Nipocalimab, an anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody, in participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy: results from the phase 2a IRIS-RA study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nipocalimab in participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 antitumour necrosis factor agent. METHODS: In this phase 2a study, participants with RA seropositive for anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) or rheumatoid factors were randomised 3:2 to nipocalimab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) or placebo from Weeks 0 to 10. Efficacy endpoints (primary endpoint: change from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 using C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed through Week 12. Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed through Week 18. RESULTS: 53 participants were enrolled (nipocalimab/placebo, n=33/20). Although the primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance for nipocalimab versus placebo, a numerically higher change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 was observed (least squares mean (95% CI): -1.03 (-1.66 to -0.40) vs -0.58 (-1.24 to 0.07)), with numerically higher improvements in all secondary efficacy outcomes and PROs. Serious adverse events were reported in three participants (burn infection, infusion-related reaction and deep vein thrombosis). Nipocalimab significantly and reversibly reduced serum immunoglobulin G, ACPA and circulating immune complex levels but not serum inflammatory markers, including CRP. ACPA reduction was associated with DAS28-CRP remission and 50% response rate in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria; participants with a higher baseline ACPA had greater clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite not achieving statistical significance in the primary endpoint, nipocalimab showed consistent, numerical efficacy benefits in participants with moderate to severe active RA, with greater benefit observed for participants with a higher baseline ACPA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04991753.

Clinical significance of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: Anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV) antibodies have recently been recommended as a better arthritis diagnostic marker. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between anti-MCV antibodies and the clinical, functional, and radiographic characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 40 RA patients and 40 healthy subjects. All patients were subjected to an assessment of disease using the 28-joint DAS (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), function by HAQ-DI, physical activity by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), fatigue by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), serological tests as well as anti-MCV Abs measurement. A plain X-ray of both hands and wrists was done. RESULTS: The anti-MCV Abs level was significantly higher in RA patients than in healthy controls (P< 0.001). The anti-MCV Abs had a significant positive correlation with DAS, CDAI, HAQ, RF, Anti-CCP, and CRP (P= 0.006, 0.013, 0.005, < 0.001, < 0.001and 0.041 respectively) and a significant negative correlation with FACIT (p= 0.007). Positive anti-MCV RA patients had significantly higher erosions, JSN, and a total sharp score. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-MCV Abs may contribute to poor physical activity and more fatigue in RA patients beyond their established role in disease activity and erosion.

Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: is it time to revise the criteria?

Classification criteria have been developed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases in order to gather a homogeneous patient population for clinical studies and facilitate the timely implementation of therapeutic measures. Although classification criteria are not intended to be used for diagnosis, they are frequently used to support the diagnostic process in clinical practice, including clinical decision-making. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for RA are capable of identifying the majority of symptomatic patients with RA already in the earliest stages of the disease who are not yet showing radiographic changes. These patients will also profit from the early implementation of therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, the risk of misclassification is higher as compared with the former 1987 ACR criteria, which were considerably less sensitive to the recognition of patients with early RA. Of note, the presence of rheumatoid factors (RFs) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) has been attributed equal weight in the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and may contribute up to 50% of the score needed for being classified as RA. However, while ACPAs have been proven to be the most specific serological markers of RA, the specificity of RF is moderate, especially at lower titres. This may lead to the misclassification of RF-positive patients and, consequently, the unjustified implementation of DMARD therapy. Therefore, issues arise on how comprehensive the criteria should be and whether they should be updated and adapted to findings from the past two decades that might increase both their specificity and sensitivity.

Utility of testing for third-generation anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP3) antibodies in individuals who present with new musculoskeletal symptoms but have a negative second-generation anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2) antibody test.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of third-generation anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP3) antibodies in predicting progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA) in individuals with new musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms and a negative second-generation anti-CCP antibody test (anti-CCP2-). METHODS: 469 anti-CCP2- individuals underwent baseline anti-CCP3 testing (QUANTA Lite CCP3; Inova Diagnostics) and received a post enrolment 12-month questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or excluded diagnosis of IA. Univariable/multivariable analyses were performed to assess the value of anti-CCP3 in predicting IA development in these anti-CCP2- individuals. RESULTS: Only 16/469 (3.4%) anti-CCP2- individuals had a positive anti-CCP3 test. Of these 16 individuals, 4 developed IA. In addition, 61/469 (13.0%) anti-CCP2- individuals self-reported, to have developed, IA. Progression was confirmed in 43/61 of them (70.5%); of whom 30/43 (69.8%) and 13/43 (30.2%) were given a diagnosis of IA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), respectively. In qualitative univariable analysis, anti-CCP3 positivity was associated with self-reported progression (p<0.01) and IA (p=0.03), but not with RA. Anti-CCP3 levels differed significantly between progressors and non-progressors (p<0.01) for all three categories. At the manufacturer's cut-off, OR for progression ranged from 2.4 (95% CI 0.5 to 18.6; RA) to 7.5 (95% CI 2.3 to 24.0; self-reported progression). Interestingly, when cut-offs for anti-CCP3 were optimised, lower values (≥5 units) significantly increased the OR for progression in all three categories. In multivariable analysis, anti-CCP3 positivity at the manufacturer's cut-off did not remain associated with IA progression, while this lower cut-off value (≥5 units) was associated with diagnosis of RA (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CCP3 testing could improve the prediction of IA development in anti-CCP2- individuals with new MSK symptoms.

Macrophage extracellular traps require peptidylarginine deiminase 2 and 4 and are a source of citrullinated antigens bound by rheumatoid arthritis autoantibodies.

Introduction: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) are a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis, but the sources of citrullinated antigens as well as which peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs) are required for their production remain incompletely defined. Here, we investigated if macrophage extracellular traps (METs) could be a source of citrullinated proteins bound by APCAs, and if their formation requires PAD2 or PAD4. Methods: Thioglycolate-induced peritoneal macrophages from wild-type, PAD2-/-, and PAD4-/- mice or human peripheral blood-derived M1 macrophages were activated with a variety of stimulants, then fixed and stained with DAPI and either anti-citrullinated histone H4 (citH4) antibody or sera from ACPA+ or ACPA- rheumatoid arthritis subjects. METs were visualized by immunofluorescence, confirmed to be extracellular using DNase, and quantified. Results: We found that ionomycin and monosodium urate crystals reliably induced murine citH4+ METs, which were reduced in the absence of PAD2 and lost in the absence of PAD4. Also, IgG from ACPA+, but not ACPA-, rheumatoid arthritis sera bound to murine METs, and in the absence of PAD2 or PAD4, ACPA-bound METs were lost. Finally, ionomycin induced human METs that are citH4+ and ACPA-bound. Discussion: Thus, METs may contribute to the pool of citrullinated antigens bound by ACPAs in a PAD2- and PAD4-dependent manner, providing new insights into the targets of immune tolerance loss in rheumatoid arthritis.

Immune response to post-translationally modified proteins in rheumatoid arthritis: what makes it special?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exhibits common characteristics with numerous other autoimmune diseases, including the presence of susceptibility genes and the presence of disease-specific autoantibodies. Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are the hallmarking autoantibodies in RA and the anti-citrullinated protein immune response has been implicated in disease pathogenesis. Insight into the immunological pathways leading to anti-citrullinated protein immunity will not only aid understanding of RA pathogenesis, but may also contribute to elucidation of similar mechanisms in other autoantibody-positive autoimmune diseases. Similarly, lessons learnt in other human autoimmune diseases might be relevant to understand potential drivers of RA. In this review, we will summarise several novel insights into the biology of the anti-citrullinated protein response and their clinical associations that have been obtained in recent years. These insights include the identification of glycans in the variable domain of ACPA, the realisation that ACPA are polyreactive towards other post-translational modifications on proteins, as well as new awareness of the contributing role of mucosal sites to the development of the ACPA response. These findings will be mirrored to emerging concepts obtained in other human (autoimmune) disease characterised by disease-specific autoantibodies. Together with an updated understanding of genetic and environmental risk factors and fresh perspectives on how the microbiome could contribute to antibody formation, these advancements coalesce to a progressively clearer picture of the B cell reaction to modified antigens in the progression of RA.

Shift in perspective: autoimmunity protecting against rheumatoid arthritis.

A hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the increased levels of autoantibodies preceding the onset and contributing to the classification of the disease. These autoantibodies, mainly anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor, have been assumed to be pathogenic and many attempts have been made to link them to the development of bone erosion, pain and arthritis. We and others have recently discovered that most cloned ACPA protect against experimental arthritis in the mouse. In addition, we have identified suppressor B cells in healthy individuals, selected in response to collagen type II, and these cells decrease in numbers in RA. These findings provide a new angle on how to explain the development of RA and maybe also other complex autoimmune diseases preceded by an increased autoimmune response.

New-onset Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Post-mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Report.

Growing evidence in the medical literature has linked the COVID-19 vaccine as a potential trigger for the development or exacerbation of various autoimmune rheumatic diseases. To the best of our knowledge, we report one of the first cases of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed after the messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine.

In early rheumatoid arthritis, anticitrullinated peptide antibodies associate with low number of affected joints and rheumatoid factor associates with systemic inflammation.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how individual rheumatoid arthritis (RA) autoantibodies associate with individual signs and symptoms at the time of RA diagnosis. METHODS: IgA, IgG, IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide version 2 (anti-CCP2) and 16 individual antibodies against citrullinated protein (ACPA) reactivities were analysed centrally in baseline sera from 1600 patients with RA classified according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. These results were related to C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), number of swollen and tender joints (SJC and TJC), 28-joint disease activity scores (DAS28 and DAS28CRP), global disease activity evaluated by the patients and Health Assessment Questionnaire, all obtained at baseline. RESULTS: Individually, all autoantibodies except immunoglobulin G (IgG) RF associated with low SJC and TJC and with high ESR. In IgM RF-negative patients, ACPA associated strictly with low number of swollen and tender joints. This association persisted in multiple regression and stratified analyses where IgM and IgA RF instead associated with inflammation expressed as ESR. Among subjects without any ACPA peptide reactivity, there was no association between RF isotypes and ESR. The effect of RF on ESR increased with the number of ACPA reactivities, especially for IgM RF. In patients fulfilling the 1987 ACR criteria without taking RF into account, associations between IgM RF and high ESR, as well as between ACPA and low joint counts, remained. CONCLUSION: Whereas ACPA associate with low counts of affected joints in early RA, RF associates with elevated measures of systemic inflammation in an ACPA-dependent manner. This latter finding corroborates in vitro models of ACPA and RF in immune complex-induced inflammation. These phenotypic associations are independent of classification criteria.

Porphyromonas gingivalis with collagen immunization induces ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis in C3H mice.

The pathogenic anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are thought to play a vital role in the initiation and immune maintenance of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is noteworthy that ACPA is not a salient characteristic of any conventional RA animal model. Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) is the first microorganism identified to induce citrullination and a target of autoantibodies in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thus, we employed C3H mice with specific MHC types and combined Pg infection with collagen immunity to develop an animal model of ACPA-positive RA. The resulting model exhibited citrullination characteristics, as well as pathological and immune cell changes. 1) Mice showed a significant increase in ACPA levels, and various organs and tissues exhibited elevated levels of citrullinated protein. 2) The mice experienced heightened pain, inflammation, and bone destruction. 3) The spleen and lymph nodes of the mice showed a significant increase in the proportion of Tfh-GCB cell subpopulations responsible for regulating autoantibody production. In conclusion, the C3H mouse model of Pg infection with collagen immunity demonstrated significant alterations in ACPA levels, citrullinated protein expression, and immune cell subpopulations, which could be a crucial factor leading to increased pain, inflammation, and bone destruction.

Are the cut-offs of the rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody different to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from their primary differential diagnoses?

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) are commonly used for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although other rheumatic diseases with arthritis can test positive. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for RF and anti-CCP with the best diagnostic performance in a sample of patients with RA, compared with other rheumatic diseases. METHODS: This was a descriptive, prospective study. EUROINMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for RF isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig) A (IgA), IgG and IgM and third-generation assay IgG for anti-CCP were used in serum samples of patients with RA, other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. The cutoff with the best diagnostic performance was determined by the Youden Index and receiver operating characteristic analysis Results: Three hundred and thirty-two serum samples were analysed. The cutoffs proposed in our population were for RF in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects IgM 135 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were psoriatic arthritis (Psa) IgA 47.2 IU/mL, clinically suspicious arthralgia (CSA) IgA 39.5 IU/mL, primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) IgM 180.6 IU/mL, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgA 42.6 IU/mL, primary fibromyalgia (pFM) IgM 68.6 IU/mL, osteoarthritis (OA) IgM 48 IU/mL, gout IgM 117 IU/mL and healthy IgM 16.3 IU/mL. For anti-CCP, in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects 6.95 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were Psa 6.8 IU/mL, CSA 9.95 IU/mL, pSS 20.7 IU/mL, SLE 6 IU /mL, pFM 11.8 IU/mL, OA 11.9 IU/mL, gout 5 IU/mL and healthy 5 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, the RA versus differential diagnosis cutoffs must be considered.

Antibodies against advanced glycation end-products and malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts identify a new specific subgroup of hitherto patients with seronegative arthritis with a distinct clinical phenotype and an HLA class II association.

OBJECTIVE: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) around two-thirds of patients are autoantibody positive for rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and/or anti-carbamylated protein antibodies. The remaining seronegative subgroup of patients is clinically heterogeneous and thus far, biomarkers predicting the disease course are lacking. Therefore, we analysed the value of other autoantibodies in RA directed against malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts (MAA) and advanced glycation end-products (AGE). METHODS: In sera of 648 patients with RA and 538 patients without RA from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic, anti-MAA and anti-AGE IgG antibody levels were measured using ELISA. Associations between genetic risk factors, acute phase reactants, radiological joint damage, remission and anti-PTM positivity were investigated using regression, correlation and survival analyses. RESULTS: Anti-AGE and anti-MAA were most prevalent in RA (44.6% and 46.1% respectively) but were also present in non-RA arthritis patients (32.9% and 30.3% respectively). Anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies were associated with HLA-DRB1*03 within seronegative RA (OR=1.98, p=0.003, and OR=2.37, p<0.001, respectively) and, for anti-AGE also in non-RA arthritis patients (OR=2.34, p<0.001). Presence of anti-MAA antibodies was associated significantly with markers of inflammation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein, in all groups independent of anti-AGE. Interestingly, the presence of anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies was associated with radiological progression in patients with seronegative RA, but not evidently with sustained drug-free remission. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-AGE and anti-MAA were present in around 45% of RA patients and 30% of non-RA arthritis patients, and although not specific for RA, their presence associated with HLA, inflammation and, for RA, with clinical outcomes especially in patients with seronegative RA.

When Autoantibodies Are Missing: The Challenge of Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) is characterized by the absence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies against the cyclic citrullinated protein (ACPA) in serum. However, the differences between the two forms of RA are more complex and have not yet been definitively characterized. Several lines of evidences support the idea that there are specific elements of the two forms, including genetic background, epidemiology, pathogenesis, severity of progression over time, and response to therapy. Clinical features that may differentiate SNRA from SPRA are also suggested by data obtained from classical radiology and newer imaging techniques. Although new evidence seems to provide additional help in differentiating the two forms of RA, their distinguishing features remain largely elusive. It should also be emphasized that the distinctive features of RA forms, if not properly recognized, can lead to the underdiagnosis of SNRA, potentially missing the period called the "window of opportunity" that is critical for early diagnosis, timely treatment, and better prognosis. This review aims to summarize the data provided in the scientific literature with the goal of helping clinicians diagnose SNRA as accurately as possible, with emphasis on the most recent findings available.

A study of the roles of some immunological biomarkers in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Autoimmune rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic condition closely correlated with a variety of autoantibodies (Abs) that could be considered diagnostic and prognostic markers. The current research was designed to detect the diagnostic values for a number (n) of these auto-Abs in RA detection and to evaluate the accuracy of a combined diagnostic scheme. This prospective study was conducted between September 2021 and August 2022 and included 110 subjects with RA, 70 individuals with other autoimmune disorders as positive controls (PC), and 50 unrelated, apparently healthy individuals as healthy controls (HC). The eligibility criteria for all study groups were followed stringently. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to measure rheumatoid factors (RF), cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (CCP-Abs), mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies (MCV-Abs), anti-perinuclear factor antibodies (APF-Abs), and anti-keratin antibodies (AKA). We calculated the specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of all auto-Abs. Significantly higher levels of anti-CCP-Abs, anti-MCV-Abs, APF-Abs, and AKAs were reported in the RA patients compared to the HC and PC subjects. RF levels, however, were only statistically elevated when compared to the HC individuals. Anti-APF-Abs had a higher sensitivity rate (70.9%), and anti-CCP-Abs had a higher specificity rate (94.16%) compared to other auto-Abs, whereas the combined detection scheme revealed a higher sensitivity (81.81%) and excellent specificity (90.83%) compared to the two former auto-Abs. Anti-perinuclear factor-Ab was a highly sensitive test, and CCP-Ab was a surpassingly specific assay for identifying RA. Furthermore, the combined detection scheme is an essential serological approach for RA diagnosis and crucial in differentiating this disease from other autoimmune diseases, thus promoting early diagnosis and treatment.

Anticitrullinated antibodies recognize rheumatoid arthritis associated T-cell epitopes modified by bacterial L-asparaginase.

Citrullinated proteins and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) play an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It has been suggested that during inflammation or dysbiosis, bacteria could initiate production of ACPAs. Most patients with RA are seropositive for ACPAs, but these antibodies have overlapping reactivity to different posttranslational modifications (PTMs). For initiation and development of RA, T lymphocytes and T cell epitopes are still required. In this study, we evaluated the ability of bacterial L-asparaginase to modify RA-related T cell epitopes within type II collagen (CII259-273 and CII311-325), as well as whether these modified epitopes are recognized by ACPAs from RA patients. We included 12 patients with early RA and 11 healthy subjects selected according to predefined specific criteria. LC-MS/MS analyses revealed that the bacterial L-asparaginase can modify investigated T cell epitopes. ELISA tests showed cross-reactivity of ACPA positive sera from early RA patients towards the enzymatically modified immunodominant T cell epitopes within type II collagen (CII), but not to the modified irrelevant peptides. These data suggest that the cross-reactive ACPAs recognize the "carbonyl-Gly-Pro" motif in CII. Moreover, the T cell recognition of the modified major immunodominant T cell epitope Gal264-CII259-273 was not affected. This epitope was still able to activate autoreactive T cells from early RA patients. It is likely that such modifications are the missing link between the T cell priming and the development of anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs). Our results provide additional information on the etiology and pathogenesis of RA.

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases collection on autoantibodies in the rheumatic diseases: new insights into pathogenesis and the development of novel biomarkers.

The rheumatic diseases are a diverse group of conditions that can display autoantibody production, functional immune disturbances and systemic disease manifestations. These autoantibodies can serve as markers for classification, diagnosis, prognosis and disease activity. Among specificities prominently expressed by patients, those directed to nuclear antigens (antinuclear antibodies or ANAs) are markers for specific rheumatic diseases. ANAs can bind to DNA, RNA and complexes of proteins with nucleic acids. Other autoantibodies expressed in the rheumatic diseases are directed to proteins, including IgG, post-translational modifications of proteins and soluble mediators such as cytokines. While autoantibodies have been investigated for over 50 years, recent studies published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) have provided an exciting perspective on the mechanisms of autoantibody production and the power of new technologies to identify novel autoantibody targets to elucidate aetiology and underpin patient evaluation. Furthermore, in-depth serological studies have demonstrated a phenomenon known as clustering; clustering defines sets of autoantibodies that are commonly expressed together in patients with a given rheumatic disease. Other research reported in ARD has used B cell phenotyping and genotypic analysis to subtype patients, and has explored the relationship of autoantibodies, complement activation and patterns of gene expression as exemplified by the interferon gene signature. Together, these studies provide important new insights into disease mechanisms as well as actionable information to facilitate personalised patient care.