Increasing Efficiency With Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Arthrocentesis: A Case Report and Procedure Demonstration.

Patients with chief complaints of musculoskeletal pain comprise a significant portion of emergency department (ED) visits. Identifying and utilizing methods to expedite diagnosis in these cases may help reduce ED crowding, improve outcomes, and increase patient satisfaction. We present a case in which a 52-year-old man presented to the ED with complaints of unilateral right knee pain, swelling, and stiffness. An initial plain film X-ray showed a large suprapatellar effusion over the patient's arthritic right knee. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was used by an ED physician to facilitate a suprapatellar arthrocentesis. The patient tolerated the procedure well, remarking that he had no pain during or after its completion. POCUS can increase the accuracy, efficacy, and speed of procedures for which physicians have traditionally used landmarks or formal radiology consultations. While POCUS can prove helpful, barriers to its widespread implementation still remain. However, these barriers can be addressed with relative ease.

Clinical outcomes of patients with unilateral internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint following arthrocentesis and stabilization splint therapy.

BACKGROUND: The management of internal derangement (ID) of the TMJ is challenging because of multiple etiologic factors and varying degrees of severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with unilateral ID treated with arthrocentesis and stabilization splint therapy during a 6-month period. METHODS: A total of 105 patients (87 females, 18 males) with unilateral ID were included in this study. Patients were divided into unilateral anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR) and unilateral anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR). Patients with ADDwoR were subdivided according to the erosive bone changes. Objective parameters on mandibular movement and subjective parameters on pain were obtained and assessed. Their clinical outcomes before and after arthrocentesis and stabilization splint therapy were compared with the chi-square, Fisher's exact test, paired t-test, or Wilcoxon singed-rank test. RESULTS: All objective parameters of unilateral ID patients significantly increased at the 6-month follow-up. The differences in mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were statistically significant in all subjective variables (p < 0.01). In joints with ADDwoR, preoperative maximal mouth opening, and maximal protrusive movement in both groups, with erosive and non-erosive changes were significantly increased after 6 months (p < 0.01). However, right and left maximal lateral movement increased after treatment in both groups but without significant differences. All VAS pain scores on jaw movement and palpation of associated muscles showed a significant decrease regardless of erosive changes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of arthrocentesis and subsequent stabilization splint therapy was shown to be highly effective in pain reduction and improvement of mandibular movements in both unilateral ADDwR and ADDwoR, as well as in cases with both erosive and non-erosive bony changes associated with unilateral ADDwoR.

Optimising needle depth in temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a magnetic resonance-based study for safety and efficacy.

The aim of this paper was to determine the optimal needle depth for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with the aim of improving procedural safety and efficacy in clinical practice. A retrospective analysis of 264 TMJ MRIs from 132 patients at Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital was conducted. T2-weighted MRI sequences were utilised to measure distances from skin to joint capsules at varying needle entry points, applying the double puncture technique. The study adhered to ethical standards with appropriate approvals. The analysis revealed significant gender-related variations in needle depths (females showing shorter distances than males, p < 0.05). No significant gender differences were found in condylar angles. An inverse correlation between age and condylar angle suggested age-related anatomical changes. Crucially, a 20 mm needle depth was identified as safer and more effective than the previously recommended 25 mm. This study underscores the necessity of revising needle depth to 20 mm in TMJ arthrocentesis. These findings hold significant implications for improving procedural safety and catering to demographic variations.

Predictive value of joint fluid volume on advanced pre-procedure imaging related to success of arthrocentesis and presence of septic arthritis.

PURPOSE: Septic arthritis is a dangerous medical condition requiring prompt diagnosis, often via arthrocentesis. A "dry tap" occurs when no fluid is aspirated. We hypothesized that the absence of a joint effusion on pre-procedure advanced imaging would reliably predict a dry tap and exclude septic arthritis. METHODS: A cohort of 217 arthrocentesis cases of large joints (hips, shoulders, knees) from our institution, with pre-procedure advanced imaging (CT, MR, US) of the same joint performed within the previous 48 h, was analyzed. Exclusion criteria included non-native joints or inadequate imaging of the affected joint. These cases underwent blinded review by 4 radiologists who measured the deepest pocket of joint fluid on the pre-procedure imaging. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed comparing joint fluid pocket size to outcomes of successful aspiration and final diagnosis. RESULTS: A smaller average joint pocket fluid size was present on advanced imaging in both dry taps compared with successful arthrocenteses (p < .0001), and in uninfected joints compared with septic joints (p = .0001). However, the overlap of values was too great to allow for a perfectly predictive cutoff. 29% (5/17) of patients with no visible joint fluid on pre-aspiration imaging underwent successful arthrocentesis, one case representing septic arthritis. CONCLUSION: Volume of joint fluid on advanced pre-arthrocentesis imaging cannot reliably predict subsequent dry tap nor exclude septic arthritis.

A do it yourself (DIY) point-of-care wrist ultrasound phantom for joint access training.

BACKGROUND: Joint access is essential for arthrocentesis, or joint aspiration of fluids. Joint treatments that are not performed properly can result in avoidable patient issues such as damage to the muscles, tendons, and blood vessels surrounding the joint. The use of ultrasound has become the gold standard for this procedure and proven to be a support in the skill learning process. However, success with this equipment, particularly in small joints like the wrist, depends on a clinician's capacity to recognize the crucial landmarks that guide these procedures. Prior to executing on a real patient, task trainers have proven to be an effective way for doctors to practice and prepare for procedures. However, shortcomings of current solutions include high purchase costs, incompatibility with ultrasound imaging, and low reusability. In addition, since this is a procedure that is not performed frequently, there may not be space or resources available in healthcare facilities to accommodate one at the point of care. This study aimed to close the existing gap by developing a DIY ultrasound compatible task trainer for wrist joint access training. RESULTS: We developed a novel ultrasound compatible wrist joint model that can be made from sustainable materials and reusable parts, thus reducing the costs for acquisition and environmental impact. Our model, which was produced utilizing small-batch production methods, is made up of 3D-printed bones enclosed in an ultrasound-compatible gelatin mixture. It can be easily remade after each practice session, removing needle tracks that are visible under ultrasound for conventional phantoms. The ultrasonic properties of this model were tested through pixel brightness analysis and visual inspection of simulated anatomical structures. CONCLUSION: Our results report the advantages and limitations of the proposed model regarding production, practice, and ultrasound compatibility. While future work entails the transfer to patients of the same skill, this reusable and replicable model has proven, when presented to experts, to be successful in representing the physical characteristics and ultrasound profile of significant anatomical structures. This novel DIY product could be an effective alternative to teach procedures in the context of resource-restrained clinical simulation centers.

Early Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint Arthralgia: A Superiority Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this superiority trial was to investigate the clinical outcomes of arthrocentesis as an early treatment supported by use of an occlusal splint vs use of an occlusal splint only in the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia. METHODS: Ninety-five adults presenting with TMJ arthralgia were recruited into the study and randomised into 2 groups: Group 1 received arthrocentesis as an early treatment supported by use of an occlusal splint, whereas group 2 received treatment with an occlusal splint only. Seventy-four patients (group 1: n = 37; group 2: n = 37) completed the 1-year follow-up schedule and were included in the final analysis. Reduction of pain intensity measured by a numeric rating scale and increase in mouth opening distance (unassisted maximal, assisted maximal, and pain-free) was seen in both treatment groups. RESULTS: In group 1, pain intensity significantly decreased at 6 weeks and all subsequent time points compared with group 2. In terms of mouth opening distance, a significant improvement was observed in both groups during the course of treatment, but statistical significance was not seen between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early arthrocentesis supported by use of an occlusal splint is superior to use of an occlusal splint alone in the treatment of TMJ arthralgia. Arthrocentesis with occlusal splint support could be discussed as first-line treatment for arthralgia of the TMJ, which may co-occur with various painful and nonpainful conditions of TMJ disorders.

Comparative study of arthrocentesis with concentric-needle cannula with classic concentric needle: A randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial.

This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two distinct single-puncture techniques in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis for managing disk displacement without reduction (DDwoR). Sixty patients with DDwoR were randomly and blindly assigned to two treatment groups (n = 30 each): group 1 - TMJ arthrocentesis with the classic concentric needle; and group 2 - TMJ arthrocentesis with the concentric needle-cannula system. The following variables were recorded and compared across the groups: patient's pain perception (visual analog scale - VAS, 0-10); maximal interincisal distance (MID, mm); facial edema (FE, presence or absence); and operation duration (OP, minutes). Patients in group 2 presented significantly lower values of VAS score and presence of FE (p < 0.05) when examining the data at 24 and 48 h after the arthrocentesis. They also showed an increase in MID values (p = 0.024) after 6 months. With regard to OP, no significant difference was observed between the groups. Performing a single-puncture TMJ arthrocentesis using a concentric needle-cannula system significantly reduced the patients' pain perception, and mitigated the presence of facial edema during the immediate postoperative period (at 24 and 48 h). Furthermore, it resulted in a notable increase in the MID after 6 months.

Temporomandibular Joint Injections and Lavage: An Overview of Reviews.

Objectives: This overview was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews guidelines and aimed to collect and compare the results of systematic reviews on temporomandibular joint injection treatment. Methods: Systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials on temporomandibular disorders treated with lavage or intra-articular administrations were qualified for syntheses. The final searches were conducted on 27 February 2024, without time frame restrictions. Results: Of the 232 identified records, 42 systematic reviews were selected. The most evidence-based conclusions call into question the clinical differences between many therapeutic approaches, including the following: (1) injectable selection for the treatment of pain and hypomobility; (2) the method of performing arthrocentesis; (3) the use of imaging when rinsing the TMJ cavity; (4) the supplementation of the extracapsular administration of unprocessed blood with intracapsular deposition in the treatment of TMJ hypermobility. Conclusions: Systematic reviews based solely on randomized clinical trials proved the following differences: (1) in painful temporomandibular hypomobility, a better therapeutic effect is observed with arthrocentesis followed by I-PRF administration compared to lavage alone; (2) in painful temporomandibular hypomobility, inferior- or double-compartment injection leads to better results than superior-compartment injection; (3) in temporomandibular joint recurrent dislocation, hypertonic dextrose administration is superior to placebo, although (4) unprocessed blood has a better effect than hypertonic dextrose. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024496142.

Progress in the Study of Temporomandibular Joint Lavage in Temporomandibular Joint Disorder.

With the continuous development and progress of medicine, there are many methods for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders, among which temporomandibular joint lavage is also constantly developed. In the past century, through the efforts of some scholars and clinical summary, the understanding of this disease has been deepened and broadened. At present, through continuous exploration of the treatment methods, the lavage is relatively mature, and has achieved good clinical results. In this paper, the application of temporomandibular joint lavage in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders, its treatment methods, treatment mechanism, the auxiliary of other drugs, indications, complications and so on were discussed.

Baseline masticatory muscles' performance may predict pain relief in temporomandibular disorders.

OBJECTIVES: To compare masticatory muscles' recruitment in patients with temporomandibular disorders and asymptomatic control subjects. To evaluate if the masticatory muscles' recruitment pattern may predict symptoms' improvement after temporomandibular disorders treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized surface electromyography of anterior temporalis and superficial masseters muscles were recorded and compared at baseline in 26 patients with arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders (study group) and 26 asymptomatic subjects (control group). The study group was treated pharmacologically and by means of five arthrocentesis sessions. Pre-, during-, and post-treatment pain and mandibular function were assessed and compared among timepoints. Clinical improvement in terms of pain and mandibular function was correlated with pre-treatment standardized surface electromyography values. RESULTS: Temporomandibular disorders patients showed improved maximum mouth opening and pain during and after treatment with arthrocentesis compared to baseline (T-test p < 0.01). Standardized surface electromyography values were significantly different in temporomandibular disorders subjects compared to controls (T-test p < 0.05). Improvement in pain at rest after treatment was inversely correlated with pre-treatment masseters standardized surface electromyography symmetry (R-coefficient 0.3936; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Temporomandibular disorders patients showed a different muscular recruitment pattern compared to controls. The lesser the pre-treatment masseters symmetry, the greater the improvement of pain at rest after treatment.

Arthrocentesis versus occlusal coverage splints in the management of disc displacement without reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR) can cause pain and limitations in mouth opening, with a significant impact on function. The optimal management strategy for DDwoR is unclear. Treatments include conservative management such as mandibular manipulation, occlusal splints, and patient education/self-management, as well as arthrocentesis, which is a minimally invasive procedure. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to ascertain whether there is a role for arthrocentesis in the management of DDwoR. Studies analysing the outcomes pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO) in patients with DDwoR treated by arthrocentesis or occlusal coverage devices were eligible for inclusion. Following a database search, six studies with a total of 343 participants were found to be eligible for analysis (three prospective observational studies, one retrospective observational study, one non-randomized single-blind clinical trial, and one unblinded randomized clinical trial). When compared to occlusal coverage splints, arthrocentesis demonstrated a slight improvement in pain, although this was statistically non-significant (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.04 to 0.05, P = 0.07; I2 = 81%), and a significant improvement in MMO (SMD 0.79 mm, 95% CI 0.24-1.35 mm, P = 0.005; I2 = 79%). However, due to the significant heterogeneity between studies and the high risk of bias, along with the paucity of double-blind randomized controlled clinical trials, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn for this clinical question.

Is the modified double-puncture arthrocentesis technique effective in terms of clinical outcomes?

We aimed to compare the clinical results of the modified double-puncture arthrocentesis technique with the results of the conventional double-puncture and single-puncture techniques. Patients who underwent unilateral arthrocentesis and had stage 2-4 internal irregularities according to Wilkes classification were included in the study. The outcome variables were pain, maximum mouth opening, quality of life, and duration of the procedure. Data were analysed preoperatively and 1st-day, 1st-week, and 1st-month after the procedure. A total of 52 patients (49-females, 3-males) with complete records were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 32.7 ± 15.6 years. There was no significant difference between the three techniques in terms of outcome variables at all times (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the single puncture technique and the other techniques in terms of procedure time (p < 0.05). No superiority of the modified double-puncture arthrocentesis was found in terms of clinical results.

Ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis for condylar head fracture: a technical report.

OBJECTIVES: Double puncture arthrocentesis (DPA) of the temporomandibular joint (TMD) is considered an effective preservative option for managing mandibular condylar head fractures. However, the procedure is commonly performed by a traditional "blind" method using anatomical characteristics. In the present study, an ultrasonography (US) device was applied for the treatment of a case with a fractured mandibular condyle. METHODS: A 79-year-old female was diagnosed right side condylar head fracture complaining pain of right TMD and reduced mouth opening range: inter-incisor distance of 20 mm. Since the fracture position was high and inoperable, the decision was made to perform DPA of the TMD. The US probe was positioned parallel and slightly oblique to the major axis of the mandibular ramus. Both the posterior and anterior insertions into the joint space were performed according to the axis mentioned above, which enabled the operator to visualize the entirety of the needle. RESULTS: The device offered safety and ensured accuracy by providing real-time visual aid to the surgeon. The procedure provided an early increase in the inter-incisor distance (31 mm) and pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: Hence, for the preservative treatment of mandibular condylar head fractures, based on the present study, we recommend US-guided arthrocentesis as a safe, feasible, and effective therapeutic option instead of the conventional "blind" method.

Does Liquid/Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Help in the Arthrocentesis Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Compared to Other Infusion Options? A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions involving pain and dysfunction of jaw mobility and function, which have proven difficult to treat satisfactorily. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a liquid platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) infusion during arthrocentesis versus other options using coadjuvant materials to reduce TMD symptoms. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs published before January 2024, comparing i-PRF to any other TMD treatment. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023495364). The searches generated several recent RCTs that compared i-PRF injection combined with arthrocentesis (AC) to AC-only or AC with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The outcomes analyzed included measures of pain (visual analog scale, VAS), maximum mouth opening, joint sounds, and MRI-verified changes in joint structure. Across the RCTs, the addition of i-PRF injection to AC resulted in significant improvements in pain relief, joint function, mouth opening, and structural changes compared to AC-only or with PRP over follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 12 months. Current clinical evidence favors using i-PRF as an adjunct to AC rather than AC-only or AC with PRP for the treatment of TMDs. The improvements in subjective and objective outcome measures are clinically meaningful. Still, additional high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are required to strengthen the evidence base and better define the role of i-PRF in TMD management guidelines.

Use of Sodium Hyaluronate and Triamcinolone Acetonide Following Arthrocentesis in Treatment of Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.

Background: Internal derangement (ID) of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a common temporomandibular disorder (TMD) which causes hypomobility of the joint. Minimally invasive treatment modality like arthrocentesis is used as first-line of management having low morbidity and high efficacy. This prospective randomized comparative study was carried to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection with sodium hyaluronate (SH) and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) after arthrocentesis in ID of TMJ. Materials and Methods: A total 40 patients diagnosed with ID (stage 1-4) were included in the study and randomly divided in two groups. Twenty patients (group A) received intra-articular injection of SH while 20 patients (group B) received intra-articular injection of TA, after arthrocentesis. The clinical parameters of pain (VAS), Maximum mouth opening (MMO) (mm) and clicking sound (present/absent) were evaluated pre-operatively and at seventh day, 1 month and 3 months post-operatively. Results: There was statistically significant improvement in pain scores in both the groups at all time intervals with SH being superior (p value 0.0086). All the patients showed improved mouth opening at all time intervals, TA being superior but statistically insignificant (p value 0.59). There was reduction in the clicking sound in both the groups which was statistically insignificant at all time intervals. Conclusions: Arthrocentesis followed by intra-articular injection with SH is superior to TA in terms of pain reduction, while TA showed superiority in terms of improved mouth opening.

Temporomandibular Joint Minimally Invasive Procedures in the Pediatric Population: A Prospective Study.

Over recent years, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) minimally invasive procedures, such as arthrocentesis and arthroscopy, have been appointed as an initial TMJ intra-articular treatment. Both procedures present safe and effective clinical results in managing temporomandibular disorders (TMD) by reducing pain and improving mouth opening. The use of these techniques in adults is validated in the literature. However, data on the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive TMJ interventions in pediatric patients are scarce. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of TMJ arthrocentesis and arthroscopy in the pediatric population. A prospective study was conducted at Instituto Português da Face (IPF) in Lisbon, Portugal, including patients treated for TMD from 1 June 2019 to 30 June 2023. In the present study, 26 patients (17 female and 9 male) were included, representing a total of 48 joints operated. A statistically significant reduction was observed in the primary outcome, TMJ pain, from 3.93 ± 2.80 preoperatively (mean ± SD) to 0.50 ± 1.53 (mean ± SD) postoperatively (p < 0.05). An improvement in the secondary outcome, maximum mouth opening, from 36.92 ± 8.79 preoperatively to 42.96 ± 5.07 postoperatively, was observed (p < 0.05). The overall success rate was 84.62%. This prospective study showed that TMJ arthrocentesis and arthroscopy appear to benefit pediatric patients with TMD, significantly lowering pain and improving MMO without relevant postoperative complications.

Evidence for minimally invasive treatment-A systematic review on surgical management of disc displacement.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement (DD) has been established in different forms since over a century. Ther is a consensus to perform minimal invasive interventions as first-line surgical treatment since there are no evidence on best surgical practice yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a complex systematic review (SR) on the topic-is there evidence for surgical treatment of TMJ DD? METHODS: The PICO was defined as DD patients (population), treated with different surgical interventions including arthrocentesis (intervention), compared with other or no treatment (control) regarding the outcome variables mandibular function, mouth opening capacity, TMJ pain, etcetera (outcome). For identification of prospective controlled trials and SRs, a search strategy was developed for application in three databases. RESULTS: The search yielded 4931 studies of which 56 fulfilled the stipulated PICO. Studies with low or moderate risk of bias were possible to include in meta-analyses. There were evidence suggesting arthrocentesis being more effective compared to conservative management (maximum interincisal opening (MIO): p < .0001, I2 = 22%; TMJ pain: p = .0003, I2 = 84%) and arthrocentesis being slightly more effective than arthrocentesis with an adjunctive hyaluronic acid injection (MIO: p = .04, I2 = 0%; TMJ pain: p = .28, I2 = 0%). Other treatment comparisons showed nonsignificant differences. The performed meta-analyses only included 2-4 studies each, which might indicate a low grade of evidence. CONCLUSION: Although arthrocentesis performed better than conservative management the findings should be interpreted cautiously, and non-invasive management considered as primary measure. Still, several knowledge gaps concerning surgical methods of choice remains.

Treatment of painful temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

There is currently no consensus on the best treatment for painful temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR), and no network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing all types of treatments for this condition has been conducted. The objective of this study was to compare and rank all treatments for DDwoR, including conservative treatments, occlusal splints, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), arthrocentesis (Arthro) alone, Arthro plus intra-articular injection (IAI) of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Arthro plus IAI of hyaluronic acid (HA), Arthro with exercises, Arthro plus occlusal splints, and manipulative therapy. Outcome variables were pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and maximum mouth opening (MMO, mm). The mean difference with 95% confidence interval was estimated using Stata software. The GRADE system was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. A total of 742 patients from 16 RCTs were included in the NMA. Both direct meta-analysis and NMA showed that Arthro with IAI of co-adjuvants provided better pain reduction in the short term (≤3 months) than Arthro alone. However, the quality of the evidence was very low. In the intermediate term, Arthro alone or combined with co-adjuvants provided better pain reduction than conservative treatment, but with low-quality evidence. Conservative treatment significantly increased MMO in the short term compared to other treatments. In conclusion, the results of this NMA suggest that arthrocentesis with intra-articular injection of adjuvant medications may be superior to conservative treatments in reducing pain intensity at long-term follow-up, while no significant differences were found for the MMO outcome. However, the quality of evidence was generally low to very low, and further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Arthrocentesis of suspected septic sternoclavicular arthritis: microbial yield and predictors of culture positivity.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the microbial yield and factors predicting culture positivity for image-guided arthrocentesis of suspected septic sternoclavicular (SC) arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic health record search identified image-guided SC joint aspirations for suspected septic arthritis. Data was extracted by retrospective chart review including patient demographics, procedure characteristics, pre-procedure lab testing, joint culture results, final SC joint diagnoses and any effect of positive synovial cultures on subsequent antibiotic therapy. Factors associated with positive joint fluid cultures were assessed using a Chi-squared test for categorical predictors and logistic regression for continuous predictors. RESULTS: A total of 31 SC arthrocenteses met inclusion criteria with most (81%) performed using ultrasound guidance. Synovial fluid was successfully aspirated in 19/31 (61%) of cases, and in all other cases lavage fluid was successfully obtained. Synovial cultures were positive in 9/31 (29%) of cases. A final diagnosis of septic arthritis was assigned to 20/31 cases (65%) in which 9/20 (45%) had positive synovial cultures. There was no statistically significant association between synovial culture positivity and risk factors for septic arthritis, positive blood cultures, pre-aspiration antibiotics and whether synovial fluid or lavage fluid was cultured. Serum white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) demonstrated statistically significant positive correlation with positive synovial cultures. CONCLUSION: Arthrocentesis is effective for microbial speciation in SC septic arthritis, and diagnostic yield may be increased with lavage when encountering a dry tap. Normal serum WBC and ESR values indicate an extremely low likelihood of positive synovial cultures.

The benefits of performing temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with catheters and a vacuum pump: A randomized control trial.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two different techniques of double puncture arthrocentesis with and without the addition of catheters and a vacuum pump for management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR). A total of 48 patients with DDWOR were randomly and blindly allocated into two treatment groups (N = 24): Group 1, TMJ arthrocentesis with the addition of catheters and a vacuum pump to the second needle; Group 2, TMJ arthrocentesis without any addition device. The following variables were registered and compared between groups: patient's pain perception (visual analogue scale [VAS; 0-10]); maximal interincisal distance [MID; mm]; joint effusion (JE, presence or absence); facial edema (FE; presence or absence); and the operation duration (OP; minutes). Patients in Group 1 presented with significantly lower VAS scores (p < 0.001) and presence of FE (p = 0.03) in the post-operative period, also an increase in MID values (p = 0.026), and a reduction in JE (p = 0.022) after 3 months. Besides that, in this group, the procedure was performed significantly faster (p < 0.001). Performing arthrocentesis with the addition of a vacuum pump makes the procedure faster and yields better results in terms of pain, facial swelling, mouth opening and joint effusion.