Combining Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies, Anti-Histone, and PLA2/COX Biomarkers to Increase Their Diagnostic Accuracy for Autism Spectrum Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in social interaction and restricted and repetitive behaviors. Oxidative stress may be a critical link between mitochondrial dysfunction and ASD as reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from pro-oxidant environmental toxicants and activated immune cells can result in mitochondrial failure. Recently, mitochondrial dysfunction, autoimmunity, and abnormal lipid mediators have been identified in multiple investigations as an acknowledged etiological mechanism of ASD that can be targeted for therapeutic intervention. METHODS: The relationship between lipid mediator markers linked to inflammation induction, such as phospholipase A2/cyclooxygenase-2 (PLA2/Cox-2), and the mitochondrial dysfunction marker anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA-M2), and anti-histone autoantibodies in the etiology of ASD was investigated in this study using combined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. This study also sought to identify the linear combination for a given set of markers that optimizes the partial area under ROC curves. This study included 40 age- and sex-matched controls and 40 ASD youngsters. The plasma of both groups was tested for PLA2/COX-2, AMA-M2, and anti-histone autoantibodies' levels using ELISA kits. ROC curves and logistic regression models were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Using the integrated ROC curve analysis, a notable rise in the area under the curve was noticed. Additionally, the combined markers had markedly improved specificity and sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggested that measuring the predictive value of selected biomarkers related to mitochondrial dysfunction, autoimmunity, and lipid metabolism in children with ASD using a ROC curve analysis could lead to a better understanding of the etiological mechanism of ASD as well as its relationship with metabolism.

Hydralazine-Induced Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis comprises several conditions involving vascular destruction that extends into tissue necrosis. There are several autoimmune and environmental causes implicated in the disease progression; among these is drug-induced vasculitis caused by hydralazine use. Hydralazine-induced vasculitis is an uncommon potential complication of the medication and can progress to multisystem involvement and eventually advance to end-organ damage and renal failure. Our patient presented with symptoms of lower extremity edema, dyspnea, and a nonproductive cough eventually resulting in the identification of hydralazine-induced ANCA-associated vasculitis with hypocomplementemia and positive anti-histone antibody. Due to the prevalence of hydralazine as a cardiac drug, physicians managing patients on the medication should have a high index of suspicion of the potential for vasculitis in order to promote prompt diagnosis and treatment of the ANCA-vasculitis.

Multiple intra-articular injections with adipose-derived stem cells for knee osteoarthritis cause severe arthritis with anti-histone H2B antibody production.

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis. OA results from the breakdown of cartilage, which leads to deterioration of the entire joint and the connective tissue that holds the joint together, and gradually and irreversibly worsens over time. Adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ADSCs) have been used in the treatment of knee OA. However, the safety and efficacy of ADSC treatment of OA remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the pathophysiology of severe knee arthritis that occurred after ADSC treatment by screening for autoantibodies in synovial fluid from patients who received ADSC treatment. Methods: Adult Japanese patients with OA who received ADSC treatment at Saitama Cooperative Hospital between June 2018 and October 2021 were enrolled. Antibodies (Abs) were screened using immunoprecipitation (IPP) with [35S]-methionine-labeled HeLa cell extracts. The detected protein was identified by liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MS) and ion trap MS, and the corresponding proteins were confirmed as autoantigens using immunoblotting. Ab titers were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: A total of 113 patients received ADSC treatment, and 75% (85/113) received ADSC injection at least twice with a 6-month interval between. No obvious abnormalities were observed in any patient after their first treatment; by contrast, 53% (45/85) of patients who received their second or third ADSC injection showed severe knee arthritis. IPP detected a common anti-15 kDa Ab in synovial fluid of 62% (8/13) of the samples analyzed from patients who showed severe arthritis. This Ab was not detected in synovial fluid obtained from the same joints before treatment. The corresponding autoantigen was identified as histone H2B. All available synovial samples from patients who tested positive for anti-histone H2B Ab were newly positive after the treatment; that is, none had been positive for anti-histone H2B Ab before treatment. Conclusions: Multiple ADSC injections for OA induced severe arthritis in a high percentage of patients, particularly after the second injection. Synovial fluid from some patients with knee arthritis contained Ab to histone H2B that appeared only after ADSC treatment. These findings provide new insights into the pathogenesis of ADSC treatment-induced severe arthritis.

Anti-histone H3.3K36M Antibody is a Highly Sensitive and Specific Immunohistochemistry Marker for the Diagnosis of Chondroblastoma. A Validation Based on Study 136 Cases Comprising Chondroblastoma and its Mimics from Single a Centre in India.

Introduction. Chondroblastoma has a wide range of differential diagnosis encompassing various benign and malignant entities. The closest differential diagnosis is giant cell tumor of the bone due to overlapping radiological and histomorphological features. Extensive aneurysmal bone cyst like changes and lack of adequately sampled chondroid matrix often masquerades the primary bone lesion and amplifies the diagnostic difficulty in small biopsies with limited tissue. Immunohistochemistry is helpful in such instances to resolve the diagnostic dilemma. Objectives. To analyze the immunohistochemical expression of anti-histone H3F3K36M antibody inchondroblastoma and validate its utility in differentiating chondroblastoma from its histological mimics. Material and methods. Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-histone antibody H3.3K36M in 44 histologically diagnosed chondroblastoma and 92 other histological mimickers. All chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor of the bone included in the study were also tested for anti-histone H3.3 G34W antibody. Of the 33 giant cell tumors of bone with classic morphology and imaging findings, 24 H3.3 G34W positive and 9 negative tumors were included intentionally to rule out the possibility of chondroblastoma. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of marker with regard to chondroblastoma was calculated. Results. Immunohistochemistry revealed unequivocal nuclear positivity for H3.3K36M in the mononuclear cells in all the 44 chondroblastoma tested, denoting a sensitivity of 100% cases. Allthesetumors tested simultaneously for anti-histone H3.3G34W were negative. None of the histological mimickers were positive H3.3K36M indicating a specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion. H3.3K36M mutant antibody is highly sensitive and specific IHC marker and can be used as a valuable adjunct to distinguish chondroblastoma from its histological mimics especially on small biopsies.

Anti-Ribosomal-P Antibody Association with Neuropsychiatric Lupus in Sudanese Patients Attending Rheumatology Clinic in Omdurman Military Hospital.

Purpose: To assess and establish the relationship between neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) involvement and serological biomarkers like antiribosomal-P antibodies. Patients and Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted on patients attending Omdurman Military Hospital from July 2019 to December 2019. A total of 90 patients were enrolled, 30 of whom had NPSLE compared with 60 SLE patients without NPSLE. SLE diagnosis was established based on the revised SLICC criteria (presence of at least 4 criteria) for SLE classification, with neuropsychiatric manifestations defined based on the ACR nomenclature. The immunological examination results have been performed by (ELISA immune-enzymatic method, immunofluorescence, and Western immunoblotting test). SPSS v 21.0 software was utilised for data analysis. Results: NPSLE patients exhibited +ve ANA in 96.7% vs 75% in non-NPSLE (P-value = 0.008), antiribosomal-P antibodies (46.7% vs 20%; P-value = 0.0001), anti-nucleosome antibodies (26.7% vs 5%; P-value = 0.005), and anti-histones antibodies (40% vs 20%; P-value = 0.04). ANA antibodies were significantly associated with neurological manifestations as ANA antibodies were common in epilepsy (n = 9; 91%) and stroke (n = 8; 27.6%) (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Neuropsychiatric manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus exhibits variable clinical manifestations. Neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE are strongly associated with the anti-ribosomal P antibody presence and can be employed as a powerful diagnostic tool.

Anti-Histone H3.3 G34W antibody is a sensitive and highly specific immunohistochemistry marker for the diagnosis of Giant cell tumor of bone. A validation based on analysis of 198 cases from a single centre in India.

Context: The diagnosis of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is difficult in small biopsies with unusual age of presentation, location, and extensive secondary changes. Most of the GCTBs harbor H3F3A G34W mutations with a subset of cases showing alternate G34V, G34R, and G34L mutations. Objectives: To analyze the expression of anti-histone H3.3G34W antibody in different cellular components of GCTB across different locations and presentations (including the unusual ones) and validate the utility of this antibody in the diagnosis of GCTB and differentiate it from the other osteoclast-like giant-cell-rich lesions. Design: Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-histone H3.3G34W antibody in the diagnosed cases of GCTB (136 cases of GCTB from 133 patients, including two malignant GCTBs) and other giant cell-containing lesions (62 cases). The presence of unequivocal crisp nuclear staining was considered positive. Results: Immunohistochemistry revealed unequivocal nuclear positivity in the mononuclear cells in 87.3% of the cases of GCTB. Of these, most showed diffuse expression with moderate to strong intensity staining. The positive staining was restricted to the nuclei of mononuclear cells with the nuclei of osteoclastic giant cells being distinctly negative. In addition to conventional GCTBs, two cases each of multicentric and malignant GCTB showed positive staining. The other giant-cell containing lesions were distinctly negative. The present study showed a sensitivity of 87.3% with specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. Conclusion: The anti-histone G34W antibody is a highly sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of GCTB and differentiating it from its mimics. The positive staining is restricted to the mononuclear cell component of GCTB with sparing the osteoclastic giant cells further reiterating the fact that the mononuclear stromal cells are the true neoplastic component of GCTB.

An unusual association between anti-histone antibody seropositive SLE, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and herpetic rash: A case report.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with several autoantibodies targeted to nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens. Positivity of the serum antinuclear antibody (ANA), double stranded (ds) DNA, anti-smith (sm) antibody are essential for the diagnosis of SLE. Anti-histone antibody is usually present in drug-induced SLE. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) in SLE is usually mediated by warm IgG anti-erythrocyte antibodies. Our case evaluation revealed negative anti-ds antibody and anti-smith antibody, low C3 and C4 complement level, strong anti-histone antibody-positive status, and AIHA. She responded with intravenous methyl prednisolone and showed significant clinical improvement. Anti-histone antibody-positive SLE presenting with AIHA is rare, probably we are reporting the first case.

Clinical use of anti-histone antibodies in idiopathic and drug-induced lupus.

Anti-histone antibodies (AHAs) make their appearance in a number of systemic autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE). Although being known for over 50 years, they are poorly studied and understood. There is emerging evidence for their use in predicting clinical features of SLE, diversifying their clinical use. AHAs, however, are probably less prevalent in DILE than once thought owing to a move away from older DILE drugs to modern biological agents which do not appear to elicit AHAs. This review examines the historical studies that have defined AHAs and looks at some of the recent work with these autoantibodies.

Diagnostic Utility of Genetic and Immunohistochemical H3-3A Mutation Analysis in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone.

To validate the reliability and implementation of an objective diagnostic method for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). H3-3A gene mutation testing was performed using two different methods, Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. A total of 214 patients, including 120 with GCTB and 94 with other giant cell-rich bone lesions, participated in the study. Sanger sequencing and IHC with anti-histone H3.3 G34W and G34V antibodies were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, which were previously decalcified in EDTA if needed. The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular method was 100% (95% CI: 96.97-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.15-100%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC was 94.32% (95% CI: 87.24-98.13%) and 100% (95% CI: 93.94-100.0%), respectively. P.G35 mutations were discovered in 2/9 (22.2%) secondary malignant GCTBs and 9/13 (69.2%) GCTB after denosumab treatment. We confirmed in a large series of patients that evaluation of H3-3A mutational status using direct sequencing is a reliable tool for diagnosing GCTB, and it should be incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm. Additionally, we discovered IHC can be used as a screening tool. Proper tissue processing and decalcification are necessary. The presence of the H3-3A mutation did not exclude malignant GCTB. Denosumab did not eradicate the neoplastic cell population of GCTB.

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Autoimmunity Context.

The formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) is a strategy utilized by neutrophils for capturing infective agents. Extracellular traps consist in a physical net made of DNA and intracellular proteins externalized from neutrophils, where bacteria and viruses are entrapped and killed by proteolysis. A complex series of events contributes to achieving NET formation: signaling from infectious triggers comes first, followed by decondensation of chromatin and extrusion of the nucleosome components (DNA, histones) from the nucleus and, after cell membrane breakdown, outside the cell. NETs are composed of either DNA or nucleosome proteins and hundreds of cytoplasm proteins, a part of which undergo post-translational modification during the steps leading to NETs. There is a thin balance between the production and the removal of circulating NETs from blood where digestion of DNA by circulating DNases 1 and IL3 has a critical role. A delay in NET removal may have consequences for autoimmunity. Recent studies have shown that circulating NET levels are increased in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) for a functional block of NET removal mediated by anti-DNase antibodies or, in rare cases, by DNase IL3 mutations. In SLE, the persistence in circulation of NETs signifies elevated concentrations of either free DNA/nucleosome components and oxidized proteins that, in some cases, are recognized as non-self and presented to B-cells by Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9). In this way, it is activated as an immunologic response, leading to the formation of IgG2 auto-antibody. Monitoring serum NET levels represents a potential new way to herald the development of renal lesions and has clinical implications. Modulating the balance between NET formation and removal is one of the objectives of basic research that are aimed to design new drugs for SLE. Clinical Trial Registration Number: The Zeus study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (study number: NCT02403115).

Serum IgG2 antibody multicomposition in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis (Part 1): cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Serum anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome IgGs have been proposed as signatures for SLE and LN in limited numbers of patients. We sought to show higher sensitivity and specificity of the same antibodies with the IgG2 isotype and included IgG2 antibodies vs specific intracellular antigens in the analysis. METHODS: A total of 1052 SLE patients with (n = 479) and without (n = 573) LN, recruited at different times from the beginning of symptoms, were included in the study. Patients with primary APS (PAPS, n = 24), RA (RA, n = 24) and UCTD (UCTD, n = 96) were analysed for comparison. Anti-nucleosome (dsDNA, Histone2A, Histone3), anti-intracellular antigens (ENO1), anti-annexin A1 and anti-C1q IgG2 were determined by non-commercial techniques. RESULTS: The presence in the serum of the IgG2 panel was highly discriminatory for SLE/LN vs healthy subjects. Serum levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q IgG2 were more sensitive than those of IgGs (Farr radioimmunoassay/commercial assays) in identifying SLE patients at low-medium increments. Of more importance, serum positivity for anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 discriminated between LN and SLE (ROC T0-12 months), and high levels at T0-1 month were detected in 63% and 67%, respectively, of LN, vs 3% and 3%, respectively, of SLE patients; serum positivity for each of these was correlated with high SLEDAI values. Minor differences existed between LN/SLE and the other rheumatologic conditions. CONCLUSION: Nephritogenic IgG2 antibodies represent a specific signature of SLE/LN, with a few overlaps with other rheumatologic conditions. High levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 correlated with SLE activity indexes and were discriminatory between SLE patients limited to the renal complication and other SLE patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Zeus study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02403115.

Serum IgG2 antibody multi-composition in systemic lupus erythematosus and in lupus nephritis (Part 2): prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Circulating anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 have been identified as specific signatures of LN in a cross-over approach. We sought to show whether the same antibodies identify selected population of patients with LN with potentially different clinical outcomes. METHODS: Here we report the prospective analysis over 36 months of circulating IgG2 levels in patients with newly diagnosed LN (n=91) and SLE (n=31) and in other patients with SLE recruited within 2 years from diagnosis (n=99). Anti-podocyte (ENO1), anti-nucleosome (DNA, histone 2 A, histone 3) and anti-circulating proteins (C1q, AnnexinA1-ANXA1) IgG2 antibodies were determined by home-made techniques. RESULTS: LN patients were the main focus of the study. Anti-ENO1, anti-H2A and anti-ANXA1 IgG2 decreased in parallel to proteinuria and normalized within 12 months in the majority of patients while anti-dsDNA IgG2 remained high over the 36 months. Anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A had the highest association with proteinuria (Heat Map) and identified the highest number of patients with high proteinuria (68% and 71% respectively) and/or with reduced estimated glomerula filtration rate (eGFR) (58% for both antibodies) compared with 23% and 17% of anti-dsDNA (agreement analysis). Anti-ENO1 positive LN patients had higher proteinuria than negative patients at T0 and presented the maximal decrement within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-ENO1, anti-H2A and anti-ANXA1 antibodies were associated with high proteinuria in LN patients and Anti-ENO1 also presented the maximal reduction within 12 months that paralleled the decrease of proteinuria. Anti-dsDNA were not associated with renal outcome parameters. New IgG2 antibody signatures should be utilized as tracers of personalized therapies in LN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Zeus study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (study number: NCT02403115).

A Case of Seronegative ANA Hydralazine-Induced Lupus Presenting With Pericardial Effusion and Pleural Effusion.

Hydralazine induced lupus syndrome (HILS), a form of Drug-Induced Lupus (DIL), was first reported in 1953. Since then, studies have shown an increasing incidence of HILS. It presents with lupus-like symptoms such as arthralgia, fever, chest pain, anorexia, fatigue, petechiae, and rash. Though rare, HILS may initially present with pericardial effusion. Lab findings of HILS usually show positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) in >95% of cases, antihistone abs in >95% of cases, rheumatoid factor ab in 20%, and anti-double-strand DNA in <5%. Herein we present a case of HILS which initially presented with a seronegative ANA and pericardial effusion. An 82-year-old woman who presented with shortness of breath was found to have bilateral pleural effusion and pericardial effusion. Common etiologies of pericardial effusion have been ruled out, after careful review of her home medications, hydralazine was suspected to be the culprit of her pericardial effusion. Initial ANA testing was negative, however given high clinical suspicion autoimmune disease screening was done revealing positive anti-histone antibodies. Hydralazine was deemed to be the etiology of her pericardial effusion which led to the discontinuation of the drug. Serial echocardiography revealed no recurrence of the effusion.

A Severe Presentation of Drug-Induced Lupus Erythematosus.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus is a rare condition associated with the exposure to certain drugs capable of triggering an autoimmune disease similar to systemic lupus erythematosus. Although there are no available diagnostic criteria, clinical and serological findings and its temporal association with the initiation of the suspected drug are important to establish the diagnosis. The withdrawal of the drug usually resolves the symptoms. However, in some cases, therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents may be required. We present a 74-year-old female with a bilateral venous thrombosis, ischemic stroke, polyserositis and diarrhea due to drug-induced lupus erythematosus that required immunosuppressive therapy.

Optimización del algoritmo diagnóstico de anticuerpos antinucleares / Optimization of the diagnostic algorithm of antinuclear antibodies

Introducción: La prueba de anticuerpos antinucleares es una poderosa herramienta en el diagnóstico de las enfermedades reumáticas. Los anticuerpos antinucleares se determinan en el laboratorio por un algoritmo o secuencia que se inicia con prueba de cribado y sigue con la identificación de las especificidades antinucleares más comunes. Pero, ¿cómo interpretar los resultados discordantes entre los dos niveles de estudio de anticuerpos antinucleares? Objetivo: Determinar las especificidades antinucleares menos frecuentes en pacientes positivos de cribado de ANA y negativos de las especificidades más comunes. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de 88 pacientes consecutivos remitidos para la detección rutinaria de ANA con resultado positivo de cribado por ensayo inmuno-adsorbente ligado a enzima (ELISA) pero negativo de anticuerpos anti-ADN de doble cadena (dc, IgG) y anti-antígenos nucleares extraíbles comunes (ENAc). Las muestras séricas correspondientes fueron evaluadas por inmunofluorescencia indirecta sobre células de carcinoma epidermoide laríngeo humano (IFI-HEp-2) y por ELISA para la detección individual de ANA específicos. Resultados: La prueba de ANA por IFI/HEp-2 resultó positiva en 56/88 (63,6 por ciento) y las especificidades antinucleares se detectaron en 57/88 (64,8 por ciento) muestras, en el orden decreciente de Anti-Nucs: 16/88 (18,2 por ciento); anti-centrómero (CENP-B): 15/88 (17,0 por ciento); -histona: 15/88 (17 por ciento); -PM/Scl: 13/88 (14,8 por ciento); -ADNsc: 11/88 (12,5 por ciento) y -ENAc individuales: 8/88 (9,1 por ciento). La sensibilidad de la IFI-HEp-2 para las especificidades antinucleares fue de 0,83 (IC95 por ciento: 0,72-0,93). De los pacientes negativos de subserología (26/31), 83,9 por ciento no tenían antecedentes de enfermedad reumática asociada a ANA. Conclusiones: La mayoría de los pacientes con resultados discordantes entre el primer y segundo nivel de ANA fueron positivos de especificidades antinucleares menos comunes, pero de reconocido valor diagnóstico(AU)

Introduction: The antinuclear antibody test is a powerful tool for diagnosing rheumatic diseases. Antinuclear antibodies are determined in the laboratory by an algorithm or sequence that starts with a screening test and continues with the identification of the most common antinuclear specificities. But how to interpret the discordant results between the two levels of study of antinuclear antibodies? Objective: To determine the less frequent antinuclear specificities in positive patients of ANA screening and negative of the most common specificities. Methods: A prospective study was done on 88 consecutive patients referred for the routine ANA screening with a positive result of screening by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) but negative for anti-double-stranded DNA (dc, IgG) and common extractable anti-nuclear antigens (ENAc). The corresponding serum samples were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence on human laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma cells (IFI-HEp-2) and by ELISA for the individual detection of specific ANA. Results: The ANA test by IFI / HEp-2 was positive in 56/88 (63.6 percent) and the antinuclear specificities were detected in 57/88 (64.8 percent) samples, in decreasing Anti-Nucs order: 16/88 (18.2 percent); anti-centromere (CENP-B): 15/88 (17.0 percent); -histona: 15/88 (17 percent); -PM / Scl: 13/88 (14.8 percent); -ADNsc: 11/88 (12.5 percent) and -ENAc individual: 8/88 (9.1 percent). The sensitivity of IFI-HEp-2 for antinuclear specificities was 0.83 (95 percent CI: 0.72-0.93). No history of rheumatic disease associated with ANA was read in (26/31) 83.9 percent patients with negative subserology. Conclusions: The majority of patients with discordant results between the first and second level of ANA were positive of less common antinuclear specificities, but of recognized diagnostic value(AU)

Characteristics of Factors of Protozoa Blastocystis hominis Persistence.

Persistence activity manifested in the expression of anti-lysozyme, anti-lactoferrin, and antihistone factors promoting inactivation of natural anti-infection resistance factors in the body was revealed in Blastocystis hominis protozoa. Activities of these factors were ranged. The frequency of these factors in clinical isolates of blastocyst decreased in the following order: anti-lactoferrin activity (84.5±3.7%)→anti-lysozyme activity (64.8±5.7%)→anti-histone activity (48.1±2.3%). In healthy humans, the corresponding parameters were 7.3±1.3, 5.3±0.9, and 3.3±0.4%, respectively (p<0.05). It was shown that the studied activities in highly virulent blastocysts were higher than in groups of medium-, low-, and avirulent protozoa.

Serum Levels of Anti-histone and Anti-double-Strand DNA Antibodies Before and After Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the serum levels of anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, and anti-nucleosome antibodies after laparoscopic ovarian electrocauterization in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Our study was performed on 35 patients with PCOS resistant to medical therapy, 35 patients with unexplained infertility, and 35 healthy fertile individuals. Patients with PCOS underwent laparoscopic electrocauterization while those with unexplained infertility underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. Serum levels of anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, and anti-nucleosome antibodies were measured at baseline and 1 month after operation and were compared between groups. RESULT: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients with PCOS had significantly higher levels of anti-dsDNA compared to unexplained infertility (p < 0.001) and control groups (p = 0.001). Anti-histone antibodies were higher in PCOS group compared to control group (p = 0.001). In those patients suffering from PCOS, anti-histone antibody increased significantly 1 month after ovarian electrocauterization (p = 0.017). Similarly, serum levels of anti-nucleosome antibodies increased significantly 1 month after operation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ovarian electrocauterization in patients with PCOS results in increased levels of anti-histone and anti-nucleosome antibodies. Anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, and anti-nucleosome antibodies also increase after diagnostic laparoscopy in those with unexplained infertility. Patients with PCOS have higher levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-histone antibodies compared to those with unexplained infertility and healthy fertile subjects.

Drug-induced lupus: Including anti-tumour necrosis factor and interferon induced.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus is defined as a syndrome with clinical and serological features similar to systemic lupus erythematosus that is temporally related to continuous drug exposure and which resolves after discontinuation of this drug. More than 90 drugs, including biological modulators such as tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interferons, have been identified as likely 'culprits'. While there are no standard diagnostic criteria for drug-induced lupus erythematosus, guidelines that can help to distinguish drug-induced lupus erythematosus from systemic lupus erythematosus have been proposed and several different patterns of drug-induced lupus erythematosus are emerging. Distinguishing drug-induced lupus erythematosus from systemic lupus erythematosus is important because the prognosis of drug-induced lupus erythematosus is usually good when the drug is withdrawn. This review discusses the differences between drug-induced lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus, the mechanisms of action of drug-induced lupus erythematosus and drugs that are usually associated with drug-induced lupus erythematosus, with particular focus on the biological treatments.

Diagnosis and classification of drug-induced autoimmunity (DIA).

Since sulfadiazine associated lupus-like symptoms were first described in 1945, certain drugs have been reported to interfere with the immune system and induce a series of autoimmune diseases (named drug-induced autoimmunity, DIA), exemplified by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Among the drugs, procainamide and hydralazine are considered to be associated with the highest risk for developing lupus, while quinidine has a moderate risk, and all other drugs have low or very low risk. More recently, drug-induced lupus has been associated with the use of newer biological modulators, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors and cytokines. In addition to lupus, other major autoimmune diseases, including vasculitis and arthritis, have also been associated with drugs. Because resolution of symptoms generally occurs after cessation of the offending drugs, early diagnosis is crucial for treatment strategy and improvement of prognosis. Unfortunately, it is difficult to establish standardized criteria for DIA diagnosis. Diagnosis of DIA requires identification of a temporal relationship between drug administration and the onset of symptoms, but the relative risk with respect to dose and duration for each drug has rarely been determined. DIA is affected by multiple genetic and environmental factors, leading to difficulties in establishing a list of global clinical features that are characteristic of most or all DIA patients. Moreover, the distinction between authentic DIA and unmasking of a latent autoimmune disease also poses challenges. In this review, we summarize the highly variable clinical features and laboratory findings of DIA, with an emphasis on the diagnostic criteria.