Appendicitis after endoscopic band ligation for massive ileocecal hemorrhage.

A 68-year-old man was admitted with hematochezia. Emergency computed tomography showed multiple diverticula throughout the colon. Initial colonoscopy on day 2 showed no active bleeding, but massive hematochezia on day 3 led to the performance of an emergency endoscopy. Substantial bleeding in the ileocecal area obscured the visual field, making it challenging to view the area around the bleeding site. Two endoscopic band ligations (EBLs) were applied at the suspected bleeding sites. Hemostasis was achieved without active bleeding after EBL. However, the patient developed lower right abdominal pain and fever (39.4°C) on day 6. Urgent computed tomography revealed appendiceal inflammation, necessitating emergency open ileocecal resection for acute appendicitis. Pathological examination confirmed acute phlegmonous appendicitis, with EBLs noted at the appendiceal orifice and on the anal side. This case illustrates the efficacy of EBL in managing colonic diverticular bleeding. However, it also highlights the risk of appendicitis due to EBL in cases of ileocecal hemorrhage exacerbated by poor visibility due to substantial bleeding. Endoscopists need to consider this rare but important complication when performing EBL in similar situations.

Emphasizing the Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Amidst Technological Advancements.

Background The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of this diagnosis amidst technological progress. It compared clinical diagnosis to radiology-aided diagnostic outcomes and negative appendicectomy rates (NAR). Methodology This study conducted a single-center retrospective and prospective cohort observational study on all adult patients presenting with suspected AA in 2018 at a major tertiary teaching hospital in Perth, Western Australia. Key demographics, clinicopathological, radiology, and operative reports were reviewed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.27. Results Of 418 patients with suspected AA, 234 (56%) were in the retrospective group. The median age was 35 (IQR=26), and 224 (54%) were female. The overall NAR was 18.6% (95% CI (14.8-22.4)) and 20.8% for clinical diagnosis. Notably, the NAR for ultrasound (USS)-reported AA (false positive) was 17.6% (95% CI (10.6-27.4)). Three-quarters of the patients, 298 (71.3%), had radiological imaging. The most common modality was CT 176 (59.1%), and 33 (7.9%) had both CT and USS imaging performed. Compared with final histopathology, no significant difference was found in the accuracy of clinically diagnosed and USS-diagnosed cases, with rates of 83.5% and 82.5%, respectively (p=0.230). CT had the best positive predictive value at 82.1%. Single-modality imaging did not cause a significant surgical delay (p=0.914), but multi-modal imaging showed a non-significant trend toward delay (p=0.065). When surgeons assessed an appendix as normal, 54 (12.9%), the histopathological assessment revealed pathology in 28 (51.9%). The inter-observer agreement was only fair to moderate, Kappa=0.46 (95% CI (0.33-0.58); p<0.001). The intraoperative identification of a normal appendix inversely correlated to the grade of the primary surgeon, which was likely related to the number of surgical personnel in the theater (p<0.001). Conclusion This study showed that clinical diagnosis matches the diagnostic accuracy of imaging technologies. Utilizing diagnostic imaging methods promptly and appropriately did not lead to considerable delays in surgery. Surgeons' capability to diagnose appendicitis during surgery is moderately accurate. Most patients underwent imaging, with CT scans being the most common. Moving forward, practitioners must minimize excessive reliance on imaging techniques as this can be resource-intensive, especially in developing countries. Future clinical practice should balance embracing technological advancements and preserving essential clinical diagnostic expertise, for medicine is both a science and an art.

Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alvarado Score and Abdominal Ultrasound for Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Background: Acute appendicitis is a complex diagnosis that often requires both clinical and radiological evaluation. Significant variations in diagnostic approaches are evident among clinicians and healthcare institutions. While certain guidelines advocate for risk stratification based on clinical characteristics, others emphasize the importance of pre-operative imaging. This study seeks to explore the accuracy of the Alvarado Score and abdominal ultrasound (AUS) in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods: Suspected cases of appendicitis admitted to Al-Thora Hospital in Ibb, Yemen, from Jan 2021 to July 2022 were evaluated. The demographics, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. This study assessed Alvarado scores (calculated based on clinical evaluation and laboratory data) and pre-operative AUS findings, correlating them with post-operative and histopathology findings. The Alvarado scores and AUS sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed using the ROC curve. Results: Out of 1021 cases of acute abdomen, 171 patients were suspected of appendicitis. Using AUS along with the Alvarado score, appendicitis was presumed in 137 patients who underwent appendectomy. 130 (94.9%) patients had positive intraoperative and histopathology findings while 7 (5.1%) had negative findings. The Alvarado Score had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.62% and 87.80% at cutoffs of 6, respectively [Area under the curve (AUC): 0.985; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.954 to 0.998; p < 0.0001]. Abdominal US showed a sensitivity of 98.46% and specificity of 82.93% (AUC:0.907; 95% CI, 0.853 to 0.946; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Alvarado's score and AUS exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The substantial accuracy and efficacy of both the Alvarado score and AUS support their utilization as primary investigative tools in resource-limited settings. This approach can help avoid unnecessary appendectomies and minimize the financial burden on patients.

Acute appendicitis poses a diagnostic challenge, with a high rate of false-positive cases identified post-operatively. Computed tomography has been recommended by several surgical societies; however, it is limited by unaffordability and unavailability. Herein, we utilized the Alvarado score along with abdominal ultrasound as an alternative accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic approach. In this study, the negative appendectomy rate was 5.1%. The sensitivity of abdominal ultrasound in detecting appendicitis was 98.5%, with a specificity of 82.9%. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were determined to be 94.8%, 94.4%, and 94.7%, respectively. The mean Alvarado score was 6.9±2.4, with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.81% and 97.06% at cutoffs of 6, respectively. The area under the curve values of the ROC curve for Alvarado's and abdominal ultrasound were 0.985 (95% CI, 0.954 to 0.998) and (AUC:0.907; 95% CI, 0.853 to 0.946), which was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).

Modified Graham patch repair for cecal perforation: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen worldwide. The complications associated with it can sometimes be unpredictable and pose a dilemma in the management of such complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A case of 18 year female with complaints of right iliac fossa pain and vomiting was diagnosed clinically as acute appendicitis and underwent emergency open appendectomy where a cecal perforation was encountered intra-operatively for which a Modified Graham's Patch Repair was done. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Acute appendicitis can sometimes present with complications like perforation, among which cecal perforation is rare and difficult to diagnose in the initial setting. Perforated appendicitis or colon can increase morbidity and mortality significantly. High degree of suspicion and early surgical approach can lead to identification of rare complications, which can still pose a surgical dilemma on the approach of management. CONCLUSION: Cecal perforation in suspected acute appendicitis is a rarely encountered intra operative complication. Management approaches can range from less invasive suture with omental patch repair to more invasive right hemicolectomy.

SpyGlass/Cholangioscope-Assisted Colonoscopic Removal of Appendicolith as a Nonsurgical Alternative for Stump Appendicitis Management.

An appendicolith is a calcified mass which can obstruct the appendix often leading to recurrent appendicitis. Failure to extract fecalith at the time of appendectomy can lead to recurrent inflammation in the appendiceal stump. We describe a 28-year-old man with stump appendicitis due to a retained fecalith postappendectomy. Our approach, akin to interval appendectomy, combines antibiotics and endoscopic intervention postinfection resolution. This case highlights the feasibility and safety of endoscopic management, offering a nonsurgical alternative to prevent the morbidity associated with revision surgery. Further exploration of nonsurgical modalities is warranted to optimize patient outcomes.

Acute Appendicitis Incidence, Diagnostic Markers, and Sequelae; Dallah Hospital-Based Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Background: Acute appendicitis is currently considered one of the most common acute surgical diseases of the abdomen and requires emergency surgery. It is also one of the most common abdominal emergencies in both developed and developing countries. The current study is aimed at assessing the specificity and sensitivity of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in the diagnosis of appendicitis as well as the prevalence of its complications. The association of appendicitis with several laboratory findings will also be evaluated. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted at Dallah-Namar Hospital, Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Results: 720 patients were differentially diagnosed with appendicitis in the study area. Of these, 618 patients had US abdomen/pelvis, with 15 (2.4%) showing positive findings. Amongst the 203 patients noted to have undergone abdominal CT,8 (4.0%) was found to have positive findings. Conclusion: The sensitivity of the US was determined to be relatively low. Also, serum creatinine was found to be elevated among all patients diagnosed with appendicitis. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to be conducted to further support the current findings.

Leaking Ectopic Pregnancy Following In vitro Fertilization with Associated Acute Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy associated with appendicitis is rare, with very few cases reported in the literature. It is unclear if appendicitis is coincidentally associated with ectopic pregnancy or a possible risk factor for the development of ectopic pregnancy. Ruptured ectopic pregnancy has also been postulated as a possible risk factor leading to appendicitis because of the probable inflammatory reaction involving the adjacent appendix. METHODS: We present a 34-year-old female who presented with right lower abdominal pain and bleeding per vaginam, three weeks after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. RESULTS: A diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was made following a positive ß-HCG and empty uterine cavity on pelvic ultrasound scan. Intraoperatively, the appendix was noted to be inflammed and it was removed and confirmed on histology examination as acute appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Ruptured ectopic pregnancy associated with acute appendicitis is rare, with few cases reported in the literature. We recommend an examination for other possible differentials of ruptured ectopic pregnancy like appendicitis during surgery for ectopic pregnancy on the right side.

CONTEXTE: L'association de la grossesse extra-utérine avec l'appendicite est rare, avec très peu de cas rapportés dans la littérature. Il n'est pas clair si l'appendicite est associée de manière fortuite à la grossesse extra-utérine ou si elle constitue un facteur de risque possible pour le développement de celle-ci. On a également postulé que la grossesse extra-utérine rompue pourrait être un facteur de risque conduisant à l'appendicite en raison de la probable réaction inflammatoire impliquant l'appendice adjacent. MÉTHODES: Nous présentons le cas d'une femme de 34 ans qui s'est présentée avec une douleur abdominale basse à droite et des saignements vaginaux, trois semaines après une fécondation in vitro et un transfert d'embryon. RÉSULTATS: Un diagnostic de grossesse extra-utérine a été posé suite à un test de ß-HCG positif et une cavité utérine vide à l'échographie pelvienne. En peropératoire, l'appendice a été noté comme étant inflammé et a été retiré. L'examen histologique a confirmé une appendicite aiguë. CONCLUSION: La grossesse extra-utérine rompue associée à une appendicite aiguë est rare, avec quelques cas rapportés dans la littérature. Nous recommandons un examen pour d'autres diagnostics différentiels possibles de la grossesse extra-utérine rompue, comme l'appendicite, lors de la chirurgie pour grossesse extra-utérine du côté droit. MOTS CLÉS: Grossesse extra-utérine hémorragique, Appendicite, Fécondation in vitro, Laparotomie.

A case of death after the severing three appendiceal arteries during appendectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal issues requiring surgery and is usually treated by appendectomy. During the process of removing the appendix, the appendiceal artery is severed. In most individuals, the appendix is supplied by only one appendiceal artery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old man underwent appendectomy. During the surgical procedure, the appendix artery and two accessory arteries of the appendix were severed, leading to massive hemorrhaging in the abdominal cavity, which ultimately resulted in the patient's unfortunate demise. CONCLUSION: Through this case, we hope that surgeons can learn more about the anatomy of the appendiceal artery and understand the possibility of accessory arteries to the appendix. During surgery, the blood vessels supplying the appendix should be carefully explored, and the "one-size-fits-all approach" should be avoided. Moreover, attention should be given to complications after appendectomy, and timely symptomatic treatment should be provided. Key points 1. Rare typing: The case of death due to improper handling of the accessory appendicular artery during appendectomy in patients with three appendiceal arteries is currently unreported. 2. Detailed anatomical knowledge: Surgeons performing an appendectomy need to make a detailed exploration of the blood vessel supply of the appendix to avoid ignoring anatomically different blood vessels. 3. Avoid a one-size-fits-all approach: In the surgical process, a "one-size-fits-all" approach should be avoided, that is, the same surgical approach should not be used in all cases, but should be adjusted according to the anatomical characteristics of the individual. 4. Observation of postoperative bleeding: In the perioperative period, peritoneal drainage should be closely observed. If a large amount of bloody fluid is found, timely surgical treatment should be carried out. 5. Attention to complications: Surgeons should pay.

Acute Appendicitis Presenting As Left Flank Pain: A Case Report.

Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common surgical emergency. The diagnosis is mainly clinical and is largely based on the typical presentation of periumbilical pain radiating to the right iliac fossa. However, atypical presentations have been reported in the literature. Left-sided appendicitis is a rare presentation. Imaging with ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) is of paramount importance in such cases to aid diagnosis and exclude other causes. We report a case of a 21-year-old man who presented with acute left flank pain. He was diagnosed with AA by CT, which showed an appendix diameter of 13 mm.

Acute Appendicitis in the Setting of Infectious Mononucleosis: A Case Report.

Infectious mononucleosis (IM) is a viral illness caused by the Epstein-Barr virus that typically manifests with pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, and fatigue. In rare cases, IM can cause acute appendicitis. We present the case of an 18-year-old female who arrived at the emergency department with worsening abdominal pain and an ongoing cough. Initial imaging showed a questionably dilated appendix, and a follow-up examination revealed cervical lymphadenopathy. She later returned to the ED with severe abdominal pain, clinical signs of acute appendicitis, and a positive monospot test, which led to an appendectomy. This case illustrates the need for complete history taking and thorough physical examination in patients with acute appendicitis, as their condition may be due to an atypical underlying cause.

Predictive Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Differentiating Perforated from Non-perforated Appendicitis: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Tamil Nadu.

Introduction Acute appendicitis is a common reason for acute abdominal pain. It has a high perforation rate of 20%. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is usually through well-known clinical signs and symptoms. Radiologic imaging is by and large carried out in peculiar cases with indistinct signs and symptoms. Although various scoring methods are available for screening and diagnosis, those have inadequate validity to accurately predict the severity of acute appendicitis. From the differential counts, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an economical and straightforward measure of subclinical inflammation. NLR may be a useful marker for predicting the onset and severity of appendicitis because of the insight it gives into immunological and inflammatory pathways. In this study, we aimed to determine the association between NLR and acute appendicitis among adult patients to differentiate between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis in a tertiary care hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of General Surgery of a deemed university in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The study was conducted from March 2022 to December 2022. Patients aged 18 years and above undergoing appendicectomy surgery were included in the study. Patients with hematology disorders, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, cancer, or auto-immune diseases, and any viral, bacterial, or parasitic infections were excluded. Pregnant women were also excluded from the study. After obtaining informed consent from the patients, blood samples were collected as and when they were diagnosed as acute appendicitis. Laboratory analysis for complete hemogram including white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil, and lymphocyte count was carried out using an automated hematology analyzer. Prevalence of perforated appendicitis was reported as a percentage. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed for NLR in differentiating perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel 2023. These analyses were carried out in STATA 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). Results A total of 212 patients aged 18 years and above were included in the study. Among them 93 (43.9%) were male and 119 (56.1%) were female. Prevalence of perforated appendicitis observed intra-operatively was 29.7% and non-perforated appendicitis was 70.3%. The mean (SD) of NLR among patients with perforated appendicitis was 8.8 (5.1) and non-perforated appendicitis was 3.2 (2.4) with a statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.0001). ROC curve with a cut-off value of 3.78 NLR, had sensitivity of 65.9% and specificity of 93.1% in differentiating perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were reported as 85.7% and 81.2%, respectively. Conclusion NLR has a reasonable validity in differentiating perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. NLR may be useful in low-resource settings where routine confirmatory radiological procedures like computed tomography scans are not available.

Retrocecal Appendicitis Post-blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Case Report.

Appendicitis, characterized by inflammation and obstruction of the appendiceal lumen, is a common surgical emergency often attributed to various factors. We present the case of an 18-year-old female who developed retrocecal appendicitis following blunt abdominal trauma, a rare occurrence with significant diagnostic challenges. Initial symptoms mimicked upper abdominal trauma, evolving to classic signs of appendicitis within hours. Despite a negative pre-trauma history of abdominal pain, clinical evaluation led to a suspicion of appendicitis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan confirmed the thickening of the cecal appendix, prompting urgent surgical intervention. An open appendectomy revealed a congested retrocecal appendix, supporting the diagnosis. Our case underscores the importance of considering trauma as a potential trigger for appendicitis, especially in the absence of typical pre-trauma symptoms. Diagnostic criteria for post-trauma appendicitis are evolving, and we underscore a comprehensive clinical assessment alongside imaging modalities. While surgical management remains standard, newer approaches like endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy warrant exploration. Further research is essential to refine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for this uncommon presentation, ensuring timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Treatment for appendicitis in cancer patients on chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: Whether to perform surgery or conservatively manage appendicitis in immunosuppressed patients is a concern for clinicians. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of these 2 treatment options for appendicitis in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study included 206 patients with cancer who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis between August 2001 and December 2021. Among them, patients who received chemotherapy within 1 month were divided into surgical and conservative groups. We evaluated the outcomes, including treatment success within 1 year, 1-year recurrence, and the number of days from the diagnosis of appendicitis to chemotherapy restart, between the 2 groups. Results: Among the 206 patients with cancer who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis, 78 received chemotherapy within 1 month. The patients were divided into surgery (n = 63) and conservative (n = 15) groups. In the surgery group, the duration of antibiotic therapy (7.0 days vs. 16.0 days, P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (8.0 days vs. 27.5 days, P = 0.002) were significantly shorter than conservative groups. The duration from the diagnosis of appendicitis to the restart of chemotherapy was shorter in the surgery group (20.8 ± 15.1 days vs. 35.2 ± 28.2 days, P = 0.028). The treatment success rate within 1 year was higher in the surgery group (100% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Surgical treatment showed a significantly higher success rate than conservative treatment for appendicitis in patients less than 1 month after chemotherapy. Further prospective studies will be needed to clinically determine treatment options.

Radiological diagnosis of severe appendicitis in 4 months infant with possible microperforation: A rare case report.

Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention; however, it is extremely rare in infants. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms. As a result, delayed or missed diagnosis is common in young children and is associated with an increased risk of perforation and peritonitis. We reported a case of a 4-month-old healthy male child. The patient presented with abdominal distention and fever. After ruling out other possible causes, he was diagnosed with acute appendicitis, which was confirmed by a CT scan. A gangrenous appendix, dilated bowel loops, and free fluid in the abdomen were discovered during surgery. An appendectomy was performed. The appendix in infants has an average length of 4.5 cm compared with 9.5 cm in adults. Infantile appendicitis is considered rare but cases have been documented also in neonates, misdiagnosis rates are high due to rarity in this age group in addition to nonspecific signs and symptoms, which led to a high perforation rate. Ultrasonography can diagnose appendicitis in children with a sensitivity and specificity of 90%-95% without subjecting the child to radiation. A physician should always keep the diagnosis of appendicitis in mind in the infant age group, even though it is rare, as a delay in diagnosis and treatment has been associated with an increased risk of complications including appendicular perforation and peritonitis.

Identification of children with a nondiagnostic ultrasound at a low appendicitis risk using a pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator.

OBJECTIVES: Up to 50% of ultrasounds (USs) for suspected pediatric appendicitis are nondiagnostic. While the validated low-risk clinical pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) score < 15% and the low-risk US with nonvisualized appendix and no periappendiceal inflammation carry relatively low appendicitis risks, the contribution of the combination of both characteristics to this risk has never been assessed. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children with the low-risk US-low-risk pARC combination with appendicitis. We hypothesized that this proportion would be 2.5% (upper 95% CI ≤ 5%). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 448 previously healthy children 4-17 years old at a pediatric ED with suspected appendicitis, nondiagnostic US, and persistent clinical concern about appendicitis. Two investigators abstracted demographic, clinical, and imaging data. Based on published criteria, USs were classified as low-risk or high-risk. The pARC includes seven demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables and is quantified according to the published formula. The primary outcome was appendicitis, based on the histological evidence. All nonoperated patients underwent a 1-month-follow-up to exclude delayed appendicitis diagnoses. RESULTS: Sixty of the 448 (13.4%) patients had appendicitis; 269 (60%) had low-risk US, 262 (58.4%) had low-risk pARC, and 163 (36.4%) had both characteristics. The appendicitis rates with low-risk pARC alone and low-risk US alone were 14/262 (5.4%) and 21/269 (7.8%), respectively. A total of 2/163 children (1.2%) with low-risk pARC and low-risk US had appendicitis (95% CI 0%-4.4%). Higher-risk US increased the appendicitis odds 5 (95% CI 1.54-20.55) to 11 times (95% CI 2.41-51.10) across pARC levels. The low-risk combination had sensitivity of 96.7% (95% CI 88.5%-99.6%), specificity of 41.5%, positive predictive value of 20.4%, and negative predictive value of 98.8% (95% CI 95.6%-99.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The children with low-risk pARC and low-risk US combination are unlikely to have appendicitis and can be discharged home. The presence of higher-risk US-pARC score combinations substantially increases the appendicitis risk and warrants reassessment or interval imaging.

Patients' attitudes toward negative appendectomies and surgery for suspected appendicitis: a qualitative interview study.

INTRODUCTION: From a surgeon's perspective, appendicitis is treated with appendectomy and sometimes a normal appendix is removed. This study aimed to investigate the patients' perspectives on having surgery but not appendicitis and their involvement in treatment decisions. METHODS: This study is reported according to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guideline. Eligible participants either had a normal diagnostic laparoscopy with no resection of the appendix or a negative appendectomy confirmed by histopathology. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: This study consisted of 15 interviews. Analysis of the interviews resulted in the formulation of four categories: (1) discovering the results of the histopathology report, (2) thoughts on having a normal appendix removed or left in situ, (3) the scarce use of shared decision-making, and (4) general anesthesia and the risk of a burst appendix made the participants nervous. CONCLUSION: The amount of information communicated to the patients before and after surgery was sparse. The participants were not aware of the histopathology results and the participants were not involved in decision-making and were generally anxious about anesthesia and a burst appendix.

Spondylodiscitis Following Perforated Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report.

Spondylodiscitis is a multifactorial disease of significant medical and socioeconomic importance, the treatment of which presents a challenge to clinicians and surgeons. Acute appendicitis is a common inflammatory disease in children, with postoperative complications occurring in up to 55% of cases. We present the case of a 15-year-old male with symptoms of severe back pain and fever two months following surgery for perforated appendicitis. The computed tomography (CT) revealed spondylodiscitis of T12-L1 spinal level. Discectomy and posterior pedicle-screw fixation were performed, followed by antibiotic treatment resulted in the resolution of preoperative symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third case of spondylodiscitis after perforated acute appendicitis in literature. Timely diagnosis and treatment in cases of spondylodiscitis are prerequisites for lowering the rate of permanent neurological deficits in these patients.

A Tale of Two "Citis": Appendicitis Versus Crohn's Appendicitis.

Appendicitis is one of the most common emergencies worldwide. One of the rare causes of acute appendicitis is Crohn's disease (CD). Management of appendicitis should not be decided in haste without a complete workup of the patient, including coexisting symptoms and past history. The appendix is essential for intestinal homeostasis, preventing the development of certain pathologies. It is important to correlate clinical and radiographic findings in diagnosing and managing Crohn's appendicitis. The mainstay of management of CD with appendicitis involves the use of systemic steroids.

Early Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy Based on Non-typical Clinical Findings: Report of a Rare Case and a Mini-Review of the Literature.

Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric reason for exploratory laparotomy during pregnancy. This case report involves a primigravida patient who presented to the emergency department of the General Hospital of Trikala at 15 weeks of gestation due to diffuse abdominal pain, primarily in the epigastric region. She also reported watery bowel movements. The ongoing atypical clinical symptoms, along with elevated inflammatory markers, strongly indicated a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. An immediate exploratory laparotomy was performed, during which acute localized inflammation of the appendix was found, leading to an appendectomy. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patient reported pain relief immediately after the surgery. On the fourth postoperative day, she was discharged without any signs of a threatened second-trimester miscarriage. At 39 gestational weeks, she delivered by elective cesarean section due to breech presentation. This paper discusses the case and highlights the significant challenges in the early diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis during pregnancy, emphasizing the importance of preventing potentially life-threatening complications for both the mother and the fetus.