Restricted Omicron-specific cross-variant memory B-cell immunity after a 3rd dose/booster of monovalent Wuhan-Hu-1-containing COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

The responsiveness/cross-binding of vaccine-induced memory B cells/MBCs to previous and emerging divergent SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g., Omicron) is understudied. In this longitudinal study subjects receiving two or three doses of monovalent ancestral strain-containing COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were evaluated. In contrast to others, we observed significantly lower frequencies of MBCs reactive to the receptor-binding domain/RBD, the N-terminal domain/NTD, and the S1 of Omicron/BA.1, compared to Wuhan and Delta, even after a 3rd vaccine dose/booster. Our study is a proof of concept that MBC cross-reactivity to variants with greater sequence divergence from the vaccine strain may be overestimated and suggests that these variants may exhibit immune escape with reduced recognition by circulating pre-existing MBCs upon infection.

Magnitude and Duration of Serum Neutralizing Antibody Titers Induced by a Third mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination against Omicron BA.1 in Older Individuals.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) is dominating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. The waning protective effect of available vaccines against the Omicron variant is a critical public health issue. This study aimed to assess the impact of the third COVID-19 vaccination on immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 strain in older individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults aged ≥60 years who had completed two doses of the homologous COVID-19 vaccine with either BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech, New York, NY, USA, BNT) or ChAdOx1 nCoV (SK bioscience, Andong-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea, ChAd) were registered to receive the third vaccination. Participants chose either BNT or mRNA-1273 (Moderna, Norwood, MA, USA, m1273) mRNA vaccine for the third dose and were categorized into four groups: ChAd/ChAd/BNT, ChAd/ChAd/m1273, BNT/BNT/BNT, and BNT/BNT/m1273. Four serum specimens were obtained from each participant at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the third dose (V1, V2, V3, and V4, respectively). Serum-neutralizing antibody (NAb) activity against BetaCoV/Korea/KCDC03/2020 (NCCP43326, ancestral strain) and B.1.1.529 (NCCP43411, Omicron BA.1 variant) was measured using plaque reduction neutralization tests. A 50% neutralizing dilution (ND50) >10 was considered indicative of protective NAb titers. RESULTS: In total, 186 participants were enrolled between November 24, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The respective groups received the third dose at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 132 (125 - 191), 123 (122 - 126), 186 (166 - 193), and 182 (175 - 198) days after the second dose. Overall, ND50 was lower at V1 against Omicron BA.1 than against the ancestral strain. NAb titers against the ancestral strain and Omicron BA.1 variant at V2 were increased at least 30-fold (median [IQR], 1235.35 [1021.45 - 2374.65)] and 129.8 [65.3 - 250.7], respectively). ND50 titers against the ancestral strain and Omicron variant did not differ significantly among the four groups (P = 0.57). NAb titers were significantly lower against the Omicron variant than against the ancestral strain at V3 (median [IQR], 36.4 (17.55 - 75.09) vs. 325.9 [276.07 - 686.97]; P = 0.012). NAb titers against Omicron at V4 were 16 times lower than that at V3. Most sera exhibited a protective level (ND50 >10) at V4 (75.0% [24/32], 73.0% [27/37], 73.3% [22/30], and 70.6% [12/17] in the ChAd/ChAd/BNT, ChAd/ChAd/m1273, BNT/BNT/BNT, and BNT/BNT/m1273 groups, respectively), with no significant differences among groups (P = 0.99). CONCLUSION: A third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose restored waning NAb titers against Omicron BA.1. Our findings support a third-dose vaccination program to prevent the waning of humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Administration of an excessive dosage of covid-19 pfizer vaccine in an infant: Case report of clinical and immune responses.

Introduction/Case report: We describe the case of a 6-month-old female infant who received the equivalent of 6 adult doses of the COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine due to an immunization error. The patient underwent clinical and laboratory evaluations from the time of vaccination error (January 2022) until November 2022. In the first three days after immunization, she presented with low-grade fever (38 °C) and mild pain and induration at the injection site. She showed no other symptoms afterwards. Laboratory tests were within normal limits for age, except for an elevated D-dimer (3.71 ug/mL; normal: up to 0.5 ug/mL) and as the echocardiogram and electrocardiogram were within normal limits as well, no interventions were instituted at that moment. On the tenth day, immune response evaluation showed a strong expression of cytokines related to the Th2 profile and a well-controlled inflammatory state. Forty-three days after the vaccine administration inflammation status remained, with a predominance of cellular immune response, IFN-γ expression increased compared to the previous evaluation, and a robust antiviral state was in place. After 90 days, immune response evaluation showed a significant reduction in the inflammatory state, still with a predominance of the cellular immune response. Clinically, the patient remained well, with no other noteworthy intercurrences, until the last appointment in November 2022. This child has had no evidence of a severe adverse effect associated to the vaccine overdose. Conclusion: The close follow-up of this case of vaccination error demonstrated that the COVID-19 Pfizer was safe and immunogenic in this individual, noting careful monitoring and followup of these vaccine administration errors is crucial.

Post-transplant dynamics and clinical significance of CMV-specific neutralizing antibodies in kidney transplant recipients treated with T-cell-depleting agents.

We measured cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific antibodies that neutralize epithelial cell infection (CMV-AbNEIs) in 101 CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) at baseline and post-transplant months 3 and 6. All the patients received antithymocyte globulin and 3-month valganciclovir prophylaxis. There were no significant differences in pre-transplant AbNEIs titers between KTRs that developed or did not develop any-level CMV infection or the composite of high-level infection and/or disease. One-year CMV infection-free survival was comparable between KTRs with or without pre-transplant CMV-AbNEIs. No differences were observed by months 3 and 6 either. We observed no protective role for CMV-AbNEIs among CMV-seropositive KTRs undergoing T-cell-depleting induction.

von Willebrand factor neutralizing and non-neutralizing alloantibodies in 213 subjects with type 3 von Willebrand disease enrolled in 3WINTERS-IPS.

BACKGROUND: Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most severe form of this disease owing to the almost complete deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Replacement therapy with plasma-derived products containing VWF or recombinant VWF rarely cause the development of alloantibodies against VWF that may be accompanied by anaphylactic reactions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of anti-VWF alloantibodies in subjects with type 3 VWD enrolled in the 3WINTERS-IPS. METHODS: An indirect in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay has been used to test all the alloantibodies against VWF. Neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) have been tested with a Bethesda-based method by using a VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay. Samples positive for anti-VWF antibodies were further tested with Bethesda-based methods by using the semiautomated gain-of-function glycoprotein-Ib binding (VWF:GPIbM) and a VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: In total, 18 of the 213 (8.4%) subjects tested positive for anti-VWF antibodies and 13 of 213 (6%) had VWF:CB inhibitors. These 13 were among the 18 with anti-VWF antibodies. Of the 5 without VWF:CB inhibitors, 3 had non-neutralizing antibodies, 1 only inhibitor against VWF:GPIbM, and one could not be tested further. Ten of the 13 subjects with VWF:CB inhibitors also had VWF:GPIbM inhibitors, 6 of whom also had VWF:Ag inhibitors. Subjects with inhibitors were homozygous for VWF null alleles (11/14), homozygous for a missense variant (1/14), or partially characterized (2/14). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VWF antibodies were found in 8.4% of subjects with type 3 VWD, whereas neutralizing VWF inhibitors were found in 6%, mainly in subjects homozygous for VWF null alleles. Because inhibitors may be directed toward different VWF epitopes, their detection is dependent on the assay used.

Low Neutralizing Activities to the Omicron Subvariants BN.1 and XBB.1.5 of Sera From the Individuals Vaccinated With a BA.4/5-Containing Bivalent mRNA Vaccine.

The continuous emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants has provided insights for updating current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. We examined the neutralizing activity of Abs induced by a BA.4/5-containing bivalent mRNA vaccine against Omicron subvariants BN.1 and XBB.1.5. We recruited 40 individuals who had received a monovalent COVID-19 booster dose after a primary series of COVID-19 vaccinations and will be vaccinated with a BA.4/5-containing bivalent vaccine. Sera were collected before vaccination, one month after, and three months after a bivalent booster. Neutralizing Ab (nAb) titers were measured against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.5, BN.1, and XBB.1.5. BA.4/5-containing bivalent vaccination significantly boosted nAb levels against both ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants. Participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection had higher nAb titers against all examined strains than the infection-naïve group. NAb titers against BN.1 and XBB.1.5 were lower than those against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and BA.5 strains. These results suggest that COVID-19 vaccinations specifically targeting emerging Omicron subvariants, such as XBB.1.5, may be required to ensure better protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in high-risk groups.

[Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)]. / Impfung gegen coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

The clinical presentation of infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV­2) is very heterogeneous and the risk of a severe course clearly increases with age. Therefore, older adults are an important target group for vaccinations. Several vaccines are currently licensed in Europe for older adults, namely two mRNA vaccines, two adenoviral vector vaccines and a protein-based vaccine. The immunogenicity and clinical efficacy of these vaccines in the first approval trials were equal or only slightly reduced for older adults compared to younger age groups; however, the concentration of neutralizing antibodies and protection against infection greatly declined over time and the latter is substantially reduced for virus variants, particularly for the Omicron variant. Nevertheless, protection against severe disease and hospitalization is maintained at a high level for longer time periods, and after three vaccine doses (2 + 1 schedule) also for the Omicron variant. Additional booster vaccinations are currently recommended for patients with risk factors, especially older adults. With respect to the currently valid recommendations for different age and risk groups, the publications and notifications of the national vaccine advisory bodies should be referred to.All currently available vaccines target the original virus strain. New vaccines, which are adapted to virus variants are currently being developed and tested, and it is highly likely that they will be used in the near future; however, viral evolution is ongoing and a continuous development of adapted vaccines will probably be necessary.

Respuesta inmune humoral a cuatro vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2 en profesionales de la salud

Objetivo: Describir la concentración de los anticuerpos neutralizantes detectados en el suero de profesionales de la salud que recibieron alguna de las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2, desarrollada por las empresas Sinopharm, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson o el candidato vacunal de CureVac. Materiales y métodos: Investigación observacional, descriptiva, retrospectiva, de corte transversal. Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 217 profesionales de la salud que recibieron el esquema completo de las vacunas de Sinopharm, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson o del candidato de CureVac. A estos individuos se les había determinado la presencia de anticuerpos neutralizantes contra el SARS-CoV-2 en el suero mediante la técnica de inmunoensayo por electroquimioluminiscencia (eCLIA). Se consideraron las variables edad, sexo, antecedentes de infección con el SARS-CoV-2, concentración de anticuerpos neutralizantes y tipo de vacuna administrada. Resultados: El 16,60 % de los profesionales de la salud manifestó haber tenido COVID-19 antes de haber recibido la vacunación. Ellos se inmunizaron con las vacunas de Sinopharm (74,65 %), Pfizer (12,90 %), Johnson & Johnson (5,07 %) y el candidato de CureVac (7,37 %). Independientemente de la vacuna recibida, el 42,50 % de las personas sin infección previa que recibieron la vacuna no desarrollaron anticuerpos neutralizantes, mientras que el 16,70 % de los que sí tuvieron enfermedad previa no desarrolló estos anticuerpos. La vacuna de Pfizer indujo mayor concentración de anticuerpos neutralizantes (196,27 UA/mL) en pacientes con o sin infección previa. Conclusiones: El estudio confirma que la vacunación refuerza la inmunidad contra el nuevo coronavirus en individuos con diagnóstico previo de COVID-19, y sugiere que la vacuna desarrollada por Pfizer estimula de manera más eficaz la producción de anticuerpos neutralizantes.

Objective: To describe the concentration of neutralizing antibodies in serum from healthcare professionals who received any of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines developed by Sinopharm, Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson, or CureVac's vaccine candidate. Materials and methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional research which included 217 healthcare professionals fully vaccinated with Sinopharm, Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson's vaccines, or CureVac's vaccine candidate. The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in serum was determined in these individuals using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Variables such as age, sex, history of infection with SARS-CoV-2, concentration of neutralizing antibodies and brand of vaccine administered were considered. Results: Sixteen point six zero percent (16.60 %) of the healthcare professionals stated that they had already had COVID-19 before receiving the vaccine. They were immunized with the vaccines developed by Sinopharm (74.65 %), Pfizer (12.90 %) or Johnson & Johnson (5.07 %), or CureVac's vaccine candidate (7.37 %). Regardless of the vaccine received, 42.50 % of the individuals who had not been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and 16.70 % of those who had been previously infected did not develop neutralizing antibodies. Pfizer's vaccine produced the highest concentration of neutralizing antibodies (196.27 AU/mL) in patients with or without previous infection. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that vaccination boosts immunity in people previously infected with the novel coronavirus and suggests that Pfizer's vaccine produces the highest concentration of neutralizing antibodies.

The use of convalescent plasma therapy in the management of a pregnant woman with COVID-19: a case report

ABSTRACT The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is responsible for the current worldwide pandemic. Treatment and prophylaxis are still under investigation. Convalescent plasma therapy could be an alternative. We report a case of a 41-year-old patient, at 28 weeks of gestation, was hospitalized with COVID-19. On the 10th day after onset of symptoms, the clinical picture worsened, and she required high-flow oxygen therapy (30L/minute), with 92% oxygen saturation, and chest X-ray showing mild bilateral opacities at lung bases. Blood tests showed D-dimer 1,004ng/mL, C-reactive protein 81mg/L, pro-calcitonin 0.05ng/mL and interleukine-6 42.9pg/mL. The therapy chosen was Tazocin® 12g/day, vancomycin 2g/day, and methylprednisolone 40mg/day. In addition, convalescent plasma therapy was administered (275mL) uneventfully, including SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and neutralizing antibodies >1:160. The patient had a fast recovery. The early administration of convalescent plasma, with high titers of neutralizing antibodies, may be an alternative option for severe COVID-19 during pregnancy, until further studies demonstrate an efficient and safe treatment or prophylaxis.

Immune characterization of a Colombian family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection / Caracterización inmunológica de un grupo familiar colombiano con infección por SARS-CoV-2

Abstract | Introduction: Immunological markers have been described during COVID-19 and persist after recovery. These immune markers are associated with clinical features among SARS- CoV-2 infected individuals. Nevertheless, studies reporting a comprehensive analysis of the immune changes occurring during SARS-CoV-2 infection are still limited. Objective: To evaluate the production of proinflammatory cytokines, the antibody response, and the phenotype and function of NK cells and T cells in a Colombian family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Materials and methods: Proinflammatory cytokines were evaluated by RT-PCR and ELISA. The frequency, phenotype, and function of NK cells (cocultures with K562 cells) and T-cells (stimulated with spike/RdRp peptides) were assessed by flow cytometry. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were determined using indirect immunofluorescence and plaque reduction neutralization assay. Results: During COVID-19, we observed a high proinflammatory-cytokine production and a reduced CD56bright-NK cell and cytotoxic response. Compared with healthy controls, infected individuals had a higher frequency of dysfunctional CD8+ T cells CD38+HLA-DR-. During the acute phase, CD8+ T cells stimulated with viral peptides exhibited a monofunctional response characterized by high IL-10 production. However, during recovery, we observed a bifunctional response characterized by the co-expression of CD107a and granzyme B or perforin. Conclusion: Although the proinflammatory response is a hallmark of SARS-CoV-2 infection, other phenotypic and functional alterations in NK cells and CD8+ T cells could be associated with the outcome of COVID-19. However, additional studies are required to understand these alterations and to guide future immunotherapy strategies.

Resumen | Introducción. Se han descrito diferentes marcadores inmunológicos durante la COVID-19, los cuales persisten incluso después de la convalecencia y se asocian con los estadios clínicos de la infección. Sin embargo, aún son pocos los estudios orientados al análisis exhaustivo de las alteraciones del sistema inmunológico en el curso de la infección. Objetivo. Evaluar la producción de citocinas proinflamatorias, la reacción de anticuerpos, y el fenotipo y la función de las células NK y los linfocitos T en una familia colombiana con infección por SARS-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos. Se evaluaron las citocinas proinflamatorias mediante RT-PCR y ELISA; la frecuencia, el fenotipo y la función de las células NK (en cocultivos con células K562) y linfocitos T CD8+ (estimulados con péptidos spike/RdRp) mediante citometría de flujo, y los anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2, mediante inmunofluorescencia indirecta y prueba de neutralización por reducción de placa. Resultados. Durante la COVID-19 hubo una producción elevada de citocinas proinflamatorias, con disminución de las células NK CD56 bright y reacción citotóxica. Comparados con los controles sanos, los individuos infectados presentaron con gran frecuencia linfocitos T CD8+ disfuncionales CD38+HLA-DR-. Además, en los linfocitos T CD8+ estimulados con péptidos virales, predominó una reacción monofuncional con gran producción de IL-10 durante la fase aguda y una reacción bifuncional caracterizada por la coexpresión de CD107a y granzima B o perforina durante la convalecencia. Conclusión. Aunque la reacción inflamatoria caracteriza la infección por SARS-CoV-2, hay otras alteraciones fenotípicas y funcionales en células NK y linfocitos T CD8+ que podrían asociarse con la progresión de la infección. Se requieren estudios adicionales para entender estas alteraciones y guiar futuras estrategias de inmunoterapia.

Detección de anticuerpos neutralizantes en profesionales de la salud vacunados contra el SARS-CoV-2

Objetivo: Determinar la presencia y concentración de los anticuerpos neutralizantes en el suero de individuos que recibieron la vacuna contra el SARS-CoV-2 desarrollada por la empresa Sinopharm. Materiales y métodos: Investigación descriptiva y transversal. En el estudio se incluyeron 117 profesionales de la salud inoculados con dos dosis de la vacuna Sinopharm, en quienes se había detectado la presencia de anticuerpos neutralizantes contra SARS-CoV-2 en el suero mediante la técnica de inmunoensayo de electroquimioluminiscencia (eCLIA). Las variables consideradas en el estudio fueron la edad, el sexo, la concentración de anticuerpos neutralizantes y el antecedente de haber tenido COVID-19. Resultados: Se evidenció el incremento significativo de la concentración de anticuerpos neutralizantes en las personas que recibieron la vacuna y tuvieron una infección previa por SARS-CoV-2 (p < 0,001) respecto a las que se vacunaron, pero no presentaron infección previa. Conclusiones: El estudio evidencia que la vacunación refuerza la inmunidad contra el nuevo coronavirus en los pacientes con diagnóstico previo de COVID-19 y sugiere la relevancia de la aplicación de una tercera dosis de esta vacuna.

Objective: To describe the presence and the concentration of neutralizing antibodies at serum of healthcare professionals inoculated with the Sinopharm anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Materials and methods: Descriptive and transversal research. A total of 117 healthcare professionals inoculated with two doses of the Sinopharm vaccine having quantitative data of neutralizing antibodies at serum (detected by eCLIA) were included. Age, sex, neutralizing antibodies concentration and previous diagnostic of COVID-19 diseases were the variables. Results: A significant increase on neutralizing antibodies concentration were detected on pre- COVID-19 vaccinated persons regarding those vaccinated without previous diagnostic of the viral infection (p < 0,001). Conclusions: the study evidence that Sinopharm vaccine boost immunity against the new coronavirus on previously infected persons and suggest that a third dose of the vaccine could be relevant to boost the immune response.

Posibles estrategias de tratamiento para COVID-19 / Possible treatment strategies for COVID-19

No hay tratamiento antiviral específico para el COVID-19. Sin embargo, conocimientos adquiridos durante los brotes del SARS y el MERS, en conjunto con la información obtenida con COVID-19, han permitido detectar varios objetivos terapéuticos en el ciclo de replicación del virus, y en su patogénesis. Se incluye la evidencia actual con respecto a los principales tratamientos propuestos para COVID-19, reutilizados o experimentales, mediante una revisión de la literatura científica a la fecha. Debido a la falta de ensayos controlados aleatorios, se incluyeron: informes de casos, series de casos y artículos de revisión. Globalmente se están llevando a cabo múltiples estudios con el fin de identificar agentes que sean efectivos ante COVID-19, en los siguientes objetivos estratégicos: inhibición de la entrada/fusión del virus (anticuerpos neutralizantes, inhibidores de proteasa de serina transmembrana 2, cloroquina, hidroxicloroquina y umifenovir); interrupción de la replicación viral (remdesivir, favipiravir, lopinavir/ritonavir e ivermectina) y supresión de la respuesta inflamatoria excesiva (corticosteroides, tocilizumab, e inmunoglobulina). Aún no existe un tratamiento efectivo y seguro contra COVID-19; los fármacos descritos en esta revisión se administran como uso compasivo de drogas, o bien, como parte de un ensayo clínico. La terapia de soporte continúa siendo el pilar del manejo de COVID-19.(AU)

There is no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19. However, knowledge acquired during the SARS and MERS outbreaks, together with the information obtained with COVID-19, have allowed the detection of various therapeutic targets in the virus replication cycle, and in its pathogenesis. The current evidence regarding the leading treatments proposed for COVID-19, reused or experimental, is included through a review of the scientific literature to date. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials, the following were involved: case reports, case series and review articles. Globally, multiple studies are being carried out in order to identify agents that are effective against COVID-19, upon the following strategic objectives: inhibition of viral entry/fusion (neutralizing antibodies, transmembrane serine protease 2 inhibitors, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and umifenovir); interruption of viral replication (remdesivir, favipiravir, lopinavir/ritonavir and ivermectin), and suppression of excessive inflammatory response (corticosteroids, tocilizumab, and immunoglobulin). There is still no effective and safe treatment against COVID-19; the medications described in this review are given as compassionate drug use, or as part of a clinical trial. Support therapy continues to be COVID-19 management cornerstone.(AU)

Evaluation of Protective Immunity of Peptide Vaccines Composed of a 15-mer N-terminal Matrix Protein 2 and a Helper T-Cell Epitope Derived from Influenza A Virus.

The matrix protein 2 of influenza A virus (IFAV) has a relatively conserved ectodomain (M2e) composed of 23 amino acids, and M2e-based vaccines have been suggested to induce broad protective immunity in mice. In this study, we investigated whether N-terminal sequence of M2e (nM2e)-based vaccines with more conserved nM2e could induce influenza viral neutralizing activity. We constructed linear peptide vaccines with an nM2e sequence for PR8 virus (nM2Pr) connected to a probable 17-mer IFAV-derived helper T-cell epitope (ThE: T1, T2, or T3) at its N- or C-terminus. The peptide vaccines induced significant production of nM2e Abs regardless of either type or location of the ThE-epitope in BALB/c mice, while only T3 was effective in C57BL/6 mice. The Abs against nM2Pr-T3 elicited broader binding affinities to the nM2e peptides derived from various IFAVs than those against T3-nM2Pr. In addition, the nM2e-based vaccines efficiently protected the immunized mice from the lethal challenge of PR8 virus. These results suggest that the more conserved nM2e without cysteine will be useful for development of universal peptide vaccines than M2e.

Antibody Determinants of Influenza Immunity.

Understanding antigenic variation in influenza virus strains and how the human immune system recognizes strains are central challenges for vaccinologists. Antibodies directed to the 2 major viral surface membrane proteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), mediate protection against reinfection following natural infection or vaccination, but HA and NA protein sequences in field strains are highly variable. The central questions are how to achieve protective antibody responses in a higher proportion of individuals and how to induce responses with more breadth and durability. Studies using isolation of human monoclonal antibodies followed by structural and functional characterization revealed conserved antigenic sites recognized by broadly cross-reactive antibodies. The antigenic landscape on HA and NA proteins is coming into focus to inform studies of the correlates and mechanisms of immunity. Understanding the antibody determinants of influenza immunity points the way toward development and testing of next-generation vaccines with potential to confer broadly protective immunity.

Evaluation of Protective Immunity of Peptide Vaccines Composed of a 15-mer N-terminal Matrix Protein 2 and a Helper T-Cell Epitope Derived from Influenza A Virus

The matrix protein 2 of influenza A virus (IFAV) has a relatively conserved ectodomain (M2e) composed of 23 amino acids, and M2e-based vaccines have been suggested to induce broad protective immunity in mice. In this study, we investigated whether N-terminal sequence of M2e (nM2e)-based vaccines with more conserved nM2e could induce influenza viral neutralizing activity. We constructed linear peptide vaccines with an nM2e sequence for PR8 virus (nM2Pr) connected to a probable 17-mer IFAV-derived helper T-cell epitope (ThE: T1, T2, or T3) at its N- or C-terminus. The peptide vaccines induced significant production of nM2e Abs regardless of either type or location of the ThE-epitope in BALB/c mice, while only T3 was effective in C57BL/6 mice. The Abs against nM2Pr-T3 elicited broader binding affinities to the nM2e peptides derived from various IFAVs than those against T3-nM2Pr. In addition, the nM2e-based vaccines efficiently protected the immunized mice from the lethal challenge of PR8 virus. These results suggest that the more conserved nM2e without cysteine will be useful for development of universal peptide vaccines than M2e.

Intravenous Epoetin Alfa-epbx versus Epoetin Alfa for Treatment of Anemia in End-Stage Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, to epoetin alfa in patients on hemodialysis with ESKD and anemia. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this 24-week, multicenter, double-blind comparative efficacy and safety study, 612 patients on hemodialysis with ESKD and anemia who had stable hemoglobin and were receiving stable doses of intravenous epoetin alfa were randomized (1:1) to intravenous epoetin alfa or epoetin alfa-epbx. Dosing was adjusted according to the epoetin alfa prescribing information. The coprimary efficacy end points were the least squares mean difference between the two treatments in mean weekly hemoglobin level and mean weekly epoetin dose per kilogram of body weight during the last 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The least squares mean difference between epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa in weekly hemoglobin was -0.12 g/dl and the 95% confidence interval (-0.25 to 0.01) was contained within the prespecified equivalence margin (-0.5 to 0.5 g/dl). The least squares mean difference between epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa in weekly epoetin dose per kilogram of body weight was 0.37 U/kg per week, and the 95% confidence interval (-10.40 to 11.13) was contained within the prespecified equivalence margin (-45 to 45 U/kg per week). Incidences of adverse events (77.1% versus 75.3%), serious adverse events (24.9% versus 27.0%), and deaths (n=5 versus 6) were similar between the epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa groups, respectively. Five patients tested positive for anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibodies at baseline, and two additional patients (n=1 per group) developed anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibodies while on study treatment. All patients tested negative for neutralizing antibodies, and no patient in either group experienced an event of pure red cell aplasia. CONCLUSIONS: This 24-week, comparative, clinical trial in patients on hemodialysis with ESKD and anemia demonstrated there is no clinically meaningful difference in efficacy or safety between epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa.

Regulatory T-Cell Augmentation or Interleukin-17 Inhibition Prevents Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Hypertension in Mice.

The immunosuppressive calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine A and tacrolimus alter T-cell subsets and can cause hypertension, vascular dysfunction, and renal toxicity. We and others have reported that cyclosporine A and tacrolimus decrease anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells and increase proinflammatory interleukin-17-producing T cells; therefore, we hypothesized that inhibition of these effects using noncellular therapies would prevent the hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and renal glomerular injury induced by calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Daily treatment of mice with cyclosporine A or tacrolimus for 1 week significantly decreased CD4+/FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in the spleen and lymph nodes, as well as induced hypertension, vascular injury and dysfunction, and glomerular mesangial expansion in mice. Daily cotreatment with all-trans retinoic acid reported to increase regulatory T cells and decrease interleukin-17-producing T cells, prevented all of the detrimental effects of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus. All-trans retinoic acid also increased regulatory T cells and prevented the hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and glomerular injury in genetically modified mice that phenocopy calcineurin inhibitor-treated mice (FKBP12-Tie2 knockout). Treatment with an interleukin-17-neutralizing antibody also increased regulatory T-cell levels and prevented the hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and glomerular injury in cyclosporine A-treated and tacrolimus-treated mice and FKBP12-Tie2 knockout mice, whereas an isotype control had no effect. Augmenting regulatory T cells and inhibiting interleukin-17 signaling using noncellular therapies prevents the cardiovascular and renal toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors in mice.

Use of antibodies neutralizing epithelial cell infection to diagnose patients at risk for CMV Disease after transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Although a CMV-specific T-cell response is associated with reduced risk for infection after transplantation, some patients still develop CMV disease. Thus, the characterization of additional parameters of the CMV-specific immune response that correlate with the control of CMV infection and disease and their use in defining thresholds that can be applied to clinical practice is of interest. METHODS: In a cohort of high risk solid organ transplant recipients we characterized CMV-specific T-cell responses using intracellular cytokine staining upon stimulation with pp65 and IE-1 peptides, and levels of CMV-specific antibodies neutralizing infection in fibroblast (MRC-5) and epithelial (ARPE-19) cells using microneutralization assays. RESULTS: Although patients with a positive (≥0.25%CD8(+)CD69(+)IFN-γ+) T-cell response were 6.4 fold more protected (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6-25.3; p < 0.001) from CMV infection than patients without a response, 2 (4.2%) patients developed disease. We defined a cut-off titer for epithelial cell neutralizing antibodies of ≥480 that correlated with disease protection. Thus, patients with a CMV-specific T-cell response and titers ≥480 were 14.2 fold more protected from CMV infection (OR 14.2, 95% CI 5-40.2; p < 0.001) and had no episodes of CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that antibodies neutralizing epithelial cell infection may have an important role in long-term protection. Quantification of antibodies neutralizing epithelial cells, in addition to the T-cell response, may be useful for identifying patients with lower risk for CMV disease.

Inhibition of the plasma SCUBE1, a novel platelet adhesive protein, protects mice against thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Signal peptide-CUB-EGF domain-containing protein 1 (SCUBE1), a secreted and surface-exposed glycoprotein on activated platelets, promotes platelet-platelet interaction and supports platelet-matrix adhesion. Its plasma level is a biomarker of platelet activation in acute thrombotic diseases. However, the exact roles of plasma SCUBE1 in vivo remain undefined. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We generated new mutant (Δ) mice lacking the soluble but retaining the membrane-bound form of SCUBE1. Plasma SCUBE1-depleted Δ/Δ mice showed normal hematologic and coagulant features and expression of major platelet receptors, but Δ/Δ platelet-rich plasma showed impaired platelet aggregation in response to ADP and collagen treatment. The addition of purified recombinant SCUBE1 protein restored the aggregation of platelets in Δ/Δ platelet-rich plasma and further enhanced platelet aggregation in +/+ platelet-rich plasma. Plasma deficiency of SCUBE1 diminished arterial thrombosis in mice and protected against lethal thromboembolism induced by collagen-epinephrine treatment. Last, antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor-like repeats of SCUBE1, which are involved in trans-homophilic protein-protein interactions, protected mice against fatal thromboembolism without causing bleeding in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that plasma SCUBE1 participates in platelet aggregation by bridging adjacent activated platelets in thrombosis. Blockade of soluble SCUBE1 might represent a novel antithrombotic strategy.

Antibodies to interferon beta in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving CinnoVex, rebif, and betaferon.

Treatment with interferon beta (IFN-ß) induces the production of binding antibodies (BAbs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). NAbs against IFN-ß are associated with a loss of IFN-ß bioactivity and decreased clinical efficacy of the drug. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the prevalence of binding antibodies (BAbs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to IFN-ß in MS patients receiving CinnoVex, Rebif, or Betaferon. The presence of BAbs was studied in serum samples from 124 MS patients using one of these IFN-ß medications by ELISA. The NAbs against IFN-ß were measured in BAb-positive MS patients receiving IFN-ß using an MxA gene expression assay (real-time RT-PCR). Of the 124 patients, 36 (29.03%) had BAbs after at least 12 months of IFN-ß treatment. The proportion of BAb+ was 38.1% for Betaferon, 21.9% for Rebif, and 26.8% for CinnoVex. Five BAb-positive MS patients were lost to follow-up; thus 31 BAb-positive MS patients were studied for NAbs. NAbs were present in 25 (80.6%) of BAb-positive MS patients receiving IFN-ß. In conclusion, the three IFN-ß preparations have different degrees of immunogenicity.