Portal vein arterialization in 25 liver transplant recipients: A Latin American single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed. AIM: To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure. METHODS: All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA. RESULTS: A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.

Postoperative Management of Portal Vein Arterialization: An Interdisciplinary Institutional Approach.

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is a surgical procedure that plays a crucial role in hepatic vascular salvage when hepatic artery flow restoration remains elusive. Dedicated diagnostic vascular imaging and the timely management of PVA shunts are paramount to preventing complications, such as portal hypertension and thrombosis. Regrettably, a lack of standardized postoperative management protocols for PVA has increased morbidity and mortality rates post-procedure. In response to this challenge, we developed a PVA standard operating procedure (SOP) tailored to the needs of interventional radiologists. This SOP is designed to harmonize postoperative care, fostering scientific comparability across cases. This concise brief report aims to offer radiologists valuable insights into the PVA technique and considerations for post-PVA care and foster effective interdisciplinary collaboration.

Penile Revascularization for Erectile Dysfunction Secondary to Arterial Insufficiency: A Case Series.

Background: First described by Michal et al in 1972, penile revascularization for vasculogenic impotence and its outcomes has been scarcely reported in plastic surgery literature. Such injuries are often secondary to atherosclerosis of the distal internal pudendal, common penile or proximal cavernosal artery, or locoregional trauma. Various techniques have been described to restore blood flow to the cavernosal body. Methods: In this report, we review 2 cases of penile revascularization for arteriogenic erectile dysfunction at our level 1 trauma center in 2021-2022 completed by the senior author in conjunction with urology. Results: Both patients sustained pelvic crush injuries with resultant arteriogenic impotence minimally responsive to medical management with phosphodiesterase inhibitors and/or injection therapy. After thorough urologic and vascular workup, they underwent microsurgical revascularization of the penis utilizing the deep inferior epigastric arteries with anastomosis to the deep dorsal penile veins. Both patients demonstrated improvement in erectile dysfunction and were able to achieve sustained erection with adequate glans tumescence on minimal pharmacotherapy postoperatively. One patient noted ability to achieve penetration. Patient 1 experienced postoperative retention requiring Foley placement, and both patients experienced glans edema requiring additional urologic procedures (patient 1: dorsal slit, patient 2: completion circumcision). Conclusions: Overall, we have demonstrated improvement of sexual function with the most common complication being prolonged penile edema requiring release of constriction by our urology colleagues. Additional research in the plastic surgery field is warranted to further refine the technique and improve outcomes.

Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous deep venous arterialization in multiple practice settings.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) in patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the hospital vs in office-based laboratory (OBL) settings. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent pDVA using off-the-shelf devices from January 2018 to March 2023 in a hospital and an OBL. We identified 73 eligible patients, 41 from a hospital setting (59% male; median age, 72 years; interquartile range, 18 years) and 32 from an OBL setting (59% males; 67 years; interquartile range, 16 years). All eligible patients were deemed to have no-option critical limb ischemia, had at least one patent proximal tibial artery available for the creation of an arteriovenous anastomosis, and were classified as having Rutherford classification IV or higher peripheral arterial disease. Patients were ineligible if classified as Rutherford classification III or lower, had active infection, did not have at least one appropriate venous target, and/or had rapidly progressing wounds requiring immediate major amputation. The primary outcome was major amputation-free survival (AFS). Secondary outcomes included technical success, limb salvage, survival, primary patency, reintervention rate, adverse events, and partial and complete wound healing. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank, and two-stage procedure tests. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 70 patients (96%) with 1 hospital (2.4%) and 2 OBL (6.3%) patients lost to follow-up. Major AFS estimates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 51.4%, 40.4%, and 30.2% in the hospital group and 69.4%, 54.0%, and 49.5% in the OBL group, respectively. Partial wound healing estimates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 27.5%, 71.7%, and 81.2% in the hospital group and 62.7% at all time points in the OBL group. Complete wound healing estimates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 6.7%, 33.3%, and 33.3% in the hospital group and 5.3%, 37.7%, and 41.6% in the OBL group, respectively. There was no significant difference in major AFS (P = .13), limb salvage (P = .07), survival (P = .69), primary patency (P = .53), partial (P = .08), or complete wound healing (P = .79) between groups. Reintervention was performed in 8 hospital (20.5%) and 14 OBL (45.2%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: pDVA is a feasible and safe procedure for no-option critical limb ischemia in the hospital and OBL setting without significant differences in outcomes at ≤2 years.

Case report: Deep vein arterialization for limb salvage in a patient with subacute limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Successful revascularization of the lower extremity is key to avoiding amputation in patients with subacute limb ischemia. Percutaneous deep vein arterialization (DVA) is a novel endovascular technique which allows the shunting of blood through an arteriovenous fistula and native vein into the lower limb, typically employed in no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia. METHOD: We present a case illustrating the unconventional use of DVA for limb salvage in a patient presenting with subacute limb ischemia refractive to surgical treatment, endovascular revascularization, and medical therapy. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: The arteriovenous anastomosis allowed for the reconstitution of arterial inflow to the patient's foot, thereby avoiding major limb amputation. CONCLUSION: The conventional knowledge that DVA neo-conduits require maturation limiting its role in the treatment of subacute limb ischemia is challenged. However, further research is needed to establish its role and effectiveness for subacute limb ischemia.

Intravascular lithotripsy-assisted percutaneous deep vein arterialization for no-option chronic limb-threatening patients and heavily calcified tibial occlusive disease.

PURPOSE: To report the first chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients who underwent an intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)-assisted percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA). CASE REPORT 1: An 81-year-old patient presented with CLTI and a heavily calcified lesion of the popliteal artery and tibioperoneal trunk (TPT), with a distal tibial and foot arch occlusion. The patient underwent IVL and drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the distal popliteal artery and of the TPT to improve the inflow prior to pDVA. The wound situation remained stable without secondary procedure until the patient`s deaths due to complications of urosepsis 3 months later. CASE REPORT 2: A 64-year-old patient with rest pain of the left limb with a single-vessel tibial run-off (peroneal artery) and occluded pedal arch was treated with 3.5 mm IVL followed by a successful pDVA as mentioned above. IVL performed in the proximal posterior tibial artery to optimize the inflow to the circuit and change the compliance of the crossing point from the arterial to the vein system. The patient underwent repeat angioplasty of the plantar vein arch 5 months after the index procedure and thereafter remained asymptomatic during 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The combined use of IVL and pDVA could improve the patency of the reconstruction with clinical benefits in no-option CTLI patients.

Re-do Hybrid Deep Venous Arterialization via the Popliteal Venous System: Conversion From a Deep Venous Arterialization to a Superficial Venous Arterialization.

Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a final option for limb salvage in patients with end stage arterial anatomy. We report a 66-year-old dialysis dependent male with forefoot gangrene, Rutherford class 6 chronic limb ischemia, who required a redo endovascular DVA. On initial presentation an angiogram was demonstrated a desert foot with absent tibial runoff to his bilateral lower extremities. After discussion, patient elected to trial DVA in hope of avoiding a major amputation. A hybrid DVA was performed using a Pioneer Plus and .018″ Viabahn stents from the peroneal artery into the peroneal venous system; following this, the peroneal vein was anastomosed to the lesser saphenous vein via an open posterior approach at the ankle. 3 months later, a second DVA was performed by exposing the above knee popliteal artery and vein and creating an end-to-side anastomosis. Of note, the great saphenous vein was less than 2 mm in diameter and no arm vein was available due to history of prior fistulas in bilateral arms. Via the popliteal vein, the posterior tibial vein was selected and additional .018″ Viabahn stents were deployed from the malleolus to the P2 segment of the popliteal vein. Three months after the second hybrid DVA, the patient's forefoot had healed after split thickness skin grafting. Continued patency is noted of the re-do hybrid DVA with minimal calf edema. Newer creative strategies are required for "No Option Chronic Limb Ischemia" which is becoming more relevant in diabetic and dialysis dependent patients. This case illustrates the potential to convert a deep venous arterialization to a superficial venous arterialization for improved venous outflow and wound healing.

Superficial venous arterialization with the great saphenous vein in situ: a single-center experience.

Background: Arterialization of the dorsal venous arch of the foot is a technique indicated in cases of critical lower limb ischemia that do not have a distal bed that is adequate to enable conventional treatment such as revascularization, angioplasty, or clinical treatment. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to present the result of arterialization of the venous arch of the foot in 16 patients who underwent treatment with this technique. Methods: This is a cross-sectional retrospective descriptive analytical study based on a review of the medical records of 16 patients who underwent arterialization of the dorsal venous arch of the foot for limb salvage from January 2016 to January 2021. Results: Four (25%) of the 16 patients who underwent arterialization of the venous arch of the foot underwent a major amputation during the same hospital stay and one patient (6.25%) had a major amputation within 6 months. The other 11 patients (68.75%) had their limbs preserved, with 10 undergoing minor amputations (toes and forefoot) and one patient having no additional procedures. Conclusions: We conclude that the technique of arterialization of the dorsal venous arch of the foot should be considered in selected cases. It is a valid alternative for limb salvage when conventional treatment is impossible.

A novel approach to deep venous arterialization using WavelinQ EndoAVF technology.

Deep venous arterialization is increasingly being considered for the management of patients with "no option chronic limb threatening ischemia" (CLTI) who would otherwise require a major limb amputation. WavelinQ (Becton Dickinson) is a new technology increasing in popularity for its role in the formation of endovascular arteriovenous fistulas but might well have applications in other areas of vascular surgery. We present a novel approach to deep venous arterialization using WavelinQ arteriovenous fistula technology for a patient with nonreconstructable chronic limb threatening ischemia experiencing both rest pain and forefoot gangrene. The patient's early tissue loss healed and he remained symptom free at 6 months after the intervention.

Short-Term Outcomes and Efficacy of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization for No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA) is considered a treatment modality in patients with no-option critical limb ischemia. However, there is still a paucity of evidence regarding its safety and efficacy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Web of Science databases as well as the CENTRAL registry up to the end of June 2023. METHODS: This review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023445171). The risk of bias was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Primary endpoints included technical success, overall survival and limb salvage during the follow-up. Amputation-free survival at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year as well as complete wound healing, major adverse limb events and reintervention were investigated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five observational studies, comprising 208 patients (142 Rutherford class 5/77 Rutherford class 6), were included. MINORS revealed a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis reached a pooled technical success rate of 96.2% (95% CI: 91.5-98.4), an overall survival of 82.8% (95% CI: 70.5-95.2) and a limb salvage rate of 77.2% (95% CI: 65.2-89.1) during the follow-up. The amputation-free survival at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year was 87.8%, 68.7% and 65.6%, respectively. Furthermore, pDVA resulted in a complete wound healing rate of 53.4% (95% CI: 30.3-76.5). The pooled reintervention rate was as high as 46.7% (37.1-56.3%). CONCLUSIONS: PDVA seems a feasible bail-out strategy for patients with no option for routine treatment of CLTI. However, due to the small number of studies, the strength of the evidence is low.

Single Center Outcomes of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization in Patients with End-Stage Peripheral Artery Disease.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) can present as chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) with ischemic pain and tissue loss. Progression of distal disease can lead to a "no option" or end-stage disease without traditional open or endovascular revascularization due to lack of pedal targets. Innovations in endovascular technology allow for the use of percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA) to treat patients with CLTI. Purpose: We describe our experience and technique for treating four patients with end-stage PAD with pDVA. Research Design: Four patients with end-stage PAD were followed during and after pDVA creation. Technical success, complications, wound healing, and freedom from major amputation were analyzed. Data Collection and Analysis: Patient data and outcomes were collected via chart review and at time of follow up appointments in vascular surgery clinic. Results: Technical success was 100%, without post-procedural complications, and patients were continued on antiplatelet and anticoagulation. Three patients (75%) had successful wound healing, with 2 patients healing after transmetatarsal amputation (TMA), and 1 healing a distal foot ulceration that did not require surgery. One patient had worsening ischemic breakdown of a TMA, despite re-intervention on the pDVA, which required a below knee amputation (BKA). Freedom from major amputation was 75% overall, with an average follow-up time of 410 days post-procedure (Range: 113-563 days). Conclusions: Percutaneous deep vein arterialization attempts to provide blood flow to the preserved venous bed in patients with end-stage PAD. Exploration and utilization of this technique continues to expand in the modern vascular era. This case series highlights 4 patients with end-stage PVD who underwent pDVA, with 100% procedural success, and 75% limb salvage rate.

Effect of Arterialization on Venous Blood Glucose Concentrations and Implications for Observed Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy.

Background: Heating of the arm and/or hand ("arterialization") is sometimes used in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) performance studies with the reported aim of reducing differences between venous and capillary glucose concentrations. In this study, the effect of heating on venous glucose concentrations and CGM accuracy was investigated. Methods: A heating pad set to 50°C (122°F) was used with 20 participants to heat either the dominant or nondominant arm and hand. Venous and capillary samples were obtained every 15 min on both arms throughout each of three 6-h glucose challenges. CGM sensors were worn on each upper arm for each of the three visits. Results: Heating of the arm led to a median increase in venous glucose concentrations of +1.4%. No similar effect on capillary concentrations was observed. As a result, the median capillary to venous difference decreased from +5.9% in the nonheated arm to +4.2% in the heated arm. CGM accuracy observed in this study was affected by the selection of heated venous, nonheated venous, or capillary glucose concentrations as comparator data. The heating effect was more pronounced with rapidly decreasing glucose concentrations. Temperatures on the skin did not exceed 40°C (104°F). No adverse events or protocol deviations were associated with the use of the heating pad. Conclusions: Heating of the arm led to a small increase in venous glucose concentrations, but venous concentrations did not reach the level of capillary glucose concentrations. CGM accuracy observed in this study varied depending on the selected comparator data. This study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00031197).

Arterialização venosa superficial com veia safena magna in situ: a experiência de um único centro / Superficial venous arterialization with the great saphenous vein in situ: a single-center experience

Resumo Contexto A arterialização do arco venoso dorsal do pé é uma técnica indicada em casos de isquemia crítica de membros inferiores sem leito distal adequado que possibilite tratamento convencional, como revascularização, angioplastia ou tratamento clínico. Objetivos O propósito do trabalho foi apresentar o resultado da arterialização do arco venoso do pé em 16 pacientes submetidos a essa técnica. Métodos Tratou-se de um estudo analítico descritivo retrospectivo transversal, baseado na revisão de prontuários de 16 pacientes submetidos à arterialização do arco venoso dorsal do pé para salvamento de membro, entre janeiro de 2016 a janeiro de 2021. Resultados Dos 16 pacientes submetidos à arterialização do arco venoso do pé, 25% (4) evoluíram para amputação maior durante a mesma internação, e 6,25% (1) pacientes evoluíram para amputação maior após 6 meses. Os demais pacientes (68,75%, 11) tiveram seus membros preservados, sendo que 10 foram submetidos a amputações menores (pododáctilos e antepé), e 1 paciente não necessitou de procedimento adicional. Conclusões A técnica de arterialização do arco venoso dorsal do pé deve ser considerada em casos selecionados. Trata-se de uma alternativa válida para a preservação do membro na impossibilidade de tratamento convencional.

Abstract Background Arterialization of the dorsal venous arch of the foot is a technique indicated in cases of critical lower limb ischemia that do not have a distal bed that is adequate to enable conventional treatment such as revascularization, angioplasty, or clinical treatment. Objectives The purpose of this study is to present the result of arterialization of the venous arch of the foot in 16 patients who underwent treatment with this technique. Methods This is a cross-sectional retrospective descriptive analytical study based on a review of the medical records of 16 patients who underwent arterialization of the dorsal venous arch of the foot for limb salvage from January 2016 to January 2021. Results Four (25%) of the 16 patients who underwent arterialization of the venous arch of the foot underwent a major amputation during the same hospital stay and one patient (6.25%) had a major amputation within 6 months. The other 11 patients (68.75%) had their limbs preserved, with 10 undergoing minor amputations (toes and forefoot) and one patient having no additional procedures. Conclusions We conclude that the technique of arterialization of the dorsal venous arch of the foot should be considered in selected cases. It is a valid alternative for limb salvage when conventional treatment is impossible.

Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization for Limb Salvage in No Option Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

An endovascular approach is often considered the first line treatment option for lower limb chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), which is defined by the presence of ischemic rest pain and severe tissue loss, such as ulcers or gangrene. Although the technical success rate of endovascular revascularization is high, in specific patients with advanced infrapopliteal disease and the absence of run-off tibial vessels, the so-called 'desert foot', the chance of successful endovascular revascularization is minimal. In order to avoid primary amputation, several treatment options are currently being investigated, including gene therapy and deep venous arterialization. This review focuses on the percutaneous deep venous arterialization technique as a promising, minimally invasive treatment option for limb salvage in CLTI patients presenting with a 'desert foot'.

Endovascular and Surgical Venous Arterialization for No-Option Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is known for its high rates of major amputation and mortality. Conventional revascularization techniques often fail in CLTI patients due to the heavily diseased arteries. Foot vein arterialization (FVA) has been proposed as an alternative technique to provide arterial blood to the foot by using the disease-free venous bed. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine outcomes of surgical FVA (sFVA) and percutaneous FVA (pFVA) at 6 and 12 months post-procedure. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify papers reporting clinical outcomes of sFVA and pFVA published between January 1966 and March 2023. METHODS: Databases were searched for eligible studies. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the limb salvage rate, overall survival rate, and wound healing rate at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included, with 753 patients and 793 limbs. Of the included studies, 16 analyzed the sFVA technique and 11 the pFVA technique. Of the included patients, 86.3% were Rutherford 5/6 in the sFVA group versus 98.4% in the pFVA group. The pooled limb salvage rate at 6 and 12 months was 78.1% and 74.1% in the sFVA group and 81.7% and 78.6% in the pFVA group, respectively. Wound healing rates were not reported in the sFVA group. In the pFVA group, the pooled wound healing rates were 48.1% and 64.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed promising results after FVA among a large population of CLTI patients. In high-risk patients, pFVA is a feasible option with favorable limb salvage and wound healing rates.

Pre-arterialization of coronary veins prior to retroperfusion of ischemic myocardium: percutaneous closure device.

Background: Chronic coronary retroperfusion to treat myocardial ischemia has previously failed due to edema and hemorrhage of coronary veins suddenly exposed to arterial pressures. The objective of this study was to selectively adapt the coronary veins to become arterialized prior to coronary venous retroperfusion to avoid vascular edema and hemorrhage. Methods and results: In 32 animals (Group I = 19 and Group II = 13), the left anterior descending (LAD) artery was occluded using an ameroid occlusion model. In Group I, the great cardiac vein was blocked with suture ligation (Group IA = 11) or with occlusion device (Group IB = 8) to arterialize the venous system within 2 weeks at intermediate pressure (between arterial and venous levels) before a coronary venous bypass graft (CVBG) was implemented through a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) anastomosis. Group II only received the LAD artery occlusion and served as control. Serial echocardiograms showed recovery of left ventricular (LV) function with this adaptation-arterialization approach, with an increase in ejection fraction (EF) in Group I from 38% ± 5% after coronary occlusion to 53% ± 7% eight weeks after CVBG, whereas in Group II the EF never recovered (41% ± 2%-33% ± 7%). The remodeling of the venous system not only allowed restoration of myocardial function when CVBG was implemented but possibly promoted a novel form of "collateralization" between the native arterioles and the newly arterialized venules, which revascularized the ischemic myocardium. Conclusions: These findings form a potential rationale for a venous arterialization-revascularization treatment for the refractory angina and the "no-option" patients using a hybrid percutaneous (closure device for arterialization)/surgical approach (CVBG) to revascularize the myocardium.

Utility of BeBack crossing catheter in fistula creation during percutaneous deep vein arterialization.

For patients with "no-option" chronic limb-threatening ischemia, a final attempt can be made for limb salvage in the form of percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA). In the present study, we describe five cases of pDVA using a BeBack crossing catheter (Bentley InnoMed GmbH; previously, the GoBack crossing catheter; Upstream Peripheral Technologies). From November 2021 to July 2022, five patients underwent pDVA using the BeBack crossing catheter. The demographic data, procedural details, and patient outcomes were recorded. Successful vascular crossing was achieved in all five cases using the BeBack device. No surgical complications were encountered. The limb salvage rate was 60%, and the wound closure rate was 40%. No mortalities occurred during the follow-up period. The findings from the present study demonstrate that the use of the BeBack crossing catheter for pDVA is safe and feasible.

Controlled flow reduction of an iliacoportal shunt graft for portal vein arterialization in a pediatric patient.

Portal vein arterialization is a rarely used, temporary surgical salvage solution to prevent biliary and hepatic ischemia and necrosis in acute liver de-arterialization. However, it can induce portal hypertension, causing increased morbidity and mortality. We report the case of a 5-year-old girl with portal hypertension and right ventricle volume overload following the creation of an iliacoportal shunt graft for portal vein arterialization due to vessel-adhering neuroblastoma. Partial shunt graft closure was accomplished by placing a stent graft in an hourglass configuration via the right femoral artery using two slender-sheaths in a line with the second more distal than the first. Subsequently, the patient's symptoms of right ventricle volume overload and portal hypertension decreased. In conclusion, endovascular reduction of elevated portal blood flow after portal vein arterialization is feasible, even in pediatric patients.

Role of Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization for Patients with Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia.

Efficacy of percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) has been reported for patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In the countries where a manufactured device dedicated for pDVA has not been reimbursed, pDVA using the off-the-shelf technique has alternatively spread. The off-the-shelf techniques for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation reported are as follows: AV spear technique, venous arterialization simplified technique (VAST), and a use of penetration guidewire or a reentry device. Technical success rates of the procedures are similar to those using the dedicated device. pDVA could be a last resort for the patients with no-option CLTI, including those suffering from stump ulcer after major limb amputation or those with occluded surgical bypass.

Advanced Endovascular Techniques for Limb Salvage.

As the number of patients affected by peripheral arterial disease continues to increase, new technical approaches and devices have been developed to provide effective and durable treatment options that will lead to improved outcomes. While the mainstay of endovascular intervention remains mostly balloon-based, several innovative techniques and technologies are in development that may provide new solutions. This review highlights recent endovascular advancements in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and additional adjunctive devices that are needed to improve lesion patency, reduce the need for reintervention, and lead to better patient-centered functional outcomes.