0.97); P = 0.04). That association was not statistically significant once adjusted for covariates (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (0.34-1.04); P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FD residence was not associated with an increase in the risk of 5-y mortality. Selection bias of patients deemed healthy enough to undergo surgery may have mitigated the negative association of FD residence demonstrated in other cancers. Future work will evaluate all NSCLC patients undergoing treatments at our institution to further evaluate FDs as a risk factor for worse outcomes.

Timing of recovery of quality of life after robotic anatomic lung resection.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an underreported aspect of surgical recovery. The purpose of our study was to track PROs after robotic anatomic lung to determine the timing to recovery of baseline patient baseline quality of life. This was a prospective cohort study at an academic medical center (4/2021-12/2022). Patients who underwent robotic anatomic lung resection were asked to complete PROMIS-29 surveys at the preoperative clinic visit, postoperative clinic visit, 30 days and 90 days postoperatively via in-person and email-based electronic surveys. The PROPr score, a summary of health-related quality of life, and mental and physical health z-scores were estimated for each patient using published methods and compared by postoperative timing. 75 patients completed the preoperative survey and at least one postoperative survey; 56 completed postoperative clinic surveys, 54 completed 30-day postoperative surveys, and 40 completed 90-day postoperative surveys. All three PROMIS scores decreased between the preoperative and first postoperative visit (all p < 0.05). PROPr scores increased over time but remained significantly worse than baseline by 90 days (-0.08 difference between 90 days and preoperative, p = 0.02). While PROMIS summary z-scores for physical health remained - 0.29 lower at 90 days postoperatively, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). Mental health scores returned to baseline by 90 days postoperatively (p = 0.41). While some PROs returned to baseline by 90 days postoperatively, overall quality-of-life scores remained significantly below preoperative baselines. These findings are important to share with patients during the informed consent process to achieve patient centered care more effectively.

Anatomic lung resection after immune checkpoint inhibitors for initially unresectable advanced-staged non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Background: Patients with initially unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might experience prolonged responses under immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this setting, Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) seldomly suggest surgical resection of the primary tumor with the ultimate goal to eradicate macroscopic residual disease. Our objective was to report the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent anatomic lung resection in these infrequent circumstances. Methods: We set a retrospective multicentric single arm study, including all patients with advanced-staged initially unresectable NSCLC (stage IIIB to IVB) who received systemic therapy including ICIs and eventually anatomical resection of the primary tumor in 10 French thoracic surgery units from January 2016 to December 2020. Coprimary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete resection of the pulmonary disease, major pathologic response, risk factors associated with post-operative complications, and overall survival. Results: Twenty-one patients (median age 64, female 62%) were included. Eighteen patients (86%) progressed after first line chemotherapy and received second line ICI. The median time between diagnosis and surgery was 22 months [interquartile range (IQR) 18-35 months]. Minimally-invasive approach was used in 10 cases (48%), with half of these requiring conversion to open thoracotomy. Nine patients (43%) presented early post-operative complications, and one patient died from broncho-pleural fistula one month after surgery. Rates of complete resection of the pulmonary disease and major pathologic response were 100% and 43%, respectively. In univariable analysis, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was the only factor associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications (P=0.027). After a median follow-up of 16.0 months after surgery (IQR, 12.0-30.0 months), 19 patients (90%) were still alive. Conclusions: Anatomic lung resections appear to be a reasonable option for initially unresectable advanced NSCLC experiencing prolonged response under ICIs. Nonetheless, minimally invasive techniques have a low applicability and post-operative complications remains higher in patients who had lower DLCO values. The late timing of surgery may also contribute to complications.

Acute pain management after thoracoscopic lung resection: a systematic review and explorative meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Pain after thoracoscopic surgery may increase the incidence of postoperative complications and impair recovery. Guidelines lack consensus regarding postoperative analgesia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the mean pain scores of different analgesic techniques (thoracic epidural analgesia, continuous or single-shot unilateral regional analgesia and only systemic analgesia) after thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection. METHODS: Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched until 1 October 2022. Patients undergoing at least >70% anatomical resections through thoracoscopy reporting postoperative pain scores were included. Due to a high inter-study variability an explorative meta-analysis next to an analytic meta-analysis was performed. The quality of evidence has been evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies comprising 5573 patients were included. Mean 24, 48 and 72 h pain scores with 95% confidence interval on a 0-10 scale were calculated. Length of hospital stay, postoperative nausea and vomiting, additional opioids and the use of rescue analgesia were analysed as secondary outcomes. A common-effect size was estimated with an extreme high heterogeneity for which pooling of the studies was not appropriate. An exploratory meta-analysis demonstrated acceptable mean pain scores of Numeric Rating Scale <4 for all analgesic techniques. CONCLUSIONS: This extensive literature review and attempt to pool mean pain scores for meta-analysis demonstrates that unilateral regional analgesia is gaining popularity over thoracic epidural analgesia in thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection, despite great heterogeneity and limitations of current studies precluding such recommendations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: ID number 205311.

Analysis of trends in perioperative outcomes in over 1000 robotic-assisted anatomic lung resections.

Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining popularity as a minimally invasive approach for anatomic lung resection. We investigated the temporal changes in case volume, costs, and postoperative outcomes for robotic-assisted anatomic lung resection in over 1000 cases. We reviewed our institutional STS database for patients who had undergone robotic-assisted lobectomy, bi-lobectomy, or segmentectomy as the primary procedure between years 2009-2021. The patients were divided into two groups: first 500 cases (n = 501) and second 500 cases (n = 500). Temporal trends of case volume, surgical indications, hospital length of stay, costs, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 1001 patients were analyzed, of which 968 (96.7%) patients underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy, 21 (2.1%) patients underwent bi-lobectomy, 10 (1.0%) patients underwent segmentectomy, and 3 (0.3%) patients underwent sleeve lobectomy. Primary lung cancer was the most common indication (87.7%), followed by metastatic lung tumors (7.1%), and benign diagnosis (5.2%). The overall postoperative complication rate decreased from 46.1% for the first 500 cases compared to 29.6% for the second 500 cases (p < 0.0001). The median hospital length of stay was down trending, which was 4 days [IQR: 3-7] for the first 500 cases and 3 days [IQR: 3-5] (p = 0.0001) for the second. The inflation-adjusted direct and indirect hospital costs were significantly lower in the second 500 cases (p < 0.0001). The complications rates, hospital costs, and hospital length of stay for robotic-assisted anatomic pulmonary resection decreased significantly over time at a single institution. Continuous improvement in perioperative outcomes may be observed with increasing institutional experience.

The association between thoracic sarcopenia and survival is gender specific in early-stage lung cancer.

Background: Sarcopenia, as measured at the 3rd lumbar (L3) level, has been shown to prognosticate survival in cancer patients. However, many patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not undergo abdominal imaging. We hypothesized that preoperative thoracic sarcopenia is associated with survival in patients undergoing lung resection for early-stage NSCLC. Methods: Patients who underwent anatomic resection for NSCLC between 2010-2019 were retrospectively identified. Exclusion criteria included induction therapy, less than 90 days of follow-up, and absence of computed tomography (CT) imaging. Cross sectional skeletal muscle area was calculated at the fifth thoracic vertebra (T5), twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12), and L3 level. Gender-specific lowest quartile values and previously defined values were used to define sarcopenia. Overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Overall, 221 patients met inclusion criteria with a median body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 kg/m2 [interquartile range (IQR), 23.3-29.9 kg/m2], age of 69 years (IQR, 62.4-74.9 years), and follow-up of 46.9 months (IQR, 25.0-70.7 months). At the T5 level, sarcopenic males demonstrated worse overall survival [median 41.0 (IQR, 13.8-53.7) vs. 42.0 (IQR, 23.1-55.1) months, P=0.023] and disease-free survival [median 15.8 (IQR, 8.4-30.78) vs. 34.8 (IQR, 20.1-50.5) months, P=0.007] when compared to non-sarcopenic males. There was no difference in survival between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic females when assessed at T5. Sarcopenia at T12 or L3 was associated with worse overall survival (P<0.05). Conclusions: Sarcopenia at T5 is associated with worse survival in males, but not females. When using upper thoracic vertebral levels to assess for sarcopenia, it is necessary to account for gender.

Feasibility and applicability of pulmonary nodule day surgery in thoracic surgery.

Background: More patients with lung diseases were identified with low-dose computed tomography (CT) popularization and increasing physical examination awareness. Day surgery was routinely conducted in many departments as a relatively mature diagnosis and treatment mode. Thus, this study aimed to assess the feasibility of day surgery in thoracic surgery for pulmonary surgery and provide guidance for selecting suitable patients. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with pulmonary nodule surgeries. Patients were divided into the day and routine surgery groups following chest tube removal within 48 h postoperatively and the discharge criteria. Each group was further divided into the wedge and anatomic lung resection groups. The feasibility and applicability of day surgery in thoracic surgery was evaluated by calculating the percentage of the day surgery group and comparing the clinical data of the two groups, and corresponding guidance was given for selecting suitable patients for day surgery. Results: The day surgery group accounted for 53.4% of the total number of patients in both groups. Data comparison revealed differences in age, hypertension, coronary heart disease, pulmonary function index, nodule localization, pleural adhesion, total postoperative drainage, and complications in the wedge resection and age, gender, smoking history, pulmonary function indexes, intraoperative adhesions, operative duration, total postoperative drainage volume, and complications in the anatomic lung resection (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the rates of re-hospitalization (1/172 ratio 1/150) and re-drainage (0/172 ratio 1/150) (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study concluded that more than half of the pulmonary surgery can be applied to the treatment mode of day surgery, and day surgery can be applied to the screened patients. It conforms to the concept of accelerated rehabilitation and can speed up bed turnover so that more patients can receive high-level medical treatment promptly.

Riesgo quirúrgico tras resección pulmonar anatómica en cirugía torácica. Modelo predictivo a partir de una base de datos nacional multicéntrica / Surgical Risk Following Anatomic Lung Resection in Thoracic Surgery: A Prediction Model Derived from a Spanish Multicenter Database

Introducción: El objetivo es obtener un modelo predictor de riesgo quirúrgico en pacientes sometidos a resecciones pulmonares anatómicas a partir del registro del Grupo Español de Cirugía Torácica Videoasistida. Métodos: Se recogen datos de 3.533 pacientes sometidos a resección pulmonar anatómica por cualquier diagnóstico entre el 20 de diciembre de 2016 y el 20 de marzo de 2018.Definimos una variable resultado combinada: mortalidad o complicación Clavien Dindo IV a 90 días tras intervención quirúrgica. Se realizó análisis univariable y multivariable por regresión logística. La validación interna del modelo se llevó a cabo por técnicas de remuestreo. Resultados: La incidencia de la variable resultado fue del 4,29% (IC 95%: 3,6-4,9). Las variables que permanecen en el modelo logístico final fueron: edad, sexo, resección pulmonar oncológica previa, disnea (mMRC), neumonectomía derecha y DLCOppo. Los parámetros de rendimiento del modelo, ajustados por remuestreo, fueron: C-statistic 0,712 (IC 95%: 0,648-0,750), Brier score 0,042 y Booststrap shrinkage 0,854. Conclusiones: El modelo predictivo de riesgo obtenido a partir de la base de datos Grupo Español de Cirugía Torácica Videoasistida es un modelo sencillo, válido y fiable, y constituye una herramienta muy útil a la hora de establecer el riesgo de un paciente que se va a someter a una resección pulmonar anatómica. (AU)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop a surgical risk prediction model in patients undergoing anatomic lung resections from the registry of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group (GEVATS). Methods: Data were collected from 3,533 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for any diagnosis between December 20, 2016 and March 20, 2018.We defined a combined outcome variable: death or Clavien Dindo grade IV complication at 90 day.s after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression. Internal validation of the model was performed using resampling techniques. Results: The incidence of the outcome variable was 4.29% (95% CI 3.6-4.9). The variables remaining in the final logistic model were: age, sex, previous lung cancer resection, dyspnea (mMRC), right pneumonectomy, and ppo DLCO. The performance parameters of the model adjusted by resampling were: C-statistic 0.712 (95% CI 0.648-0.750), Brier score 0.042 and bootstrap shrinkage 0.854. Conclusions: The risk prediction model obtained from the GEVATS database is a simple, valid, and reliable model that is a useful tool for establishing the risk of a patient undergoing anatomic lung resection. (AU)

[Translated article] Surgical Risk Following Anatomic Lung Resection in Thoracic Surgery: A Prediction Model Derived From a Spanish Multicenter Database / Riesgo quirúrgico tras resección pulmonar anatómica en cirugía torácica. Modelo predictivo a partir de una base de datos nacional multicéntrica

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop a surgical risk prediction model in patients undergoing anatomic lung resections from the registry of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group (GEVATS). Methods: Data were collected from 3,533 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for any diagnosis between December 20, 2016 and March 20, 2018.We defined a combined outcome variable: death or Clavien Dindo grade IV complication at 90 day.s after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression. Internal validation of the model was performed using resampling techniques. Results: The incidence of the outcome variable was 4.29% (95% CI 3.6-4.9). The variables remaining in the final logistic model were: age, sex, previous lung cancer resection, dyspnea (mMRC), right pneumonectomy, and ppo DLCO. The performance parameters of the model adjusted by resampling were: C-statistic 0.712 (95% CI 0.648-0.750), Brier score 0.042 and bootstrap shrinkage 0.854. Conclusions: The risk prediction model obtained from the GEVATS database is a simple, valid, and reliable model that is a useful tool for establishing the risk of a patient undergoing anatomic lung resection. (AU)

Introducción: El objetivo es obtener un modelo predictor de riesgo quirúrgico en pacientes sometidos a resecciones pulmonares anatómicas a partir del registro del Grupo Español de Cirugía Torácica Videoasistida. Métodos: Se recogen datos de 3.533 pacientes sometidos a resección pulmonar anatómica por cualquier diagnóstico entre el 20 de diciembre de 2016 y el 20 de marzo de 2018.Definimos una variable resultado combinada: mortalidad o complicación Clavien Dindo IV a 90 días tras intervención quirúrgica. Se realizó análisis univariable y multivariable por regresión logística. La validación interna del modelo se llevó a cabo por técnicas de remuestreo. Resultados: La incidencia de la variable resultado fue del 4,29% (IC 95%: 3,6-4,9). Las variables que permanecen en el modelo logístico final fueron: edad, sexo, resección pulmonar oncológica previa, disnea (mMRC), neumonectomía derecha y DLCOppo. Los parámetros de rendimiento del modelo, ajustados por remuestreo, fueron: C-statistic 0,712 (IC 95%: 0,648-0,750), Brier score 0,042 y Booststrap shrinkage 0,854. Conclusiones: El modelo predictivo de riesgo obtenido a partir de la base de datos Grupo Español de Cirugía Torácica Videoasistida es un modelo sencillo, válido y fiable, y constituye una herramienta muy útil a la hora de establecer el riesgo de un paciente que se va a someter a una resección pulmonar anatómica. (AU)

External validation of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons morbidity and mortality risk models.

OBJECTIVES: There is a wide variety of predictive models of postoperative risk, although some of them are specific to thoracic surgery, none of them is widely used. The European Society for Thoracic Surgery has recently updated its models of cardiopulmonary morbidity (Eurolung 1) and 30-day mortality (Eurolung 2) after anatomic lung resection. The aim of our work is to carry out the external validation of both models in a multicentre national database. METHODS: External validation of Eurolung 1 and Eurolung 2 was evaluated through calibration (calibration plot, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and discrimination [area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ROC)], on a national multicentre database of 2858 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection between 2016 and 2018. RESULTS: For Eurolung 1, calibration plot showed suboptimal overlapping (slope = 0.921) and a Hosmer-Lemeshow test and Brier score of P = 0.353 and 0.104, respectively. In terms of discrimination, AUC ROC for Eurolung 1 was 0.653 (95% confidence interval, 0.623-0.684). In contrast, Eurolung 2 showed a good calibration (slope = 1.038) and a Hosmer-Lemeshow test and Brier score of P = 0.234 and 0.020, respectively. AUC ROC for Eurolung 2 was 0.760 (95% confidence interval, 0.701-0.819). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day mortality score (Eurolung 2) seems to be transportable to other anatomic lung-resected patients. On the other hand, postoperative cardiopulmonary morbidity score (Eurolung 1) seems not to have sufficient generalizability for new patients.

Surgical Risk Following Anatomic Lung Resection in Thoracic Surgery: A Prediction Model Derived from a Spanish Multicenter Database. / Riesgo quirúrgico tras resección pulmonar anatómica en cirugía torácica. Modelo predictivo a partir de una base de datos nacional multicéntrica.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to develop a surgical risk prediction model in patients undergoing anatomic lung resections from the registry of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group (GEVATS). METHODS: Data were collected from 3,533 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for any diagnosis between December 20, 2016 and March 20, 2018. We defined a combined outcome variable: death or Clavien Dindo grade IV complication at 90 days after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression. Internal validation of the model was performed using resampling techniques. RESULTS: The incidence of the outcome variable was 4.29% (95% CI 3.6-4.9). The variables remaining in the final logistic model were: age, sex, previous lung cancer resection, dyspnea (mMRC), right pneumonectomy, and ppo DLCO. The performance parameters of the model adjusted by resampling were: C-statistic 0.712 (95% CI 0.648-0.750), Brier score 0.042 and bootstrap shrinkage 0.854. CONCLUSIONS: The risk prediction model obtained from the GEVATS database is a simple, valid, and reliable model that is a useful tool for establishing the risk of a patient undergoing anatomic lung resection.

Introduction of robotic surgery leads to increased rate of segmentectomy in patients with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary segmentectomy provides an anatomic lung resection while avoiding removal of excess normal lung tissue. This may be beneficial in patients with minimal pulmonary reserve who present with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the operative performance of a segmentectomy using a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach can be technically challenging. We hypothesized that introduction of the robotic surgical system would facilitate the performance of a segmentectomy as measured by an increase in the proportion of segmentectomies being pursued. METHODS: We completed a retrospective analysis of thoracoscopic and robotic anatomic lung resections, including lobectomies and segmentectomies, performed in patients with primary lung cancer from the time of initiation of the robotic thoracic surgery program in November 2017 to November 2019. We compared the proportion of thoracoscopic and robotic segmentectomies performed during the first year compared to the second year of the data collection period. RESULTS: A total of 138 thoracoscopic and robotic anatomic lung resections were performed for primary lung cancer. Types of lung cancer resected (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or other), tumor size based on clinical T staging (T1-T4), and tumor location were not significantly different between years (P=0.44, P=0.98, and P=0.26, respectively). The proportion of segmentectomies increased from 8.6% during the first year to 25.0% during the second year (P=0.01). One out of 6 (16.7%) segmentectomies were performed using the robot during the first year versus 15 out of 17 (88.2%) during the second year (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the robot led to a significant increase in the number of segmentectomies performed in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection. With increasing lung cancer awareness and widely available screening, a greater number of small, early-stage tumors suitable for segmentectomy will likely be detected. We conclude that robotic-assisted surgery may facilitate the challenges of performing a minimally invasive segmentectomy.

Perioperative Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Reoperations for Clinical Recurrence of Pulmonary Malignancy.

The utility of thoracoscopic lung surgery is well established, however, reoperation for pulmonary resections has not been thoroughly studied. We sought to evaluate patient perioperative outcomes following redo thoracoscopic pulmonary resections for malignancy by comparing first and second ipsilateral operations. We included patients undergoing redo thoracoscopic pulmonary resections for clinically recurrent disease following prior lung resection for malignancy from January 1, 2011 to May 31, 2019. Nonmalignant indications were excluded. We analyzed type of procedure, diagnosis, rate of conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operating time, margin status, length of stay and complications. Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 68 years (range 13-84) and 20 were women. Redo operations had longer lengths of stay with a trend toward higher rate of conversion to thoracotomy, but other perioperative outcomes were similar. No difference in outcomes was seen when patients were grouped by indication for reoperation (recurrence, multiple primaries, and metastasis) or approach of first operation (VATS vs open). However, patients undergoing an anatomic resection after a prior anatomic resection had more complications, higher blood loss, higher rate of conversions to thoracotomy, significantly longer length of stay and longer operative times than nonanatomic resections. Thoracoscopic reoperation for recurrent, metachronous, or metastatic cancer to the lung is a reasonable approach. However, the surgeon must recognize and counsel patients that in patients undergoing a redo anatomic resection, thoracoscopic reoperations are more difficult with more adverse outcomes.

Implication of a novel postoperative recovery protocol to increase day 1 discharge rate after anatomic lung resection.

BACKGROUND: Chest-tube drainage and prolonged air leak after anatomic lung resection (ALR) continue to drive admission days for most programs employing minimal access techniques. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a novel postoperative recovery protocol with revised chest tube management strategies to target discharge on post-operative day 1 (POD1) after ALR. METHODS: This is a pilot study investigating a novel enhanced recovery protocol which either allowed chest tube removal on POD1 or ambulatory management with indwelling chest tube using a portable closed drainage system. We included all patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-ALR; exclusion criteria were open surgery, non-anatomic or extended resections. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the study [N=29 portable drainage (PD), N=110 standard pathway (SP)]. POD1 discharge rate was 72% in PD vs. 15% in SP cohort (P<0.001). Median length of stay (LOS) was 1 day [interquartile range (IQR), 1-2 days] in PD cohort, while it was 3 days (IQR, 2-5 days) in SP cohort (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in length of indwelling chest-tube, rate of discharge with chest-tube, post-operative complications, or readmissions. On multivariate analysis, PD pathway as well as short surgical time were significant predictors of discharge on POD1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that POD1 discharge rates of 72% after VATS-ALR can be safely achieved by a well-developed perioperative care pathway and simple chest tube drainage interventions. Based on these findings we are currently drafting a follow-up study to investigate the possibility of performing ALRs as day surgery.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation prophylaxis using a novel amiodarone order set.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that chemoprophylaxis following anatomic lung resection can reduce post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). However, it is unclear if non-anatomic wedge resection warrants prophylaxis, as previously published rates vary widely. The primary goal of this study was to assess an institutional rate of POAF following anatomic resections with implementation of a novel amiodarone administration regimen compared to wedge resections without prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database and compared anatomic and wedge lung resection patients from 1/2015 to 4/2018. During the study period, a previously unpublished amiodarone order set consisting of a 300 mg IV bolus followed by 400 mg tablets TID ×3 days was administered to anatomic resection patients ≥65 who met criteria. Wedge resection patients were not intended to receive amiodarone prophylaxis. The primary outcome was POAF incidence. Risk factors for developing POAF were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 537 patients met inclusion where 56% underwent anatomic resection and 44% wedge resection. Overall, 5.4% of patients experienced POAF. There was a significant reduction in post-anatomic resection POAF as compared to historic rates without prophylaxis (9.3% vs. 20.3%, P<0.001). A single wedge resection patient (0.4%) developed POAF. On multivariable analysis, the only independent POAF risk factor was age ≥65 (OR: 5.41, 95% CI: 1.47-19.85). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of our novel amiodarone order set reduces POAF after anatomic resection; however, POAF following wedge resection is too rare to warrant chemoprophylaxis.

Preoperative Type and Screen is Unnecessary in Elective Anatomic Lung Resection and Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative type and screen (TS) is routinely performed before elective thoracic surgery. We sought to evaluate the utility of this practice by examining our institutional data related to intraoperative and postoperative transfusions for two common, complex procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of a prospective thoracic surgery database was performed. Patients who underwent consecutive elective anatomic lung resection (ALR) and esophagectomy from January 2015 to April 2018 were included. Perioperative characteristics between patients who received transfusion of packed red blood cells and those who did not were compared. The rates of emergent and nonemergent transfusions were evaluated. Cost data were derived from institutional charges and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedules. RESULTS: Of 370 patients, 16 (4.3%) received a transfusion and four (1.1%) were deemed emergent by the surgeons and 0 (0%) by blood bank criteria. For ALR (n = 321), 13 (4.0%) received a transfusion, and four (1.2%) were emergent. For esophagectomies (n = 49), three (6.1%) received a transfusion, and none were emergent. Patients who underwent ALR requiring a transfusion had a lower preoperative hemoglobin (11.7 versus 13.4 gm/dL, P = 0.001), higher estimated blood loss (1325 versus 196 mL, P < 0.001), and longer operative time (291 versus 217 min, P = 0.003) than nontransfused patients. Based on current volumes, eliminating TS in these patients would save at least an estimated $60,100 per year. CONCLUSIONS: Emergent transfusion in ALR and esophagectomy is rare. Routine preoperative TS is most likely unnecessary for these cases. These results will be used in a quality improvement initiative to change practice at our institution.

[Establishment of A Clinical Prediction Model of Prolonged Air Leak 
after Anatomic Lung Resection].

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak (PAL) after anatomic lung resection is a common and challenging complication in thoracic surgery. No available clinical prediction model of PAL has been established in China. The aim of this study was to construct a model to identify patients at increased risk of PAL by using preoperative factors exclusively. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data and PAL occurrence of patients after anatomic lung resection, in department of thoracic surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, from January 2016 to October 2016. 359 patients were in group A, clinical data including age, body mass index (BMI), gender, smoking history, surgical methods, pulmonary function index, pleural adhesion, pathologic diagnosis, side and site of resected lung were analyzed. By using univariate and multivariate analysis, we found the independent predictors of PAL after anatomic lung resection and subsequently established a clinical prediction model. Then, another 112 patients (group B), who underwent anatomic lung resection in different time by different team, were chosen to verify the accuracy of the prediction model. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed using the prediction model. RESULTS: Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify six clinical characteristics [BMI, gender, smoking history, forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1%), pleural adhesion, site of resection] as independent predictors of PAL after anatomic lung resection. The area under the ROC curve for our model was 0.886 (95%CI: 0.835-0.937). The best predictive P value was 0.299 with sensitivity of 78.5% and specificity of 93.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Our prediction model could accurately identify occurrence risk of PAL in patients after anatomic lung resection, which might allow for more effective use of intraoperative prophylactic strategies.
.

Posterior uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for resection of the apical segment of the right lower lobe followed by completion lobectomy.

Uniportal thoracoscopic resections offer less pain and better cosmetic results. They are usually performed through an antero-lateral incision. Posterior uniportal approach has not been described yet. A 65-year-old female was admitted to our clinic for the treatment of an adenocarcinoma, located in the apical segment of the right lower lobe. Owing to the ideal location and size, anatomical segment resection and radical lymphadenectomy was planned. Fissureless video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of the apical segment of the right lower lobe, using a uniportal posterior approach was performed, followed by mediastinal lymphadenectomy. However, resection margins showed microscopic presence of lepidic tumour on frozen section analysis, so we needed to proceed with a completion lower lobectomy. Postoperative course was event-free and the patient was discharged on the 4th postoperative day. The 1.8-cm large tumour was diagnosed to be primary lepidic (80%) and acinar (20%) adenocarcinoma and the final TNM was pT2aN0M0.

Is VATS lobectomy standard of care for operable non-small cell lung cancer?

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) for treatment of lung cancer is being increasingly applied worldwide in the last few years. Since its introduction, many publications have been providing strong evidences that this minimally invasive approach is feasible, safe and oncologically efficient; offering to patients several advantages over traditional open thoracotomy, particularly for early-stage disease (I and II). The application of VATS for locally advanced disease treatment has also been largely described, but probably requires a further level of experience, which is more likely to be found in reference centers, with skilled experts. Although a large multi-institutional prospective randomized-controlled trial is the best way to confirm the superiority of one technique over another, such study comparing VATS versus open lobectomy for lung cancer is unlikely to ever come out. And in this scenario, retrospective data remains as the most reliable source of scientific information. Based on a literature review, the main objective of this article is to discuss to what extent VATS lobectomy can be considered the gold standard in the surgical treatment of lung cancer, taking into account the most important comparison aspects between the minimally invasive approach and open thoracotomy technique. This review addresses questions regarding lymph node dissection, oncologic efficacy, extended resections beyond standard lobectomy, post-operative complications/pain/quality of life, survival rates and the present limits of indication (and contraindication) for VATS, in order to define the real role of this technique on the surgical treatment of lung cancer in a minimally invasive, but safe and effective manner.

Anatomic lung resections for benign pulmonary diseases by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

PURPOSE: Based on increasing evidence of its benefits regarding perioperative and oncologic outcome, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gained increasing acceptance in the surgical treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the evidence for a VATS approach in anatomic lung resection for benign pulmonary diseases is still limited. METHODS: Between March 2011 and May 2014, data from 33 and 63 patients who received VATS anatomic lung resection for benign diseases (VATS-B) and early stage NSCLC (VATS-N), respectively, were analyzed retrospectively. For subgroup analyses, VATS-B was subdivided by operation time and underlying diseases. Subgroups were compared to VATS-N. RESULTS: Three patients from VATS-B and four from VATS-N experienced conversion to open surgery. Causes of conversion in VATS-B were intraoperative complications, whereas conversions in VATS-N were elective for oncological concerns (p < 0.05). Operation time and duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation were longer by tendency; postoperative stay on intensive care unit and chest tube duration were significantly longer in VATS-B. Subgroup analyses showed a longer operation time as a predictor for worse perioperative outcome regarding postoperative mechanical ventilation, postoperative stay on intensive care unit, chest tube duration, and length of hospital stay. Patients with longer operation time suffered from more postoperative complications. Differences in perioperative outcome data were not significantly dependent on the underlying benign diseases compared to VATS-N. CONCLUSIONS: VATS is feasible and safe in anatomic lung resection for benign pulmonary diseases. Not the underlying disease, but a longer operation time is a factor for worse postoperative outcome.