Axillary ultrasonography for early-stage invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Among women with early invasive breast cancer and 1-2 positive sentinel nodes, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is non-inferior to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).1-3 However, preoperative axillary ultrasonography (AxUS) may not be sensitive enough to discriminate burden of nodal metastasis in these patients, potentially leading to overtreatment.4-6 This study compares axillary operation rates in patients who did and did not receive preoperative AxUS, assessing its utility and risks for overtreatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with clinical T1/T2 breast tumors who were clinically node negative and underwent an axillary operation. RESULTS: Patients who had preoperative AxUS received more ALND compared to patients who did not (5.6% vs. 1.4%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of additional axillary operations following SLNB (2.1% vs. 2.3%, p â€‹= â€‹0.77). CONCLUSION: Eliminating preoperative AxUS is associated with fewer invasive ALND procedures, without increased rate of axillary reoperations.

The validity and clinical utility of axillary ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in detection of nodal metastasis in early-stage breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the validity and clinical utility of axillary ultrasonography (AUS)-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in detection of nodal metastasis during preoperative axillary investigation in comparison to the histopathologic diagnosis in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 279 operated primary breast cancer patients (age: 55.3 ± 12.8, ranged 17-90 years) were included. Data on AUS findings at the time of initial diagnosis (first look AUS), second-look AUS findings performed by the breast radiologist during breast biopsy procedure and the AUS-guided FNAB findings were evaluated with respect to the final histopathology report obtained through axillary surgery via sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The diagnostic performance of each method in detecting metastatic ALNs were compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the first look AUS in detecting nodal metastasis were 64.56%, 86.78%, and 74.19% while the PPV and NPV were 86.44% and 65.22%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the second-look AUS were 70.25%, 87.60%, and 77.78%, while PPV and NPV were 88.10% and 69.28%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the second-look AUS guided FNAB were 89.19%, 73.33%, and 87.30%, while the PPV and NPV were 96.12% and 47.83%, respectively. The consideration of second-look AUS and finding of nodal metastasis in FNAB was associated with significantly higher likelihood of ALND (55.4% vs. 44.6%, p < 0.001) and lower likelihood of SLNB (34.7% vs. 65.3%, p < 0.001) compared to consideration of nonmetastatic ALN status. In 23 (22.3%) patients with positive findings on AUS-guided FNAB, SLNB was applied; 21 had positive results after surgical dissection, indicating that nearly 20% of patients had unnecessary SLNB. DISCUSSION: US-guided FNAB of suspicious ALNs is a simple, minimally invasive, and highly effective method for preoperative axillary staging in patients with invasive breast cancer avoiding the more invasive method SLNB and it enables the surgeon to proceed directly to ALND in positive cases.

Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese women with clinical T1-T2 N0 breast cancer and a normal axillary ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathological predictors of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in clinical T1-T2 N0 (cT1-T2 N0) patients with a normal axillary ultrasound (AUS) are unclear. PURPOSE: To assess the association between clinicopathological characteristics of a primary tumor and SLN metastasis in cT1-T2 N0 patients with a normal AUS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with cT1-T2 N0 invasive breast cancer and who obtained normal AUS results between October 2016 and September 2018 in a single hospital were included. Clinicopathological data were collected to explore the predictors of SLN metastasis using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: SLN metastasis occurred in 26 patients (18.4%) among 141 AUS-normal patients, of which 24 cases (17.0%) had one or two nodal involvements. In the univariate analysis, tumor location, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were significantly associated with SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that tumor location in the upper outer quadrant (odds ratio [OR] = 4.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.63-12.37; P = 0.004), positive PR status (OR = 13.35, 95% CI = 1.60-111.39; P = 0.017), and positive LVI (OR = 8.66, 95% CI = 2.20-34.18; P = 0.002) were independent high-risk factors for SLN metastasis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the regression model was 0.787 (95% CI = 0.694-0.881; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor location in the upper outer quadrant, positive PR, and LVI status were found to be significantly high-risk factors for SLN metastasis among cT1-T2 N0 breast cancer patients with a normal AUS result.

The impact of axillary ultrasound with biopsy in overtreatment of early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: (a) To compare the axillary tumor burden detected by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). (b) To evaluate the relationship between axillary tumor burden and the number of suspicious lymph nodes detected by axillary ultrasonography (US). (c) To calculate the false-positive and false-negative rates for FNAC in patients fulfilling ACOSOG Z0011 criteria. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study of 355 pT1 breast cancers. SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were gold standards. Low axillary burden (≤2 positive lymph nodes); high burden (>2 positive lymph nodes). Patients ACOSOG Z0011: false-positive (positive FNAC+low burden), false-negative (negative FNAC+high burden). RESULTS: High axillary burden: in entire series 38.5% FNAC+ vs. 5.7% SLNB+ (p<0.0001). In subgroup fulfilling ACOSOG Z0011 criteria: 45.5% vs 6.7%, respectively (p<0.001). 61 positive axillary US. With 1 suspicious node on axillary US: 95.6% had ≤2 involved nodes (including pN0); with 2 suspicious nodes: 60% had >2 involved nodes. In ACOSOG Z0011 patients, with 1 suspicious node, 93.7% had ≤2 involved nodes. Of the 37 FNAC in ACOSOG Z0011patients: 54.5% false-positives for high burden; 3.8% false-negatives. CONCLUSIONS: FNAC-positive tumors have greater axillary burden, even in patients fulfilling ACOSOG Z0011 criteria. Using axillary US/FNAC to triage patients meeting Z0011 criteria may result in axillary overtreatment. The number of suspicious nodes seen in axillary US is related with the final axillary burden and should be taken into account when deciding to do FNAC in patients fulfilling ACOSOG Z0011 criteria.

Ecografía axilar con punción citológica positiva en pacientes con cáncer de mama: Análisis de su utilidad para indicar linfadenectomía axilar en la era del acozog Z0011: Experiencia en la Unidad de Mastología del Hospital Español de Montevideo, Uruguay / Axillary ultrasound with puncture positive cytology in patients with breast cancer: Analysis of its usefulness to indicate axillary lymphadenectomy in the era of acozog Z0011: Experience in the Mastology Unit of the Spanish Hospital of Montevideo, Uruguay

Objetivo Evaluar la validez de la ecografía axilar (ea) con punción citológica para indicar linfadenectomía axilar en pacientes con cáncer de mama, dentro del marco de los criterios propuestos por el estudio acosog Z0011. Material y método Estudio prospectivo, descriptivo. Se presentan los resultados del análisis de 123 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama pertenecientes a la Unidad de Mastología del Hospital Español de Montevideo (Uruguay). En todas las pacientes se evaluó la axila con ecografía y, cuando existían ganglios sospechosos, se procedió a realizar punción con aguja fina. Cuando esta modalidad resultó positiva, en todas las pacientes se realizó linfadenectomía axilar de inicio. Cuantificamos la carga tumoral axilar de estas pacientes y analizamos la indicación de linfadenectomía axilar dentro del marco de propuestas del acozog Z0011. Resultados Los resultados obtenidos para predecir alta carga tumoral fueron los siguientes: porcentaje de verdaderos positivos (vp) 88,88%; porcentaje de falsos negativos (fn) 32%; sensibilidad (s) 80%; especificidad 80,95%; valor predictivo positivo (vpp) 88,89%; valor predictivo negativo (vpn) 68%; cociente de probabilidad positivo 4,20; cociente de probabilidad negativo 0,25; pacientes correctamente diagnosticados 80,33%. Discusión Desde hace varios años, la ecografía axilar con punción citológica ha demostrado elevada especificidad para predecir metástasis ganglionares. Publicaciones recientes afirman que la positividad de esta modalidad de estudio evidencia alta carga tumoral axilar y que, por lo tanto, se debe excluir a la paciente de las conductas conservadoras sobre la axila propuestas por el estudio acosog Z0011. Conclusiones Nuestros resultados concuerdan con la literatura internacional: la ecografía axilar con punción citológica es una metodología de elevada especificidad para predecir alta carga tumoral axilar. Esta metodología permite individualizar a aquellas pacientes que deben ser tratadas de inicio con linfadenectomía axilar, inclusive bajo los nuevos postulados del acosog Z0011

Objectives Evaluate the validity of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (ugfna) of lymph nodes to determine axillary lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer, following the criteria proposed by acosog Z0011. Materials and method A prospective descriptive design was utilized. We present the analysis and results of 123 patients who were treated in the Unidad de Mastología at Hospital Español in Montevideo (Uruguay). All patients underwent axillary ultrasonography in order to evaluate lymphnodes. When suspicious lymph nodes were found, ugfna was performed. Patients who's ugfna yielded positive results were subjected to immediate axillary lymphadenectomy. We then quantified tumoral load and analyzed it according to the guidelines proposed by acosog Z0011. Results The following results were obtained for predicting tumoral load: True Positive Value of 88.88%; False Negative Value of 32%; Sensitivity of 80%; Specificity of 80.95%; Positive Predictive Value of 88.89%; Negative Predictive Value of 68%; Positive Likelihood Ratio of 4.20; Negative Likelihood Ratio of 0.25; accurately diagnosed patients 80.33%. Discussion ugfna has shown to have elevated specificity when predicting lymph node metastases. Recent investigations have shown that positive results of ugfna of lymph nodes determines elevated tumoral load; therefore, conservative treatment proposed by acosog Z0011 should not be followed. Conclusions Our results are comparable to research published internationally. ugfna is a method which has high specificity for the prediction of elevated axillary lymph node tumoral load. ugfna allows the tailoring of treatment for patients which must be treated initially with axillary lymphadenectomy, even under the new evidence put forth by acosog Z0011.

Preoperative Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Malignant Breast Lesions with Ultrasonography and Histopathologic Correlation.

PURPOSE: Our aim is to define the sonographic criteria for assessing involved axillary nodes and to evaluate the accuracy of axillary ultrasound in the staging workup of individuals with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with breast cancer were prospectively evaluated with preoperative ultrasonography (US) to determine the presence of axillary lymph node metastasis. We determined whether there was axillary lymph node metastasis after axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy. If metastasis was found, the number of metastatic lymph nodes was recorded and compared with preoperative axillary US findings using histopathological evaluation as a reference. RESULTS: Metastatic lymph node detection in sonographic evaluation was associated with echogenic hilus obliteration, complete hypoechoic or anechoic appearance of lymph nodes, and asymmetric/nodal or diffuse cortical thickening greater than 3.8 mm. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US were calculated as (20/22) 91 percent, (10/13) 77 percent, (20/23) 87 percent, and (10/12) 83 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography examination is a valuable method for evaluating the axilla in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and provides valuable information for planning proper breast cancer management.

Pre-operative Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients: For Which Group Still of Additional Value and in Which Group Cause for Special Attention?

A non-invasive and widely available method for pre-operative evaluation of the axilla is axillary ultrasonography (US). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of axillary US and fine-needle aspiration cytology in a large cohort of breast cancer patients. The sensitivity and specificity of US and fine-needle aspiration cytology in our cohort of 1124 patients were 42.2% and 97.1%, respectively. As the number of axillary nodes increased, sensitivity increased. The percentage of false-negative US results was 18.9%; patients in this subgroup were significantly younger, had larger tumors, more often had lymph vascular invasion and were more likely to have estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Ultrasonography in combination with fine-needle aspiration cytology is useful in the pre-operative workup of breast cancer patients, especially patients with three or more nodal metastases. Special attention should be paid to younger women with larger tumors in whom a larger percentage of false-negative results are obtained.

Linfonodos axilares em pacientes com câncer de mama: avaliação ultrassonográfica / Axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: sonographic evaluation

O estadiamento axilar nas pacientes portadoras de câncer de mama inicial é fator essencial no planejamento terapêutico. Atualmente este é realizado durante o tratamento cirúrgico, mas há uma tendência em buscar técnicas pré-operatórias e de menor morbidade para avaliação dos linfonodos axilares. A ultrassonografia é um exame amplamente usado para esta finalidade e muitas vezes associado a punção aspirativa por agulha fina ou por agulha grossa. Entretanto, os critérios ultrassonográficos de suspeição para linfonodos axilares não apresentam valores preditivos significativos, gerando resultados discrepantes em estudos sobre sensibilidade e especificidade do método. O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar uma revisão na literatura médica sobre a ultrassonografia no estadiamento axilar e as principais alterações morfológicas do linfonodo metastático.

Axillary staging of patients with early-stage breast cancer is essential in the treatment planning. Currently such staging is intraoperatively performed, but there is a tendency to seek a preoperative and less invasive technique to detect lymph node metastasis. Ultrasonography is widely utilized for this purpose, many times in association with fine-needle aspiration biopsy or core needle biopsy. However, the sonographic criteria for determining malignancy in axillary lymph nodes do not present significant predictive values, producing discrepant results in studies evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of this method. The present study was aimed at reviewing the literature approaching the utilization of ultrasonography in the axillary staging as well as the main morphological features of metastatic lymph nodes.

Risk stratification of patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure performed to stage the axillae, and axillary node clearance (ANC) or radiotherapy is the treatment for nodal involvement. The aims of this study were to assess (1) the role of preoperative axillary ultrasonography (US), (2) the number of positive lymph nodes on ANC after either positive SLNB results or preoperative ultrasonographically guided nodal biopsy, and (3) the role of ANC in patients with node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with invasive breast cancer and axillary node involvement (but clinically negative nodes on presentation) who underwent ANC between January 2008 and December 2009 were identified, and information regarding clinicopathologic parameters and the nodal yield was collected. ANC was performed for 3 groups: patients with micrometastasis seen in SLNB specimens, macrometastasis seen in SLNB specimens, and positive axillary nodes detected on US biopsy. RESULTS: ANC was performed 141 times over the 2-year period. Forty-two percent of axillary node involvement was diagnosed by biopsy or preoperative US, and 40% of these patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The remainder of cases were diagnosed by SLNB: 30% had micrometastases and 70% had macrometastases. Fifty percent of cancers with an ultrasonographic diagnosis of lymph node involvement were high grade and 56% had 4 or more positive nodes on ANC; this was significantly higher than in patients with positive SLNB results (P = .0001). Only 20% of patients with macrometastases on SLNB had 4 or more positive nodes in comparison with 56% with positive axillary lymph nodes by US (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The routine use of preoperative axillary US and biopsy of abnormal nodes helps in identifying high-risk patients and thus aids in planning treatment.

Axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: sonographic evaluation.

Axillary staging of patients with early-stage breast cancer is essential in the treatment planning. Currently such staging is intraoperatively performed, but there is a tendency to seek a preoperative and less invasive technique to detect lymph node metastasis. Ultrasonography is widely utilized for this purpose, many times in association with fine-needle aspiration biopsy or core needle biopsy. However, the sonographic criteria for determining malignancy in axillary lymph nodes do not present significant predictive values, producing discrepant results in studies evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of this method. The present study was aimed at reviewing the literature approaching the utilization of ultrasonography in the axillary staging as well as the main morphological features of metastatic lymph nodes.

O estadiamento axilar nas pacientes portadoras de câncer de mama inicial é fator essencial no planejamento terapêutico. Atualmente este é realizado durante o tratamento cirúrgico, mas há uma tendência em buscar técnicas pré-operatórias e de menor morbidade para avaliação dos linfonodos axilares. A ultrassonografia é um exame amplamente usado para esta finalidade e muitas vezes associado a punção aspirativa por agulha fina ou por agulha grossa. Entretanto, os critérios ultrassonográficos de suspeição para linfonodos axilares não apresentam valores preditivos significativos, gerando resultados discrepantes em estudos sobre sensibilidade e especificidade do método. O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar uma revisão na literatura médica sobre a ultrassonografia no estadiamento axilar e as principais alterações morfológicas do linfonodo metastático.