Prosthetic Joint Infection and Wound Leakage After the Introduction of Intraoperative Wound Irrigation With a Chlorhexidine-Cetrimide Solution: A Large-Scale Before-After Study.

Background: Intraoperative chlorhexidine irrigation could be a valuable additive to systemic antibiotics to prevent infections after total joint arthroplasties. However, it may cause cytotoxicity and impair wound healing. This study evaluates the incidence of infection and wound leakage before and after the introduction of intraoperative chlorhexidine lavage. Methods: All 4453 patients receiving a primary hip or knee prosthesis between 2007 and 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively included. They all underwent intraoperative lavage before wound closure. Initially, wound irrigation with 0.9% NaCl was standard care (n = 2271). In 2008, additional irrigation with a chlorhexidine-cetrimide (CC) solution was gradually introduced (n = 2182). Data on the incidence of prosthetic joint infections and wound leakage, as well as relevant baseline and surgical characteristics, were derived from medical charts. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the incidence of infection and wound leakage between patients with and without CC irrigation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess robustness of these effects by adjusting for potential confounders. Results: The prosthetic infection rate was 2.2% in the group without CC irrigation vs 1.3% in the group with CC irrigation (P = .021). Wound leakage occurred in 15.6% of the group without CC irrigation and in 18.8% of the group with CC irrigation (P = .004). However, multivariable analyses showed that both findings were likely due to confounding variables, rather than by the change in intraoperative CC irrigation. Conclusions: Intraoperative wound irrigation using a CC solution does not seem to affect the risk of prosthetic joint infection or wound leakage. Observational data easily yield misleading results, so prospective randomized studies are needed to verify causal inference. Level of Evidence: Level III-uncontrolled before and after the study.

Biological Characterization, Properties, and Clinical Use of a Novel Homeopathic Antiseptic Oral Recovery Kit: A Narrative Review.

Most available antiseptic solutions have strong antibacterial effects, but many also possess major cytotoxic effects on gingival fibroblasts, osteoblasts, osteoprogenitor cells, and/or epithelial cells. A novel VEGA Oral Care Recovery Kit (StellaLife) consisting of 16 active ingredients that are monographed in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (HPUS) has gained tremendous momentum as a replacement for more cytotoxic oral rinses such as chlorhexidine. While accumulating evidence has thus far supported its use, little of the gathered data have fully described the properties of the oral formulation. Therefore, the aim of the present review article was 3-fold. First, a biological characterization regarding the active ingredients found in StellaLife Recovery Kit including their biological properties was assessed in 4 predominant categories; 1) antimicrobial resistance, 2) accelerated wound healing, 3) pain management control, and 4) anti-cancer properties. The second aim of this review article was to assess both fundamental and clinical research to date comparing VEGA oral rinse (StellaLife) to the more commonly utilized CHX for differences regarding their effect on decreasing bacterial loads as well as cell viability, survival, proliferation, and expression of both regenerative cytokines and inflammatory markers. Lastly, clinical case examples are presented describing the use of StellaLife remedies in a variety of clinical situations. These include but are not limited to wisdom-tooth extraction, extraction site management, dental implants and ridge augmentation, soft-tissue grafting procedures, frenectomies, and also temporary relief of dry sockets, dry mouth, aphthous ulcers, mucositis, lichen planus, among others. In summary, findings from the present review article provide evidence from basic laboratory experiments that validate clinical studies supporting the use of the StellaLife oral rinse regarding its superior biocompatibility and wound healing properties when compared to common antiseptic solutions such as CHX.

Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate Knowledge on Hand Hygiene in a Pandemic Context with SARS-CoV-2.

Background and Objectives: The basis of any infection control program is hand hygiene (HH). The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge of HH among medical students. Materials and Methods: Students were randomly selected from two Romanian universities and a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted between January and May 2021. The answers regarding demographic data and knowledge concerning the methods, the time and the antiseptics used for HH were collected. The selection of the study group was made according to selection criteria in accordance with ethical issues. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and a chi-square test was used for data comparison, with a cut-off point of 0.05 for statistical significance. Results: The results indicated that the attitude of the students towards the practice of HH improved significantly. Most students believe that simple HH can control infections. Significant differences were found by the year of study in terms of the hand surfaces included and recommended duration (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, the study shows that most respondents have sufficient knowledge on HH, meaning that a higher compliance is required to control infections. The indicated reasons of non-compliance with HH are emergencies and other priorities.

Clinical application of skin antisepsis using aqueous olanexidine: a scoping review.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) caused by bacteria from surfaces poorly disinfected with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and povidone-iodine (PVP-I) are increasing. Olanexidine gluconate (OLG) was developed in 2015 in Japan to prevent SSI and CRBSI caused by bacteria resistant to CHG and PVP-I. This scoping review aimed to identify the knowledge gap between what is known and what is not known about the disinfection efficacy of OLG. We searched MEDLINE through PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Web-based database of Japanese medical articles for works published to July 18, 2021. Manual reference searches were also carried out. A total of 131 studies were screened. Forty-seven studies were included in this review and classified into two major categories: studies on pharmacological effects and spectrum (n = 29) and studies on clinical and adverse effects (n = 18). Olanexidine gluconate showed bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, in addition to common Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In clinical settings, although there is limited evidence on SSI prevention, 1.5% OLG might be more effective than 10% PVP-I and 1% CHG in preventing SSI. However, the clinical usefulness of OLG is unclear due to the limited number of clinical studies. Also, clinical research is limited to studies targeting SSI prevention, and there are no clinical studies on CRBSI. Further clinical studies are needed on SSI and CRBSI prevention.

Randomized Trial of Dilute Povidone-Iodine Soak and Scrub for Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus as to which skin antiseptic solution is most effective at reducing infection following orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of a dilute povidone-iodine soak and scrub to a standard preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine decreases positive bacterial culture rates from the hallux nailfold. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 242 subjects undergoing orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery were randomized to one of 2 groups. The control group received our standard 2-step skin antiseptic preparation of an alcohol scrub (step 1) followed by chlorhexidine/alcohol paint (step 2). The intervention group received a 3-minute dilute povidone-iodine soak and scrub followed by that same standard 2-step skin preparation. Immediately before skin incision, culture swabs were taken from the hallux nailfold of both groups. RESULTS: Of the 257 subjects enrolled and randomized, 242 (94.2%) completed the study, satisfying the a priori sample size requirement of 242 subjects. There were no crossovers between groups. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups (P > .05 for each). There was no difference in bacterial growth rates between groups (26.8% growth in the intervention group vs 26.9% growth in the control group, P = .991). CONCLUSION: The hallux nailfold is one of the most difficult to sterilize areas prior to orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. This randomized controlled trail found no benefit to adding a 3-minute dilute povidone-iodine soak and scrub to a standard skin preparation with alcohol and chlorohexidine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Effect of skin antiseptic solutions on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The most effective skin antiseptic solution to reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) remains unknown. AIM: To compare solutions with different chlorhexidine (CHG)-based concentrations and povidone-iodine (PVI) in adults with a central venous catheter (CVC) or arterial catheter, and identify an association with the incidence of CRBSI. METHODS: This study evaluated randomized controlled trials comparing CHG and PVI antiseptic agents in patients aged ≥18 years with an underlying illness and a CVC or arterial catheter. The primary outcome was CRBSI rate. Network meta-analysis was performed by a frequentist-based approach with multi-variate random effects meta-analysis, and the effect size was expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). FINDINGS: The search yielded 1511 records, of which five studies (2815 catheters) were included in the network meta-analysis. The risk of CRBSI was significantly lower with 1% CHG-alcohol than with 0.5% CHG-alcohol (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.98; high certainty) or 10% PVI-aqueous (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63; high certainty). There was no significant difference in the risk of CRBSI between 1% CHG-alcohol and 2% CHG-aqueous (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.04; moderate certainty) or other antiseptic solutions. The hierarchy of efficacy in reducing CRBSI was 1% CHG-alcohol, 0.5% CHG-alcohol, 2% CHG-aqueous and 10% PVI-aqueous. CONCLUSION: Antiseptic agents containing 1% CHG-alcohol were more strongly associated with reduced risk for CRBSI compared with agents containing 0.5% CHG-alcohol or 10% PVI-aqueous.

Large variations in the practice patterns of surgical antiseptic preparation solutions in patients with open and closed extremity fractures: a cross-sectional survey.

Background: Surgically-managed fractures, particularly open fractures, are associated with high rates of surgical site infections (SSIs). To reduce the risk of an SSI, orthopaedic surgeons routinely clean open fracture wounds in the emergency department (ED) and then apply a bandage to the open wound. Prior to the surgical incision, it is standard practice to prepare the fracture region with an antiseptic skin solution as an additional SSI prevention strategy. Multiple antiseptic solutions are available. Objectives: To explore the variation in practice patterns among orthopaedic surgeons regarding antiseptic solution use in the ED and antiseptic preparatory techniques for fracture surgery. Methods: We developed a 27-item survey and surveyed members of several orthopaedic associations. Results: Two hundred and-ten surveys were completed. 71.0% of respondents irrigate the open wound and skin in the ED, primarily with saline alone (59.7%) or iodine-based solutions (32.9%). 90.5% of responders indicated that they dress the open wound in the ED, with 41.0% applying a saline-soaked bandage and 33.7% applying an iodine-soaked dressing (33.7%). In their surgical preparation of open fractures, 41.0% of respondents used an iodine-based solution, 26.7% used a chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-based solution, and 31.4% used a combination of the two. In closed fractures, 43.8% of respondents used a CHG-based solution, 28.1% used an iodine-based solution, and 27.1% used a combination. Despite theoretical concerns about the use of alcohol in open wounds, 51.4% used alcohol-based solutions or alcohol alone during skin preparation of open fractures. Conclusions: A lack of consensus exists regarding use of antiseptic surgical preparation solutions for fractures. High-quality clinical research is needed to assess the effectiveness of different surgical antiseptic preparation solutions on patient outcomes in fracture populations.

Antiseptic solutions modulate the paracrine-like activity of bone chips: differential impact of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite.

AIM: Chemical decontamination increases the availability of bone grafts; however, it remains unclear whether antiseptic processing changes the biological activity of bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone chips were incubated with four different antiseptic solutions including (1) povidone-iodine (0.5%), (2) chlorhexidine diguluconate (0.2%), (3) hydrogen peroxide (1%) and (4) sodium hypochlorite (0.25%). After 10 min. of incubation, changes in the capacity of the bone-conditioned medium (BCM) to modulate gene expression of gingival fibroblasts was investigated. RESULTS: Conditioned medium obtained from freshly prepared bone chips increased the expression of TGF-ß target genes interleukin 11 (IL11), proteoglycan4 (PRG4), NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4), and decreased the expression of adrenomedullin (ADM), and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) in gingival fibroblasts. Incubation of bone chips with 0.2% chlorhexidine, followed by vigorously washing resulted in a BCM with even higher expression of IL11, PRG4 and NOX4. These findings were also detected with a decrease in cell viability and an activation of apoptosis signalling. Chlorhexidine alone, at low concentrations, increased IL11, PRG4 and NOX4 expression, independent of the TGF-ß receptor I kinase activity. In contrast, 0.25% sodium hypochlorite almost entirely abolished the activity of BCM, whereas the other two antiseptic solutions, 1% hydrogen peroxide and 0.5% povidone-iodine, had relatively no impact respectively. CONCLUSION: These in vitro findings demonstrate that incubation of bone chips with chlorhexidine differentially affects the activity of the respective BCM compared to the other antiseptic solutions. The data further suggest that the main effects are caused by chlorhexidine remaining in the BCM after repeated washing of the bone chips.

Avaliação da concentração e do efeito sanitizante do hipoclorito de sódio em pedilúvio para bovinos / Evaluation of concentration and antiseptic effect of sodium hypochlorite in cattle foot bath

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito sanitizante do hipoclorito de sódio em soluções a 2% e 4% em pedilúvio para bovinos, empregando como parâmetros sua estabilidade durante estocagem e uso, ação sobre microrganismos aeróbios mesófilos e anaeróbios e o efeito direto sobre o tecido animal. Durante cinco dias, bovinos saudáveis passaram em um pedilúvio, em intervalos de 24 horas. Ao final da passagem eram colhidas amostras de cada solução para análises físico-químicas e microbiológica sendo a primeira colheita realizada imediatamente após a deposição no pedilúvio. Aplicou-se o teste t de Student (p=0,05%) para análise dos resultados. As soluções a 2% e a 4% não apresentaram diferença significativa, quanto à contagem de microorganismos aeróbios e anaeróbios, inferindo-se que as soluções apresentam o mesmo efeito sanitizante. Com relação ao pH, em ambas as soluções esse parâmetro mantevese estável. As concentrações de cloro livre apresentaram níveis equivalentes a zero a partir do 3º dia. Não se observou irritação da pele interdigital ou em outras regiões dos dígitos que pudesse ser atribuída à ação do produto. Conclui-se que o hipoclorito de sódio, em soluções a 2% e a 4%, possui efeito sanitizante em dígitos de bovinos quando utilizado em pedilúvio, porém a renovação deve ocorrer a cada 48 horas.

This study aimed to evaluate the antiseptic effect of 2% and 4% sodium hypochloride solutions in footbath for bovines, considering parameters as stability during storage and use, action on mesophilic aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and direct effects on tissue. Healthy bovines passed by a footbath,once a day, during five days. At the end of passages, samples of each solution were harvested for physiochemical and microbiological analysis. The first samples were obtained immediately after the solution deposition in footbath. Student t Test (p= 0,05%) was applied for data analysis. It was observedthat 2% and 4% solutions didn't show significant differences on aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms counting, suggesting that solutions have the same antiseptic effect. In both solutions, the pH remained steady. Free chlorine concentrations showed levels equivalent to zero from the third day. Clinical signs of injury weren't observed in interdigital skin and others digital regions. Thus, these results allow us toconclude that sodium hypochloride solution in 2% and 4% dilutions, when they are used in footbath,have antiseptic effect in bovine digits, however, the renewal must be after 48 hours.