Practice Variation Among Hispanic American Orthopedic Surgeons in the Management of Geriatric Distal Radius Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: There is a controversy in the management of distal radius fractures (DRF) and its criteria for surgical intervention on geriatric patients. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) developed evidence-based guidelines for treatment of DRF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice of Hispanic orthopedic surgeons in the management of geriatric DRF and examine their adherence to AAOS guidelines based on years of surgical experience. MATERIAL & METHODS: A survey was emailed to all orthopedic surgeons who live in Puerto Rico and treated DRF in their daily practice. Responses concerning demographic, management and clinical scenarios were evaluated. For each clinical scenario, treatment of choice was selected with the same fracture in a geriatric and young adult patient. Comparison between years of surgical experience and adherence to the AAOS guidelines was performed. RESULTS: A total of 65 surgeons responded the survey with 65% having >15 years in practice. A high consensus with AAOS guidelines for DRF was found. Use of preoperative radiographs was reported in all respondents, with an additional 12% routine use of preoperative computed tomography scans. Seventy-seven percent of respondents did not allow any range of motion (ROM) at immediate postoperative period, while 23% allowed active or passive ROM. Use of postoperative therapy was reported in 72.3%. Correlation between years of surgical experience showed a higher use of Vitamin C postoperatively for prophylaxis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome among surgeons <15 years (P = 0.01). A general consensus trend toward operative fixation was noted among geriatric and young adult patients with the same fracture type in all clinical scenarios. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates a practice variation toward surgical management of geriatric DRF among Hispanic orthopedic surgeons; despite their compliance with the AAOS AUC guidelines. The geriatric DRF management does not vary significantly among years of surgical experience.

Comparison of Initial Pediatric Outpatient Echocardiogram Indications between Community and Academic Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the appropriateness and diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) between a community pediatric cardiology practice and an academic children's hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Initial outpatient pediatric TTE ordered by pediatric cardiologists between January and March 2014 at a community practice (Packard Children's Health Alliance [PCHA]; n = 238) and an academic tertiary center (Lucile Packard Children's Hospital [LPCH]; n = 76) were evaluated based on appropriate use criteria (AUC) released in December 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of "rarely appropriate" indications and abnormal TTE findings. RESULTS: Of 314 TTEs, 165 (52.5%) were classified as "appropriate," 40 (12.7%) were classified as "may be appropriate," 100 (31.9%) were classified as "rarely appropriate," and 9 (2.9%) were unclassifiable. The proportion of abnormal findings did not differ between the 2 practice settings (5.3% for LPCH vs 7.6% for PCHA; P = .61). TTEs performed at PCHA were significantly more likely to be "rarely appropriate" (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.28-5.15; P = .008). Children aged <1 year (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.03-3.50; P = .04) and ordering providers with <10 years since the completion of their fellowship (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.20-3.87; P = .01) were associated with "rarely appropriate" indications. "Appropriate" TTEs were associated with abnormal findings (OR, 8.69; 95% CI, 1.77-42.68; P = .008). CONCLUSION: The community practice was independently associated with greater inappropriate ordering of initial outpatient pediatric TTEs compared with the academic practice. The assessment of practice patterns following AUC release should account for physician and practice-related factors that could influence differences in TTE ordering patterns.

Appropriateness of Outpatient Echocardiograms Ordered by Pediatric Cardiologists or Other Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the appropriateness and diagnostic yield of TTEs ordered by various pediatric providers according to the pediatric appropriate use criteria (AUC) for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before its release. STUDY DESIGN: Clinic notes of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent initial outpatient TTE between April and September 2014 were reviewed to determine the AUC indication, and appropriateness was assigned based on the AUC document. Ordering physicians were categorized into cardiologists, primary care physicians (PCPs; including pediatricians and family practitioners [FPs]), and noncardiology subspecialists. RESULTS: Of the 1921 TTEs ordered during the study period, 84.6% were by cardiologists, 9.2% by pediatricians, 3.4% by FPs, and 2.8% by noncardiology subspecialists. The appropriateness rate for cardiologists was higher than that for PCPs (86% vs 64%; P < .001) but not noncardiology subspecialist (86% vs 87%; P = .80). PCPs had a significantly higher proportion of studies that could not be classified compared with cardiologists (35% vs 5%; P < .001) and noncardiology subspecialists (35% vs 11%; P < .001), owing primarily to a lack of adequate clinical information. The likelihood of an abnormal finding was higher in TTEs ordered by a cardiologist vs those ordered by a noncardiologist (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-10.9; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCPs, cardiologists ordered more TTEs, had the highest yield of abnormal findings, and had greater appropriateness of TTE orders. A large proportion of TTEs ordered by PCPs were unclassifiable owing to insufficient information. This study lays a framework for provider education and improvement in the TTE order intake process.