Combination of an aurora kinase inhibitor and the ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor asciminib against ABL inhibitor-resistant CML cells.

The development of BCR::ABL1-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, resistance to ABL TKIs can develop in CML patients due to BCR::ABL1 point mutations and CML leukemia stem cell (LSC). Aurora kinases are essential kinases for cell division and regulate mitosis, especially the process of chromosomal segregation. Aurora kinase members also promote cancer cell survival and proliferation. This study analyzed whether aurora kinases were regulated in the progression of CML. It also evaluated the efficacy of the ABL TKI asciminib and the aurora kinase inhibitor LY3295668. The expressions of AURKA and AURKB were higher in the CML cells compared with normal cells using a public database (GSE100026). Asciminib or LY3295668 alone inhibited CML cells after 72 h, and cellular cytotoxicity was increased. The combined use of Asciminib and LY3295668 increased superior efficacy compared with either drug alone. Colony formation was reduced by cotreatment with asciminib and LY3295668. In the cell-cycle analyses, LY3295668 induced G2/M arrest. Cell populations in the sub-G1 phase were observed when cotreating with asciminib and LY3295668. The combination treatment also changed the mitochondrial membrane potential. In addition, AURKA shRNA transfectant cells had increased asciminib sensitivity. Combining asciminib and aurora kinase inhibition enhanced the efficacy and is proposed as a new therapeutic option for patients with CML. These findings have clinical implications for a potential novel therapeutic strategy for CML patients.

New Epigenetic Modifier Inhibitors Enhance Microspore Embryogenesis in Bread Wheat.

The use of doubled haploid (DH) technology enables the development of new varieties of plants in less time than traditional breeding methods. In microspore embryogenesis (ME), stress treatment triggers microspores towards an embryogenic pathway, resulting in the production of DH plants. Epigenetic modifiers have been successfully used to increase ME efficiency in a number of crops. In wheat, only the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) has been shown to be effective. In this study, inhibitors of epigenetic modifiers acting on histone methylation (chaetocin and CARM1 inhibitor) and histone phosphorylation (aurora kinase inhibitor II (AUKI-II) and hesperadin) were screened to determine their potential in ME induction in high- and mid-low-responding cultivars. The use of chaetocin and AUKI-II resulted in a higher percentage of embryogenic structures than controls in both cultivars, but only AUKI-II was superior to TSA. In order to evaluate the potential of AUKI-II in terms of increasing the number of green DH plants, short and long application strategies were tested during the mannitol stress treatment. The application of 0.8 µM AUKI-II during a long stress treatment resulted in a higher percentage of chromosome doubling compared to control DMSO in both cultivars. This concentration produced 33% more green DH plants than the control in the mid-low-responding cultivar, but did not affect the final ME efficiency in a high-responding cultivar. This study has identified new epigenetic modifiers whose use could be promising for increasing the efficiency of other systems that require cellular reprogramming.

Discovery of a Novel Pseudo-Natural Product Aurora Kinase Inhibitor Chemotype through Morphological Profiling.

The pseudo-natural product (pseudo-NP) concept aims to combine NP fragments in arrangements that are not accessible through known biosynthetic pathways. The resulting compounds retain the biological relevance of NPs but are not yet linked to bioactivities and may therefore be best evaluated by unbiased screening methods resulting in the identification of unexpected or unprecedented bioactivities. Herein, various NP fragments are combined with a tricyclic core connectivity via interrupted Fischer indole and indole dearomatization reactions to provide a collection of highly three-dimensional pseudo-NPs. Target hypothesis generation by morphological profiling via the cell painting assay guides the identification of an unprecedented chemotype for Aurora kinase inhibition with both its relatively highly 3D structure and its physicochemical properties being very different from known inhibitors. Biochemical and cell biological characterization indicate that the phenotype identified by the cell painting assay corresponds to the inhibition of Aurora kinase B.

A comprehensive review on role of Aurora kinase inhibitors (AKIs) in cancer therapeutics.

Aurora kinases (AURKs) are a family of serine /threonine protein kinases that have a crucial role in cell cycle process mainly in the event of chromosomal segregation, centrosome maturation and cytokinesis. The family consists of three members including Aurora kinase A (AURK-A), Aurora kinase B (AURK-B) and Aurora kinase C (AURK-C). All AURKs contain a conserved kinase domain for their activity but differ in their cellular localization and functions. AURK-A and AURK-B are expressed mainly in somatic cells while the expression of AURK-C is limited to germ cells. AURK-A promotes G2 to M transition of cell cycle by controlling centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly. AURK-B and AURK-C form the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) that ensures proper chromosomal alignments and segregation. Aberrant expression of AURK-A and AURK-B has been detected in several solid tumours and malignancies. Hence, they have become an attractive therapeutic target against cancer. The first part of this review focuses on AURKs structure, functions, subcellular localization, and their role in tumorigenesis. The review also highlights the functional and clinical impact of selective as well as pan kinase inhibitors. Currently, >60 compounds that target AURKs are in preclinical and clinical studies. The drawbacks of existing inhibitors like selectivity, drug resistance and toxicity have also been addressed. Since, majority of inhibitors are Aurora kinase inhibitor (AKI) type-1 that bind to the active (DFGin and Cin) conformation of the kinase, this information may be utilized to design highly selective kinase inhibitors that can be combined with other therapeutic agents for better clinical outcomes.

Multifaceted Effects of Kinase Inhibitors on Pancreatic Cancer Cells Reveals Pivotal Entities with Therapeutic Implications.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer and is the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for over 90% of pancreatic cancers. Most pancreatic cancers are recalcitrant to radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options for this deadly disease. To this end, we screened a library of kinase inhibitors in the PDAC cell lines PANC-1 and BxPC-3 and identified two highly potent molecules: Aurora kinase inhibitor AT 9283 (AT) and EGFR kinase inhibitor WZ 3146 (WZ). Both AT and WZ exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition of viability in both cell lines. Thus, we conducted an in-depth multilevel (cellular, molecular, and proteomic) analysis with AT and WZ in PANC-1 cells, which harbor KRAS mutation and exhibit quasimesenchymal properties representing pancreatic cancer cells as having intrinsic chemoresistance and the potential for differential response to therapy. Elucidation of the molecular mechanism of action of AT and WZ revealed an impact on the programmed cell death pathway with an increase in apoptotic, multicaspase, and caspase 3/7 positive cells. Additionally, the key survival molecule Bcl-2 was impacted. Moreover, cell cycle arrest was observed with both kinase inhibitors. Additionally, an increase in superoxide radicals was observed in the AT-treated group. Importantly, proteomic profiling revealed differentially regulated key entities with multifaceted effects, which could have a deleterious impact on PDAC. These findings suggest potential targets for efficacious treatment, including a possible increase in the efficacy of immunotherapy using PD-L1 antibody due to the upregulation of lactoferrin and radixin. Furthermore, combination therapy outcomes with gemcitabine/platinum drugs may also be more effective due to an increase in the NADH dehydrogenase complex. Notably, protein-protein interaction analysis (STRING) revealed possible enrichment of reactome pathway entities. Additionally, novel therapy options, such as vimentin-antibody--drug conjugates, could be explored. Therefore, future studies with the two kinases as monotherapy/combination therapy are warranted.

Combined inhibition of aurora kinases and Bcl-xL induces apoptosis through select BH3-only proteins.

Aurora kinases (AURKs) are mitotic kinases important for regulating cell cycle progression. Small-molecule inhibitors of AURK have shown promising antitumor effects in multiple cancers; however, the utility of these inhibitors as inducers of cancer cell death has thus far been limited. Here, we examined the role of the Bcl-2 family proteins in AURK inhibition-induced apoptosis in colon cancer cells. We found that alisertib and danusertib, two small-molecule inhibitors of AURK, are inefficient inducers of apoptosis in HCT116 and DLD-1 colon cancer cells, the survival of which requires at least one of the two antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1. We further identified Bcl-xL as a major suppressor of alisertib- or danusertib-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells. We demonstrate that combination of a Bcl-2 homology (BH)3-mimetic inhibitor (ABT-737), a selective inhibitor of Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, and Bcl-w, with alisertib or danusertib potently induces apoptosis through the Bcl-2 family effector protein Bax. In addition, we identified Bid, Puma, and Noxa, three BH3-only proteins of the Bcl-2 family, as mediators of alisertib-ABT-737-induced apoptosis. We show while Noxa promotes apoptosis by constitutively sequestering Mcl-1, Puma becomes associated with Mcl-1 upon alisertib treatment. On the other hand, we found that alisertib treatment causes activation of caspase-2, which promotes apoptosis by cleaving Bid into truncated Bid, a suppressor of both Bcl-xL and Mcl-1. Together, these results define the Bcl-2 protein network critically involved in AURK inhibitor-induced apoptosis and suggest that BH3-mimetics targeting Bcl-xL may help overcome resistance to AURK inhibitors in cancer cells.

The Aurora Kinase Inhibitor CYC116 Promotes the Maturation of Cardiomyocytes Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) have great potential in applications such as regenerative medicine, cardiac disease modeling, and in vitro drug evaluation. However, hPSC-CMs are immature, which limits their applications. During development, the maturation of CMs is accompanied by a decline in their proliferative capacity. This phenomenon suggests that regulating the cell cycle may facilitate the maturation of hPSC-CMs. Aurora kinases are essential kinases that regulate the cell cycle, the role of which is not well studied in hPSC-CM maturation. Here, we demonstrate that CYC116, an inhibitor of Aurora kinases, significantly promotes the maturation of CMs derived from both human embryonic stem cells (H1 and H9) and iPSCs (induced PSCs) (UC013), resulting in increased expression of genes related to cardiomyocyte function, better organization of the sarcomere, increased sarcomere length, increased number of mitochondria, and enhanced physiological function of the cells. In addition, a number of other Aurora kinase inhibitors have also been found to promote the maturation of hPSC-CMs. Our data suggest that blocking aurora kinase activity and regulating cell cycle progression may promote the maturation of hPSC-CMs.

Pan-Aurora Kinase Inhibitor Danusertib Induces Apoptosis of Epstein-Barr Virus-transformed B-Cells Through Caspase and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Evidence for the relevance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in various types of cancer has expanded; however, the definitive mechanism of EBV-induced oncogenesis remains ambiguous. The purpose of this study was to identify the relevance of aurora kinases in EBV-induced carcinogenesis, and the cellular responses to danusertib, a pan-aurora kinase inhibitor. The underlying signaling mechanism in EBV-transformed B-cells was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Western blotting was performed on EBV-transformed B-cells and EBV-positive lymphoma cells to identify aurora kinase expression. Cellular responses of EBV-transformed B-cells to danusertib were investigated using AlamaBlue assay and apoptosis analysis. To evaluate the underlying signaling mechanisms of danusertib-induced apoptosis, cleavage of caspase cascade molecules, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-associated molecule activation, and intracellular Ca2+ levels were evaluated using western blotting, flow cytometry, and inhibition assays. RESULTS: Expression of both aurora kinase A and B was gradually increased in EBV-infected B-cells and two EBV-positive B lymphoma cell lines. Danusertib significantly suppressed EBV-transformed B-cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Danusertib induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest through disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential in EBV-transformed B-cells in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. Moreover, danusertib induced cleavage of caspases, ER stress-associated molecule activation, and intracellular Ca2+ release from ER to cytoplasm in EBV-transformed B-cells, while BAPTA-AM, a calcium chelator, inhibited danusertib-induced apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Danusertib treatment led to apoptosis of EBV-transformed B-cells through ER stress-associated proteins and mitochondrial caspase activation. These results suggest that aurora kinases may be valuable targets for potential therapeutic agents against EBV-associated carcinoma.

Increased Aurora B expression reduces substrate phosphorylation and induces chromosomal instability.

Increased Aurora B protein expression, which is common in cancers, is expected to increase Aurora B kinase activity, yielding elevated phosphorylation of Aurora B substrates. In contrast, here we show that elevated expression of Aurora B reduces phosphorylation of six different Aurora B substrates across three species and causes defects consistent with Aurora B inhibition. Complexes of Aurora B and its binding partner INCENP autophosphorylate in trans to achieve full Aurora B activation. Increased expression of Aurora B mislocalizes INCENP, reducing the local concentration of Aurora B:INCENP complexes at the inner centromere/kinetochore. Co-expression of INCENP rescues Aurora B kinase activity and mitotic defects caused by elevated Aurora B. However, INCENP expression is not elevated in concert with Aurora B in breast cancer, and increased expression of Aurora B causes resistance rather than hypersensitivity to Aurora B inhibitors. Thus, increased Aurora B expression reduces, rather than increases, Aurora B kinase activity.

Dual roles of oxostephanine as an Aurora kinase inhibitor and angiogenesis suppressor.

The Aurora kinases, including Aurora A, B and C, play critical roles in cell division. They have been found overexpressed in a number of types of cancer and may thus be potential targets in cancer therapy. Several Aurora kinase inhibitors have been identified and developed. Some of these have been used in clinical trials and have exhibited certain efficacy in cancer treatment. However, none of these has yet been applied clinically due to the poor outcomes. Oxostephanine is an aporphine alkaloid isolated from several plants of the genus Stephania. This compound has been reported to inhibit Aurora kinase activity in kinase assays and in cancer cells. The present study aimed to investigate the real­time effects of oxostephanine extracted from Stephania dielsiana Y.C. Wu leaves on the growth of an ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR­8, human ovarian carcinoma); these effects were compared to those of the well­known Aurora kinase inhibitor, VX­680. The effects of oxostephanine on stromal cells, as well as endothelial cells were also examined. The results demonstrated that oxostephanine was an Aurora kinase inhibitor through the prevention of histone H3 phosphorylation at serine 10, the mislocalization of Aurora B and the induction of aneuploidy. Moreover, this substance was selectively cytotoxic to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (hUVECs), whereas it was less cytotoxic to human fibroblasts and umbilical cord­derived mesenchymal stem cells. In addition, this compound significantly attenuated the migration and tube formation ability of hUVECs. Taken together, the present study demonstrates that oxostephanine plays dual roles in inhibiting Aurora kinase activity and angiogenesis. Thus, it may have potential for use as a drug in cancer treatment.

A new imaging platform (iScreen) allows for the concurrent assessment of micronucleus induction and genotoxic mode of action in human A375 cells.

Genotoxicity testing guidelines require the assessment of the clastogenic and aneugenic potential of compounds. While in vitro micronucleus assays detect both types of endpoints, it requires labor-intensive microscopic scoring and does not discriminate between the two modes of actions. Here, we present a novel high-content imaging platform in A375 human cells that addresses the need for rapid scoring while providing additional mechanistic information. We evaluated the new platform with 12 compounds, three compounds from each mechanistic class (clastogen, aneugen tubulin binder, aneugen aurora inhibitor, and nongenotoxicant) following 4- and 24-h compound treatments. The approach we developed is first discriminating between genotoxicant and nongenotoxicant using an image analysis algorithm to quantify micronucleus induction below a 60% cytotoxicity cutoff. Then it uses centromere protein A (CENPA) staining for the genotoxic compounds to discriminate between aneugens and clastogens. Lastly, we use phosphorylated histone H2AX Ser139 (γH2AX) staining to confirm clastogenicity and changes in phosphorylated histone 3 Ser10 (pH 3) and increases in polyploidy in mitotic cells to discriminate between aneugens that bind tubulin from those that affect aurora kinases. All compounds were correctly classified, and we showed by using benchmark dose-response analysis that the imaging platform in A375 cells is at least as sensitive as the MicroFlow® assay in TK6 cells for genotoxicant but appears to be more specific for the nongenotoxicants. A detailed comparison of the cell lines and a more comprehensive validation with a much larger compound set, predictive and dose-response modeling will be presented in the future.

Phase 1 study combining alisertib with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

AIM: Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a pleiotropic serine/threonine kinase that orchestrates mitotic progression. Paclitaxel stabilises microtubules and disrupts mitotic spindle assembly. The combination of AURKA inhibitor (alisertib) plus paclitaxel may be synergistic in rapidly proliferative cancers. We evaluated the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of alisertib in combination with nab-paclitaxel and its preliminary efficacy in patients with refractory high-grade neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHOD: This is a two-part, Phase 1 study. In Part A (dose escalation), a standard 3 + 3 design was used to determine MTD. In Part B (dose expansion), patients with predominantly refractory high-grade NETs were enrolled. RESULTS: In total, 31 patients were enrolled and treated (16 in Part A and 15 in Part B). The MTD of alisertib was 40 mg BID on D1-3 per week and nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m2 weekly: 3 weeks, 1 week off. Dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, and other common side-effects included fatigue, mucositis, and diarrhoea. In Part A, a patient with small-cell lung cancer with partial response (PR) was treated for more than 2 years, whereas four other patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (one patient), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (two patients), or high-grade NET (one patient) achieved stable disease (SD). In Part B, 13 of 15 enrolled patients had high-grade NETs. Of these, one had PR, and four had SD for more than 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alisertib and nab-paclitaxel has manageable side-effect profile and showed promising preliminary efficacy in high-grade NETs, warranting further testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01677559.

Androgen Receptor Signaling and the Emergence of Lethal Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer With the Treatment-Induced Suppression of the Androgen Receptor: A Literature Review.

Androgen receptor signaling primarily influences both the normal growth and proliferation of the prostate gland and the development of prostatic carcinoma. While localized prostate cancers are typically managed with definitive therapies like surgery and radiotherapy, many patients have recurrences in the form of metastatic disease. Androgen deprivation therapy, by way of castration via orchiectomy or with drugs like luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (commonly called gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonists and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonists, is the primary mode of therapy for advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Castration resistance invariably develops in these patients. Further treatment has shifted to newer anti-androgen drugs like enzalutamide or abiraterone and taxane-based chemotherapy. Prolonged inhibition of the androgen receptor signaling pathway causes androgen receptor-independent clonal evolution which leads to the development of treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer. All prostate cancers at the initial presentation should undergo evaluation for the markers of neuroendocrine differentiation. Detection of serum biomarkers of neuroendocrine differentiation and circulating tumor cells is a prospective non-invasive method of detecting neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in patients undergoing treatment with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. It is essential to perform a biopsy in the presence of red flags of neuroendocrine differentiation. Alisertib, an Aurora kinase inhibitor, showed promising clinical benefit in a subgroup of patients with certain molecular alterations. A thorough understanding of the molecular and clinical programming of treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer can potentially lead to the development of drugs to prevent the development of this lethal variant of prostate cancer.

Overexpression of human ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 contributes to reducing the cytotoxicity of GSK1070916 in cancer cells.

The emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) is one of the main factors that impair therapeutic outcome in cancer therapy. Among all the factors that contribute to MDR, overexpression of ABCG2 transporter has been described as a key factor. GSK1070916 is a potent Aurora kinase inhibitor with broad anticancer effects. The robust efficacy shown in preclinical studies allowed the drug progress to clinical investigation. However, the potential mechanisms of acquired resistance to GSK1070916 remain inconclusive. Since several Aurora kinase inhibitors were reported to be transported substrates of ABCG2, we aimed to identify the potential interaction of GSK1070916 with ABCG2. Our data showed that ABCG2-overexpressing cells demonstrated high resistance-fold to GSK1070916 compared to the parental cells. In addition, combination of GSK1070916 with an ABCG2 inhibitor was able to restore its sensitivity. The multicellular tumor spheroid assay supported this finding by demonstrating attenuated growth inhibition in ABCG2-overexpressing tumor spheroids. In addition, the ABCG2 ATPase assay and computational modeling suggested that GSK1070916 could bind to ABCG2 substrate-binding site. The HPLC assay provided another direct evidence that ABCG2-overexpressing cells showed attenuated intracellular accumulation of GSK1070916, and such phenomenon was abolished by Ko143, a known ABCG2 inhibitor. Furthermore, GSK1070916 was able to hinder the efflux activity of ABCG2, indicating possible drug-drug interactions with other ABCG2 substrate drugs. In summary, we revealed that overexpression of ABCG2 can cause GSK1070916 resistance in cancer cells. The combination of an ABCG2 inhibitor with GSK1070916 may be a rational strategy to overcome the drug resistance and should be considered for clinical investigation.

Experiments in the EpiDerm 3D Skin In Vitro Model and Minipigs In Vivo Indicate Comparatively Lower In Vivo Skin Sensitivity of Topically Applied Aneugenic Compounds.

Risk management of in vitro aneugens for topically applied compounds is not clearly defined because there is no validated methodology to accurately measure compound concentration in proliferating stratum basale keratinocytes of the skin. Here, we experimentally tested several known aneugens in the EpiDerm reconstructed human skin in vitro micronucleus assay and compared the results to flow cytometric mechanistic biomarkers (phospho-H3; MPM2, DNA content). We then evaluated similar biomarkers (Ki-67, nuclear area) using immunohistochemistry in skin sections of minipigs following topical exposure the potent aneugens, colchicine, and hesperadin. Data from the EpiDerm model showed positive micronucleus responses for all aneugens tested following topical or direct media dosing with similar sensitivity when adjusted for applied dose. Quantitative benchmark dose-response analysis exhibited increases in the mitotic index biomarkers phospho-H3 and MPM2 for tubulin binders and polyploidy for aurora kinase inhibitors are at least as sensitive as the micronucleus endpoint. By comparison, the aneugens tested did not induce histopathological changes, increases in Ki-67 immunolabeling or nuclear area in skin sections from the in vivo minipig study at doses in significant excess of those eliciting a response in vitro. Results indicate the EpiDerm in vitro micronucleus assay is suitable for the hazard identification of aneugens. The lack of response in the minipig studies indicates that the barrier function of the minipig skin, which is comparable to human skin, protects from the effects of aneugens in vivo. These results provide a basis for conducting additional studies in the future to further refine this understanding.

The Evaluation of Effect of Aurora Kinase Inhibitor CCT137690 in Melanoma and Melanoma Cancer Stem Cell.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the cell cycle is one of the main causes of melanomagenesis. Genomewide studies showed that the expression of Aurora -A and -B significantly has been upregulated in melanoma. However, there is no FDA approved drug targeting aurora kinases in the treatment of melanoma. In addition, the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of melanoma and, as a result, the relapse due to heterogeneous cell groups in patients is a second phenomenon that causes treatment failure. Therefore, there is an urgent need for therapeutic alternatives targeting both melanoma and Melanoma Cancer Stem Cells (MCSCs) in treatments. At this stage, cell cycle regulators become promising targets. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify the effects of Aurora kinase inhibitor CCT137690 on the cytotoxicity, apoptosis, cell cycle, migration, and colony formation and expression changes of genes related to proliferation, cell death and cell cycle in melanoma and melanoma cancer stem cell. In addition, we investigated the apoptotic and cytostatic effects of CCT137690 in normal fibroblast cells. METHODS: We evaluated the cytotoxic effect of CCT137690 in MCSCs, NM2C5 referring as melanoma model cells and WI-38 cells by using the WST-1 test. The effect of CCT137690 on apoptosis was detected via Annexin V and JC-1 method; on cell cycle progression by cell cycle test; on gene expression by using RT-PCR, on migration activity by wound healing assay and clonal growth by clonogenic assay in NM2C5 cells and MCSCs. The effects of CCT137690 in WI-38, referring as healthy fibroblast cell, were assessed through Annexin V and cell cycle method. RESULTS: CCT137690 was determined to have a cytotoxic and apoptotic effect in MCSCs and melanoma. It caused polyploidy and cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in MCSCs and melanoma cells. The significant decrease in the expression of MMP2, MMP7, MMP10, CCNB1, IRAK1, PLK2 genes, and the increase in the expression of PTEN, CASP7, p53 genes were detected. CONCLUSION: Aurora kinases inhibitor CCT137690 displays promising anticancer activity in melanoma and especially melanoma cancer stem cells. The effect of CCT137690 on melanoma and MCSC may provide a new approach to treatment protocols.

Screening of Drug Efficacy of Rosmarinic Acid Derivatives as Aurora Kinase Inhibitors by Computer-Aided Drug Design Method.

BACKGROUND: Aurora kinases (AKs) belong to the serine/threonine kinase family and play a crucial role in regulating the cell cycle. Therefore, AKs are the hopeful target for anticancer therapies and these findings have encouraged researchers to rigorously hunt small molecule aurora kinase inhibitors, not only for research articles but also for use as therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVE: The present study helps us to identify and screen the best phytochemicals as potent inhibitors against AKs. These potent inhibitors come from the various substitution of rosmarinic acid (RA). METHODS: In this paper, we choose different tested derivative compounds for designing anticancer drugs by substituting various functional groups of standard drug RA. In silico studies were carried out to appreciate better drug candidature of some of these derivative compounds. This study was performed on 56 derived compounds of the standard RA. DFT study was conducted using the UB3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) basis set to study HOMO-LUMO energies, dipole moments, using the Gaussian16 suite. Some of the derived parameters, like ionization potential, electron affinity, softness- hardness, chemical potential, and electrophilicity index were noted. A docking study was performed with AKs inhibiting receptor using AutoDock 4.2. ADME prediction was made with the preADMET web tool. Molecular descriptor properties were predicted with molinspiration and OSIRIS property explorer. RESULTS: Out of the 56 derivatives, 11 have passed all the rules of drug candidature, to serve as best AKs inhibitor, in a theoretical manner. CONCLUSION: This study should be supported by a new proposal to explore future studies with these 11 compounds against cancer.

A Novel Aurora Kinase Inhibitor Attenuates Leukemic Cell Proliferation Induced by Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play an essential role in protecting leukemic cells from chemotherapeutic agents through activating a wide range of adhesion molecules and cytokines. Thus, more attention should be paid to attenuate the protection of leukemic cells by MSCs. By examining the gene expression files of MSCs from healthy donors and AML patients through high-throughput microarrays, we found that interleukin (IL)-6 was an important cytokine secreted by AML MSCs to protect leukemic cells, contributing to disease progression. Strikingly, Aurora A (AURKA) was activated by IL-6, offering a new target to interfere with leukemia. Importantly, a novel AURKA inhibitor, PW21, showed excellent AURKA kinase inhibitory activities and attenuated the interaction of leukemic cells and the microenvironment. PW21 inhibited MSC-induced cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration, and it induced cell apoptosis. Mechanically, PW21 could inhibit IL-6 secreted by MSCs. Moreover, we found that PW21 displayed a strong anti-leukemia effect on non-obese diabetic (NOD)-severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and murine MLL-AF9 leukemic models. PW21 significantly prolonged the survival of leukemic mice and eliminated the leukemic progenitor cells. AURKA inhibitor PW21 could provide a new approach for treatment of leukemia through blocking the protection by the leukemic microenvironment in clinical application.

Sequencing Endocrine Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: What Do We Do After Disease Progression on a CDK4/6 Inhibitor?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, optimal therapy after CDK4/6 inhibitors is unknown. This review provides an update on recent understanding of potential resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: CDK4/6 inhibitors are broadly effective for HR+/HER2- MBC. However, intrinsic and acquired resistance is inevitable. Although there are no established clinical predictors of response aside from ER positivity, several cell cycle-specific and non-specific mechanisms have emerged as potential resistance biomarkers and therapeutic targets in recent studies. Examples include loss of function mutations in RB1 or FAT1, overexpression or amplification of CDK6 and CCNE1, alterations of FGFR, and PI3K/mTOR-mediated CDK2 activation. Biomarker studies and clinical trials targeting CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance are critical to improve treatments for HR+/HER2- MBC.